Study Of The Safety And Efficacy Video Assisted Submandibular Gland Resection Using A New Two Step Technique

NCT00798863 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 12

Last updated 2009-07-15

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The study addresses a problem that face surgeons who perform key-hole surgery to resect the submandibular salivary gland. The problem is the narrow space available around that gland. This does not allow for a safe operation. The study aims to evaluate a new, two step resection technique, that should overcome this difficulty.

Conditions

  • Submandibular Gland Resection

Interventions

PROCEDURE

video assisted submandibular sialadenectomy

Step 1: A 15 to 20 mm skin incision is performed. The anterior part of the gland is then dissected off the mylohyoid muscle. The superficial part of the gland is dissected free. Now, the free superficial part of the gland is resected .Step 2: The scope is inserted into the wound to view the deeper part of the gland. The latter is dissected and removed after identifying the tendon of the digastric muscle, the hypoglossal nerve, the lingual nerve and the submandibular duct. The lingual nerve is released from its attachment to the gland. The submandibular duct is ligated using 3/0 vicryl. The deep part of the gland is extracted through the wound. Hemostasis is secured.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Alexandria

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Yasser Hamza, A professor · University of Alexandria

Study Design

Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2007-01-31
Primary Completion
2009-05-31
Completion
2009-05-31

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00798863 on ClinicalTrials.gov