Trial Outcomes & Findings for University of Texas H.S.C. San Antonio Pioglitazone in Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis Trial (UTHSCSA NASH Trial) (NCT NCT00994682)
NCT ID: NCT00994682
Last Updated: 2017-04-05
Results Overview
Number of patients with reduction of at least 2 points in the nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS) (with reduction in at least 2 different histological categories) without worsening of fibrosis. NAS is the sum of the separate scores for steatosis (0-3), hepatocellular ballooning (0-2) and lobular inflammation (0-3), and ranges from 0-8 . The scoring system is based on the following grading: Steatosis: 0 = \<5%; 1 = 5-33%; 2 = \>33-66%; 3 = \>66%. Lobular Inflammation: 0 = No foci 1 = \<2 foci/200x; 2 = 2-4 foci/200x, 3 = \>4 foci/200x. Hepatocyte Ballooning: 0 = None; 1 = Few balloon cells; 2 = Many cells/prominent ballooning. Fibrosis: 0 = None; 1 = Perisinusoidal or periportal; 2 = Perisinusoidal and portal/periportal; 3 = Bridging fibrosis, 4 = Cirrhosis.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
176 participants
At 18 months
2017-04-05
Participant Flow
Participants were recruited from the general population of San Antonio, Texas, via newspaper advertisements and from the endocrinology and hepatology clinics at UTHSCSA and the Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
Once eligibility was met by histologically confirmed NASH, patients were randomized. The number of patients consented was 176, screen failed was 38, did not complete run-in phase was 37 (12 consent withdrawn, 9 lost to follow-up, 4 discontinued by PI decision, and 12 for other reasons). The remaining 101 patients were randomized.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
After all participants receive dietary counseling at the research unit (CTSA), patients with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and NASH will be started on placebo (or pioglitazone) in a randomized, double-blind,placebo-controlled study design by the research pharmacy. Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received placebo pills with identical physical characteristics and in identical bottles to pioglitazone pills.
|
Pioglitazone
After dietary counseling to all patients at the research unit (CTSA), patients with prediabetes or T2DM and NASH will be started on pioglitazone (or placebo) in a randomized, double-blind,placebo-controlled study design. Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received pioglitazone 30mg/d (titrated after 2 months to 45 mg/d).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Double Bilnd
STARTED
|
51
|
50
|
|
Double Bilnd
COMPLETED
|
42
|
41
|
|
Double Bilnd
NOT COMPLETED
|
9
|
9
|
|
Pioglitazone Open Label
STARTED
|
42
|
41
|
|
Pioglitazone Open Label
COMPLETED
|
29
|
34
|
|
Pioglitazone Open Label
NOT COMPLETED
|
13
|
7
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
After all participants receive dietary counseling at the research unit (CTSA), patients with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and NASH will be started on placebo (or pioglitazone) in a randomized, double-blind,placebo-controlled study design by the research pharmacy. Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received placebo pills with identical physical characteristics and in identical bottles to pioglitazone pills.
|
Pioglitazone
After dietary counseling to all patients at the research unit (CTSA), patients with prediabetes or T2DM and NASH will be started on pioglitazone (or placebo) in a randomized, double-blind,placebo-controlled study design. Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received pioglitazone 30mg/d (titrated after 2 months to 45 mg/d).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Double Bilnd
Withdrawal by Subject
|
5
|
6
|
|
Double Bilnd
Lost to Follow-up
|
3
|
3
|
|
Double Bilnd
Adverse Event
|
1
|
0
|
|
Pioglitazone Open Label
Withdrawal by Subject
|
4
|
4
|
|
Pioglitazone Open Label
Lost to Follow-up
|
3
|
2
|
|
Pioglitazone Open Label
Physician Decision
|
6
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
University of Texas H.S.C. San Antonio Pioglitazone in Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis Trial (UTHSCSA NASH Trial)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received placebo pills with identical physical characteristics and in identical bottles to pioglitazone pills. After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients whose NASH resolved after 18 months were instructed to discontinue the study because pioglitazone treatment or a repeated liver biopsy were considered unethical and were not indicated, whereas those with persistent disease were invited to start open-label pioglitazone therapy, titrated as described for the other arm.
|
Pioglitazone
n=50 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received pioglitazone 30mg/d (titrated after 2 months to 45 mg/d). After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients initially assigned to pioglitazone were asked to continue at the same dose.
|
Total
n=101 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
49 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 • n=99 Participants
|
52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10 • n=107 Participants
|
50 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
16 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
35 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
71 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
37 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
68 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
14 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Weight
|
99.2 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.0 • n=99 Participants
|
98.2 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.5 • n=107 Participants
|
98.7 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.7 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Body mass index
|
34.5 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8 • n=99 Participants
|
34.3 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8 • n=107 Participants
|
34.4 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Total body fat
|
34 percentage of fat mass
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8 • n=99 Participants
|
33 percentage of fat mass
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7 • n=107 Participants
|
33 percentage of fat mass
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Fasting plasma glucose
|
121 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27 • n=99 Participants
|
124 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29 • n=107 Participants
|
122 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28 • n=206 Participants
|
|
2-hour plasma glucose
|
203 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 64 • n=99 Participants
|
211 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 78 • n=107 Participants
|
207 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 71 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Hemoglobin A1c
|
6.3 percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0 • n=99 Participants
|
6.4 percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0 • n=107 Participants
|
6.3 percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Fasting plasma insulin
|
16 μU/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12 • n=99 Participants
|
15 μU/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 • n=107 Participants
|
16 μU/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Fasting free fatty acids
|
0.54 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.19 • n=99 Participants
|
0.49 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.18 • n=107 Participants
|
0.52 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.19 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Use of diabetes medications
Metformin
|
17 participants
n=99 Participants
|
19 participants
n=107 Participants
|
36 participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Use of diabetes medications
Sulfonylurea
|
16 participants
n=99 Participants
|
12 participants
n=107 Participants
|
28 participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Use of diabetes medications
Insulin
|
6 participants
n=99 Participants
|
5 participants
n=107 Participants
|
11 participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Use of statins
|
19 participants
n=99 Participants
|
19 participants
n=107 Participants
|
38 participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Plasma triglycerides
|
179 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 109 • n=99 Participants
|
224 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 171 • n=107 Participants
|
201 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 144 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Plasma total cholesterol
|
182 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 42 • n=99 Participants
|
187 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 46 • n=107 Participants
|
185 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 44 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Plasma LDL-C
|
109 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33 • n=99 Participants
|
109 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 44 • n=107 Participants
|
109 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 38 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Plasma HDL-C
|
37 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 • n=99 Participants
|
36 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 • n=107 Participants
|
37 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Plasma AST
|
43 U/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22 • n=99 Participants
|
47 U/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21 • n=107 Participants
|
45 U/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Plasma ALT
|
57 U/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33 • n=99 Participants
|
62 U/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33 • n=107 Participants
|
60 U/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33 • n=206 Participants
|
|
NAFLD activity score (NAS) Liver histology
|
4.5 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2 • n=99 Participants
|
4.5 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5 • n=107 Participants
|
4.5 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Steatosis grade
|
1.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8 • n=99 Participants
|
2.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8 • n=107 Participants
|
2.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Inflammation grade
|
1.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5 • n=99 Participants
|
1.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6 • n=107 Participants
|
1.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Ballooning grade
|
0.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4 • n=99 Participants
|
0.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4 • n=107 Participants
|
0.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Fibrosis stage
|
0.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9 • n=99 Participants
|
1.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1 • n=107 Participants
|
1.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Diagnosis of definite NASH
|
45 participants
n=99 Participants
|
42 participants
n=107 Participants
|
87 participants
n=206 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At 18 monthsNumber of patients with reduction of at least 2 points in the nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS) (with reduction in at least 2 different histological categories) without worsening of fibrosis. NAS is the sum of the separate scores for steatosis (0-3), hepatocellular ballooning (0-2) and lobular inflammation (0-3), and ranges from 0-8 . The scoring system is based on the following grading: Steatosis: 0 = \<5%; 1 = 5-33%; 2 = \>33-66%; 3 = \>66%. Lobular Inflammation: 0 = No foci 1 = \<2 foci/200x; 2 = 2-4 foci/200x, 3 = \>4 foci/200x. Hepatocyte Ballooning: 0 = None; 1 = Few balloon cells; 2 = Many cells/prominent ballooning. Fibrosis: 0 = None; 1 = Perisinusoidal or periportal; 2 = Perisinusoidal and portal/periportal; 3 = Bridging fibrosis, 4 = Cirrhosis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received placebo pills with identical physical characteristics and in identical bottles to pioglitazone pills. After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients whose NASH resolved after 18 months were instructed to discontinue the study because pioglitazone treatment or a repeated liver biopsy were considered unethical and were not indicated, whereas those with persistent disease were invited to start open-label pioglitazone therapy, titrated as described for the other arm.
|
Pioglitazone
n=50 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received pioglitazone 30mg/d (titrated after 2 months to 45 mg/d). After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients initially assigned to pioglitazone were asked to continue at the same dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Liver Histology (Using Kleiner et al Criteria, Hepatology 2005)
|
9 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 18Population: Multiple imputation was used to impute missing histologic data for patients who did not complete 18 months of therapy.
Resolution of NASH was defined as absence of NASH after 18 months of therapy in patients with definite NASH (presence of zone 3 accentuation of macrovesicular steatosis of any grade, hepatocellular ballooning of any degree, and lobular inflammatory infiltrates of any amount) at baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received placebo pills with identical physical characteristics and in identical bottles to pioglitazone pills. After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients whose NASH resolved after 18 months were instructed to discontinue the study because pioglitazone treatment or a repeated liver biopsy were considered unethical and were not indicated, whereas those with persistent disease were invited to start open-label pioglitazone therapy, titrated as described for the other arm.
|
Pioglitazone
n=50 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received pioglitazone 30mg/d (titrated after 2 months to 45 mg/d). After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients initially assigned to pioglitazone were asked to continue at the same dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Resolution of NASH
|
10 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 18Population: Multiple imputation was used to impute missing histologic data for patients who did not complete 18 months of therapy.
Mean change in individual scores compared to baseline. Steatosis: 0 = \<5%; 1 = 5-33%; 2 = \>33-66%; 3 = \>66%. Lobular Inflammation: 0 = No foci 1 = \<2 foci/200x; 2 = 2-4 foci/200x, 3 = \>4 foci/200x. Hepatocyte Ballooning: 0 = None; 1 = Few balloon cells; 2 = Many cells/prominent ballooning. Fibrosis: 0 = None; 1 = Perisinusoidal or periportal; 2 = Perisinusoidal and portal/periportal; 3 = Bridging fibrosis, 4 = Cirrhosis
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received placebo pills with identical physical characteristics and in identical bottles to pioglitazone pills. After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients whose NASH resolved after 18 months were instructed to discontinue the study because pioglitazone treatment or a repeated liver biopsy were considered unethical and were not indicated, whereas those with persistent disease were invited to start open-label pioglitazone therapy, titrated as described for the other arm.
|
Pioglitazone
n=50 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received pioglitazone 30mg/d (titrated after 2 months to 45 mg/d). After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients initially assigned to pioglitazone were asked to continue at the same dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Individual Histological Scores
Steatosis
|
-0.2 units on a scale
Interval -1.8 to 1.4
|
-1.1 units on a scale
Interval -2.7 to 0.5
|
|
Mean Individual Histological Scores
Inflammation
|
-0.1 units on a scale
Interval -1.7 to 1.5
|
-0.6 units on a scale
Interval -2.2 to 1.0
|
|
Mean Individual Histological Scores
Ballooning
|
-0.2 units on a scale
Interval -1.8 to 1.4
|
-0.6 units on a scale
Interval -2.2 to 1.0
|
|
Mean Individual Histological Scores
Fibrosis
|
0 units on a scale
Interval -1.568 to 1.568
|
-0.5 units on a scale
Interval -2.1 to 1.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 18Population: Multiple imputation was used to impute missing histologic data for patients who did not complete 18 months of therapy.
Number of patients with improvement of at least 1 grade in each of the histological parameters. Steatosis: 0 = \<5%; 1 = 5-33%; 2 = \>33-66%; 3 = \>66%. Lobular Inflammation: 0 = No foci 1 = \<2 foci/200x; 2 = 2-4 foci/200x, 3 = \>4 foci/200x. Hepatocyte Ballooning: 0 = None; 1 = Few balloon cells; 2 = Many cells/prominent ballooning. Fibrosis: 0 = None; 1 = Perisinusoidal or periportal, 1A = Mild, zone 3, perisinusoidal "delicate" fibrosis; 1B = Moderate, zone 3, perisinusoidal "dense" fibrosis; 1C = Portal/periportal; 2 = Perisinusoidal and portal/periportal; 3 = Bridging fibrosis, 4 = Cirrhosis
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received placebo pills with identical physical characteristics and in identical bottles to pioglitazone pills. After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients whose NASH resolved after 18 months were instructed to discontinue the study because pioglitazone treatment or a repeated liver biopsy were considered unethical and were not indicated, whereas those with persistent disease were invited to start open-label pioglitazone therapy, titrated as described for the other arm.
|
Pioglitazone
n=50 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received pioglitazone 30mg/d (titrated after 2 months to 45 mg/d). After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients initially assigned to pioglitazone were asked to continue at the same dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Individual Histological Scores
Steatosis
|
13 Participants
|
35 Participants
|
|
Individual Histological Scores
Inflammation
|
11 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
|
Individual Histological Scores
Ballooning
|
12 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
|
Individual Histological Scores
Fibrosis
|
13 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 36Steatosis: 0 = \<5%; 1 = 5-33%; 2 = \>33-66%; 3 = \>66%. Lobular Inflammation: 0 = No foci 1 = \<2 foci/200x; 2 = 2-4 foci/200x, 3 = \>4 foci/200x. Hepatocyte Ballooning: 0 = None; 1 = Few balloon cells; 2 = Many cells/prominent ballooning. Fibrosis: 0 = None; 1 = Perisinusoidal or periportal; 2 = Perisinusoidal and portal/periportal; 3 = Bridging fibrosis, 4 = Cirrhosis
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=29 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received placebo pills with identical physical characteristics and in identical bottles to pioglitazone pills. After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients whose NASH resolved after 18 months were instructed to discontinue the study because pioglitazone treatment or a repeated liver biopsy were considered unethical and were not indicated, whereas those with persistent disease were invited to start open-label pioglitazone therapy, titrated as described for the other arm.
|
Pioglitazone
n=34 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received pioglitazone 30mg/d (titrated after 2 months to 45 mg/d). After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients initially assigned to pioglitazone were asked to continue at the same dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Individual Histological Scores
Steatosis
|
1.56 units on a scale
Interval 1.22 to 1.89
|
0.97 units on a scale
Interval 0.67 to 1.27
|
|
Mean Individual Histological Scores
Inflammation
|
1.30 units on a scale
Interval 0.8 to 1.51
|
0.81 units on a scale
Interval 0.6 to 1.03
|
|
Mean Individual Histological Scores
Fibrosis
|
0.89 units on a scale
Interval 0.49 to 1.29
|
0.66 units on a scale
Interval 0.32 to 0.99
|
|
Mean Individual Histological Scores
Ballooning
|
0.33 units on a scale
Interval 0.14 to 0.52
|
0.22 units on a scale
Interval 0.07 to 0.37
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 18 and 36 monthsPopulation: Data include 101 observations at baseline (51 in the placebo group and 50 in the pioglitazone group), 83 at month 18 (42 and 41, respectively), and 63 at month 36 (29 and 34, respectively).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received placebo pills with identical physical characteristics and in identical bottles to pioglitazone pills. After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients whose NASH resolved after 18 months were instructed to discontinue the study because pioglitazone treatment or a repeated liver biopsy were considered unethical and were not indicated, whereas those with persistent disease were invited to start open-label pioglitazone therapy, titrated as described for the other arm.
|
Pioglitazone
n=50 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received pioglitazone 30mg/d (titrated after 2 months to 45 mg/d). After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients initially assigned to pioglitazone were asked to continue at the same dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Liver Transaminases (AST and ALT).
AST at month 18
|
38 U/L
Standard Deviation 31
|
29 U/L
Standard Deviation 10
|
|
Liver Transaminases (AST and ALT).
ALT at month 18
|
44 U/L
Standard Deviation 33
|
27 U/L
Standard Deviation 12
|
|
Liver Transaminases (AST and ALT).
ALT at month 36
|
32 U/L
Standard Deviation 17
|
27 U/L
Standard Deviation 13
|
|
Liver Transaminases (AST and ALT).
AST at month 36
|
30 U/L
Standard Deviation 10
|
27 U/L
Standard Deviation 8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 18 monthsPopulation: Data include 101 observations at baseline (51 in the placebo group and 50 in the pioglitazone group) and 83 at month 18 (42 and 41, respectively).
Liver fat content was calculated as the fat fraction: 100\*(area under the curve \[AUC\] of fat peak / \[AUC of fat peak + AUC of water peak\]).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=42 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received placebo pills with identical physical characteristics and in identical bottles to pioglitazone pills. After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients whose NASH resolved after 18 months were instructed to discontinue the study because pioglitazone treatment or a repeated liver biopsy were considered unethical and were not indicated, whereas those with persistent disease were invited to start open-label pioglitazone therapy, titrated as described for the other arm.
|
Pioglitazone
n=41 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received pioglitazone 30mg/d (titrated after 2 months to 45 mg/d). After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients initially assigned to pioglitazone were asked to continue at the same dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Liver Fat by Magnetic Resonance and Spectroscopy (MRS).
|
11 percentage of fat in liver
Standard Deviation 7
|
7 percentage of fat in liver
Standard Deviation 5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 18 and 36 monthsPopulation: Data include 101 observations at baseline (51 in the placebo group and 50 in the pioglitazone group), 83 at month 18 (42 and 41, respectively), and 63 at month 36 (29 and 34, respectively).
Homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) is a method for assessing insulin resistance (IR) from basal fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and fasting plasma insulin (FPI). It is calculated as (FPG x FPI)/405.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received placebo pills with identical physical characteristics and in identical bottles to pioglitazone pills. After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients whose NASH resolved after 18 months were instructed to discontinue the study because pioglitazone treatment or a repeated liver biopsy were considered unethical and were not indicated, whereas those with persistent disease were invited to start open-label pioglitazone therapy, titrated as described for the other arm.
|
Pioglitazone
n=50 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received pioglitazone 30mg/d (titrated after 2 months to 45 mg/d). After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients initially assigned to pioglitazone were asked to continue at the same dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)
HOMA-IR month 18
|
4.3 Arbitrary units
Interval 2.9 to 5.7
|
1.4 Arbitrary units
Interval 1.0 to 1.8
|
|
Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)
HOMA-IR month 36
|
2.3 Arbitrary units
Interval 1.4 to 3.3
|
1.6 Arbitrary units
Interval 1.1 to 2.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 18 monthsPopulation: Data include 101 observations at baseline (51 in the placebo group and 50 in the pioglitazone group) and 83 at month 18 (42 and 41, respectively).
Suppression of endogenous glucose production (Supp EGP) by low dose insulin (i.e., percentage of reduction of EGP with low dose insulin infusion compared to the baseline state). This was calculated as: 100\*((EGP without insulin - EGP with insulin infusion)/EGP without insulin). All measurements are obtained at the same time point during an euglycemic insulin clamp.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=42 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received placebo pills with identical physical characteristics and in identical bottles to pioglitazone pills. After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients whose NASH resolved after 18 months were instructed to discontinue the study because pioglitazone treatment or a repeated liver biopsy were considered unethical and were not indicated, whereas those with persistent disease were invited to start open-label pioglitazone therapy, titrated as described for the other arm.
|
Pioglitazone
n=41 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received pioglitazone 30mg/d (titrated after 2 months to 45 mg/d). After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients initially assigned to pioglitazone were asked to continue at the same dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Hepatic Insulin Sensitivity
|
37.7 % of suppression of EGP
Interval 30.6 to 44.7
|
55.3 % of suppression of EGP
Interval 47.2 to 63.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 18 monthsPopulation: Data include 101 observations at baseline (51 in the placebo group and 50 in the pioglitazone group) and 83 at month 18 (42 and 41, respectively).
Suppression of free fatty acids by low dose insulin (i.e., percentage of reduction of plasma FFA with low dose insulin infusion compared to the baseline state). This was calculated as: 100\*((plasma FFA without insulin - plasma FFA with insulin infusion)/plasma FFA without insulin). All measurements are obtained at the same time point during an euglycemic insulin clamp.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=42 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received placebo pills with identical physical characteristics and in identical bottles to pioglitazone pills. After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients whose NASH resolved after 18 months were instructed to discontinue the study because pioglitazone treatment or a repeated liver biopsy were considered unethical and were not indicated, whereas those with persistent disease were invited to start open-label pioglitazone therapy, titrated as described for the other arm.
|
Pioglitazone
n=41 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received pioglitazone 30mg/d (titrated after 2 months to 45 mg/d). After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients initially assigned to pioglitazone were asked to continue at the same dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Adipose Tissue Insulin Sensitivity
|
46.1 % of suppression of FFA
Interval 38.8 to 53.5
|
65.9 % of suppression of FFA
Interval 60.6 to 71.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 18 monthsPopulation: Data include 101 observations at baseline (51 in the placebo group and 50 in the pioglitazone group) and 83 at month 18 (42 and 41, respectively).
Rate of glucose disappearance (Rd) during high-dose insulin infusion. The rate of plasma glucose disappearance was calculated using Steele's non-steady-state equation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=42 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received placebo pills with identical physical characteristics and in identical bottles to pioglitazone pills. After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients whose NASH resolved after 18 months were instructed to discontinue the study because pioglitazone treatment or a repeated liver biopsy were considered unethical and were not indicated, whereas those with persistent disease were invited to start open-label pioglitazone therapy, titrated as described for the other arm.
|
Pioglitazone
n=41 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received pioglitazone 30mg/d (titrated after 2 months to 45 mg/d). After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients initially assigned to pioglitazone were asked to continue at the same dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Skeletal Muscle Insulin Sensitivity
|
5.4 mg/kgLBM/min
Interval 4.6 to 6.2
|
9.6 mg/kgLBM/min
Interval 8.2 to 11.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Months 18 and 36Population: Data include 101 observations at baseline (51 in the placebo group and 50 in the pioglitazone group), 83 at month 18 (42 and 41, respectively), and 63 at month 36 (29 and 34, respectively).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received placebo pills with identical physical characteristics and in identical bottles to pioglitazone pills. After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients whose NASH resolved after 18 months were instructed to discontinue the study because pioglitazone treatment or a repeated liver biopsy were considered unethical and were not indicated, whereas those with persistent disease were invited to start open-label pioglitazone therapy, titrated as described for the other arm.
|
Pioglitazone
n=50 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received pioglitazone 30mg/d (titrated after 2 months to 45 mg/d). After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients initially assigned to pioglitazone were asked to continue at the same dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
BMI Month 18
|
34.6 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 5.0
|
34.6 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 4.8
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
BMI Month 36
|
36.7 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 5.7
|
35.2 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 4.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Months 18Population: Data include 101 observations at baseline (51 in the placebo group and 50 in the pioglitazone group), 83 at month 18 (42 and 41, respectively).
Total body fat measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=42 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received placebo pills with identical physical characteristics and in identical bottles to pioglitazone pills. After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients whose NASH resolved after 18 months were instructed to discontinue the study because pioglitazone treatment or a repeated liver biopsy were considered unethical and were not indicated, whereas those with persistent disease were invited to start open-label pioglitazone therapy, titrated as described for the other arm.
|
Pioglitazone
n=41 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received pioglitazone 30mg/d (titrated after 2 months to 45 mg/d). After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients initially assigned to pioglitazone were asked to continue at the same dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Total Body Fat
|
36 Percentage of body weight that is fat
Standard Deviation 8
|
36 Percentage of body weight that is fat
Standard Deviation 7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 18 and 36 monthsPopulation: Data include 101 observations at baseline (51 in the placebo group and 50 in the pioglitazone group), 83 at month 18 (42 and 41, respectively), and 63 at month 36 (29 and 34, respectively).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received placebo pills with identical physical characteristics and in identical bottles to pioglitazone pills. After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients whose NASH resolved after 18 months were instructed to discontinue the study because pioglitazone treatment or a repeated liver biopsy were considered unethical and were not indicated, whereas those with persistent disease were invited to start open-label pioglitazone therapy, titrated as described for the other arm.
|
Pioglitazone
n=50 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received pioglitazone 30mg/d (titrated after 2 months to 45 mg/d). After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients initially assigned to pioglitazone were asked to continue at the same dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Plasma Biomarkers Relevant to Hepatic Inflammation, Apoptosis and Fibrosis (Adiponectin).
Adiponectin month 18
|
9.1 μg/ml
Interval 7.1 to 11.1
|
22.8 μg/ml
Interval 19.0 to 26.5
|
|
Plasma Biomarkers Relevant to Hepatic Inflammation, Apoptosis and Fibrosis (Adiponectin).
Adiponectin month 36
|
24.0 μg/ml
Interval 14.5 to 33.5
|
24.2 μg/ml
Interval 18.6 to 29.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 18 and 36 monthsPopulation: Data include 101 observations at baseline (51 in the placebo group and 50 in the pioglitazone group), 83 at month 18 (42 and 41, respectively), and 63 at month 36 (29 and 34, respectively).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=51 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received placebo pills with identical physical characteristics and in identical bottles to pioglitazone pills. After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients whose NASH resolved after 18 months were instructed to discontinue the study because pioglitazone treatment or a repeated liver biopsy were considered unethical and were not indicated, whereas those with persistent disease were invited to start open-label pioglitazone therapy, titrated as described for the other arm.
|
Pioglitazone
n=50 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received pioglitazone 30mg/d (titrated after 2 months to 45 mg/d). After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients initially assigned to pioglitazone were asked to continue at the same dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Plasma Biomarkers Relevant to Hepatic Inflammation, Apoptosis and Fibrosis (CK-18).
CK-18 month 18
|
314 U/L
Interval 247.0 to 381.0
|
186 U/L
Interval 133.0 to 238.0
|
|
Plasma Biomarkers Relevant to Hepatic Inflammation, Apoptosis and Fibrosis (CK-18).
CK-18 month 36
|
245 U/L
Interval 184.0 to 305.0
|
151 U/L
Interval 114.0 to 189.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 18 monthsPopulation: Only patients with prediabetes are included in this analysis
Number of patients developing T2DM and number of patients regressing to NGT among patients with prediabetes (IFG/IGT).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=26 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received placebo pills with identical physical characteristics and in identical bottles to pioglitazone pills. After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients whose NASH resolved after 18 months were instructed to discontinue the study because pioglitazone treatment or a repeated liver biopsy were considered unethical and were not indicated, whereas those with persistent disease were invited to start open-label pioglitazone therapy, titrated as described for the other arm.
|
Pioglitazone
n=23 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received pioglitazone 30mg/d (titrated after 2 months to 45 mg/d). After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients initially assigned to pioglitazone were asked to continue at the same dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Prevention of the Onset of T2DM and/or Reversal From IFG/IGT to NGT in Non-diabetics.
Patients developing T2DM
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Prevention of the Onset of T2DM and/or Reversal From IFG/IGT to NGT in Non-diabetics.
Patients regressing to NGT
|
10 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 18 and 36 monthsNumber of patients with osteoporotic fractures
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=50 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received placebo pills with identical physical characteristics and in identical bottles to pioglitazone pills. After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients whose NASH resolved after 18 months were instructed to discontinue the study because pioglitazone treatment or a repeated liver biopsy were considered unethical and were not indicated, whereas those with persistent disease were invited to start open-label pioglitazone therapy, titrated as described for the other arm.
|
Pioglitazone
n=51 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received pioglitazone 30mg/d (titrated after 2 months to 45 mg/d). After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients initially assigned to pioglitazone were asked to continue at the same dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Osteoporotic Fractures
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At 18 (2nd liver biopsy) and 36 (3rd liver biopsy) months.Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 18 and 36 monthsPopulation: Data analysis included 78 patients at month 18 and 62 at month 36 (based on DXA availability).
Bone mineral density measured at the levels of spine, femoral neck, hip, and wrist by DXA.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=39 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received placebo pills with identical physical characteristics and in identical bottles to pioglitazone pills. After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients whose NASH resolved after 18 months were instructed to discontinue the study because pioglitazone treatment or a repeated liver biopsy were considered unethical and were not indicated, whereas those with persistent disease were invited to start open-label pioglitazone therapy, titrated as described for the other arm.
|
Pioglitazone
n=39 Participants
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received pioglitazone 30mg/d (titrated after 2 months to 45 mg/d). After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients initially assigned to pioglitazone were asked to continue at the same dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bone Mineral Density
Spine BMD at month 36
|
1.06 g/cm^2
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
1.10 g/cm^2
Standard Deviation 0.21
|
|
Bone Mineral Density
Femoral Neck BMD at month 36
|
0.84 g/cm^2
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
0.84 g/cm^2
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
|
Bone Mineral Density
Hip BMD at month 36
|
1.02 g/cm^2
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
1.06 g/cm^2
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
|
Bone Mineral Density
Wrist BMD at month 36
|
0.75 g/cm^2
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
0.77 g/cm^2
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
|
Bone Mineral Density
Spine BMD at month 18
|
1.04 g/cm^2
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
1.10 g/cm^2
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
|
Bone Mineral Density
Femoral Neck BMD at month 18
|
0.84 g/cm^2
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
0.86 g/cm^2
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
|
Bone Mineral Density
Hip BMD at month 18
|
1.05 g/cm^2
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
1.05 g/cm^2
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
|
Bone Mineral Density
Wrist BMD at month 18
|
0.76 g/cm^2
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
0.78 g/cm^2
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
Adverse Events
Placebo (First 18 Months)
Pioglitazone (First 18 Months)
Placebo (PIO Open-label)
Pioglitazone (Months 18-36)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo (First 18 Months)
n=51 participants at risk
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received placebo pills with identical physical characteristics and in identical bottles to pioglitazone pills.
|
Pioglitazone (First 18 Months)
n=50 participants at risk
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received pioglitazone 30mg/d (titrated after 2 months to 45 mg/d).
|
Placebo (PIO Open-label)
n=36 participants at risk
After being randomized to placebo for the first 18 months, patients whose NASH resolved after 18 months were instructed to discontinue the study because pioglitazone treatment or a repeated liver biopsy were considered unethical and were not indicated, whereas those with persistent disease were invited to start open-label pioglitazone therapy, titrated as described for the other arm.
|
Pioglitazone (Months 18-36)
n=40 participants at risk
After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients initially assigned to pioglitazone were asked to continue at the same dose.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atypical chest pain
|
2.0%
1/51 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
0.00%
0/36 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
5.0%
2/40 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pulmonary thromboembolism
|
0.00%
0/51 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
2.8%
1/36 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
0.00%
0/40 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia
|
2.0%
1/51 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
2.8%
1/36 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
0.00%
0/40 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis
|
0.00%
0/51 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
0.00%
0/36 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
0.00%
0/40 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colelithiasis
|
0.00%
0/51 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
2.8%
1/36 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
5.0%
2/40 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diverticulitis
|
0.00%
0/51 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
5.6%
2/36 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
0.00%
0/40 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Diagnosis of adrenal carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/51 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
2.8%
1/36 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
0.00%
0/40 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dissociative amnesia
|
0.00%
0/51 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
0.00%
0/36 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
0.00%
0/40 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Ovarian cyst rupture
|
0.00%
0/51 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
0.00%
0/36 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
2.5%
1/40 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Diagnosis of prostate cancer
|
0.00%
0/51 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
0.00%
0/36 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
2.5%
1/40 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urine retention
|
0.00%
0/51 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
5.6%
2/36 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
0.00%
0/40 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Kidney stones
|
0.00%
0/51 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
0.00%
0/36 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
5.0%
2/40 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Biopsy-related
|
5.9%
3/51 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
2.8%
1/36 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
2.5%
1/40 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
|
Social circumstances
Motor vehicle accident
|
0.00%
0/51 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
2.0%
1/50 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
0.00%
0/36 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
0.00%
0/40 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Concussion
|
0.00%
0/51 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
0.00%
0/50 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
2.8%
1/36 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
0.00%
0/40 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo (First 18 Months)
n=51 participants at risk
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received placebo pills with identical physical characteristics and in identical bottles to pioglitazone pills.
|
Pioglitazone (First 18 Months)
n=50 participants at risk
Participants were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (500- kcal/d deficit from the calculated weight maintaining diet) and received pioglitazone 30mg/d (titrated after 2 months to 45 mg/d).
|
Placebo (PIO Open-label)
n=36 participants at risk
After being randomized to placebo for the first 18 months, patients whose NASH resolved after 18 months were instructed to discontinue the study because pioglitazone treatment or a repeated liver biopsy were considered unethical and were not indicated, whereas those with persistent disease were invited to start open-label pioglitazone therapy, titrated as described for the other arm.
|
Pioglitazone (Months 18-36)
n=40 participants at risk
After 18 months of treatment, metabolic measurements (OGTT and euglycemic insulin clamp), DXA, 1H-MRS, and liver biopsy were repeated, at which point the medication code was disclosed to investigators and patients. Patients initially assigned to pioglitazone were asked to continue at the same dose.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Vascular disorders
Chronic lower limb edema
|
5.9%
3/51 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
22.0%
11/50 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
13.9%
5/36 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
0.00%
0/40 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Hypoglycemia
|
7.8%
4/51 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
8.0%
4/50 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
19.4%
7/36 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
25.0%
10/40 • Adverse event data were collected for the entire study (36 months for each patient).
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place