FS VH S/D 500 S-apr in Vascular Surgery

NCT00892957 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 176

Last updated 2012-11-27

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

The purpose of this study was to compare safety and efficacy of FS VH S/D 500 s-apr (FS) versus manual compression in prosthetic expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) graft placement.

Conditions

  • Hemostasis in Participants Receiving Peripheral Vascular Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) Graft Prostheses

Interventions

BIOLOGICAL

Fibrin Sealant, Vapor Heated, Solvent/Detergent-treated with 500 IU/ml thrombin and synthetic aprotinin (FS VH S/D 500 s-apr)

The actual dose of FS VH S/D 500 s-apr will depend on the length of the suture line and the intensity of bleeding (but shall not exceed 4 mL FS VH S/D 500 s-apr).

OTHER

Surgical gauze pads

Manual compression with surgical gauze pads

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Baxter Healthcare Corporation

    lead INDUSTRY

Principal Investigators

  • Isabella Presch, MD, MBA · Baxter Innovations GmbH

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2009-07-31
Primary Completion
2010-10-31
Completion
2010-11-30

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00892957 on ClinicalTrials.gov