Trial Outcomes & Findings for Durability of Adherence in Self-Management of HIV (NCT NCT00991302)

NCT ID: NCT00991302

Last Updated: 2018-03-20

Results Overview

The adherence self-report questionnaire captured adherence at an Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) regimen over a one-month recall (0-100): 0 means none of anti-HIV medications were taken, 100 means every single dose of anti-HIV medications were taken. The primary endpoint evaluated for each participant was the average self-reported adherence over a one-month recall across each of their study visit week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48: missing values were ignored. Note: This was a change to the primary endpoint as described in the study protocol. This was due to an update to ACTG Case Report Form (CRF) that captured self-report adherence. Since the data captured on this form captured adherence over a longer timeframe and allowed for more variability in response, it was anticipated this endpoint would provide greater power to assess treatment differences.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

172 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

At weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48

Results posted on

2018-03-20

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
CAP-IT
Participants received the modified CAP-IT adherence intervention in addition to standard care. Modified client adherence profiling and intervention tailoring (CAP-IT): Interventions designed to improve medication adherence, modified to specifically target people first starting highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)
Standard Care
Participants received standard care.
Overall Study
STARTED
86
86
Overall Study
COMPLETED
72
73
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
14
13

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
CAP-IT
Participants received the modified CAP-IT adherence intervention in addition to standard care. Modified client adherence profiling and intervention tailoring (CAP-IT): Interventions designed to improve medication adherence, modified to specifically target people first starting highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)
Standard Care
Participants received standard care.
Overall Study
Death
0
1
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
14
12

Baseline Characteristics

Durability of Adherence in Self-Management of HIV

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
CAP-IT
n=86 Participants
Participants received the modified CAP-IT adherence intervention in addition to standard care. Modified client adherence profiling and intervention tailoring (CAP-IT): Interventions designed to improve medication adherence, modified to specifically target people first starting highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)
Standard Care
n=86 Participants
Participants received standard care.
Total
n=172 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
31 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8 • n=99 Participants
32 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10 • n=107 Participants
31 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 • n=206 Participants
Age, Customized
18-29 years
48 participants
n=99 Participants
43 participants
n=107 Participants
91 participants
n=206 Participants
Age, Customized
30-39 years
25 participants
n=99 Participants
23 participants
n=107 Participants
48 participants
n=206 Participants
Age, Customized
40-49 years
10 participants
n=99 Participants
14 participants
n=107 Participants
24 participants
n=206 Participants
Age, Customized
50+ years
3 participants
n=99 Participants
6 participants
n=107 Participants
9 participants
n=206 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
5 Participants
n=107 Participants
6 Participants
n=206 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
85 Participants
n=99 Participants
81 Participants
n=107 Participants
166 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White Non-Hispanic
7 participants
n=99 Participants
16 participants
n=107 Participants
23 participants
n=206 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black Non-Hispanic
4 participants
n=99 Participants
1 participants
n=107 Participants
5 participants
n=206 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic (Regardless of Race)
73 participants
n=99 Participants
62 participants
n=107 Participants
135 participants
n=206 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian, Pacific Islander
0 participants
n=99 Participants
3 participants
n=107 Participants
3 participants
n=206 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
More than Once Race
1 participants
n=99 Participants
1 participants
n=107 Participants
2 participants
n=206 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Missing
1 participants
n=99 Participants
3 participants
n=107 Participants
4 participants
n=206 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
26 participants
n=99 Participants
26 participants
n=107 Participants
52 participants
n=206 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Peru
60 participants
n=99 Participants
60 participants
n=107 Participants
120 participants
n=206 Participants
Regimen complexity
QD
25 participants
n=99 Participants
25 participants
n=107 Participants
50 participants
n=206 Participants
Regimen complexity
BID or TID
61 participants
n=99 Participants
61 participants
n=107 Participants
122 participants
n=206 Participants
HIV-1 RNA
4.9 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8 • n=99 Participants
5.0 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7 • n=107 Participants
5.0 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7 • n=206 Participants
CD4+ T-cell count
318 cells/mm^3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 178 • n=99 Participants
313 cells/mm^3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 213 • n=107 Participants
315 cells/mm^3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 195 • n=206 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: At weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48

Population: Intention to treat: All eligible participants were included in the analysis: participants were analyzed per original assigned randomized treatment. Missing data were assumed missing completely at random.

The adherence self-report questionnaire captured adherence at an Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) regimen over a one-month recall (0-100): 0 means none of anti-HIV medications were taken, 100 means every single dose of anti-HIV medications were taken. The primary endpoint evaluated for each participant was the average self-reported adherence over a one-month recall across each of their study visit week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48: missing values were ignored. Note: This was a change to the primary endpoint as described in the study protocol. This was due to an update to ACTG Case Report Form (CRF) that captured self-report adherence. Since the data captured on this form captured adherence over a longer timeframe and allowed for more variability in response, it was anticipated this endpoint would provide greater power to assess treatment differences.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CAP-IT
n=86 Participants
Participants received the modified CAP-IT adherence intervention in addition to standard care. Modified client adherence profiling and intervention tailoring (CAP-IT): Interventions designed to improve medication adherence, modified to specifically target people first starting highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)
Standard Care
n=86 Participants
Participants received standard care.
Mean Self-reported Adherence Score (%) Over a One-month Recall
97.5 percentage of adherence score
Interval 93.4 to 100.0
98.2 percentage of adherence score
Interval 94.0 to 99.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72

Population: Intention to treat: All eligible participants were included in the analysis: participants were analyzed per original assigned randomized treatment. Missing data were assumed missing completely at random.

The mean of participant's average self-reported adherence score over a one-month recall across visit week 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72; missing values were ignored.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CAP-IT
n=86 Participants
Participants received the modified CAP-IT adherence intervention in addition to standard care. Modified client adherence profiling and intervention tailoring (CAP-IT): Interventions designed to improve medication adherence, modified to specifically target people first starting highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)
Standard Care
n=86 Participants
Participants received standard care.
Mean Self-reported Adherence Score Over a One-month Recall
97.2 percentage of adherence score
Interval 92.9 to 99.4
97.8 percentage of adherence score
Interval 93.4 to 99.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From study entry to week 48

Population: Intention to treat: All eligible participants were included in the analysis: participants were analyzed per original assigned randomized treatment.

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative probability of initial antiretroviral (ARV) treatment regimen for any reason by week 48. Time to ARV treatment regimen change was defined as first time to change in the drug class of participant's ART regimen for any reason from study entry. Participants completing the study without a change in the drug class of their ART regimen were censored at their last visit.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CAP-IT
n=86 Participants
Participants received the modified CAP-IT adherence intervention in addition to standard care. Modified client adherence profiling and intervention tailoring (CAP-IT): Interventions designed to improve medication adherence, modified to specifically target people first starting highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)
Standard Care
n=86 Participants
Participants received standard care.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Cumulative Probability of Time to Change of Initial Antiretroviral (ARV) Treatment Regimen for Any Reason by Week 48
17 cumulative probability per 100 persons
Interval 9.0 to 25.0
19 cumulative probability per 100 persons
Interval 11.0 to 28.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At week 24, 48, 72

Population: Intention to treat: All eligible participants were included in the analysis: participants were analyzed per original assigned randomized treatment.

Virologic suppression was defined as HIV-1 RNA \<=200 copies/mL at week 24, 48, and 72. The results obtained within +/- 12 weeks of 24, 48, and 72 weeks were included. If there were multiple HIV-1 RNA measurement within the specified window, the HIV-1 RNA result closest to the center of the window was selected.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CAP-IT
n=86 Participants
Participants received the modified CAP-IT adherence intervention in addition to standard care. Modified client adherence profiling and intervention tailoring (CAP-IT): Interventions designed to improve medication adherence, modified to specifically target people first starting highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)
Standard Care
n=86 Participants
Participants received standard care.
Virologic Suppression
Week 24 (nCAP-IT=80, nSOC=79)
94 percentage of participants
Interval 88.0 to 99.0
86 percentage of participants
Interval 78.0 to 94.0
Virologic Suppression
Week 48 (nCAP-IT=77, nSOC=73)
95 percentage of participants
Interval 90.0 to 100.0
85 percentage of participants
Interval 77.0 to 93.0
Virologic Suppression
Week 72 (nCAP-IT=64, nSOC=66)
88 percentage of participants
Interval 79.0 to 96.0
88 percentage of participants
Interval 80.0 to 96.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At weeks 0 (entry), 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72

Population: Intention to treat: All eligible participants were included in the analysis: participants were analyzed per original assigned randomized treatment.

The GSES is a 10-item scale designed to assess optimistic self-beliefs used to cope with a variety of demands in life. The scale was designed to assess self efficacy, i.e., the belief that one's actions are responsible for successful outcomes. The scaled score for each question ranges from 1 to 4. Higher scores indicate participant's stronger belief in self-efficacy. The GSES score was sum of all responses. The range was from 0 to 40 scores: any unfinished question got a score of zero.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CAP-IT
n=86 Participants
Participants received the modified CAP-IT adherence intervention in addition to standard care. Modified client adherence profiling and intervention tailoring (CAP-IT): Interventions designed to improve medication adherence, modified to specifically target people first starting highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)
Standard Care
n=86 Participants
Participants received standard care.
Self-management Skills, as Measured by Self-reported General Self-efficacy Scale (GSES) Score
Week 48 (nCAP-IT=75, nSOC=77)
37 scores on a scale
Interval 34.0 to 40.0
38 scores on a scale
Interval 33.0 to 40.0
Self-management Skills, as Measured by Self-reported General Self-efficacy Scale (GSES) Score
Week 0 (nCAP-IT=86, nSOC=86)
36 scores on a scale
Interval 31.0 to 39.0
36 scores on a scale
Interval 32.0 to 38.0
Self-management Skills, as Measured by Self-reported General Self-efficacy Scale (GSES) Score
Week 4 (nCAP-IT=84, nSOC=86)
37 scores on a scale
Interval 33.0 to 38.0
36 scores on a scale
Interval 31.0 to 39.0
Self-management Skills, as Measured by Self-reported General Self-efficacy Scale (GSES) Score
Week 12 (nCAP-IT=81, nSOC=77)
36 scores on a scale
Interval 33.0 to 38.0
36 scores on a scale
Interval 32.0 to 39.0
Self-management Skills, as Measured by Self-reported General Self-efficacy Scale (GSES) Score
Week 24 (nCAP-IT=81, nSOC=82)
36 scores on a scale
Interval 32.0 to 39.0
37 scores on a scale
Interval 34.0 to 39.0
Self-management Skills, as Measured by Self-reported General Self-efficacy Scale (GSES) Score
Week 36 (nCAP-IT=81, nSOC=79)
37 scores on a scale
Interval 33.0 to 39.0
37 scores on a scale
Interval 33.0 to 39.0
Self-management Skills, as Measured by Self-reported General Self-efficacy Scale (GSES) Score
Week 60 (nCAP-IT=73, nSOC=73)
37 scores on a scale
Interval 34.0 to 39.0
36 scores on a scale
Interval 33.0 to 39.0
Self-management Skills, as Measured by Self-reported General Self-efficacy Scale (GSES) Score
Week 72 (nCAP-IT=71, nSOC=72)
37 scores on a scale
Interval 31.0 to 40.0
38 scores on a scale
Interval 33.0 to 40.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From study entry to week 72

Population: Intention to treat: All eligible participants were included in the analysis: participants were analyzed per original assigned randomized treatment.

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative probability of experiencing a grade 3 or 4 adverse event by week 72. New Grade 3 or 4 signs, symptoms were identified by MedDRA preferred term. Events were included regardless of participant status on ART. If a participant had multiple reports of the same event, only the event reported at the highest grade were included. Time was measured from the study entry until the date of the first new grade 3 or 4 adverse event. Participants lost to follow-up prior to reaching an adverse event endpoint or not documented to have reached an adverse event endpoint at the end of the study had their endpoint censored at the date of their last visit.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CAP-IT
n=86 Participants
Participants received the modified CAP-IT adherence intervention in addition to standard care. Modified client adherence profiling and intervention tailoring (CAP-IT): Interventions designed to improve medication adherence, modified to specifically target people first starting highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)
Standard Care
n=86 Participants
Participants received standard care.
Cumulative Probability of First Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events (AEs)
6 cumulative probability per 100 persons
Interval 3.0 to 14.0
2 cumulative probability per 100 persons
Interval 1.0 to 9.0

Adverse Events

CAP-IT

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 44 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Standard Care

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 38 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
CAP-IT
n=86 participants at risk
Participants received the modified CAP-IT adherence intervention in addition to standard care. Modified client adherence profiling and intervention tailoring (CAP-IT): Interventions designed to improve medication adherence, modified to specifically target people first starting highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)
Standard Care
n=86 participants at risk
Participants received standard care.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
10.5%
9/86 • From treatment dispensation until off-study at any time throughout the study (up to 213 weeks), participant follow-up time was variable
There were no drugs administered through the study and SAEs were reported to local IRB/ECs only. The protocol requested recording of new signs and symptoms \>=Grade 3, any AEs that led to a change in ART, regardless of grade, and all diagnoses identified according to ACTG criteria. DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1, 2004; Clarification 2009) was used.
7.0%
6/86 • From treatment dispensation until off-study at any time throughout the study (up to 213 weeks), participant follow-up time was variable
There were no drugs administered through the study and SAEs were reported to local IRB/ECs only. The protocol requested recording of new signs and symptoms \>=Grade 3, any AEs that led to a change in ART, regardless of grade, and all diagnoses identified according to ACTG criteria. DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1, 2004; Clarification 2009) was used.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
9.3%
8/86 • From treatment dispensation until off-study at any time throughout the study (up to 213 weeks), participant follow-up time was variable
There were no drugs administered through the study and SAEs were reported to local IRB/ECs only. The protocol requested recording of new signs and symptoms \>=Grade 3, any AEs that led to a change in ART, regardless of grade, and all diagnoses identified according to ACTG criteria. DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1, 2004; Clarification 2009) was used.
4.7%
4/86 • From treatment dispensation until off-study at any time throughout the study (up to 213 weeks), participant follow-up time was variable
There were no drugs administered through the study and SAEs were reported to local IRB/ECs only. The protocol requested recording of new signs and symptoms \>=Grade 3, any AEs that led to a change in ART, regardless of grade, and all diagnoses identified according to ACTG criteria. DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1, 2004; Clarification 2009) was used.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
8.1%
7/86 • From treatment dispensation until off-study at any time throughout the study (up to 213 weeks), participant follow-up time was variable
There were no drugs administered through the study and SAEs were reported to local IRB/ECs only. The protocol requested recording of new signs and symptoms \>=Grade 3, any AEs that led to a change in ART, regardless of grade, and all diagnoses identified according to ACTG criteria. DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1, 2004; Clarification 2009) was used.
4.7%
4/86 • From treatment dispensation until off-study at any time throughout the study (up to 213 weeks), participant follow-up time was variable
There were no drugs administered through the study and SAEs were reported to local IRB/ECs only. The protocol requested recording of new signs and symptoms \>=Grade 3, any AEs that led to a change in ART, regardless of grade, and all diagnoses identified according to ACTG criteria. DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1, 2004; Clarification 2009) was used.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hypertransaminasaemia
4.7%
4/86 • From treatment dispensation until off-study at any time throughout the study (up to 213 weeks), participant follow-up time was variable
There were no drugs administered through the study and SAEs were reported to local IRB/ECs only. The protocol requested recording of new signs and symptoms \>=Grade 3, any AEs that led to a change in ART, regardless of grade, and all diagnoses identified according to ACTG criteria. DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1, 2004; Clarification 2009) was used.
7.0%
6/86 • From treatment dispensation until off-study at any time throughout the study (up to 213 weeks), participant follow-up time was variable
There were no drugs administered through the study and SAEs were reported to local IRB/ECs only. The protocol requested recording of new signs and symptoms \>=Grade 3, any AEs that led to a change in ART, regardless of grade, and all diagnoses identified according to ACTG criteria. DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1, 2004; Clarification 2009) was used.
Immune system disorders
Drug hypersensitivity
34.9%
30/86 • From treatment dispensation until off-study at any time throughout the study (up to 213 weeks), participant follow-up time was variable
There were no drugs administered through the study and SAEs were reported to local IRB/ECs only. The protocol requested recording of new signs and symptoms \>=Grade 3, any AEs that led to a change in ART, regardless of grade, and all diagnoses identified according to ACTG criteria. DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1, 2004; Clarification 2009) was used.
26.7%
23/86 • From treatment dispensation until off-study at any time throughout the study (up to 213 weeks), participant follow-up time was variable
There were no drugs administered through the study and SAEs were reported to local IRB/ECs only. The protocol requested recording of new signs and symptoms \>=Grade 3, any AEs that led to a change in ART, regardless of grade, and all diagnoses identified according to ACTG criteria. DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1, 2004; Clarification 2009) was used.
Infections and infestations
Latent syphilis
5.8%
5/86 • From treatment dispensation until off-study at any time throughout the study (up to 213 weeks), participant follow-up time was variable
There were no drugs administered through the study and SAEs were reported to local IRB/ECs only. The protocol requested recording of new signs and symptoms \>=Grade 3, any AEs that led to a change in ART, regardless of grade, and all diagnoses identified according to ACTG criteria. DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1, 2004; Clarification 2009) was used.
3.5%
3/86 • From treatment dispensation until off-study at any time throughout the study (up to 213 weeks), participant follow-up time was variable
There were no drugs administered through the study and SAEs were reported to local IRB/ECs only. The protocol requested recording of new signs and symptoms \>=Grade 3, any AEs that led to a change in ART, regardless of grade, and all diagnoses identified according to ACTG criteria. DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1, 2004; Clarification 2009) was used.
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
8.1%
7/86 • From treatment dispensation until off-study at any time throughout the study (up to 213 weeks), participant follow-up time was variable
There were no drugs administered through the study and SAEs were reported to local IRB/ECs only. The protocol requested recording of new signs and symptoms \>=Grade 3, any AEs that led to a change in ART, regardless of grade, and all diagnoses identified according to ACTG criteria. DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1, 2004; Clarification 2009) was used.
5.8%
5/86 • From treatment dispensation until off-study at any time throughout the study (up to 213 weeks), participant follow-up time was variable
There were no drugs administered through the study and SAEs were reported to local IRB/ECs only. The protocol requested recording of new signs and symptoms \>=Grade 3, any AEs that led to a change in ART, regardless of grade, and all diagnoses identified according to ACTG criteria. DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1, 2004; Clarification 2009) was used.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Anogenital warts
3.5%
3/86 • From treatment dispensation until off-study at any time throughout the study (up to 213 weeks), participant follow-up time was variable
There were no drugs administered through the study and SAEs were reported to local IRB/ECs only. The protocol requested recording of new signs and symptoms \>=Grade 3, any AEs that led to a change in ART, regardless of grade, and all diagnoses identified according to ACTG criteria. DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1, 2004; Clarification 2009) was used.
9.3%
8/86 • From treatment dispensation until off-study at any time throughout the study (up to 213 weeks), participant follow-up time was variable
There were no drugs administered through the study and SAEs were reported to local IRB/ECs only. The protocol requested recording of new signs and symptoms \>=Grade 3, any AEs that led to a change in ART, regardless of grade, and all diagnoses identified according to ACTG criteria. DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1, 2004; Clarification 2009) was used.
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
8.1%
7/86 • From treatment dispensation until off-study at any time throughout the study (up to 213 weeks), participant follow-up time was variable
There were no drugs administered through the study and SAEs were reported to local IRB/ECs only. The protocol requested recording of new signs and symptoms \>=Grade 3, any AEs that led to a change in ART, regardless of grade, and all diagnoses identified according to ACTG criteria. DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1, 2004; Clarification 2009) was used.
4.7%
4/86 • From treatment dispensation until off-study at any time throughout the study (up to 213 weeks), participant follow-up time was variable
There were no drugs administered through the study and SAEs were reported to local IRB/ECs only. The protocol requested recording of new signs and symptoms \>=Grade 3, any AEs that led to a change in ART, regardless of grade, and all diagnoses identified according to ACTG criteria. DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1, 2004; Clarification 2009) was used.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
8.1%
7/86 • From treatment dispensation until off-study at any time throughout the study (up to 213 weeks), participant follow-up time was variable
There were no drugs administered through the study and SAEs were reported to local IRB/ECs only. The protocol requested recording of new signs and symptoms \>=Grade 3, any AEs that led to a change in ART, regardless of grade, and all diagnoses identified according to ACTG criteria. DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1, 2004; Clarification 2009) was used.
3.5%
3/86 • From treatment dispensation until off-study at any time throughout the study (up to 213 weeks), participant follow-up time was variable
There were no drugs administered through the study and SAEs were reported to local IRB/ECs only. The protocol requested recording of new signs and symptoms \>=Grade 3, any AEs that led to a change in ART, regardless of grade, and all diagnoses identified according to ACTG criteria. DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1, 2004; Clarification 2009) was used.
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
10.5%
9/86 • From treatment dispensation until off-study at any time throughout the study (up to 213 weeks), participant follow-up time was variable
There were no drugs administered through the study and SAEs were reported to local IRB/ECs only. The protocol requested recording of new signs and symptoms \>=Grade 3, any AEs that led to a change in ART, regardless of grade, and all diagnoses identified according to ACTG criteria. DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1, 2004; Clarification 2009) was used.
2.3%
2/86 • From treatment dispensation until off-study at any time throughout the study (up to 213 weeks), participant follow-up time was variable
There were no drugs administered through the study and SAEs were reported to local IRB/ECs only. The protocol requested recording of new signs and symptoms \>=Grade 3, any AEs that led to a change in ART, regardless of grade, and all diagnoses identified according to ACTG criteria. DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1, 2004; Clarification 2009) was used.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin lesion
1.2%
1/86 • From treatment dispensation until off-study at any time throughout the study (up to 213 weeks), participant follow-up time was variable
There were no drugs administered through the study and SAEs were reported to local IRB/ECs only. The protocol requested recording of new signs and symptoms \>=Grade 3, any AEs that led to a change in ART, regardless of grade, and all diagnoses identified according to ACTG criteria. DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1, 2004; Clarification 2009) was used.
7.0%
6/86 • From treatment dispensation until off-study at any time throughout the study (up to 213 weeks), participant follow-up time was variable
There were no drugs administered through the study and SAEs were reported to local IRB/ECs only. The protocol requested recording of new signs and symptoms \>=Grade 3, any AEs that led to a change in ART, regardless of grade, and all diagnoses identified according to ACTG criteria. DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1, 2004; Clarification 2009) was used.

Additional Information

ACTG Clinicaltrials.gov Coordinator

ACTG Network Coordinating Center, Social and Scientific Systems, Inc.

Phone: (301) 628-3313

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place