Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study Evaluating SKI-606 (Bosutinib) In Japanese Subjects With Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Leukemias (NCT NCT00811070)

NCT ID: NCT00811070

Last Updated: 2016-06-28

Results Overview

DLT was defined as any of the following events occurring during the first 28 days of study medication and considered at least possibly-related to study medication: any grade 3 or 4 clinically-relevant non-hematologic toxicity.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE2

Target enrollment

63 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline up to Day 28 (Part 1 )

Results posted on

2016-06-28

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Bosutinib Second-line 400 mg (Part 1 )
Single oral dose of bosutinib 400 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 400 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 500 mg (Part 1 )
Single oral dose of bosutinib 500 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 500 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 600 mg (Part 1 )
Single oral dose of bosutinib 600 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 600 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred.
Bosutinib Primary Second-line 500 mg (Part 2 )
Bosutinib 500 mg was administered orally once-daily in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML).Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy.
Bosutinib Advanced Second-line 500 mg (Part 2 )
Bosutinib 500 mg was administered orally once-daily in participants with accelerated or blast phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy.
Bosutinib Exploratory Third-line 500 mg (Part 2 )
Bosutinib 500 mg was administered orally once-daily in participants with chronic or accelerated or blast phase third-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant followed by dasatinib or nilotinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy.
Overall Study
STARTED
7
7
3
28
7
11
Overall Study
COMPLETED
6
6
3
26
2
10
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
1
1
0
2
5
1

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Bosutinib Second-line 400 mg (Part 1 )
Single oral dose of bosutinib 400 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 400 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 500 mg (Part 1 )
Single oral dose of bosutinib 500 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 500 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 600 mg (Part 1 )
Single oral dose of bosutinib 600 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 600 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred.
Bosutinib Primary Second-line 500 mg (Part 2 )
Bosutinib 500 mg was administered orally once-daily in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML).Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy.
Bosutinib Advanced Second-line 500 mg (Part 2 )
Bosutinib 500 mg was administered orally once-daily in participants with accelerated or blast phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy.
Bosutinib Exploratory Third-line 500 mg (Part 2 )
Bosutinib 500 mg was administered orally once-daily in participants with chronic or accelerated or blast phase third-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant followed by dasatinib or nilotinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy.
Overall Study
Death
0
0
0
2
5
0
Overall Study
Other
1
0
0
0
0
0
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
0
1
0
0
0
0
Overall Study
Physician Decision
0
0
0
0
0
1

Baseline Characteristics

Study Evaluating SKI-606 (Bosutinib) In Japanese Subjects With Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Leukemias

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Bosutinib Second-line 400 mg (Part 1 )
n=7 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 400 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 400 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 500 mg (Part 1 )
n=7 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 500 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 500 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 600 mg (Part 1 )
n=3 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 600 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 600 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred.
Bosutinib Primary Second-line 500 mg (Part 2 )
n=28 Participants
Bosutinib 500 mg was administered orally once-daily in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML).Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy.
Bosutinib Advanced Second-line 500 mg (Part 2 )
n=7 Participants
Bosutinib 500 mg was administered orally once-daily in participants with accelerated or blast phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy.
Bosutinib Exploratory Third-line 500 mg (Part 2 )
n=11 Participants
Bosutinib 500 mg was administered orally once-daily in participants with chronic or accelerated or blast phase third-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant followed by dasatinib or nilotinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy.
Total
n=63 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Customized
< 65 years
7 Participants
n=39 Participants
4 Participants
n=41 Participants
2 Participants
n=35 Participants
20 Participants
n=31 Participants
3 Participants
n=146 Participants
9 Participants
n=19 Participants
45 Participants
n=147 Participants
Age, Customized
>= 65 years
0 Participants
n=39 Participants
3 Participants
n=41 Participants
1 Participants
n=35 Participants
8 Participants
n=31 Participants
4 Participants
n=146 Participants
2 Participants
n=19 Participants
18 Participants
n=147 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants
n=39 Participants
2 Participants
n=41 Participants
2 Participants
n=35 Participants
12 Participants
n=31 Participants
1 Participants
n=146 Participants
4 Participants
n=19 Participants
24 Participants
n=147 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants
n=39 Participants
5 Participants
n=41 Participants
1 Participants
n=35 Participants
16 Participants
n=31 Participants
6 Participants
n=146 Participants
7 Participants
n=19 Participants
39 Participants
n=147 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 28 (Part 1 )

Population: Participants enrolled in Part 1 of the study were analyzed for DLT. Two participants (1 each in the 400 mg and 500 mg) who discontinued the treatment by Day 28 due to non-safety reasons were excluded from the analysis.

DLT was defined as any of the following events occurring during the first 28 days of study medication and considered at least possibly-related to study medication: any grade 3 or 4 clinically-relevant non-hematologic toxicity.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bosutinib Second-line 400 mg (Part 1 )
n=6 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 400 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 400 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 500 mg (Part 1 )
n=6 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 500 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 500 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 600 mg (Part 1 )
n=3 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 600 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 600 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred.
Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT) - Part 1
1 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 28 (Part 1 )

Population: Participants enrolled in Part 1 of the study were analyzed for DLT. Two participants (1 each in the 400 mg and 500 mg) who discontinued the treatment by Day 28 due to non-safety reasons were excluded from the analysis.

MTD was defined as highest dose level for which no more than 1 participant in a dose cohort experienced DLT.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bosutinib Second-line 400 mg (Part 1 )
n=15 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 400 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 400 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 500 mg (Part 1 )
Single oral dose of bosutinib 500 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 500 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 600 mg (Part 1 )
Single oral dose of bosutinib 600 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 600 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred.
Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) - Part 1
NA mg
MTD was not achieved since no more than 1 DLT was observed in any cohort.

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24

Population: All treated population was defined as all participants who received at least 1 dose of bosutinib.

Cytogenetic response (CyR) is based on the prevalence of Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) cells. Major cytogenetic response was categorized as either complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) or partial cytogenetic response (PCyR). CCyR was achieved when there was 0 percent (%) Ph+ cells and PCyR was achieved when 1 to 35% Ph+ cells.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bosutinib Second-line 400 mg (Part 1 )
n=28 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 400 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 400 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 500 mg (Part 1 )
Single oral dose of bosutinib 500 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 500 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 600 mg (Part 1 )
Single oral dose of bosutinib 600 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 600 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred.
Percentage of Participants With Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR) at Week 24 in Chronic Phase Second-line Cohort - Part 2
35.7 percentage of participants
Interval 18.6 to 55.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Before and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours after administration on Day 1, and before and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours after administration on Day 15

Population: The pharmacokinetic parameter population was defined as all participants who received at least 1 dose of bosutinib and had at least 1 of the pharmacokinetic parameters of interest. n= number of participants analyzed.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bosutinib Second-line 400 mg (Part 1 )
n=7 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 400 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 400 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 500 mg (Part 1 )
n=7 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 500 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 500 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 600 mg (Part 1 )
n=3 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 600 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 600 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred.
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) - Part 1
Day 1 (n = 7, 7, 3)
131 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 29.7
128 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 23.1
155 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 44.4
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) - Part 1
Day 15 (n = 5, 4, 2)
129 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 24.4
226 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 49.5
214 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation obtained by sampling distribution of 2 participants was not meaningful, hence not reported.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Before and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours after administration on Day 1, and before and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours after administration on Day 15

Population: The pharmacokinetic parameter population was defined as all participants who received at least 1 dose of bosutinib and had at least 1 of the pharmacokinetic parameters of interest. n= number of participants analyzed.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bosutinib Second-line 400 mg (Part 1 )
n=7 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 400 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 400 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 500 mg (Part 1 )
n=7 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 500 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 500 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 600 mg (Part 1 )
n=3 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 600 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 600 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred.
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) - Part 1
Day 1 (n = 7, 7, 3)
4.00 hour
Interval 3.97 to 7.9
3.95 hour
Interval 3.0 to 5.98
3.98 hour
Interval 3.97 to 4.03
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) - Part 1
Day 15 (n = 5, 4, 2)
4.03 hour
Interval 3.92 to 8.0
3.95 hour
Interval 3.93 to 7.98
4.00 hour
Interval 3.98 to 4.02

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Before and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours after administration on Day 1

Population: The pharmacokinetic parameter population was defined as all participants who received at least 1 dose of bosutinib and had at least 1 of the pharmacokinetic parameters of interest.

Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bosutinib Second-line 400 mg (Part 1 )
n=7 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 400 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 400 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 500 mg (Part 1 )
n=7 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 500 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 500 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 600 mg (Part 1 )
n=3 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 600 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 600 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred.
Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) - Part 1
16.82 hour
Standard Deviation 2.37
16.90 hour
Standard Deviation 2.47
17.27 hour
Standard Deviation 3.64

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Before and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours after administration on Day 1, and before and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours after administration on Day 15

Population: The pharmacokinetic parameter population was defined as all participants who received at least 1 dose of bosutinib and had at least 1 of the pharmacokinetic parameters of interest. n= number of participants analyzed.

Area under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero to infinity. AUC on Day 15 was assessed as the steady state AUC.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bosutinib Second-line 400 mg (Part 1 )
n=7 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 400 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 400 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 500 mg (Part 1 )
n=7 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 500 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 500 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 600 mg (Part 1 )
n=3 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 600 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 600 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred.
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) - Part 1
Day 1 (n = 7, 7, 3)
2474 nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng•hr/mL)
Standard Deviation 482.7
2720 nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng•hr/mL)
Standard Deviation 560.4
2760 nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng•hr/mL)
Standard Deviation 625.9
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) - Part 1
Day 15 (n = 5, 4, 2)
2235 nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng•hr/mL)
Standard Deviation 220.1
3690 nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng•hr/mL)
Standard Deviation 962.1
3371 nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng•hr/mL)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation obtained by sampling distribution of 2 participants was not meaningful, hence not reported.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Before and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours after administration on Day 1, and before and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours after administration on Day 15

Population: The pharmacokinetic parameter population was defined as all participants who received at least 1 dose of bosutinib and had at least 1 of the pharmacokinetic parameters of interest. n= number of participants analyzed.

Clearance of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. Clearance obtained after oral dose (apparent oral clearance) is influenced by the fraction of the dose absorbed. Drug clearance is a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the blood. CL/F on Day 15 was assessed as the steady state CL/F.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bosutinib Second-line 400 mg (Part 1 )
n=7 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 400 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 400 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 500 mg (Part 1 )
n=7 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 500 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 500 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 600 mg (Part 1 )
n=3 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 600 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 600 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred.
Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) - Part 1
Day 1 (n = 7, 7, 3)
167 L/hr
Standard Deviation 34.6
190 L/hr
Standard Deviation 37.8
224 L/hr
Standard Deviation 45.7
Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) - Part 1
Day 15 (n = 5, 4, 2)
180 L/hr
Standard Deviation 17.4
144 L/hr
Standard Deviation 41.8
179 L/hr
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation obtained by sampling distribution of 2 participants was not meaningful, hence not reported.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Before and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours after administration on Day 1

Population: The pharmacokinetic parameter population was defined as all participants who received at least 1 dose of bosutinib and had at least 1 of the pharmacokinetic parameters of interest.

Volume of distribution is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired plasma concentration of a drug. Apparent volume of distribution after oral dose (Vz/F) is influenced by the fraction absorbed.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bosutinib Second-line 400 mg (Part 1 )
n=7 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 400 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 400 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 500 mg (Part 1 )
n=7 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 500 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 500 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 600 mg (Part 1 )
n=3 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 600 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 600 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred.
Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) - Part 1
4035 liter
Standard Deviation 879.8
4570 liter
Standard Deviation 713.8
5707 liter
Standard Deviation 2187

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Before and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours after administration on Day 1, and before and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours after administration on Day 15

Population: The pharmacokinetic parameter population was defined as all participants who received at least 1 dose of bosutinib and had at least 1 of the pharmacokinetic parameters of interest.

R=accumulation ratio (AUCss on Day 15/AUC\[0-24\] on Day 1)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bosutinib Second-line 400 mg (Part 1 )
n=5 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 400 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 400 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 500 mg (Part 1 )
n=4 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 500 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 500 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 600 mg (Part 1 )
n=2 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 600 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 600 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred.
Accumulation Ratio (R) - Part 1
1.67 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.369
2.16 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.556
2.46 ratio
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was Standard deviation obtained by sampling distribution of 2 participants was not meaningful, hence not reported.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24

Population: All treated population was defined as all participants who received at least 1 dose of bosutinib.

Cytogenetic response (CyR) is based on the prevalence of Philadelphia positive (Ph+) cells. Major cytogenetic response was categorized as either complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) or partial cytogenetic response (PCyR). CCyR was achieved when there was 0 percent (%) Ph+ cells and PCyR was achieved when 1 to 35% Ph+ cells. The responder for maintained MCyR included 'participants without baseline response who had a response at a specified time' and 'participants with baseline response who had a post-baseline response either maintained or improved at a specified time'.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bosutinib Second-line 400 mg (Part 1 )
n=28 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 400 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 400 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 500 mg (Part 1 )
n=7 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 500 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 500 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 600 mg (Part 1 )
n=11 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 600 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 600 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred.
Percentage of Participants With Maintained Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR) at Week 24 in Chronic Phase Second-line and Third-line Cohort - Part 2
64.3 percentage of participants
Interval 44.1 to 81.4
14.3 percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 57.9
63.6 percentage of participants
Interval 30.8 to 89.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24

Population: All treated population was defined as all participants who received at least 1 dose of bosutinib.

Cytogenetic response (CyR) is based on the prevalence of Philadelphia positive (Ph+) cells. Major cytogenetic response was categorized as either complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) or partial cytogenetic response (PCyR). CCyR was achieved when there was 0 percent (%) Ph+ cells and PCyR was achieved when 1 to 35% Ph+ cells.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bosutinib Second-line 400 mg (Part 1 )
n=7 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 400 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 400 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 500 mg (Part 1 )
n=7 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 500 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 500 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 600 mg (Part 1 )
n=3 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 600 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 600 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred.
Percentage of Participants With Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR) at Week 24 - Part 1
42.9 percentage of participants
Interval 9.9 to 81.6
57.1 percentage of participants
Interval 18.4 to 90.1
33.3 percentage of participants
Interval 0.8 to 90.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24

Population: All treated population was defined as all participants who received at least 1 dose of bosutinib.

Cytogenetic response (CyR) is based on the prevalence of Philadelphia positive (Ph+) cells. Major cytogenetic response was categorized as either complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) or partial cytogenetic response (PCyR). CCyR was achieved when there was 0 percent (%) Ph+ cells and PCyR was achieved when 1 to 35% Ph+ cells.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bosutinib Second-line 400 mg (Part 1 )
n=11 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 400 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 400 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 500 mg (Part 1 )
Single oral dose of bosutinib 500 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 500 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 600 mg (Part 1 )
Single oral dose of bosutinib 600 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 600 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred.
Percentage of Participants With Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR) at Week 24 in Chronic Phase Third-line Cohort - Part 2
18.2 percentage of participants
Interval 2.3 to 51.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 204 weeks in the second-line participants and 48 weeks in the third-line participants

Population: Subset of participants who had the response among all treated population

Time to MCyR was the interval from the date of first dose of study medication until the first date of achieving a given response. Time to response in weeks = (event date minus first dose date plus 1)/7, where the event date is the non-missing date of the first attained response or last cytogenetic assessment date of a participants.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bosutinib Second-line 400 mg (Part 1 )
n=13 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 400 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 400 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 500 mg (Part 1 )
n=2 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 500 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 500 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 600 mg (Part 1 )
Single oral dose of bosutinib 600 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 600 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred.
Time to Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR) in Chronic Phase Second-line and Third-line Cohort - Part 2
12.3 weeks
Interval 12.0 to 24.1
18.1 weeks
Interval 12.1 to 24.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 204 weeks in the second-line participants and 48 weeks in the third-line participants

Population: Subset of participants who had the response among all treated population

Duration of MCyR was defined as the interval from the date of the earliest demonstration of a response, until the earliest date of loss of that response. Duration of response in weeks = (date of confirmed loss of first attained response minus date of first attained response)/7 days.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bosutinib Second-line 400 mg (Part 1 )
n=13 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 400 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 400 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 500 mg (Part 1 )
n=2 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 500 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 500 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 600 mg (Part 1 )
Single oral dose of bosutinib 600 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 600 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred.
Duration of Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR) in Chronic Phase Second-line and Third-line Cohort - Part 2
NA weeks
Median and 95% CI was not estimable due to the small number of responders who lost the response.
NA weeks
Median and 95% CI was not estimable due to the small number of responders who lost the response.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 192

Population: All treated population was defined as all participants who received at least 1 dose of bosutinib.

CHR response was considered to be achieved if participants met all of the following criteria: White Blood Cells =\< institutional upper limit of normal, no peripheral blood blasts or promyelocytes, myelocytes+metamyelocytes \<5% in blood, absolute neutrophil count \>=1.0\*10\^9 per liter (/L), platelets \>=100 but \<450\*10\^9/L, \<20% basophils in blood and no extramedulary involvement (including hepato- or splenomegaly), =\<5% BM blasts.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bosutinib Second-line 400 mg (Part 1 )
n=7 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 400 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 400 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 500 mg (Part 1 )
Single oral dose of bosutinib 500 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 500 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 600 mg (Part 1 )
Single oral dose of bosutinib 600 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 600 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred.
Percentage of Participants With Complete Hematologic Response (CHR) up to Week 192 in Advance Phase Second-line Cohort - Part 2
14.3 percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 57.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 192

Population: Subset of participants who had the response among all treated population.

The time to CHR was measured from the date of first dosing to the first date of response. Time to response in weeks = (event date - first dose date plus 1)/7, where the event date is the non-missing date of the first attained response or last assessment date of a participant.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bosutinib Second-line 400 mg (Part 1 )
n=1 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 400 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 400 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 500 mg (Part 1 )
Single oral dose of bosutinib 500 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 500 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 600 mg (Part 1 )
Single oral dose of bosutinib 600 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 600 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred.
Time to Achieve Complete Hematologic Response (CHR) in Advanced Phase Second-line Cohort - Part 2
84.0 weeks
Only 1 participant was analyzed, therefore, 95% CI was not calculated

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 192

Population: Subset of participants who had the response among all treated population

The duration of CHR was defined as the interval from the first date of response until the first date of confirmed loss of response. Duration of response in weeks =(date of confirmed loss of first attained response - date of first attained response)/7.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bosutinib Second-line 400 mg (Part 1 )
n=1 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 400 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 400 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 500 mg (Part 1 )
Single oral dose of bosutinib 500 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 500 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 600 mg (Part 1 )
Single oral dose of bosutinib 600 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 600 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred.
Duration of Complete Hematologic Response (CHR) in Advanced Phase Second-line Cohort - Part 2
95.3 weeks
Only 1 participant was analyzed, therefore, 95% CI was not calculated

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 192

Population: Subset of the third-line cohort who was in accelerated or blast phase

OHR included CHR, no evidence of leukemia (NEL), minor hematologic response (MiHR) or return to chronic phase (RCP), participants had to meet at least 1 of this criterion. Criteria for RCP: disappearance of features defining AP/BP, but still in CP and persistence of clonal evolution. Criteria for MiHR: \<15% blasts in blood and bone marrow, \<30% blasts+promyelocytes in blood and bone marrow, \<20% basophils in blood, no extramedullary disease other than liver/spleen. Criteria for CHR and NEL: \<20% basophils in blood, no extramedullary involvement including liver/spleen, no peripheral blasts or promyelocytes, myelocytes + metamyelocytes \<5% in blood, \<5% (NEL) and \<=5% (CHR) marrow blasts, 0.5\*10\^9 \<= Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \<1.0\*10\^9/L (NEL) and ANC\>=1.0\*10\^9/L (CHR), 20\*10\^9 \<=platelets\<100 \*10\^9/L (NEL) and platelets\>=100 but \<450x10\^9/L (CHR), white blood cells \<=institutional upper limit of the normal range.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bosutinib Second-line 400 mg (Part 1 )
n=1 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 400 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 400 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 500 mg (Part 1 )
Single oral dose of bosutinib 500 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 500 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 600 mg (Part 1 )
Single oral dose of bosutinib 600 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 600 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred.
Percentage of Participants With Overall Hematologic Response (OHR) Up to Week 192 in Accelerated Phase/Blast Phase Third-line Cohort - Part 2
100 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 192

Population: Subset of participants who had the response among all treated population and who was in accelerated or blast phase in the third-line cohort

The time to OHR was measured from the date of first dosing to the first date of response. Time to response in weeks = (event date - first dose date plus 1)/7, where the event date is the non-missing date of the first attained response or last assessment date of a participant.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bosutinib Second-line 400 mg (Part 1 )
n=1 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 400 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 400 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 500 mg (Part 1 )
Single oral dose of bosutinib 500 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 500 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 600 mg (Part 1 )
Single oral dose of bosutinib 600 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 600 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred.
Time to Achieve Overall Hematologic Response (OHR) in Accelerated Phase/Blast Phase Third-line Cohort - Part 2
12.4 weeks
Only 1 participant was analyzed, therefore, 95% CI was not calculated

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 192

Population: Subset of participants who had the response among all treated population and who was in accelerated or blast phase in the third-line cohort

The duration of OHR was defined as the interval from the first date of response until the first date of confirmed loss of response. Duration of response in weeks =(date of confirmed loss of first attained response - date of first attained response)/7.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bosutinib Second-line 400 mg (Part 1 )
n=1 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 400 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 400 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 500 mg (Part 1 )
Single oral dose of bosutinib 500 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 500 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 600 mg (Part 1 )
Single oral dose of bosutinib 600 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 600 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred.
Duration of Overall Hematologic Response (OHR) in Accelerated Phase/Blast Phase Third-line Cohort - Part 2
36.1 weeks
Only 1 participant was analyzed, therefore, 95% CI was not calculated.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Date of first dose of study drug up to Week 336 in primary second line participants; up to Week 192 in advanced second line and exploratory third line participants

Population: All treated population was defined as all participants who received at least 1 dose of bosutinib.

TTF was the interval from the date of first dose of bosutinib until the earlier date of progression or death (any cause), withdrawal from treatment owing to an AE, subject refusal, or loss to follow-up (censored at the last contact date), or further anti-tumor therapy before documented progression (whichever occurred first). TTF rate indicates the probability of no treatment failure. Percent of participants with no treatment failure were estimated.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bosutinib Second-line 400 mg (Part 1 )
n=28 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 400 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 400 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 500 mg (Part 1 )
n=7 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 500 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 500 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 600 mg (Part 1 )
n=11 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 600 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 600 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred.
Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) Rate - Part 2
Week 288
45.9 percentage of participants
Interval 24.9 to 67.0
NA percentage of participants
Data was not collected as participants were only assessed up to Week 192.
NA percentage of participants
Data was not collected as participants were only assessed up to Week 192.
Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) Rate - Part 2
Week 48
67.9 percentage of participants
Interval 50.6 to 85.2
14.3 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 40.2
81.8 percentage of participants
Interval 59.0 to 100.0
Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) Rate - Part 2
Week 96
60.7 percentage of participants
Interval 42.6 to 78.8
14.3 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 40.2
72.7 percentage of participants
Interval 46.4 to 99.0
Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) Rate - Part 2
Week 144
57.1 percentage of participants
Interval 38.8 to 75.5
14.3 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 40.2
63.6 percentage of participants
Interval 35.2 to 92.1
Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) Rate - Part 2
Week 192
53.6 percentage of participants
Interval 35.1 to 72.0
NA percentage of participants
TTF rate and 95% CI was not calculated as all participants were discontinued the follow up by Week 179.
NA percentage of participants
TTF rate and 95% CI was not calculated as all participants were discontinued the follow up by Week 160.
Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) Rate - Part 2
Week 240
53.6 percentage of participants
Interval 35.1 to 72.0
NA percentage of participants
Data was not collected as participants were only assessed up to Week 192.
NA percentage of participants
Data was not collected as participants were only assessed up to Week 192.
Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) Rate - Part 2
Week 336
NA percentage of participants
TTF rate and 95% CI was not calculated as all participants were discontinued the follow up by Week 312.
NA percentage of participants
Data was not collected as participants were only assessed up to Week 192.
NA percentage of participants
Data was not collected as participants were only assessed up to Week 192.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Date of first dose of study drug up to Week 336 in primary second line participants; up to Week 192 in advanced second line and exploratory third line participants

Population: All treated population was defined as all participants who received at least 1 dose of bosutinib.

PFS was based on Kaplan-Meier estimates. PFS was defined as time in weeks from start of study treatment to treatment discontinuation due to disease progression as assessed by the investigator. Tumor progression was determined from oncologic assessment data (where data meet the criteria for progressive disease \[PD\]), or from death case report forms (CRFs). Percent of participants with PFS were estimated.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bosutinib Second-line 400 mg (Part 1 )
n=28 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 400 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 400 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 500 mg (Part 1 )
n=7 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 500 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 500 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 600 mg (Part 1 )
n=11 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 600 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 600 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred.
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Rate - Part 2
Week 48
100 percentage of participants
Interval 100.0 to 100.0
21.4 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 56.3
100 percentage of participants
Interval 100.0 to 100.0
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Rate - Part 2
Week 96
94.4 percentage of participants
Interval 83.9 to 100.0
21.4 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 56.3
88.9 percentage of participants
Interval 68.4 to 100.0
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Rate - Part 2
Week 144
94.4 percentage of participants
Interval 83.9 to 100.0
21.4 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 56.3
88.9 percentage of participants
Interval 68.4 to 100.0
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Rate - Part 2
Week 192
94.4 percentage of participants
Interval 83.9 to 100.0
NA percentage of participants
PFS rate and 95% CI was not calculated as all participants were discontinued the follow up by Week 179.
NA percentage of participants
PFS rate and 95% CI was not calculated as all participants were discontinued the follow up by Week 160.
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Rate - Part 2
Week 240
94.4 percentage of participants
Interval 83.9 to 100.0
NA percentage of participants
Data was not collected as participants were only assessed up to Week 192.
NA percentage of participants
Data was not collected as participants were only assessed up to Week 192.
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Rate - Part 2
Week 288
94.4 percentage of participants
Interval 83.9 to 100.0
NA percentage of participants
Data was not collected as participants were only assessed up to Week 192.
NA percentage of participants
Data was not collected as participants were only assessed up to Week 192.
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Rate - Part 2
Week 336
NA percentage of participants
PFS rate and 95% CI was not calculated as all participants were discontinued the follow up by Week 312.
NA percentage of participants
Data was not collected as participants were only assessed up to Week 192.
NA percentage of participants
Data was not collected as participants were only assessed up to Week 192.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Date of first dose of study drug up to Week 336 in primary second line participants; up to Week 192 in advanced second line and exploratory third line participants

Population: All treated population was defined as all participants who received at least 1 dose of bosutinib.

OS was based on Kaplan-Meier method. Survival was defined as the time period from the date of first dose of bosutinib to the date of death, censored at the participant's last contact date. Percent of participants with OS were estimated.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bosutinib Second-line 400 mg (Part 1 )
n=28 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 400 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 400 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 500 mg (Part 1 )
n=7 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 500 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 500 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred. Intra-subject dose escalation up to 600 mg was allowed for lack of efficacy after the safety confirmation of 600 mg cohort.
Bosutinib Second-line 600 mg (Part 1 )
n=11 Participants
Single oral dose of bosutinib 600 mg on Day 1 and then bosutinib 600 mg orally once daily was administered continuously from Day 3 in participants with chronic phase second-line imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent occurred.
Overall Survival (OS) Rate - Part 2
Week 48
96.4 percentage of participants
Interval 89.6 to 100.0
42.9 percentage of participants
Interval 6.2 to 79.5
100 percentage of participants
Interval 100.0 to 100.0
Overall Survival (OS) Rate - Part 2
Week 96
96.4 percentage of participants
Interval 89.6 to 100.0
42.9 percentage of participants
Interval 6.2 to 79.5
100 percentage of participants
Interval 100.0 to 100.0
Overall Survival (OS) Rate - Part 2
Week 144
96.4 percentage of participants
Interval 89.6 to 100.0
28.6 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 62.0
100 percentage of participants
Interval 100.0 to 100.0
Overall Survival (OS) Rate - Part 2
Week 192
96.4 percentage of participants
Interval 89.6 to 100.0
NA percentage of participants
OS rate and 95% CI was not calculated as all participants were discontinued the follow up by Week 179.
NA percentage of participants
OS rate and 95% CI was not calculated as all participants were discontinued the follow up by Week 160.
Overall Survival (OS) Rate - Part 2
Week 240
96.4 percentage of participants
Interval 89.6 to 100.0
NA percentage of participants
Data was not collected as participants were only assessed up to Week 192.
NA percentage of participants
Data was not collected as participants were only assessed up to Week 192.
Overall Survival (OS) Rate - Part 2
Week 288
82.7 percentage of participants
Interval 57.0 to 100.0
NA percentage of participants
Data was not collected as participants were only assessed up to Week 192.
NA percentage of participants
Data was not collected as participants were only assessed up to Week 192.
Overall Survival (OS) Rate - Part 2
Week 336
NA percentage of participants
OS rate and 95% CI was not calculated as all participants were discontinued the follow up by Week 312.
NA percentage of participants
Data was not collected as participants were only assessed up to Week 192.
NA percentage of participants
Data was not collected as participants were only assessed up to Week 192.

Adverse Events

Total Second-line

Serious events: 19 serious events
Other events: 52 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Exploratory Third-line

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 11 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Total Population

Serious events: 21 serious events
Other events: 63 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Total Second-line
n=52 participants at risk
All participants who received bosutinib orally once daily in second-line chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), who were imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant.
Exploratory Third-line
n=11 participants at risk
All participants who received bosutinib 500 mg orally once daily in third-line chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), participants were with imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant followed by dasatinib or nilotinib resistant/refractory/intolerant.
Total Population
n=63 participants at risk
Total participants who were second-line or third-line chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML).
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
0.00%
0/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Eye disorders
Cataract
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
3.2%
2/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Eye disorders
Macular fibrosis
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
General disorders
Fatigue
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic function abnormal
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Liver injury
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Enterocolitis infectious
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
3.2%
2/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Pertussis
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia pneumococcal
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Spinal compression fracture
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteonecrosis
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bladder cancer
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bladder neoplasm
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Blast cell crisis
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal impairment
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
3.8%
2/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
3.2%
2/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleurisy
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Drug eruption
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Eye disorders
Macular hole
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Diverticulitis
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral haemorrhage
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Psychiatric disorders
Completed suicide
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Alveolitis allergic
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Total Second-line
n=52 participants at risk
All participants who received bosutinib orally once daily in second-line chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), who were imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant.
Exploratory Third-line
n=11 participants at risk
All participants who received bosutinib 500 mg orally once daily in third-line chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), participants were with imatinib resistant/refractory/intolerant followed by dasatinib or nilotinib resistant/refractory/intolerant.
Total Population
n=63 participants at risk
Total participants who were second-line or third-line chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML).
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
25.0%
13/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
20.6%
13/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Eosinophilia
5.8%
3/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
6.3%
4/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
21.2%
11/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
18.2%
2/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
20.6%
13/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphopenia
36.5%
19/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
45.5%
5/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
38.1%
24/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
23.1%
12/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
18.2%
2/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
22.2%
14/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
30.8%
16/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
18.2%
2/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
28.6%
18/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Eye disorders
Conjunctival haemorrhage
5.8%
3/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
3/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort
5.8%
3/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
3/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
13.5%
7/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
11.1%
7/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
3.8%
2/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
3/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
13.5%
7/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
18.2%
2/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
14.3%
9/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Cheilitis
0.00%
0/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
13.5%
7/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
11.1%
7/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dental caries
17.3%
9/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
18.2%
2/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
17.5%
11/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
96.2%
50/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
90.9%
10/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
95.2%
60/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
5.8%
3/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
18.2%
2/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
7.9%
5/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
13.5%
7/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
11.1%
7/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
36.5%
19/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
45.5%
5/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
38.1%
24/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Proctalgia
7.7%
4/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
6.3%
4/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
21.2%
11/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
19.0%
12/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
42.3%
22/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
36.5%
23/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
General disorders
Chest discomfort
5.8%
3/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
3/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
General disorders
Chills
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
3.2%
2/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
General disorders
Fatigue
13.5%
7/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
12.7%
8/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
General disorders
Malaise
5.8%
3/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
6.3%
4/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
General disorders
Pyrexia
23.1%
12/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
19.0%
12/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic function abnormal
13.5%
7/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
18.2%
2/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
14.3%
9/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Liver disorder
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
3.2%
2/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
7.7%
4/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
6.3%
4/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
5.8%
3/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
6.3%
4/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Folliculitis
5.8%
3/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
3/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
15.4%
8/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
12.7%
8/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Gingivitis
11.5%
6/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
11.1%
7/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Influenza
9.6%
5/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
7.9%
5/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
57.7%
30/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
54.5%
6/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
57.1%
36/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Otitis media
0.00%
0/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Periodontitis
5.8%
3/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
3/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
9.6%
5/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
7.9%
5/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arthropod sting
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
3.2%
2/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post-traumatic neck syndrome
0.00%
0/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
38.5%
20/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
36.4%
4/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
38.1%
24/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Investigations
Amylase increased
11.5%
6/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
11.1%
7/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
28.8%
15/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
36.4%
4/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
30.2%
19/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Investigations
Blood albumin decreased
7.7%
4/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
6.3%
4/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Investigations
Blood alkaline phosphatase increased
17.3%
9/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
18.2%
2/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
17.5%
11/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Investigations
Blood bilirubin increased
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
3.2%
2/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Investigations
Blood creatine phosphokinase decreased
5.8%
3/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
3/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Investigations
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased
11.5%
6/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
18.2%
2/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
12.7%
8/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
15.4%
8/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
12.7%
8/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Investigations
Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased
7.7%
4/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
18.2%
2/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.5%
6/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Investigations
Blood sodium decreased
5.8%
3/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
3/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Investigations
Electrocardiogram QT prolonged
0.00%
0/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
17.3%
9/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
15.9%
10/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Investigations
Haemoglobin decreased
11.5%
6/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.5%
6/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Investigations
Lipase increased
21.2%
11/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
36.4%
4/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
23.8%
15/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Investigations
Liver function test abnormal
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
3.2%
2/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
3.8%
2/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
3/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
5.8%
3/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
3/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Investigations
Weight decreased
17.3%
9/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
14.3%
9/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Investigations
White blood cell count decreased
5.8%
3/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
6.3%
4/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
26.9%
14/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
23.8%
15/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
7.7%
4/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
6.3%
4/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperlipidaemia
7.7%
4/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
6.3%
4/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypophosphataemia
25.0%
13/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
20.6%
13/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
5.8%
3/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
18.2%
2/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
7.9%
5/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc protrusion
5.8%
3/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
3/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness
5.8%
3/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
3/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
3.2%
2/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
3.2%
2/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
3.8%
2/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
3/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
7.7%
4/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
7.9%
5/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
3.2%
2/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
7.7%
4/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
6.3%
4/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal impairment
5.8%
3/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
3/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Renal and urinary disorders
Urogenital haemorrhage
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
3.2%
2/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
5.8%
3/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
6.3%
4/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
11.5%
6/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
18.2%
2/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
12.7%
8/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Upper respiratory tract inflammation
9.6%
5/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
7.9%
5/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acne
7.7%
4/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
6.3%
4/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
7.7%
4/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
7.9%
5/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Eczema
11.5%
6/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.5%
6/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
3.8%
2/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
3/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Generalised erythema
0.00%
0/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperkeratosis
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
3.2%
2/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Leukoderma
5.8%
3/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
3/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Photosensitivity reaction
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
18.2%
2/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
3/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
11.5%
6/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
18.2%
2/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
12.7%
8/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
59.6%
31/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
45.5%
5/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
57.1%
36/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Seborrhoeic dermatitis
9.6%
5/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
7.9%
5/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
7.7%
4/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
6.3%
4/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
11.5%
6/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.5%
6/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Iron deficiency anaemia
5.8%
3/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
3/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders
Pericardial effusion
7.7%
4/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
6.3%
4/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Eye disorders
Cataract
5.8%
3/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
6.3%
4/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Enterocolitis
5.8%
3/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
3/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis acute
0.00%
0/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Periodontal disease
5.8%
3/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
3/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Conjunctivitis
5.8%
3/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
6.3%
4/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Epididymitis
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
3.2%
2/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
5.8%
3/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
3/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
3.2%
2/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
5.8%
3/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
3/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Investigations
Blood potassium increased
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
3.2%
2/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Investigations
Blood uric acid increased
0.00%
0/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Investigations
Weight increased
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
3.2%
2/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthritis
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
3.2%
2/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
3.8%
2/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
3/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
3.8%
2/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
3/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
3.2%
2/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Neuropathy peripheral
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
3.2%
2/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Renal and urinary disorders
Pollakiuria
1.9%
1/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
3.2%
2/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Benign prostatic hyperplasia
0.00%
0/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Eczema asteatotic
7.7%
4/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
6.3%
4/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema nodosum
0.00%
0/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pigmentation disorder
3.8%
2/52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
1/11
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
3/63
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.

Additional Information

Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center

Pfizer, Inc.

Phone: 1-800-718-1021

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER