Trial Outcomes & Findings for Tanezumab in Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee (2) (NCT NCT00863304)
NCT ID: NCT00863304
Last Updated: 2021-05-17
Results Overview
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
849 participants
Baseline, Week 16
2021-05-17
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
212
|
212
|
213
|
212
|
|
Overall Study
Treated
|
209
|
211
|
209
|
211
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
18
|
27
|
26
|
21
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
194
|
185
|
187
|
191
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
10
|
4
|
14
|
16
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
5
|
4
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
57
|
26
|
30
|
28
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
19
|
14
|
20
|
18
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
2
|
6
|
2
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Randomized, but not Treated
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Entered extension study
|
101
|
129
|
113
|
125
|
Baseline Characteristics
Tanezumab in Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee (2)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
Total
n=840 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
18 to 44 years
|
6 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
47 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
45 to 64 years
|
133 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
133 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
134 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
126 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
526 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Greater than or equal to (>=) 65 years
|
70 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
65 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
61 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
71 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
267 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
136 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
134 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
128 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
136 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
534 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
73 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
77 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
81 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
75 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
306 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo). BOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=208 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=207 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Week 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at week 16
|
-2.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.74
|
-3.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.77
|
-3.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.05
|
-2.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.70
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Week 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Baseline
|
7.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.38
|
7.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.38
|
7.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.39
|
7.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.41
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo). BOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated maximum difficulty. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score was 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated worse physical function.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=208 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=207 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Week 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Baseline
|
7.04 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.49
|
6.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.56
|
7.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.52
|
6.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.64
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Week 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 16
|
-1.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.53
|
-3.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.64
|
-2.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.98
|
-2.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.51
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo). BOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here, 'overall number of participants' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
PGA of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1=very good (no symptom and limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicated worse condition.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=208 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=207 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Baseline
|
3.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.65
|
3.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.56
|
3.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.61
|
3.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.61
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 16
|
-0.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.80
|
-0.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
-0.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
-0.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo). BOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=208 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=207 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 2
|
-2.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.15
|
-2.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.48
|
-2.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.64
|
-2.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.42
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 4
|
-2.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.38
|
-3.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.55
|
-3.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.82
|
-2.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.33
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 8
|
-2.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.46
|
-3.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.65
|
-3.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.81
|
-2.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.39
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 12
|
-2.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.69
|
-3.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.76
|
-3.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.02
|
-2.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.63
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo). LOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=208 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=207 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) in Pain Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Baseline
|
7.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.38
|
7.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.38
|
7.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.39
|
7.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.41
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) in Pain Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Change at Week 2
|
-2.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.15
|
-2.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.48
|
-2.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.64
|
-2.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.42
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) in Pain Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Change at Week 4
|
-2.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.36
|
-3.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.49
|
-3.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.79
|
-3.04 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.35
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) in Pain Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Change at Week 8
|
-2.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.39
|
-3.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.57
|
-3.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.75
|
-3.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.39
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) in Pain Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Change at Week 12
|
-2.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.63
|
-3.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.58
|
-3.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.84
|
-3.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.56
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) in Pain Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Change at Week 16
|
-2.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.67
|
-3.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.58
|
-3.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.87
|
-3.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.66
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo). BOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated maximum difficulty. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score was 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated worse physical function.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=208 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=207 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 8
|
-1.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.31
|
-3.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.61
|
-2.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.79
|
-2.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.29
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Baseline
|
7.04 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.49
|
6.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.56
|
7.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.52
|
6.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.64
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 2
|
-1.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.12
|
-2.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.37
|
-2.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.50
|
-2.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.40
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 4
|
-1.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.24
|
-3.04 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.50
|
-2.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.80
|
-2.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.36
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 12
|
-1.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.49
|
-3.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.66
|
-2.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.95
|
-2.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.45
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo). LOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated maximum difficulty. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score was 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated worse physical function.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=208 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=207 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Change at Week 2
|
-1.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.12
|
-2.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.37
|
-2.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.50
|
-2.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.40
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Change at Week 4
|
-1.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.25
|
-3.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.49
|
-3.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.78
|
-2.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.37
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Change at Week 8
|
-1.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.29
|
-3.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.57
|
-3.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.76
|
-2.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.34
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Change at Week 12
|
-2.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.52
|
-3.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.58
|
-3.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.85
|
-2.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.49
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Change at Week 16
|
-2.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.55
|
-3.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.57
|
-3.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.87
|
-2.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.59
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo). BOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Patient global assessment of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1=very good (no symptom and limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicated worse condition.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=208 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=207 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 12
|
-0.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
-0.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
-0.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
-0.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.83
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 2
|
-0.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.87
|
-0.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
-0.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
-0.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 4
|
-0.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
-0.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
|
-0.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
-0.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.83
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 8
|
-0.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
-0.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
-0.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
-0.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo). LOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Patient global assessment of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1=very good (no symptom and limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicated worse condition.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=208 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=207 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Change at Week 2
|
-0.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.87
|
-0.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
-0.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
-0.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Change at Week 8
|
-0.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
-0.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
-0.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
-0.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.87
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Change at Week 4
|
-0.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
-0.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
-0.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
-0.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Change at Week 12
|
-0.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.94
|
-0.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
-0.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
-0.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Change at Week 16
|
-0.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
-0.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
-0.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
-0.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo). BOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Participants were considered as OMERACT-OARSI responder: if the improvement from baseline to week of interest was greater than or equal to (\>=) 50 percent and \>=2 units in WOMAC pain subscale or WOMAC physical function subscale score; if improvement from baseline to week of interest was \>=20 percent and \>=1 unit in at least 2 of the following: 1) WOMAC pain subscale score, 2) WOMAC physical function subscale score, 3) PGA of osteoarthritis. WOMAC pain subscale assess amount of pain experienced (score: 0 \[no pain\] to 10 \[worst possible pain\], higher score = more pain), WOMAC physical function subscale assess degree of difficulty experienced (score: 0 \[minimum difficulty\] to 10 \[maximum difficulty\], higher score = worse physical function) and PGA of osteoarthritis (score: 1 \[very good\] to 5 \[very poor\], higher score = worse condition). Percentage of participants who were considered as OMERACT-OARSI responder were reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=208 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=207 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Week 2
|
49.8 percentage of participants
|
59.7 percentage of participants
|
55.3 percentage of participants
|
68.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Week 4
|
45.9 percentage of participants
|
72.5 percentage of participants
|
63.9 percentage of participants
|
67.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Week 16
|
42.6 percentage of participants
|
64.9 percentage of participants
|
55.8 percentage of participants
|
53.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Week 8
|
46.9 percentage of participants
|
72.0 percentage of participants
|
60.6 percentage of participants
|
64.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Week 12
|
42.6 percentage of participants
|
64.5 percentage of participants
|
59.6 percentage of participants
|
58.9 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo). LOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Participants were considered as OMERACT-OARSI responder: if the improvement from baseline to week of interest was \>=50 percent and \>=2 units in WOMAC pain subscale or WOMAC physical function subscale score; if improvement from baseline to week of interest was \>=20 percent and \>=1 unit in at least 2 of the following: 1) WOMAC pain subscale score, 2) WOMAC physical function subscale score, 3) PGA of osteoarthritis. WOMAC pain subscale assess amount of pain experienced (score: 0 \[no pain\] to 10 \[worst possible pain\], higher score = more pain), WOMAC physical function subscale assess degree of difficulty experienced (score: 0 \[minimum difficulty\] to 10 \[maximum difficulty\], higher score = worse physical function) and PGA of osteoarthritis (score: 1 \[very good\] to 5 \[very poor\], higher score = worse condition). Percentage of participants who were considered as OMERACT-OARSI responder were reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=208 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=207 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 2
|
49.8 percentage of participants
|
59.7 percentage of participants
|
55.3 percentage of participants
|
68.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 8
|
53.1 percentage of participants
|
74.9 percentage of participants
|
66.8 percentage of participants
|
69.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 4
|
48.8 percentage of participants
|
74.4 percentage of participants
|
65.9 percentage of participants
|
69.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 12
|
53.6 percentage of participants
|
73.5 percentage of participants
|
69.7 percentage of participants
|
68.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 16
|
55.0 percentage of participants
|
74.9 percentage of participants
|
68.8 percentage of participants
|
64.3 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo). BOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Percentage of participants with at least 30 percent and 50 percent reduction in WOMAC pain subscale at specified weeks were reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=208 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=207 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Week 4: >=50 percent reduction
|
34.0 percentage of participants
|
51.7 percentage of participants
|
44.2 percentage of participants
|
39.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Week 8: >=30 percent reduction
|
39.7 percentage of participants
|
68.2 percentage of participants
|
54.8 percentage of participants
|
57.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Week 8: >=50 percent reduction
|
32.1 percentage of participants
|
54.0 percentage of participants
|
42.8 percentage of participants
|
41.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Week 2: >=30 percent reduction
|
43.1 percentage of participants
|
50.2 percentage of participants
|
45.2 percentage of participants
|
56.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Week 2: >=50 percent reduction
|
26.3 percentage of participants
|
37.0 percentage of participants
|
28.4 percentage of participants
|
37.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Week 4: >=30 percent reduction
|
46.4 percentage of participants
|
68.7 percentage of participants
|
58.2 percentage of participants
|
57.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Week 12: >=30 percent reduction
|
40.2 percentage of participants
|
64.0 percentage of participants
|
56.3 percentage of participants
|
52.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Week 12: >=50 percent reduction
|
32.1 percentage of participants
|
53.1 percentage of participants
|
48.6 percentage of participants
|
41.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Week 16: >=30 percent reduction
|
39.2 percentage of participants
|
62.1 percentage of participants
|
52.9 percentage of participants
|
51.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Week 16: >=50 percent reduction
|
29.7 percentage of participants
|
51.7 percentage of participants
|
44.7 percentage of participants
|
41.1 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo). LOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Percentage of participants with at least 30 percent and 50 percent reduction in WOMAC pain subscale at specified weeks were reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=208 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=207 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 2: >=50 percent reduction
|
26.3 percentage of participants
|
37.0 percentage of participants
|
28.4 percentage of participants
|
37.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 12: >=50 percent reduction
|
37.8 percentage of participants
|
58.3 percentage of participants
|
53.8 percentage of participants
|
45.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 2: >=30 percent reduction
|
43.1 percentage of participants
|
50.2 percentage of participants
|
45.2 percentage of participants
|
56.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 4: >=30 percent reduction
|
49.3 percentage of participants
|
70.1 percentage of participants
|
59.6 percentage of participants
|
58.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 4: >=50 percent reduction
|
35.9 percentage of participants
|
53.1 percentage of participants
|
45.2 percentage of participants
|
40.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 8: >=30 percent reduction
|
45.5 percentage of participants
|
70.6 percentage of participants
|
61.5 percentage of participants
|
60.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 8: >=50 percent reduction
|
35.9 percentage of participants
|
56.4 percentage of participants
|
47.1 percentage of participants
|
44.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 12: >=30 percent reduction
|
48.8 percentage of participants
|
71.6 percentage of participants
|
65.9 percentage of participants
|
58.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 16:>=30 percent reduction
|
48.8 percentage of participants
|
71.1 percentage of participants
|
64.4 percentage of participants
|
58.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 16:>=50 percent reduction
|
35.4 percentage of participants
|
58.8 percentage of participants
|
51.0 percentage of participants
|
46.9 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo). BOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
PGA of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1=very good (no symptom and limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicated worse condition. Improvement signifies a decrease of at least 2 points on the 5-point scale relative to baseline value. Percentage of participants with improvement of at least 2 points in PGA of osteoarthritis were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=208 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=207 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 2 Points Improvement in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Week 2
|
13.4 percentage of participants
|
14.7 percentage of participants
|
16.8 percentage of participants
|
23.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 2 Points Improvement in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Week 4
|
12.4 percentage of participants
|
24.2 percentage of participants
|
26.4 percentage of participants
|
21.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 2 Points Improvement in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Week 8
|
12.4 percentage of participants
|
26.5 percentage of participants
|
26.9 percentage of participants
|
15.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 2 Points Improvement in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Week 12
|
12.9 percentage of participants
|
23.2 percentage of participants
|
22.1 percentage of participants
|
15.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 2 Points Improvement in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Week 16
|
12.4 percentage of participants
|
21.8 percentage of participants
|
22.6 percentage of participants
|
19.3 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo). LOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
PGA of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1=very good (no symptom and limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicated worse condition. Improvement signifies a decrease of at least 2 points on the 5-point scale relative to baseline value. Percentage of participants with improvement of at least 2 points in PGA of osteoarthritis were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=208 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=207 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 2 Points Improvement in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 2
|
13.4 percentage of participants
|
14.7 percentage of participants
|
16.8 percentage of participants
|
23.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 2 Points Improvement in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 4
|
12.9 percentage of participants
|
24.6 percentage of participants
|
26.9 percentage of participants
|
22.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 2 Points Improvement in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 8
|
12.4 percentage of participants
|
27.0 percentage of participants
|
28.8 percentage of participants
|
17.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 2 Points Improvement in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 12
|
13.9 percentage of participants
|
25.6 percentage of participants
|
25.5 percentage of participants
|
17.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 2 Points Improvement in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 16
|
13.4 percentage of participants
|
24.6 percentage of participants
|
26.0 percentage of participants
|
21.3 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 16Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo). BOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Percentage of participants with cumulative reduction (as percent) (greater than 0 percent \[%\]; \>= 10 %, 20 %, 30 %, 40 %, 50 %, 60 %, 70 %, 80 % and 90%; = 100 %) in WOMAC pain subscale from Baseline up to Week 16 were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=208 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=207 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline up to Week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
>0% reduction
|
54.1 percentage of participants
|
71.6 percentage of participants
|
64.9 percentage of participants
|
67.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline up to Week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
>=10% reduction
|
51.2 percentage of participants
|
69.7 percentage of participants
|
61.5 percentage of participants
|
61.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline up to Week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
>=20% reduction
|
44.5 percentage of participants
|
66.4 percentage of participants
|
57.2 percentage of participants
|
55.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline up to Week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
>=30% reduction
|
39.2 percentage of participants
|
62.1 percentage of participants
|
52.9 percentage of participants
|
51.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline up to Week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
>=40% reduction
|
33.5 percentage of participants
|
56.9 percentage of participants
|
47.6 percentage of participants
|
43.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline up to Week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
>=50% reduction
|
29.7 percentage of participants
|
51.7 percentage of participants
|
44.7 percentage of participants
|
41.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline up to Week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
>=60% reduction
|
26.8 percentage of participants
|
44.5 percentage of participants
|
38.9 percentage of participants
|
32.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline up to Week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
>=70% reduction
|
19.6 percentage of participants
|
38.9 percentage of participants
|
29.3 percentage of participants
|
23.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline up to Week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
>=80% reduction
|
13.4 percentage of participants
|
23.7 percentage of participants
|
22.6 percentage of participants
|
19.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline up to Week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
>=90% reduction
|
8.6 percentage of participants
|
13.3 percentage of participants
|
13.9 percentage of participants
|
9.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline up to Week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
=100% reduction
|
2.4 percentage of participants
|
6.2 percentage of participants
|
5.8 percentage of participants
|
3.4 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 16Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo). LOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Percentage of participants with cumulative reduction (as percent) (greater than 0%; \>= 10 %, 20 %, 30 %, 40 %, 50 %, 60 %, 70 %, 80 % and 90%; = 100 %) in WOMAC pain subscale from Baseline up to Week 16 were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=208 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=207 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline up to Week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
>=60% reduction
|
29.2 percentage of participants
|
49.8 percentage of participants
|
44.2 percentage of participants
|
37.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline up to Week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
>0% reduction
|
81.3 percentage of participants
|
89.6 percentage of participants
|
86.5 percentage of participants
|
85.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline up to Week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
>=10% reduction
|
72.7 percentage of participants
|
83.4 percentage of participants
|
79.8 percentage of participants
|
75.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline up to Week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
>=20% reduction
|
59.3 percentage of participants
|
78.7 percentage of participants
|
72.6 percentage of participants
|
65.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline up to Week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
>=30% reduction
|
48.8 percentage of participants
|
71.1 percentage of participants
|
64.4 percentage of participants
|
58.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline up to Week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
>=40% reduction
|
40.7 percentage of participants
|
64.5 percentage of participants
|
56.3 percentage of participants
|
50.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline up to Week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
>=50% reduction
|
35.4 percentage of participants
|
58.8 percentage of participants
|
51.0 percentage of participants
|
46.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline up to Week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
>=70% reduction
|
20.6 percentage of participants
|
42.2 percentage of participants
|
32.2 percentage of participants
|
26.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline up to Week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
>=80% reduction
|
13.9 percentage of participants
|
25.6 percentage of participants
|
24.5 percentage of participants
|
21.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline up to Week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
>=90% reduction
|
9.1 percentage of participants
|
14.2 percentage of participants
|
14.9 percentage of participants
|
10.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline up to Week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
=100% reduction
|
2.9 percentage of participants
|
6.2 percentage of participants
|
6.3 percentage of participants
|
4.3 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo). BOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Participants assessed their average daily pain score in the index hip/knee using a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Higher scores indicated higher pain. A weekly mean was calculated using the daily index hip/knee pain scores within each specified study week. Change from baseline was calculated using the difference between each post-baseline weekly mean and the baseline mean score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=207 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=206 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=206 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain Score in the Index Hip or Knee at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 2
|
-1.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.06
|
-1.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.20
|
-1.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.32
|
-2.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.29
|
|
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain Score in the Index Hip or Knee at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 4
|
-1.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.25
|
-2.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.44
|
-2.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.54
|
-2.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.37
|
|
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain Score in the Index Hip or Knee at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 8
|
-1.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.27
|
-2.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.47
|
-2.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.59
|
-2.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.37
|
|
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain Score in the Index Hip or Knee at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 12
|
-1.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.46
|
-2.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.57
|
-2.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.83
|
-2.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.54
|
|
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain Score in the Index Hip or Knee at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 16
|
-1.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.51
|
-2.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.68
|
-2.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.80
|
-1.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.52
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo). BOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). Stiffness was defined as a sensation of decreased ease of movement in the index joint (knee or hip).The WOMAC stiffness subscale was a 2-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of stiffness experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint (knee or hip) during the past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 2 individual questions scored on NRS of 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (worst stiffness), where higher scores indicated higher stiffness. Total score range for WOMAC stiffness subscale score was 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (worst stiffness), where higher scores indicated higher stiffness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=208 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=207 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 12
|
-1.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.69
|
-3.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.84
|
-3.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.24
|
-2.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.67
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Baseline
|
7.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.88
|
7.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.67
|
7.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.85
|
6.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.99
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 2
|
-1.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.51
|
-2.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.59
|
-2.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.77
|
-2.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.51
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 4
|
-1.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.58
|
-3.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.63
|
-3.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.96
|
-2.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.47
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 8
|
-1.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.57
|
-3.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.79
|
-2.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.09
|
-2.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.41
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 16
|
-1.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.76
|
-3.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.89
|
-2.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.27
|
-2.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.70
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo). BOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). WOMAC pain subscale assess amount of pain experienced (score: 0 \[no pain\] to 10 \[worst possible pain\], higher score = more pain), WOMAC physical function subscale assess degree of difficulty experienced (score: 0 \[minimum difficulty\] to 10 \[maximum difficulty\], higher score = worse physical function) and WOMAC stiffness subscale assess the amount of stiffness experienced (score: 0 \[no stiffness\] to 10 \[worst stiffness\], higher score = higher stiffness). WOMAC average score was the mean of WOMAC pain, physical function and stiffness subscale scores and ranges from 0 (no difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated worse response.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=208 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=207 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Baseline
|
7.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.35
|
7.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.38
|
7.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.39
|
7.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.47
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at week 2
|
-1.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.07
|
-2.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.35
|
-2.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.48
|
-2.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.31
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at week 4
|
-1.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.28
|
-3.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.46
|
-3.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.75
|
-2.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.27
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at week 8
|
-1.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.32
|
-3.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.58
|
-2.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.79
|
-2.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.24
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at week 12
|
-1.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.54
|
-3.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.67
|
-3.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.98
|
-2.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.48
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at week 16
|
-1.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.59
|
-3.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.68
|
-2.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.01
|
-2.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.53
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo). BOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Participants answered a question: "How much pain have you had when walking on a flat surface?". Participants responded about the amount of pain they experienced when walking on a flat surface by using a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=208 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=207 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 2
|
-2.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.30
|
-2.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.60
|
-2.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.75
|
-3.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.68
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 4
|
-2.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.46
|
-3.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.83
|
-3.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.84
|
-3.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.55
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 8
|
-2.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.54
|
-3.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.75
|
-3.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.84
|
-2.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.71
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 12
|
-2.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.76
|
-3.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.90
|
-3.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.05
|
-2.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.74
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 16
|
-2.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.78
|
-3.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.90
|
-2.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.10
|
-2.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.81
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Baseline
|
7.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.60
|
7.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.61
|
7.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.59
|
7.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.61
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo). BOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Participants answered a question: "How much pain have you had when going up or down the stairs?" Participants responded about the amount of pain they experienced when going up or down stairs by using a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=208 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=208 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=207 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale (Pain When Going up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Baseline
|
8.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.36
|
8.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.50
|
8.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.38
|
8.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.45
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale (Pain When Going up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 2
|
-1.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.33
|
-2.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.64
|
-2.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.72
|
-2.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.60
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale (Pain When Going up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 4
|
-2.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.50
|
-3.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.77
|
-3.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.94
|
-3.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.53
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale (Pain When Going up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 8
|
-2.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.57
|
-3.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.92
|
-3.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.99
|
-2.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale (Pain When Going up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 12
|
-2.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.83
|
-3.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.03
|
-3.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.15
|
-2.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.67
|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale (Pain When Going up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 16
|
-2.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.85
|
-3.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.04
|
-3.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.17
|
-2.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.87
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, and 16Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo). BOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here, 'number analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group, respectively.
The SF-36 health survey is a self-administered questionnaire that measures each of the following 8 health domains: domain 1= general health, domain 2= physical function, domain 3= role physical, domain 4= bodily pain, domain 5= vitality, domain 6= social function, domain 7= role emotional, domain 8= mental health. Total score for each of the 8 domains were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher score indicated a better health related quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 12: General Health
|
1.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.12
|
3.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.04
|
4.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.89
|
3.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.72
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 16: General Health
|
1.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.42
|
5.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.38
|
3.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.01
|
3.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.52
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 12: Physical Function
|
9.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.05
|
18.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.26
|
18.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.35
|
11.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.57
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 16: Physical Function
|
8.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.69
|
17.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.04
|
15.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.85
|
11.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.80
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 12: Role Physical
|
10.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.47
|
19.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.69
|
16.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.67
|
13.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.75
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 16: Role Physical
|
8.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.75
|
17.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.59
|
15.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.95
|
11.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.21
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 12: Bodily Pain
|
11.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.91
|
21.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.40
|
20.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.28
|
15.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.71
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 16: Bodily Pain
|
10.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.62
|
19.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.00
|
17.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.42
|
13.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.22
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 12:Vitality
|
3.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.45
|
9.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.00
|
6.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.53
|
4.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.21
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 16:Vitality
|
4.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.97
|
9.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.76
|
6.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.53
|
6.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 12: Social Function
|
4.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.16
|
10.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.75
|
8.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.66
|
7.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.78
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 16: Social Function
|
5.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.23
|
10.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.31
|
7.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.23
|
7.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.69
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 12: Role Emotional
|
3.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.48
|
8.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.00
|
8.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.96
|
1.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.39
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 16: Role Emotional
|
3.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.43
|
8.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.13
|
7.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.02
|
3.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.24
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 12: Mental Health
|
1.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.91
|
3.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.29
|
3.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.44
|
3.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.88
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 16: Mental Health
|
1.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.64
|
3.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.35
|
3.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.81
|
2.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.60
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, and 16Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo). BOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here, 'number analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group, respectively.
The SF-36 health survey is a self-administered questionnaire that measures each of the following 8 health domains: domain 1= general health, domain 2= physical function, domain 3= role physical, domain 4= bodily pain, domain 5= vitality, domain 6= social function, domain 7= role emotional, domain 8= mental health. Total score for each of the 8 domains were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). These 8 domains are also summarized as 2 summary scores: mental component aggregate (MCA) and physical component aggregate (PCA). Total score range for each of the 2 summary scores =0 (minimum level of functioning) to 100 (maximum level of functioning). Higher (8 domains and 2 summary) scores indicate a better health related quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Weeks 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 16: PCA
|
0.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.72
|
0.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
0.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.94
|
0.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.76
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Weeks 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 12: MCA
|
0.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.73
|
0.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
0.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
0.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Weeks 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 16: MCA
|
0.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.67
|
0.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.81
|
0.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.87
|
0.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Weeks 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Change at Week 12: PCA
|
0.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.78
|
0.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
0.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
0.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.81
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 16Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo). BOCF method was used to impute missing values.
Median time to discontinuation due to lack of efficacy was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Discontinuation Due to Lack of Efficacy
|
NA days
Interval 7.0 to 106.0
Median was not estimable due to less than 50% of population with event to meet the threshold for Kaplan-Meier analysis.
|
NA days
Interval 10.0 to 85.0
Median was not estimable due to less than 50% of population with event to meet the threshold for Kaplan-Meier analysis.
|
NA days
Interval 8.0 to 92.0
Median was not estimable due to less than 50% of population with event to meet the threshold for Kaplan-Meier analysis.
|
NA days
Interval 7.0 to 78.0
Median was not estimable due to less than 50% of population with event to meet the threshold for Kaplan-Meier analysis.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 16Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo). BOCF method was used to impute missing values.
Median time to discontinuation due to lack of efficacy was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Discontinuation Due to Lack of Efficacy
|
87.78 days
Standard Error 2.23
|
80.12 days
Standard Error 1.09
|
84.62 days
Standard Error 1.37
|
72.87 days
Standard Error 1.07
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo). LOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here 'number analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group, respectively.
In case of inadequate pain relief for osteoarthritis, acetaminophen up to 4000 mg per day up to 3 days per week could be taken as rescue medication. Percentage of participants with any use of rescue medication during the specified study week were summarized.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Used Rescue Medication
Week 2
|
61.6 percentage of participants
|
63.3 percentage of participants
|
68.9 percentage of participants
|
46.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Used Rescue Medication
Week 4
|
52.5 percentage of participants
|
47.1 percentage of participants
|
45.6 percentage of participants
|
36.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Used Rescue Medication
Week 8
|
47.8 percentage of participants
|
38.9 percentage of participants
|
37.9 percentage of participants
|
35.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Used Rescue Medication
Week 12
|
42.7 percentage of participants
|
33.2 percentage of participants
|
33.5 percentage of participants
|
33.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Used Rescue Medication
Week 16
|
37.4 percentage of participants
|
33.2 percentage of participants
|
33.5 percentage of participants
|
30.1 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo). LOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here 'number analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group, respectively.
In case of inadequate pain relief for osteoarthritis, acetaminophen up to 4000 mg per day up to 3 days per week could be taken as rescue medication. Number of days participants used any of the rescue medication, during the specified week were summarized.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Rescue Medication Use
Week 8
|
0 days
Interval 0.0 to 7.0
|
0 days
Interval 0.0 to 7.0
|
0 days
Interval 0.0 to 7.0
|
0 days
Interval 0.0 to 7.0
|
|
Duration of Rescue Medication Use
Week 12
|
0 days
Interval 0.0 to 7.0
|
0 days
Interval 0.0 to 7.0
|
0 days
Interval 0.0 to 7.0
|
0 days
Interval 0.0 to 7.0
|
|
Duration of Rescue Medication Use
Week 2
|
1 days
Interval 0.0 to 7.0
|
2 days
Interval 0.0 to 7.0
|
2 days
Interval 0.0 to 7.0
|
0 days
Interval 0.0 to 7.0
|
|
Duration of Rescue Medication Use
Week 4
|
1 days
Interval 0.0 to 7.0
|
0 days
Interval 0.0 to 7.0
|
0 days
Interval 0.0 to 7.0
|
0 days
Interval 0.0 to 7.0
|
|
Duration of Rescue Medication Use
Week 16
|
0 days
Interval 0.0 to 7.0
|
0 days
Interval 0.0 to 7.0
|
0 days
Interval 0.0 to 7.0
|
0 days
Interval 0.0 to 7.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo). LOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here 'number analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group, respectively.
In case of inadequate pain relief for osteoarthritis, acetaminophen up to 4000 mg per day up to 3 days per week could be taken as rescue medication. The total dosage of acetaminophen in mg used during the specified week were summarized.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Amount of Rescue Medication Taken
Week 2
|
3967.98 mg
Standard Deviation 5614.49
|
3661.84 mg
Standard Deviation 5025.34
|
3325.24 mg
Standard Deviation 4143.00
|
2069.71 mg
Standard Deviation 3851.87
|
|
Amount of Rescue Medication Taken
Week 4
|
3392.16 mg
Standard Deviation 5588.13
|
2442.31 mg
Standard Deviation 4423.97
|
2648.06 mg
Standard Deviation 4653.47
|
1713.94 mg
Standard Deviation 3652.96
|
|
Amount of Rescue Medication Taken
Week 8
|
3329.27 mg
Standard Deviation 5733.90
|
2024.04 mg
Standard Deviation 4124.50
|
2274.27 mg
Standard Deviation 4692.11
|
1956.94 mg
Standard Deviation 4967.74
|
|
Amount of Rescue Medication Taken
Week 12
|
3055.83 mg
Standard Deviation 5712.68
|
2012.02 mg
Standard Deviation 4261.23
|
1963.59 mg
Standard Deviation 4531.99
|
1851.67 mg
Standard Deviation 3918.89
|
|
Amount of Rescue Medication Taken
Week 16
|
3155.34 mg
Standard Deviation 5899.37
|
1968.75 mg
Standard Deviation 4265.10
|
2014.56 mg
Standard Deviation 4631.26
|
1827.75 mg
Standard Deviation 4138.99
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo).
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to Week 24 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
AEs
|
85 Participants
|
101 Participants
|
101 Participants
|
110 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
SAEs
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo). Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Laboratory values: hematology (hemoglobin; hematocrit; red blood cell count \[less than {\<}0.8\* lower limit of normal \[LLN\], platelets \<0.5\* LLN,\>1.75\* upper limit of normal (ULN), white blood cell count\<0.6\* LLN, \>1.5\* ULN, liver function (total bilirubin\>1.5\* ULN, aspartate aminotransferase; alanine aminotransferase; gamma-glutamyltransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase\>3.0\* ULN, total protein; albumin\<0.8\* LLN; \>1.2\* ULN), renal function (blood urea nitrogen; creatinine\>1.3\* ULN, uric acid\>1.2\* ULN), lipids (cholesterol, triglycerides \>1.3\*ULN), electrolytes (sodium\<0.95\* LLN, \>1.05\* ULN; potassium; chloride; calcium; magnesium; phosphate; bicarbonate\<0.9\* LLN, \>1.1\* ULN), chemistry (glucose \<0.6\*LLN, \>1.5\*ULN; creatine kinase \>2.0\*ULN), urinalysis (specific gravity \<1.003, \>1.030; pH\<4.5, \>8, glucose; protein; blood; ketones; urobilinogen; bilirubin; nitrite, esterase\>=1).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=201 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=205 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=201 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=204 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities
|
145 Participants
|
145 Participants
|
144 Participants
|
164 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo).
All standard intervals (PR, QRS, QT, QT interval corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula \[QTcF\], QT interval corrected for heart rate using Bazett's formula \[QTcB\], RR intervals and heart rate) were analyzed. Participants with abnormal ECG findings reported as treatment related adverse events were presented. Relatedness to treatment was assessed by investigator.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
QRS complex abnormal
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
T wave abnormal
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
T wave inversion
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
Bradycardia
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
Ventricular extrasystoles
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo). Here 'number analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each arm, respectively.
NIS is a standardized instrument used to evaluate participant for signs of peripheral neuropathy. NIS is the sum of scores of 37 items, where 24 items scored from 0 (normal function) to 4 (extreme abnormal function), higher score indicates higher abnormality and 13 items scored from 0 (normal function) to 2 (extreme abnormal function), higher score indicates higher abnormality. NIS possible overall score ranged from 0 (no impairment) to 122 (maximum impairment), higher scores indicated increased impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Baseline
|
1.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.29
|
1.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.04
|
0.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.64
|
1.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.18
|
|
Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Change at Week 2
|
-0.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.40
|
-0.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.65
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.85
|
-0.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.60
|
|
Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Change at Week 4
|
-0.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.87
|
-0.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.75
|
-0.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.13
|
-0.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.54
|
|
Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Change at Week 8
|
-0.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.52
|
-0.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.66
|
-0.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.65
|
-0.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.78
|
|
Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Change at Week 12
|
-0.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.63
|
-0.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.55
|
0.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.64
|
-0.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.78
|
|
Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Change at Week 16
|
-0.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.68
|
-0.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.37
|
-0.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.54
|
-0.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.80
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 8, 16, and 24Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo). Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. This outcome measure was planned not to be analyzed for reporting arms: Placebo and Naproxen + Placebo.
Participants who developed anti-tanezumab antibodies after treatment were evaluated for the presence of anti-tanezumab neutralizing antibodies in their serum. Number of participants with positive ADA were summarized for reporting groups: Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo and Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo. Results with titer value \>= 4.32 nanogram per milliliter of anti-tanezumab neutralizing antibodies were counted as positive.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Level
Baseline
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Level
Week 8
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Level
Week 16
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Level
Week 24
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1)Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo). Here, 'number analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for each specified category for each group, respectively.
Physical examination included an examination of the general appearance, skin, heart, head, eyes, ears, nose, throat, breasts, abdomen, musculoskeletal, neck, extremities, thyroid and others. Criteria for abnormal physical findings were based on investigator's discretion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations Findings
Abdomen
|
19 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations Findings
Ears
|
5 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations Findings
Extremities
|
40 Participants
|
47 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
33 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations Findings
Eyes
|
9 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations Findings
General
|
14 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations Findings
Head
|
6 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations Findings
Heart
|
7 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations Findings
Lungs
|
5 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations Findings
Musculoskeletal
|
87 Participants
|
89 Participants
|
81 Participants
|
88 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations Findings
Neck
|
7 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations Findings
Nose
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations Findings
Skin
|
31 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
31 Participants
|
34 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations Findings
Throat
|
6 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations Findings
Thyroid
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized IV study drug (either tanezumab or IV placebo).
Vital signs included the assessment of the following: body temperature, blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate. Number of participants with clinically significant vital signs (based on the investigator's judgment) considered as adverse events were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=209 Participants
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=211 Participants
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Associated With Vital Sign Measurements
|
3 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
Naproxen + Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 participants at risk
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 participants at risk
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=209 participants at risk
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=211 participants at risk
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.47%
1/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial flutter
|
0.48%
1/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.47%
1/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis ischaemic
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.48%
1/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.47%
1/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestine ulcer
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.47%
1/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Sarcoidosis
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.47%
1/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Breast cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.47%
1/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.47%
1/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.47%
1/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.48%
1/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.47%
1/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Drug exposure during pregnancy
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.47%
1/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hip fracture
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.47%
1/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.47%
1/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Pelvic fracture
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.48%
1/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.96%
2/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.47%
1/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hyperaesthesia
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.48%
1/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ischaemic stroke
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.48%
1/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Abortion spontaneous
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.47%
1/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Mental status changes
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.47%
1/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.47%
1/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=209 participants at risk
Participants received placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12.
|
Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo
n=211 participants at risk
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo
n=209 participants at risk
Participants received tanezumab (PF-04383119) 10 mg IV infusion over 5 minutes at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8 along with placebo matched to naproxen tablet orally twice daily from Baseline up to Week 12.
|
Naproxen + Placebo
n=211 participants at risk
Participants received naproxen 500 mg tablet orally twice daily at Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 4, 8 and 12 along with placebo matched to tanezumab (PF-04383119) IV infusion at Baseline (Day 1) and Week 8.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.48%
1/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.95%
2/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
2.8%
6/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.48%
1/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.4%
3/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
2.4%
5/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
2.4%
5/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
1.9%
4/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.4%
3/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.96%
2/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
4.7%
10/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.48%
1/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.47%
1/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
2.9%
6/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
0.96%
2/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.9%
4/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
5.3%
11/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.9%
4/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.96%
2/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
2.8%
6/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.48%
1/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.95%
2/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
0.96%
2/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.8%
8/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.9%
4/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
2.4%
5/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.96%
2/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.8%
8/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
2.9%
6/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
2.4%
5/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
2.9%
6/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
2.4%
5/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
2.9%
6/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
2.8%
6/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
2.4%
5/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
2.8%
6/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.9%
4/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
2.4%
5/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased
|
0.48%
1/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.9%
4/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
2.9%
6/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.47%
1/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.96%
2/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
5.7%
12/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
5.7%
12/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
4.3%
9/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.48%
1/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
2.8%
6/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.4%
3/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.47%
1/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.48%
1/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.9%
4/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
5.3%
11/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.95%
2/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Burning sensation
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.95%
2/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
2.4%
5/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.95%
2/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
1.4%
3/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.95%
2/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
2.4%
5/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.4%
3/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
2.9%
6/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
4.3%
9/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
7/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
2.8%
6/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
|
0.00%
0/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
7/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.96%
2/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.95%
2/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
0.96%
2/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.2%
13/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
5.7%
12/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
2.4%
5/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
1.9%
4/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
2.8%
6/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.4%
3/209
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.47%
1/211
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER