Unilateral Versus Bilateral Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction A Comparative Case Study

NCT00995852 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20

Last updated 2011-04-27

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Patients with bilateral heterogeneous pulmonary emphysema benefit to differing degrees from unilateral ELVR with complete lobe closure in comparison with incomplete bilateral treatment.

Conditions

  • Pulmonary Emphysema

Interventions

DEVICE

IBV Implantation

In severe cases of COPD even optimum treatment involving bronchodilatation with drugs, physical training and possibly oxygen therapy is unable to influence exercise capacity and the perception of dyspnoea to a sufficient extent. Given the assumption that the elastic recoil of the small airways can be improved by a reduction in lung volume and pulmonary function overall by more ergonomic breathing mechanics and diaphragm function, various endoscopic procedures for lung volume reduction are available. Here one of the most advanced techniques is the implantation of intrabronchial valves. The one-way mechanism of this valve allows air to escape from the downstream lung segment without any influx of "new" air during inspiration

DEVICE

IBV Implantation

In severe cases of COPD even optimum treatment involving bronchodilatation with drugs, physical training and possibly oxygen therapy is unable to influence exercise capacity and the perception of dyspnoea to a sufficient extent. Given the assumption that the elastic recoil of the small airways can be improved by a reduction in lung volume and pulmonary function overall by more ergonomic breathing mechanics and diaphragm function, various endoscopic procedures for lung volume reduction are available. Here one of the most advanced techniques is the implantation of intrabronchial valves. The one-way mechanism of this valve allows air to escape from the downstream lung segment without any influx of "new" air during inspiration

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Olympus Corporation of the Americas

    collaborator INDUSTRY
  • Heidelberg University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Felix JF Herth, MD · Heidelberg University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
40 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2009-09-30
Primary Completion
2011-05-31
Completion
2011-05-31

Countries

  • Germany

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00995852 on ClinicalTrials.gov