Effect of Interventions in Return to Work for Patients With Neck and Low Back Pain

NCT00840697 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 400

Last updated 2011-06-27

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Low back pain is a usual condition in the western countries and several treatments available for patients with "non-specific low back pain". According to the European guidelines both Brief intervention and exercise/cognitive intervention are effective treatments with regard to pain and function (www.backpaineurope.org), but none have documented effect on return to work.

The challenges for health personnel is not cure of the patients back pain, but to build up rehabilitation programs which focus on disability and work incapacity, in patients which are at risk of loosing their work. Dr. P. Loisel, Montreal, Canada", has since 1995 treated patients with back pain according to the "The PREVICAP model - (PREVention of work handICAP)", where the main purpose with work-related program is to prevent prolonged disability and to help patients back to work. Loisel demonstrated that the PREVICAP models accelerated the "return to work" factor by a factor 2.4 (p=0.01). The PREVICAP model had also been evaluated in Amsterdam, by Dr. Anema with the same results.

At the Back Clinic, Ullevål University Hospital we are presently involved in a randomized controlled trial after the PREVICAP model, where patients are randomized to Brief intervention including a work-related intervention or usual care. All included patients in both groups, will have a clinical examination by specialist in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and advice from a physiotherapist. The current study replaces Brief intervention with an exercise - and a work-related program, so patients with non-specific LBP will be randomized to an exercise and work-related program or usual care.

The main purpose of this study

* to investigate if rehabilitation programs specifically focusing on the return to work process will reduce sickness absence and disability pension in patients with neck and low back pain.
* to assess the work-, individual- and health factors and their interrelationship predicting sickness absence and work disability.
* to compare results from the rehabilitation program with results from rehabilitation program in Toronto
* to which extent are the patients met by actions from employers and employment services, and does is influence sickness absence and disability.
* do these actions represent favourable cost benefit for the work places and the society

Conditions

  • Low Back Pain
  • Neck Pain

Interventions

BEHAVIORAL

Exercises and work related rehabilitation

Treatment in groups, twice a week for 3 weeks. The treatment includes exercises, cognitive intervention and work related rehabilitation. The exercises include fitness, strength and stretching

BEHAVIORAL

Brief intervention

1 consultation at the physiotherapist, which give advice Summary talk with the physician about activity and work when having neck- and low back pain

BEHAVIORAL

multidisciplinary exercise group

10 days during 3 weeks. Treatment in groups, exercise and cognitive treatment

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • The Research Council of Norway

    collaborator OTHER
  • Ullevaal University Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Erik Bautz-Holter, Professor · Ullevaal University Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2009-08-31
Primary Completion
2011-08-31
Completion
2013-08-31

Countries

  • Norway

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00840697 on ClinicalTrials.gov