Trial Outcomes & Findings for An Open-label Extension Study of Canakinumab in Patients With Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Active Systemic Manifestations Manifestations and Response Characterization Study in Canakinumab Treatment-naïve Patients With Active SJIA With and Without Fever. (NCT NCT00891046)
NCT ID: NCT00891046
Last Updated: 2019-03-26
Results Overview
An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not related to study drug. A SAE was defined as an event which was fatal or life threatening, required or prolonged hospitalization, was significantly or permanently disabling or incapacitating, constituted a congenital anomaly or a birth defect, or encompassed any other clinically significant event that could jeopardize the participants or require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the aforementioned outcomes. Treatment related AEs or SAEs were defined as AEs or SAEs that were suspected to be related to study treatment as per investigator.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
270 participants
From start of study treatment (Day 1) up to end of follow-up period (Week 271 for ACZ885 treated participants and Week 145 for ACZ885 treatment naive participants)
2019-03-26
Participant Flow
The study was conducted at 61 centres in 20 countries.
A total of 147 participants from studies CACZ885G2301 (NCT number: NCT00889863) and CACZ885G2305 (NCT number: NCT00886769) and 123 canakinumab treatment- naive participants were enrolled into this extension study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
ACZ885 Treated: Group 1 (Discontinued From Core Study)
Participants who discontinued from Study CACZ885G2301 Part 2 (NCT00889863) due to SJIA flare, received a subcutaneous (s.c.).
|
ACZ885 Treated: Group 2 (Completed Core Study)
Participants who completed Study CACZ885G2301 (NCT00889863), received an s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treated: Group 3 (Steroid Taper Failures in Core Study)
Participants who failed to taper their steroid dose in CACZ885G2301 (NCT00889863); received an s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treated: Group 4 (Other Criteria)
Participants who previously received canakinumab treatment in Studies CACZ885G2301 (NCT00889863) and CACZ885G2305 (NCT00886769), but did not fulfill the criteria for Group 1, 2 or 3, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
33
|
63
|
40
|
11
|
123
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
21
|
54
|
17
|
8
|
84
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
12
|
9
|
23
|
3
|
39
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
ACZ885 Treated: Group 1 (Discontinued From Core Study)
Participants who discontinued from Study CACZ885G2301 Part 2 (NCT00889863) due to SJIA flare, received a subcutaneous (s.c.).
|
ACZ885 Treated: Group 2 (Completed Core Study)
Participants who completed Study CACZ885G2301 (NCT00889863), received an s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treated: Group 3 (Steroid Taper Failures in Core Study)
Participants who failed to taper their steroid dose in CACZ885G2301 (NCT00889863); received an s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treated: Group 4 (Other Criteria)
Participants who previously received canakinumab treatment in Studies CACZ885G2301 (NCT00889863) and CACZ885G2305 (NCT00886769), but did not fulfill the criteria for Group 1, 2 or 3, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Unsatisfactory therapeutic effect
|
5
|
2
|
19
|
2
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
Administrative problems
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Participant no longer required drug
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
0
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
An Open-label Extension Study of Canakinumab in Patients With Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Active Systemic Manifestations Manifestations and Response Characterization Study in Canakinumab Treatment-naïve Patients With Active SJIA With and Without Fever.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
ACZ885 Treated: Group 1 (Discontinued From Core Study)
n=33 Participants
Participants who discontinued from NCT00889863, received a subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks unless discontinuation occurs. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treated: Group 2 (Completed Core Study)
n=63 Participants
Participants who completed study NCT00889863, received an s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treated: Group 3 (Steroid Taper Failures in Core Study)
n=40 Participants
Participants who failed to taper their steroid dose in NCT00889863; received an s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treated: Group 4 (Other Criteria)
n=11 Participants
Participants who previously received canakinumab treatment in Studies NCT00889863 and NCT00886769, but did not fulfill the criteria for Group 1, 2 or 3, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
n=123 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment- naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
Total
n=270 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
2 -- <4 years
|
0 participants
n=99 Participants
|
2 participants
n=107 Participants
|
3 participants
n=206 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
18 participants
n=31 Participants
|
24 participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
4 -- <6 years
|
6 participants
n=99 Participants
|
10 participants
n=107 Participants
|
6 participants
n=206 Participants
|
5 participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 participants
n=31 Participants
|
42 participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
6 -- <12 years
|
16 participants
n=99 Participants
|
32 participants
n=107 Participants
|
21 participants
n=206 Participants
|
3 participants
n=7 Participants
|
50 participants
n=31 Participants
|
122 participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
12 -- <20 years
|
11 participants
n=99 Participants
|
17 participants
n=107 Participants
|
10 participants
n=206 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
40 participants
n=31 Participants
|
80 participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
≥ 20 years
|
0 participants
n=99 Participants
|
2 participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=31 Participants
|
2 participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
19 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
75 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
156 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
14 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
48 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
114 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From start of study treatment (Day 1) up to end of follow-up period (Week 271 for ACZ885 treated participants and Week 145 for ACZ885 treatment naive participants)Population: The analysis was performed in safety set (SS), defined as all participants who received at least one dose of study drug.
An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not related to study drug. A SAE was defined as an event which was fatal or life threatening, required or prolonged hospitalization, was significantly or permanently disabling or incapacitating, constituted a congenital anomaly or a birth defect, or encompassed any other clinically significant event that could jeopardize the participants or require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the aforementioned outcomes. Treatment related AEs or SAEs were defined as AEs or SAEs that were suspected to be related to study treatment as per investigator.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
n=123 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treated
n=147 Participants
Participants who were responsive to canakinumab in previous studies: NCT00889863 and NCT00886769 and entered into this extension study in Group 1, 2, 3 and 4.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who discontinued anakinra for safety/tolerability reasons, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who never exposed to anakinra, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAE
AEs
|
108 participants
|
137 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAE
SAEs
|
40 participants
|
47 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAE
Discontinuation due to any AE
|
14 participants
|
18 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAE
Discontinuation due to any SAE
|
13 participants
|
14 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAE
Treatment Related AEs
|
44 participants
|
57 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), AEs by Severity, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, SAEs Leading to Discontinuation, Treatment Related AEs and SAE
Treatment related SAEs
|
1 participants
|
4 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From start of study treatment (Day 1) up to end of follow-up period (Week 271 for ACZ885 treated participants and Week 145 for ACZ885 treatment naive participants)Population: The analysis was performed on the SS population.
Immunogenicity assessment included determination of anti-canakinumab (ACZ885) antibodies in serum samples using BIAcore system.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
n=123 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treated
n=147 Participants
Participants who were responsive to canakinumab in previous studies: NCT00889863 and NCT00886769 and entered into this extension study in Group 1, 2, 3 and 4.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who discontinued anakinra for safety/tolerability reasons, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who never exposed to anakinra, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Anti -ACZ885 Antibodies at Any Visit During the Study
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From start of study treatment (Day 1) up to end of follow-up period (Week 271 for ACZ885 treated participants and Week 145 for ACZ885 treatment naive participants)Population: The analysis was performed in SS population.
Local injection site tolerability was assessed on the injection site. Each participant was classified into one of the following four categories: 1. no tolerability reactions at any time during the study, 2. mild reaction observed on at least one occasion but no moderate or severe reactions. 3. moderate reaction observed on at least one occasion but no severe reaction. 4. severe reaction observed on at least one occasion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
n=123 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treated
n=147 Participants
Participants who were responsive to canakinumab in previous studies: NCT00889863 and NCT00886769 and entered into this extension study in Group 1, 2, 3 and 4.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who discontinued anakinra for safety/tolerability reasons, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who never exposed to anakinra, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Local Injection Site Reactions During the Study
No tolerability reaction
|
115 participants
|
129 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Local Injection Site Reactions During the Study
Mild tolerability reaction
|
6 participants
|
15 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Local Injection Site Reactions During the Study
Moderate tolerability reaction
|
2 participants
|
3 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Local Injection Site Reactions During the Study
Severe tolerability reaction
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierPopulation: The analysis was done in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analyzed' signifies number of participants with an ACR assessment at the given visit.
Adapted ACR Paediatric 30/50/70/90 or 100 was assessed based on following 7 variables: 1.Physician's Global Assessment on a 1-100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS); 2. Participants Global Assessment on a 1-100 mm VAS; 3. Functional ability; 4. Joints count with active arthritis; 5. Joints count with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of C-reactive protein (CRP) and 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to severe juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA) during the preceding week. Response was defined as more than or equal to (≥) 30%/50%/70%/90% or 100% improvement in at least 3 of the response variables 1 to 6, no intermittent fever (i.e. body temperature less than or equal to (≤) 38 °C) in the preceding week (variable 7) and with no more than one variable 1 to 6, worsening by more than 30%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
n=26 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treated
n=12 Participants
Participants who were responsive to canakinumab in previous studies: NCT00889863 and NCT00886769 and entered into this extension study in Group 1, 2, 3 and 4.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3
n=13 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who discontinued anakinra for safety/tolerability reasons, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4
n=70 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who never exposed to anakinra, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study
ACR ≥30 criteria
|
80.8 Percentage of participants
|
91.7 Percentage of participants
|
100 Percentage of participants
|
95.7 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study
ACR ≥ 50 criteria
|
80.8 Percentage of participants
|
91.7 Percentage of participants
|
100 Percentage of participants
|
92.9 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study
ACR ≥ 70 criteria
|
76.9 Percentage of participants
|
91.7 Percentage of participants
|
92.3 Percentage of participants
|
90 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study
ACR ≥ 90 criteria
|
69.2 Percentage of participants
|
91.7 Percentage of participants
|
76.9 Percentage of participants
|
80 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Anakinra Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study
ACR 100 criteria
|
57.7 Percentage of participants
|
91.7 Percentage of participants
|
69.2 Percentage of participants
|
64.3 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierPopulation: The analysis was done in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analyzed' signifies number of participants with an ACR assessment at the given visit.
Adapted ACR Paediatric 30/50/70/90 or 100 was assessed based on following 7 variables: 1.Physician's Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 2. Participants Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 3. Functional ability; 4. Joints count with active arthritis; 5. Joints count with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of CRP and 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to SJIA during the preceding week. Response was defined as ≥ 30%/50%/70%/90% or 100% improvement in at least 3 of the response variables 1 to 6, no intermittent fever (i.e. body temperature ≤ 38 °C) in the preceding week (variable 7) and with no more than one variable 1 to 6, worsening by more than 30%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
n=26 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treated
n=3 Participants
Participants who were responsive to canakinumab in previous studies: NCT00889863 and NCT00886769 and entered into this extension study in Group 1, 2, 3 and 4.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3
n=2 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who discontinued anakinra for safety/tolerability reasons, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4
n=90 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who never exposed to anakinra, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study
ACR ≥30 criteria
|
92.3 Percentage of participants
|
100 Percentage of participants
|
100 Percentage of participants
|
92.2 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study
ACR ≥ 50 criteria
|
88.5 Percentage of participants
|
100 Percentage of participants
|
100 Percentage of participants
|
91.1 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study
ACR ≥ 70 criteria
|
88.5 Percentage of participants
|
100 Percentage of participants
|
100 Percentage of participants
|
86.7 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study
ACR ≥ 90 criteria
|
88.5 Percentage of participants
|
66.7 Percentage of participants
|
50 Percentage of participants
|
76.7 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Tocilizumab Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study
ACR 100 criteria
|
65.4 Percentage of participants
|
66.7 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
67.8 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierPopulation: The analysis was done in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analyzed' signifies number of participants with an ACR assessment at the given visit. For arm 'ACZ885 treatment naive: Group 2' there were no participants who had discontinued other biologics due to safety/tolerability issues.
Adapted ACR Paediatric 30/50/70/90 or 100 was assessed based on following 7 variables: 1.Physician's Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 2. Participants Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 3. Functional ability; 4. Joints count with active arthritis; 5. Joints count with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of CRP and 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to SJIA during the preceding week. Response was defined as ≥ 30%/50%/70%/90% or 100% improvement in at least 3 of the response variables 1 to 6, no intermittent fever (i.e. body temperature ≤ 38 °C) in the preceding week (variable 7) and with no more than one variable 1 to 6, worsening by more than 30%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
n=30 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treated
Participants who were responsive to canakinumab in previous studies: NCT00889863 and NCT00886769 and entered into this extension study in Group 1, 2, 3 and 4.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3
n=2 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who discontinued anakinra for safety/tolerability reasons, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4
n=89 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who never exposed to anakinra, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study
ACR ≥30 criteria
|
96.7 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
100 Percentage of participants
|
91.0 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study
ACR ≥ 50 criteria
|
93.3 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
50 Percentage of participants
|
91.0 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study
ACR ≥ 70 criteria
|
86.7 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
50 Percentage of participants
|
88.8 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study
ACR ≥ 90 criteria
|
83.3 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
50 Percentage of participants
|
77.5 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Previously Treated With Other Biologics Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study
ACR 100 criteria
|
60 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
50 Percentage of participants
|
68.5 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierPopulation: The analysis was done in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analysed' signifies number of participants with an ACR assessment at the given visit. For arm 'ACZ885 treated: Group 2 (Completed core study)' there were no Non-Responders participants available.
Adapted ACR Paediatric 30/50/70/90 or 100 was assessed based on following 7 variables: 1.Physician's Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 2. Participants Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 3. Functional ability; 4. Joints count with active arthritis; 5. Joints count with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of -CRP and 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to SJIA during the preceding week. Response was defined as ≥ 30%/50%/70%/90% or 100% improvement in at least 3 of the response variables 1 to 6, no intermittent fever (i.e. body temperature ≤ 38°C) in the preceding week (variable 7) and with no more than one variable 1 to 6, worsening by more than 30%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
n=17 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treated
Participants who were responsive to canakinumab in previous studies: NCT00889863 and NCT00886769 and entered into this extension study in Group 1, 2, 3 and 4.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3
n=17 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who discontinued anakinra for safety/tolerability reasons, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4
n=6 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who never exposed to anakinra, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
n=121 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100
ACR ≥30 criteria
|
82.4 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
76.5 Percentage of participants
|
83.3 Percentage of participants
|
92.6 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100
ACR ≥ 50 criteria
|
82.4 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
70.6 Percentage of participants
|
83.3 Percentage of participants
|
90.9 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100
ACR ≥ 70 criteria
|
82.4 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
52.9 Percentage of participants
|
83.3 Percentage of participants
|
87.6 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100
ACR ≥ 90 criteria
|
76.5 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
23.5 Percentage of participants
|
50 Percentage of participants
|
78.5 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Non--Responders Who Achieved Minimum Response of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100
ACR 100 criteria
|
58.8 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
17.6 Percentage of participants
|
50 Percentage of participants
|
66.1 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierPopulation: The analysis was done in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analysed' signifies number of participants with an ACR assessment at the given visit.
Adapted ACR Paediatric 30/50/70/90 or 100 was assessed based on following 7 variables: 1.Physician's Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 2. Participants Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 3. Functional ability; 4. Joints count with active arthritis; 5. Joints count with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of CRP and 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to SJIA during the preceding week. Response was defined as ≥ 30%/50%/70%/90% or 100% improvement in at least 3 of the response variables 1 to 6, no intermittent fever in the preceding week (variable 7) and with no more than one variable 1 to 6 worsening by more than 30%. For minimum adapted ACR paediatric scores, the last measurement recorded from the participant's previous study was considered baseline for the current study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
n=16 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treated
n=63 Participants
Participants who were responsive to canakinumab in previous studies: NCT00889863 and NCT00886769 and entered into this extension study in Group 1, 2, 3 and 4.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3
n=23 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who discontinued anakinra for safety/tolerability reasons, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4
n=5 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who never exposed to anakinra, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study
ACR ≥ 30
|
100 Percentage of participants
|
100 Percentage of participants
|
91.3 Percentage of participants
|
100 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study
ACR ≥ 50
|
100 Percentage of participants
|
100 Percentage of participants
|
87 Percentage of participants
|
100 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study
ACR ≥ 70
|
100 Percentage of participants
|
100 Percentage of participants
|
78.3 Percentage of participants
|
100 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study
ACR ≥ 90
|
100 Percentage of participants
|
100 Percentage of participants
|
69.6 Percentage of participants
|
100 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric ≥ 30 at Baseline Who Achieved Minimum Response of ACR Pediatric 30/50/70/90/100 at Last Assessment of Study
ACR ≥ 100
|
87.5 Percentage of participants
|
93.7 Percentage of participants
|
39.1 Percentage of participants
|
80 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierPopulation: The analysis was done in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analysed' signifies number of participants who were steroid users at baseline.
Steroid tapering with oral steroids was allowed if the participant achieved an adapted ACR Paediatric 50 response and had no fever. A participant was considered to have tapered steroids successfully, if the steroid dose was reduced from baseline and the participant did not flare and maintained a minimum adapted ACR Paediatric 30 at the last measurement. A participant was considered to have unsuccessfully tapered steroids if the steroid dose was reduced during the study but dose at last assessment was equal to or greater than dose at baseline or; if steroid dose was reduced but the participant did not maintain a minimum adapted ACR Paediatric 30 at the last measurement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
n=11 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treated
n=9 Participants
Participants who were responsive to canakinumab in previous studies: NCT00889863 and NCT00886769 and entered into this extension study in Group 1, 2, 3 and 4.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3
n=38 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who discontinued anakinra for safety/tolerability reasons, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4
n=8 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who never exposed to anakinra, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
n=71 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free Regimen
Steroid free
|
36.4 Percentage of participants
|
55.6 Percentage of participants
|
23.7 Percentage of participants
|
25 Percentage of participants
|
33.8 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free Regimen
Successfully tapered
|
27.3 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
21.1 Percentage of participants
|
25 Percentage of participants
|
23.9 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free Regimen
Unsuccessfully tapered
|
18.2 Percentage of participants
|
22.2 Percentage of participants
|
18.4 Percentage of participants
|
25 Percentage of participants
|
11.3 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Able to Taper Oral Steroid Use or Reached Steroid Free Regimen
Did not taper
|
18.2 Percentage of participants
|
22.2 Percentage of participants
|
36.8 Percentage of participants
|
25 Percentage of participants
|
31 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierPopulation: The analysis was done in FAS population.
The canakinumab dose could be reduced from 4 mg/kg to 2 mg/kg in participants who were steroid-free, if requested by the treating physician and agreed by the sponsor. For treatment naive participants , dose reduction was allowed after the participant had received 6 months treatment with canakinumab.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
n=33 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treated
n=63 Participants
Participants who were responsive to canakinumab in previous studies: NCT00889863 and NCT00886769 and entered into this extension study in Group 1, 2, 3 and 4.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3
n=40 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who discontinued anakinra for safety/tolerability reasons, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4
n=11 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who never exposed to anakinra, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
n=123 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Reduced Their Canakinumab Dose to 2 mg/kg
|
9 participants
|
29 participants
|
4 participants
|
2 participants
|
18 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierPopulation: The analysis was done in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analysed' signifies number of participants with an assessment in the given visit.
Clinical remission was defined as at least 6 months of inactive disease or at least 12 months of inactive disease on medication during the extension period. Participants with inactive disease for at least 6 months, but had loss of inactive disease before 12 months were also determined.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
n=123 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treated
n=147 Participants
Participants who were responsive to canakinumab in previous studies: NCT00889863 and NCT00886769 and entered into this extension study in Group 1, 2, 3 and 4.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who discontinued anakinra for safety/tolerability reasons, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who never exposed to anakinra, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission
Loss of inactive disease after 6 months
|
8.9 Percentage of participants
|
6.8 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission
At least 6 consecutive months of inactive disease
|
42.3 Percentage of participants
|
52.4 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission
At least 12 consecutive months of inactive disease
|
26.8 Percentage of participants
|
42.9 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierPopulation: The analysis was performed in FAS population.
The CHAQ was used to assess physical ability, overall well- being and pain intensity experienced by participants. The CHAQ (disability and well-being) dimension consisted of 20 multiple choice items concerning difficulty in performing eight common activities of daily living; dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, reaching, personal hygiene, gripping and other "activities". Participants were graded for the response in four categories, ranging from 0 (without any difficulty), 1 (with some difficulty), 2 (with much difficulty) and 3 (unable to do). Participant's pain intensity was assessed by parents and adult participants (18-20 years old) on a VAS scale of 0-100 mm (0 mm: no pain to 100: very severe pain). Change from baseline was calculated by using the formula = (post baseline value - baseline value). For both scales, lower scores indicate increased functional ability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
n=33 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treated
n=63 Participants
Participants who were responsive to canakinumab in previous studies: NCT00889863 and NCT00886769 and entered into this extension study in Group 1, 2, 3 and 4.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3
n=40 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who discontinued anakinra for safety/tolerability reasons, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4
n=11 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who never exposed to anakinra, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
n=121 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of Study
Disability score
|
-0.375 units on a scale
Interval -2.0 to 0.625
|
0 units on a scale
Interval -1.5 to 2.125
|
-0.125 units on a scale
Interval -1.25 to 2.25
|
0 units on a scale
Interval -2.125 to 1.375
|
-0.7143 units on a scale
Interval -3.0 to 2.5
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of Study
Overall well-being score
|
-18 units on a scale
Interval -64.0 to 54.0
|
0 units on a scale
Interval -36.0 to 81.0
|
0 units on a scale
Interval -36.0 to 1.0
|
-10 units on a scale
Interval -69.0 to 20.0
|
-28 units on a scale
Interval -100.0 to 83.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disability, Overall Well-Being and Pain Intensity Scores Based on Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) to Last Assessment of Study
Pain Intensity score
|
-13 units on a scale
Interval -69.0 to 39.0
|
0 units on a scale
Interval -39.0 to 80.0
|
0 units on a scale
Interval -58.0 to 93.0
|
0 units on a scale
Interval -57.0 to 53.0
|
-39 units on a scale
Interval -100.0 to 89.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierPopulation: The analysis was performed in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analysed' signifies number of participants with HRQoL assessment in the given visit.
The Child Health Questionnaire - Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) instrument was used to measure HRQoL aged 5 to 18 years from a parent's perspective. This 14 concept questionnaire measured physical and psychosocial health of the participants on following points: physical functioning, role/social emotional, role/social behavior, role/social physical, bodily pain, general behavior, mental health, self-esteem, general health perception, change in health, parental impact - emotional, parental impact - time, family activities, and family cohesion. Total score ranged from 1-100. Increase in score represented improvement in overall well being of participants. Change from baseline was calculated by using the formula = (post baseline value - baseline value).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
n=26 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treated
n=44 Participants
Participants who were responsive to canakinumab in previous studies: NCT00889863 and NCT00886769 and entered into this extension study in Group 1, 2, 3 and 4.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3
n=29 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who discontinued anakinra for safety/tolerability reasons, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4
n=8 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who never exposed to anakinra, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
n=90 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Over Time Based on Child Health Questionnaire- Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) to Last Assessment of Study
CHQ-PF50 physical score
|
14.0407 units on a scale
Interval -18.289 to 38.33
|
0.6959 units on a scale
Interval -14.663 to 23.833
|
1.3716 units on a scale
Interval -42.009 to 41.275
|
13.9255 units on a scale
Interval -3.074 to 37.083
|
18.8758 units on a scale
Interval -38.587 to 60.661
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Over Time Based on Child Health Questionnaire- Parent Form (CHQ-PF50) to Last Assessment of Study
CHQ-PF50 psychosocial score
|
3.8815 units on a scale
Interval -22.516 to 22.471
|
1.4004 units on a scale
Interval -14.99 to 30.982
|
0.7582 units on a scale
Interval -21.674 to 22.907
|
11.9798 units on a scale
Interval -5.931 to 33.497
|
9.3209 units on a scale
Interval -23.862 to 48.657
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierPopulation: The analysis was performed in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analyzed' signifies number of participants with EQ-5D assessment in the given visit.
EQ-5D HRQoL tool was used for participants above 12 years and EQ-5D proxy for 8-11 years. EQ-5D index scores range from -0.11 (worst possible health, worse than dead), to 0 (dead) to 1 (perfect health). Utility based EQ-5D questionnaire provides generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal based on 2 parts: EQ-5D descriptive system - 5 dimensions each with 3 levels (1:no, 2:moderate, 3:severe problem) on: mobility (1=0, 2=0.069, 3=0.314), self-care (1=0, 2=0.104, 3=0.214), usual activities (1=0, 2=0.036, 3=0.094), pain/discomfort (1=0, 2=0, 3=0.386) and anxiety/depression (1=0, 2=0.071, 3=0.2). EQ-5D Total score= 1-0.081-(score of level 2 in present)-0.269 (if at least one of level 3 presents). EQ-5D total score: 1=high quality of life; -0.59 worst quality of life; and EQ-VAS - record participant's self-rated health on vertical, visual analog scale as '100=Best and 0=Worst imaginable health state'. Positive change from baseline score indicated improved health status.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
n=17 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treated
n=35 Participants
Participants who were responsive to canakinumab in previous studies: NCT00889863 and NCT00886769 and entered into this extension study in Group 1, 2, 3 and 4.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3
n=22 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who discontinued anakinra for safety/tolerability reasons, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4
n=4 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who never exposed to anakinra, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
n=65 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in EuroQual 5 -Dimension Health Status Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Index and Health State Assessment Scores [EQ Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS)] to Last Assessment of Study
EQ- 5D Utility Index
|
0.204 units on a scale
Interval -0.636 to 0.945
|
0 units on a scale
Interval -0.434 to 0.377
|
0.069 units on a scale
Interval -1.181 to 0.508
|
0.2385 units on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 0.741
|
0.228 units on a scale
Interval -0.434 to 1.291
|
|
Change From Baseline in EuroQual 5 -Dimension Health Status Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Index and Health State Assessment Scores [EQ Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS)] to Last Assessment of Study
EQ-VAS
|
21 units on a scale
Interval -45.0 to 63.0
|
0 units on a scale
Interval -17.0 to 49.0
|
5 units on a scale
Interval -86.0 to 50.0
|
28 units on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 65.0
|
30 units on a scale
Interval -24.0 to 95.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierPopulation: The analysis was performed in FAS population. Here, 'Number of participants analysed' signifies those participants with a value at both baseline and the respective post baseline time point and with an assessment of PDSS score in the given visit..
Sleep patterns in children and adolescents aged between 11 and 15 years were determined using PDSS instrument to evaluate whether canakinumab helps in reducing sleepiness in children with SJIA. Participants were assessed on 8 items of PDSS, on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 - never, 1 - seldom, 2- sometimes, 3 - frequently and 4 - always). The sum of all the items was reported as total score with a range of 0-32. Change from baseline was calculated by using the formula = (post baseline value - baseline value). A positive change from baseline score indicated improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
n=9 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treated
n=12 Participants
Participants who were responsive to canakinumab in previous studies: NCT00889863 and NCT00886769 and entered into this extension study in Group 1, 2, 3 and 4.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3
n=5 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who discontinued anakinra for safety/tolerability reasons, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4
n=2 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who never exposed to anakinra, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale (PDSS) Score to Last Assessment of Study
|
1 units on a scale
Interval -9.0 to 4.0
|
0.5 units on a scale
Interval -6.0 to 9.0
|
0 units on a scale
Interval -4.0 to 6.0
|
-4.5 units on a scale
Interval -11.0 to 2.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierPopulation: The analysis was performed in FAS population. Here, 'Number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants with a value at both baseline and the respective post baseline time point.
Growth velocity parameter height percentile was determined. Percentile was based on the growth charts smoothed percentile curve released by Centers for Disease control and prevention (CDC) in 2000, by sex and age.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
n=123 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treated
n=139 Participants
Participants who were responsive to canakinumab in previous studies: NCT00889863 and NCT00886769 and entered into this extension study in Group 1, 2, 3 and 4.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who discontinued anakinra for safety/tolerability reasons, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who never exposed to anakinra, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Growth Velocity Parameter for Height to Last Assessment of Study
|
-0.01 Percentile
Interval -66.18 to 47.06
|
0 Percentile
Interval -37.94 to 37.12
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierPopulation: The analysis was performed in FAS population. Here 'Number of participants analysed' signifies number of participants with an assessment in the given visit.
Inactive disease was defined as no joints with active arthritis; no fever (body temperature ≤ 38 degree Celsius); no rheumatoid rash, serositis, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, or generalized lymphadenopathy attributable to SJIA; normal CRP, and a rating of no disease activity on the Physician's Global Assessment of disease activity (with a best possible score ≤10 mm on the VAS).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
n=33 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treated
n=63 Participants
Participants who were responsive to canakinumab in previous studies: NCT00889863 and NCT00886769 and entered into this extension study in Group 1, 2, 3 and 4.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3
n=40 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who discontinued anakinra for safety/tolerability reasons, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4
n=11 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who never exposed to anakinra, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
n=122 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease
|
39.4 Percentage of participants
|
79.4 Percentage of participants
|
12.5 Percentage of participants
|
36.4 Percentage of participants
|
50.8 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierPopulation: The analysis was performed in FAS population. Here, 'Number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants with a value at both baseline and the respective post baseline time point.
Growth velocity parameter weight percentile was determined. Percentile was based on the growth charts smoothed percentile curve released by Centers for Disease control and prevention (CDC) in 2000, by sex and age.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
n=123 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treated
n=139 Participants
Participants who were responsive to canakinumab in previous studies: NCT00889863 and NCT00886769 and entered into this extension study in Group 1, 2, 3 and 4.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who discontinued anakinra for safety/tolerability reasons, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who never exposed to anakinra, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Growth Velocity Parameters to Last Assessment of Study
|
0.1 Percentile
Interval -47.35 to 82.84
|
0 Percentile
Interval -62.49 to 56.87
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to last assessment (4 years) or date of discontinuation, which ever occurred earlierPopulation: The analysis was performed in FAS population. Here, 'Number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants with a value at both baseline and the respective post baseline time point.
Growth velocity parameter BMI percentile was determined. Percentile was based on the growth charts smoothed percentile curve released by Centers for Disease control and prevention (CDC) in 2000, by sex and age.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
n=123 Participants
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treated
n=139 Participants
Participants who were responsive to canakinumab in previous studies: NCT00889863 and NCT00886769 and entered into this extension study in Group 1, 2, 3 and 4.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 3
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who discontinued anakinra for safety/tolerability reasons, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive: Group 4
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and who never exposed to anakinra, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Growth Velocity Parameter for BMI to Last Assessment of Study
|
1.08 Percentile
Interval -66.95 to 76.3
|
-0.77 Percentile
Interval -72.88 to 88.47
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
ACZ885 Treated
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
ACZ885 Treated
n=147 participants at risk
Participants who were responsive to canakinumab in previous studies: NCT00889863 and NCT00886769 and entered into this extension study in Group 1, 2, 3 and 4.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
n=123 participants at risk
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pericarditis
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
1.4%
2/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis ulcerative
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Enteritis
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal disorder
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Abdominal lymphadenopathy
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Histiocytosis haematophagic
|
6.8%
10/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
4.9%
6/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
1.6%
2/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphadenitis
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
2.4%
3/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphadenopathy
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
2.4%
3/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Splenomegaly
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pericardial effusion
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Hiatus hernia
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
General disorders
Device dislocation
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
General disorders
Disease progression
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
General disorders
Drug ineffective
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
General disorders
Injury associated with device
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
3.4%
5/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
3.3%
4/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Autoimmune hepatitis
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatitis
|
1.4%
2/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatitis toxic
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatocellular injury
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatomegaly
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Drug hypersensitivity
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Abscess neck
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchopneumonia
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cytomegalovirus hepatitis
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cytomegalovirus infection
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Device related sepsis
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Escherichia urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Furuncle
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
2.7%
4/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
1.6%
2/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis salmonella
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis yersinia
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastrointestinal viral infection
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Impetigo
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infected bites
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lymph node abscess
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lymphangitis
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Meningitis viral
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Otitis media acute
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Parvovirus infection
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Peritonitis
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis streptococcal
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
1.4%
2/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
2.4%
3/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia bacterial
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pseudocroup
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Salmonella sepsis
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Scarlet fever
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal sepsis
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Subcutaneous abscess
|
1.4%
2/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tonsillitis streptococcal
|
1.4%
2/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Toxoplasmosis
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Varicella
|
2.0%
3/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Wound infection
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ankle fracture
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arteriovenous fistula site complication
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fibula fracture
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Road traffic accident
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Transfusion-related acute lung injury
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Investigations
C-reactive protein increased
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Investigations
Hepatic enzyme increased
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Investigations
Liver function test abnormal
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Investigations
Serum ferritin increased
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Investigations
Transaminases increased
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Investigations
Weight decreased
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc compression
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis
|
9.5%
14/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
10.6%
13/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal chest pain
|
1.4%
2/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal disorder
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteonecrosis
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoporosis
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Polyarthritis
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
1.6%
2/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Anaplastic large cell lymphoma T- and null-cell types
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Convulsion
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Nervous system disorder
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Superior sagittal sinus thrombosis
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Abnormal behaviour
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicide attempt
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure acute
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vulvovaginal pain
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vulvovaginal pruritus
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute interstitial pneumonitis
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis allergic
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
1.6%
2/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Eczema
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Henoch-Schonlein purpura
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Ingrowing nail
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
1.4%
2/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Toxic skin eruption
|
0.68%
1/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
0.00%
0/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
ACZ885 Treated
n=147 participants at risk
Participants who were responsive to canakinumab in previous studies: NCT00889863 and NCT00886769 and entered into this extension study in Group 1, 2, 3 and 4.
|
ACZ885 Treatment Naive
n=123 participants at risk
Participants who were canakinumab treatment naive and did not participate in previous canakinumab studies, received a s.c. injection of canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Canakinumab 2 mg/kg was administered for participants who were able to taper their steroid dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear pain
|
6.8%
10/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
5.7%
7/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
14.3%
21/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
17.9%
22/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
12.2%
18/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
10.6%
13/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
20.4%
30/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
13.0%
16/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
11.6%
17/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
8.9%
11/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
23.8%
35/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
14.6%
18/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
6.8%
10/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
2.4%
3/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
25.9%
38/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
22.0%
27/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
8.8%
13/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
4.9%
6/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Conjunctivitis
|
5.4%
8/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
4.9%
6/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
19.0%
28/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
15.4%
19/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
9.5%
14/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
3.3%
4/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
32.0%
47/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
26.0%
32/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral herpes
|
7.5%
11/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.81%
1/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Otitis media
|
7.5%
11/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
5.7%
7/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
10.2%
15/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
12.2%
15/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection
|
4.8%
7/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
10.6%
13/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Rhinitis
|
23.8%
35/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
21.1%
26/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tonsillitis
|
6.8%
10/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
5.7%
7/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
24.5%
36/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
19.5%
24/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
5.4%
8/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
3.3%
4/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
|
4.1%
6/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
8.9%
11/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral upper respiratory tract infection
|
6.8%
10/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
3.3%
4/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arthropod bite
|
6.1%
9/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
9.8%
12/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
7.5%
11/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
0.00%
0/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
7.5%
11/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
5.7%
7/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ligament sprain
|
7.5%
11/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
4.1%
5/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
5.4%
8/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
4.1%
5/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
24.5%
36/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
20.3%
25/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthritis
|
6.1%
9/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
5.7%
7/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
7.5%
11/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
7.3%
9/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint swelling
|
6.1%
9/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
4.1%
5/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis
|
15.6%
23/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
22.0%
27/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
6.1%
9/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
4.9%
6/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
|
5.4%
8/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
5.7%
7/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
12.9%
19/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
9.8%
12/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Skin papilloma
|
9.5%
14/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
3.3%
4/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
20.4%
30/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
19.5%
24/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
25.2%
37/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
22.8%
28/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
6.8%
10/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
4.1%
5/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
24.5%
36/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
13.8%
17/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Eczema
|
8.2%
12/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
13.0%
16/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
10.2%
15/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
10.6%
13/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
4.8%
7/147 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
5.7%
7/123 • From start of study treatment (Day 1) to end of follow-up period (Week 271)
The analysis was performed in safety set, defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug under this study protocol.
|
Additional Information
Study Director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single site are postponed until the publication of the pooled data (i.e, data from all sites) in the clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER