Trial Outcomes & Findings for Prevention Study in Adult Patients Suffering From Migraine Headaches (NCT NCT00742209)
NCT ID: NCT00742209
Last Updated: 2013-07-22
Results Overview
A migraine headache day is defined as a calendar day with any occurrence of migraine headache pain of at least 30 minutes in duration. Change from baseline was calculated as the mean number of MHD over the last 4 weeks of treatment prior to taper minus the number at baseline using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF). The last 4-week treatment phase is based on the last 4 weeks prior to taper for each participant.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
526 participants
Baseline and last 4 weeks of treatment prior to taper (up to Week 17)
2013-07-22
Participant Flow
There were 3 subjects who were randomized but did not take investigational product, and, therefore, were not included in the Safety, Intent to Treat (ITT), or Per Protocol (PP) population.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Oral GEn (XP13512) placebo
|
GEn 1200 mg
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Weeks 2-17: 1200 mg/day.
|
GEn 1800 mg
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Weeks 3-17: 1800 mg/day
|
GEn 2400 mg
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4-17: 2400 mg/day
|
GEn 3000 mg
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4: 2400 mg/day. Weeks 5-17: 3000 mg/day.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
129
|
67
|
134
|
134
|
62
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
95
|
49
|
88
|
97
|
37
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
34
|
18
|
46
|
37
|
25
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
Oral GEn (XP13512) placebo
|
GEn 1200 mg
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Weeks 2-17: 1200 mg/day.
|
GEn 1800 mg
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Weeks 3-17: 1800 mg/day
|
GEn 2400 mg
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4-17: 2400 mg/day
|
GEn 3000 mg
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4: 2400 mg/day. Weeks 5-17: 3000 mg/day.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
11
|
4
|
17
|
16
|
13
|
|
Overall Study
Participant Withdrew Consent
|
8
|
4
|
14
|
7
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
6
|
5
|
4
|
5
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
5
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
6
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Investigator Discretion
|
0
|
0
|
5
|
1
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Prevention Study in Adult Patients Suffering From Migraine Headaches
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=128 Participants
Oral GEn (XP13512) placebo on Weeks 1-17
|
GEn 1200 mg
n=66 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Weeks 2-17: 1200 mg/day.
|
GEn 1800 mg
n=134 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Weeks 3-17: 1800 mg/day.
|
GEn 2400 mg
n=133 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4-17: 2400 mg/day.
|
GEn 3000 mg
n=62 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4: 2400 mg/day. Weeks 5-17: 3000 mg/day.
|
Total
n=523 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age Continuous
|
41.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.72 • n=99 Participants
|
39.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.74 • n=107 Participants
|
37.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.75 • n=206 Participants
|
39.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.04 • n=7 Participants
|
39.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.78 • n=31 Participants
|
39.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.61 • n=30 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
111 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
115 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
105 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
46 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
429 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
17 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
94 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
108 participants
n=99 Participants
|
54 participants
n=107 Participants
|
107 participants
n=206 Participants
|
112 participants
n=7 Participants
|
53 participants
n=31 Participants
|
434 participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American/African Heritage (AA)
|
11 participants
n=99 Participants
|
8 participants
n=107 Participants
|
15 participants
n=206 Participants
|
11 participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 participants
n=31 Participants
|
51 participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian (AI) or Alaska Native (AN)
|
2 participants
n=99 Participants
|
1 participants
n=107 Participants
|
3 participants
n=206 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=31 Participants
|
7 participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
4 participants
n=99 Participants
|
3 participants
n=107 Participants
|
6 participants
n=206 Participants
|
6 participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 participants
n=31 Participants
|
22 participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander
|
1 participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=31 Participants
|
1 participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
AA/African Heritage and AI or AN and White
|
0 participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 participants
n=206 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=31 Participants
|
1 participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
AA/African Heritage and White
|
0 participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 participants
n=107 Participants
|
2 participants
n=206 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=31 Participants
|
3 participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
AI or AN and White
|
1 participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 participants
n=107 Participants
|
1 participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=31 Participants
|
2 participants
n=30 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian and White
|
1 participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 participants
n=206 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=31 Participants
|
2 participants
n=30 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and last 4 weeks of treatment prior to taper (up to Week 17)Population: Intent to treat (ITT). There were 3 subjects who were randomized but did not take investigational product, and, therefore were not included in the Safety, ITT, or Per Protocol (PP) population.
A migraine headache day is defined as a calendar day with any occurrence of migraine headache pain of at least 30 minutes in duration. Change from baseline was calculated as the mean number of MHD over the last 4 weeks of treatment prior to taper minus the number at baseline using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF). The last 4-week treatment phase is based on the last 4 weeks prior to taper for each participant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=128 Participants
Oral GEn (XP13512) placebo
|
Average of GEn 1800/2400 mg
n=261 Participants
Average of GEn 1800 mg group and GEn 2400 mg group
|
GEn 1800 mg
n=131 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Weeks 3-17: 1800 mg/day
|
GEn 2400 mg
n=130 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4-17: 2400 mg/day
|
GEn 3000 mg
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4: 2400 mg/day. Weeks 5-17: 3000 mg/day
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in the Number of Migraine Headache Days (MHD) During the Last 4 Weeks of Treatment Prior to Taper
|
-3.8 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.38
|
-3.6 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.26
|
-3.8 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.37
|
-3.3 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.37
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and last 4 weeks of treatment prior to taper (up to Week 17)Population: ITT Population
A migraine headache day is defined as a calendar day with any occurrence of migraine headache pain of at least 30 minutes in duration. Change from baseline and the last 4 weeks of treatment prior to taper were calculated means of the number of migraine headache days using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF). Change from baseline is calculated as post-baseline minus baseline. The last 4-week treatment phase is based on the last 4 weeks prior to taper for each participant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=124 Participants
Oral GEn (XP13512) placebo
|
Average of GEn 1800/2400 mg
n=59 Participants
Average of GEn 1800 mg group and GEn 2400 mg group
|
GEn 1800 mg
n=119 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Weeks 3-17: 1800 mg/day
|
GEn 2400 mg
n=124 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4-17: 2400 mg/day
|
GEn 3000 mg
n=59 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4: 2400 mg/day. Weeks 5-17: 3000 mg/day
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Number of MHD in All Study Phases
Baseline to Titration(n=124, 59, 119, 124, 59)
|
-2.434 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.3621
|
-1.920 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.5224
|
-2.431 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.3375
|
-2.573 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.3352
|
-2.325 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.5055
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Number of MHD in All Study Phases
Baseline to 2nd 4-Week (n=124, 59, 119, 124, 59)
|
-3.595 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.3784
|
-2.739 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.6897
|
-3.953 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.3794
|
-3.360 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.4201
|
-3.520 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.5669
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Number of MHD in All Study Phases
Baseline to 3rd 4-Week (n=124, 59, 119, 124, 59)
|
-3.865 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.3992
|
-3.171 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.6660
|
-3.9888 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.3810
|
-3.439 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.4483
|
-3.220 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.6594
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Number of MHD in All Study Phases
Baseline to Maint Phase (n=112, 54, 101, 107)
|
-3.846 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.3589
|
-2.854 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.6565
|
-4.047 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.3368
|
-3.794 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.3761
|
-3.723 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.6492
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Number of MHD in All Study Phases
Baseline to Treat Phase (n=118, 56, 113, 118, 56)
|
-3.396 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.3422
|
-2.834 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.5640
|
-3.579 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.3140
|
-3.393 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.3388
|
-3.193 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.5165
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Number of MHD in All Study Phases
Baseline to 1st 4-Week (n=124, 59, 119,124, 59)
|
-3.147 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.4043
|
-2.191 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.6758
|
-3.424 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.3204
|
-3.419 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.3941
|
-2.974 Migraine Headache Days (MHD)
Standard Error 0.5522
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and last 4 weeks of treatment prior to taper (up to Week 17)Population: ITT Population
A migraine attack is defined as a migraine headache of at least 30 minutes in duration and may also include recurring non-migraine or migraine headaches . Change from baseline and the last 4 weeks of treatment prior to taper were calculated means of the number of migraine attacks using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF). The last 4-week treatment phase is based on the last 4 weeks prior to taper for each participant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=120 Participants
Oral GEn (XP13512) placebo
|
Average of GEn 1800/2400 mg
n=59 Participants
Average of GEn 1800 mg group and GEn 2400 mg group
|
GEn 1800 mg
n=114 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Weeks 3-17: 1800 mg/day
|
GEn 2400 mg
n=123 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4-17: 2400 mg/day
|
GEn 3000 mg
n=58 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4: 2400 mg/day. Weeks 5-17: 3000 mg/day
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in the Number of Migraine Attacks
|
-2.2 Migraine Attacks
Standard Error 0.15
|
-2.2 Migraine Attacks
Standard Error 0.22
|
-2.3 Migraine Attacks
Standard Error 0.16
|
-2.1 Migraine Attacks
Standard Error 0.15
|
-2.6 Migraine Attacks
Standard Error 0.22
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and last 4 weeks of treatment prior to taper (up to Week 17)Population: ITT Population
A migraine headache period is a 24-hour block of time that begins at the onset of a migraine event . The 24-hour period is not linked directly with a calendar day. The change from baseline and the last 4 weeks of treatment prior to taper were calculated means of the number of migraine headache periods using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF). The last 4-week treatment phase is based on the last 4 weeks prior to taper for each participant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=120 Participants
Oral GEn (XP13512) placebo
|
Average of GEn 1800/2400 mg
n=59 Participants
Average of GEn 1800 mg group and GEn 2400 mg group
|
GEn 1800 mg
n=114 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Weeks 3-17: 1800 mg/day
|
GEn 2400 mg
n=123 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4-17: 2400 mg/day
|
GEn 3000 mg
n=58 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4: 2400 mg/day. Weeks 5-17: 3000 mg/day
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Number of Migraine Headache Periods (MHP)
|
-3.3 Migraine Headache Periods (MHP)
Standard Error 0.35
|
-3.0 Migraine Headache Periods (MHP)
Standard Error 0.50
|
-3.6 Migraine Headache Periods (MHP)
Standard Error 0.36
|
-3.0 Migraine Headache Periods (MHP)
Standard Error 0.34
|
-3.2 Migraine Headache Periods (MHP)
Standard Error 0.50
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and last 4 weeks of treatment prior to taper (up to Week 17)Population: ITT Population
The total duration of a migraine attack is measured from migraine attack onset until the resolution of the attack measured in hours and may include more than 1 headache event. The duration is assessed using a Daily Migraine Diary. Change from baseline and the last 4 weeks of treatment prior to taper were calculated means of the number of migraine headache days using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF). Change from baseline is calculated as post-baseline minus baseline. The last 4-week treatment phase is based on the last 4 weeks prior to taper for each participant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=99 Participants
Oral GEn (XP13512) placebo
|
Average of GEn 1800/2400 mg
n=52 Participants
Average of GEn 1800 mg group and GEn 2400 mg group
|
GEn 1800 mg
n=89 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Weeks 3-17: 1800 mg/day
|
GEn 2400 mg
n=102 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4-17: 2400 mg/day
|
GEn 3000 mg
n=44 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4: 2400 mg/day. Weeks 5-17: 3000 mg/day
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Migraine Attack Duration
|
-0.97 Hours
Standard Error 3.355
|
3.01 Hours
Standard Error 5.720
|
-2.93 Hours
Standard Error 3.658
|
2.59 Hours
Standard Error 5.000
|
9.82 Hours
Standard Error 9.975
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and last 4 weeks of treatment prior to taper (up to Week 17)Population: ITT Population
Peak Migraine Pain Severity was measured using a 4-point scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, or 3=severe) on a participant self assessed Daily Migraine Diary. The scale measured the maximum pain severity across all headache events considered to be one attack.. Change from baseline and the last 4 weeks of treatment prior to taper were calculated means of the number of migraine headache days using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF). The last 4-week treatment phase is based on the last 4 weeks prior to taper for each participant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=99 Participants
Oral GEn (XP13512) placebo
|
Average of GEn 1800/2400 mg
n=52 Participants
Average of GEn 1800 mg group and GEn 2400 mg group
|
GEn 1800 mg
n=89 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Weeks 3-17: 1800 mg/day
|
GEn 2400 mg
n=102 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4-17: 2400 mg/day
|
GEn 3000 mg
n=62 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4: 2400 mg/day. Weeks 5-17: 3000 mg/day
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Mean Peak Migraine Pain Severity
|
-0.12 Scores on a Scale
Standard Error 0.058
|
-0.13 Scores on a Scale
Standard Error 0.086
|
-0.12 Scores on a Scale
Standard Error 0.055
|
-0.04 Scores on a Scale
Standard Error 0.050
|
-0.09 Scores on a Scale
Standard Error 0.080
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and last 4 weeks of treatment prior to taper (up to Week 17)Population: ITT Population
The Number of Days of Acute Migraine Medication Use was assessed via the participant-assessed Daily Migraine Diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=120 Participants
Oral GEn (XP13512) placebo
|
Average of GEn 1800/2400 mg
n=59 Participants
Average of GEn 1800 mg group and GEn 2400 mg group
|
GEn 1800 mg
n=114 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Weeks 3-17: 1800 mg/day
|
GEn 2400 mg
n=123 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4-17: 2400 mg/day
|
GEn 3000 mg
n=58 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4: 2400 mg/day. Weeks 5-17: 3000 mg/day
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline to the Last 4-Week Treatment Phase in the Number of Days of Acute Migraine Medication Use
|
-2.0 Days
Standard Error 0.28
|
-2.3 Days
Standard Error 0.39
|
-2.7 Days
Standard Error 0.28
|
-2.2 Days
Standard Error 0.27
|
-2.1 Days
Standard Error 0.40
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and last 4 weeks of treatment prior to taper (up to Week 17)Population: ITT Population
The Number of Acute Migraine Medication Doses Administered was captured via the participant-assessed Daily Migraine Diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=120 Participants
Oral GEn (XP13512) placebo
|
Average of GEn 1800/2400 mg
n=59 Participants
Average of GEn 1800 mg group and GEn 2400 mg group
|
GEn 1800 mg
n=114 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Weeks 3-17: 1800 mg/day
|
GEn 2400 mg
n=123 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4-17: 2400 mg/day
|
GEn 3000 mg
n=58 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4: 2400 mg/day. Weeks 5-17: 3000 mg/day
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline to the Last 4-Week Treatment Phase in the Number of Acute Migraine Medication Doses Administered
|
-4.5 Acute Medication Doses Admin.
Standard Error 0.69
|
-4.8 Acute Medication Doses Admin.
Standard Error 0.97
|
-5.8 Acute Medication Doses Admin.
Standard Error 0.70
|
-5.1 Acute Medication Doses Admin.
Standard Error 0.67
|
-4.5 Acute Medication Doses Admin.
Standard Error 0.69
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and last 4 weeks of treatment prior to taper (up to Week 17)Population: ITT Population
The Number of Acute Migraine Medication Administered was measured via the participant-assessed Daily Migraine Diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=120 Participants
Oral GEn (XP13512) placebo
|
Average of GEn 1800/2400 mg
n=59 Participants
Average of GEn 1800 mg group and GEn 2400 mg group
|
GEn 1800 mg
n=114 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Weeks 3-17: 1800 mg/day
|
GEn 2400 mg
n=123 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4-17: 2400 mg/day
|
GEn 3000 mg
n=58 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4: 2400 mg/day. Weeks 5-17: 3000 mg/day
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline to the Last 4-Week Treatment Phase in the Number of Acute Migraine Medication Doses Administered by Triptan Use
Triptan Use (n= 72, 30, 65, 63, 32)
|
-3.3 Acute Migraine Medication Dose
Standard Error 0.88
|
-2.9 Acute Migraine Medication Dose
Standard Error 1.35
|
-4.9 Acute Migraine Medication Dose
Standard Error 0.91
|
-4.3 Acute Migraine Medication Dose
Standard Error 0.93
|
-2.6 Acute Migraine Medication Dose
Standard Error 1.31
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline to the Last 4-Week Treatment Phase in the Number of Acute Migraine Medication Doses Administered by Triptan Use
Not a Triptan User (n = 48, 29, 49, 60, 26)
|
-6.3 Acute Migraine Medication Dose
Standard Error 1.06
|
-6.7 Acute Migraine Medication Dose
Standard Error 1.36
|
-6.9 Acute Migraine Medication Dose
Standard Error 1.05
|
-6.0 Acute Migraine Medication Dose
Standard Error 0.95
|
-6.8 Acute Migraine Medication Dose
Standard Error 1.44
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and last 4 weeks of treatment prior to taper (up to Week 17)Population: ITT Population
The Number of Acute Migraine Medication Doses Administered by Opioid Use was measured via the participant-assessed Daily Migraine Diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=120 Participants
Oral GEn (XP13512) placebo
|
Average of GEn 1800/2400 mg
n=59 Participants
Average of GEn 1800 mg group and GEn 2400 mg group
|
GEn 1800 mg
n=114 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Weeks 3-17: 1800 mg/day
|
GEn 2400 mg
n=123 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4-17: 2400 mg/day
|
GEn 3000 mg
n=58 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4: 2400 mg/day. Weeks 5-17: 3000 mg/day
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline to the Last 4-Week Treatment Phase in the Number of Acute Migraine Medication Doses Administered by Opioid Use
Opioid Use (n=20, 7, 14, 26, 10)
|
-1.7 Days
Standard Error 1.66
|
1.4 Days
Standard Error 2.81
|
-3.2 Days
Standard Error 1.97
|
-6.0 Days
Standard Error 1.45
|
-5.1 Days
Standard Error 2.34
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline to the Last 4-Week Treatment Phase in the Number of Acute Migraine Medication Doses Administered by Opioid Use
Non-Opioid Use (n=100, 52, 100, 97, 48)
|
-5.1 Days
Standard Error 0.75
|
-5.7 Days
Standard Error 0.75
|
-6.2 Days
Standard Error 0.74
|
-4.9 Days
Standard Error 0.75
|
-4.4 Days
Standard Error 1.08
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and last 4 weeks of treatment prior to taper (up to Week 17)Population: ITT Population
The Number of Acute Migraine Medication Doses Administered by Prescription Headache Medication use was measured via the participant-assessed Daily Migraine Diary.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=120 Participants
Oral GEn (XP13512) placebo
|
Average of GEn 1800/2400 mg
n=59 Participants
Average of GEn 1800 mg group and GEn 2400 mg group
|
GEn 1800 mg
n=114 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Weeks 3-17: 1800 mg/day
|
GEn 2400 mg
n=123 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4-17: 2400 mg/day
|
GEn 3000 mg
n=58 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4: 2400 mg/day. Weeks 5-17: 3000 mg/day
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline to the Last 4-Week Treatment Phase in the Number of Acute Migraine Medication Doses Administered by Prescription Headache Medication Use
Uses Prescription HA meds (n=89, 38, 80, 88, 39)
|
-3.6 Acute Migraine Medication Doses
Standard Error 0.78
|
-3.5 Acute Migraine Medication Doses
Standard Error 1.19
|
-4.9 Acute Migraine Medication Doses
Standard Error 0.82
|
-4.0 Acute Migraine Medication Doses
Standard Error 0.78
|
-3.3 Acute Migraine Medication Doses
Standard Error 1.18
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline to the Last 4-Week Treatment Phase in the Number of Acute Migraine Medication Doses Administered by Prescription Headache Medication Use
Uses OTC HA meds only (n=31, 21, 34, 35, 19)
|
-6.9 Acute Migraine Medication Doses
Standard Error 1.31
|
-7.2 Acute Migraine Medication Doses
Standard Error 1.59
|
-7.8 Acute Migraine Medication Doses
Standard Error 1.25
|
-7.9 Acute Migraine Medication Doses
Standard Error 1.23
|
-6.9 Acute Migraine Medication Doses
Standard Error 1.68
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and last 4 weeks of treatment prior to taper (up to Week 17)Population: ITT Population
The endpoint is defined as the percentage of attacks with each symptom (separately) for each study phase. Migraine symptoms aura, nausea, vomiting, photophobia, and phonophobia are defined as the presence of each migraine symptom during any of the headache events within an attack.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=125 Participants
Oral GEn (XP13512) placebo
|
Average of GEn 1800/2400 mg
n=62 Participants
Average of GEn 1800 mg group and GEn 2400 mg group
|
GEn 1800 mg
n=123 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Weeks 3-17: 1800 mg/day
|
GEn 2400 mg
n=121 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4-17: 2400 mg/day
|
GEn 3000 mg
n=59 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4: 2400 mg/day. Weeks 5-17: 3000 mg/day
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Percentage of Migraine Attacks With Each of the Following Migraine Symptoms: Aura, Nausea, Vomiting, Photophobia, Phonophobia
Aura (n=99, 52, 89, 102, 44)
|
-7.4 Percentage of MA with migraine symptoms
Standard Error 3.640
|
-3.37 Percentage of MA with migraine symptoms
Standard Error 4.834
|
-7.43 Percentage of MA with migraine symptoms
Standard Error 3.230
|
-0.72 Percentage of MA with migraine symptoms
Standard Error 3.044
|
1.21 Percentage of MA with migraine symptoms
Standard Error 4.372
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Percentage of Migraine Attacks With Each of the Following Migraine Symptoms: Aura, Nausea, Vomiting, Photophobia, Phonophobia
Nausea (n=125, 62, 123, 121, 59)
|
-7.8 Percentage of MA with migraine symptoms
Standard Error 2.73
|
-3.6 Percentage of MA with migraine symptoms
Standard Error 3.92
|
-8.4 Percentage of MA with migraine symptoms
Standard Error 3.01
|
-5.4 Percentage of MA with migraine symptoms
Standard Error 2.50
|
1.4 Percentage of MA with migraine symptoms
Standard Error 3.31
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Percentage of Migraine Attacks With Each of the Following Migraine Symptoms: Aura, Nausea, Vomiting, Photophobia, Phonophobia
Vomiting (n=99, 52, 89, 102, 44)
|
0 Percentage of MA with migraine symptoms
Standard Error 2.60
|
-0.9 Percentage of MA with migraine symptoms
Standard Error 2.98
|
-0.4 Percentage of MA with migraine symptoms
Standard Error 3.01
|
3.7 Percentage of MA with migraine symptoms
Standard Error 0.4
|
0.4 Percentage of MA with migraine symptoms
Standard Error 4.83
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Percentage of Migraine Attacks With Each of the Following Migraine Symptoms: Aura, Nausea, Vomiting, Photophobia, Phonophobia
Photophobia (n=99, 52, 89, 102, 44)
|
-1.9 Percentage of MA with migraine symptoms
Standard Error 2.82
|
-3.5 Percentage of MA with migraine symptoms
Standard Error 4.09
|
-2.1 Percentage of MA with migraine symptoms
Standard Error 2.86
|
-5.5 Percentage of MA with migraine symptoms
Standard Error 2.64
|
0.1 Percentage of MA with migraine symptoms
Standard Error 2.49
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Percentage of Migraine Attacks With Each of the Following Migraine Symptoms: Aura, Nausea, Vomiting, Photophobia, Phonophobia
Phonophobia (n=99, 52, 89, 102, 44)
|
-5.4 Percentage of MA with migraine symptoms
Standard Error 3.14
|
1.2 Percentage of MA with migraine symptoms
Standard Error 3.05
|
-0.7 Percentage of MA with migraine symptoms
Standard Error 3.42
|
-7.4 Percentage of MA with migraine symptoms
Standard Error 2.88
|
3.6 Percentage of MA with migraine symptoms
Standard Error 1.93
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to the Last 4 weeks of treatmentPopulation: ITT Population
A responder is defined as a participant who achieved at least a 50% reduction from baseline for the indicated measures.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=65 Participants
Oral GEn (XP13512) placebo
|
Average of GEn 1800/2400 mg
n=31 Participants
Average of GEn 1800 mg group and GEn 2400 mg group
|
GEn 1800 mg
n=70 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Weeks 3-17: 1800 mg/day
|
GEn 2400 mg
n=69 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4-17: 2400 mg/day
|
GEn 3000 mg
n=40 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4: 2400 mg/day. Weeks 5-17: 3000 mg/day
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Classified as Responders for Each of the Following Measures: Migraine Headache Days, Migraine Attacks, and Migraine Headache Periods
Migraine headache days (n=65, 26, 68, 67, 38)
|
54 percentage of participants
|
44 percentage of participants
|
60 percentage of participants
|
54 percentage of participants
|
66 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Classified as Responders for Each of the Following Measures: Migraine Headache Days, Migraine Attacks, and Migraine Headache Periods
Migraine attacks (n=64, 31, 67, 67, 39)
|
53 percentage of participants
|
53 percentage of participants
|
59 percentage of participants
|
54 percentage of participants
|
67 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Classified as Responders for Each of the Following Measures: Migraine Headache Days, Migraine Attacks, and Migraine Headache Periods
Migraine headache periods (n=65, 27, 70, 69, 40)
|
54 percentage of participants
|
46 percentage of participants
|
61 percentage of participants
|
56 percentage of participants
|
69 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 17Population: ITT Population
The PGIC is a single question measured on the 7-point Likert Scale (1 = "very much improved"; 2 = "much improved"; 7 = "very much worse"). A responder is defined as being "very much improved" or "much improved."
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=123 Participants
Oral GEn (XP13512) placebo
|
Average of GEn 1800/2400 mg
n=57 Participants
Average of GEn 1800 mg group and GEn 2400 mg group
|
GEn 1800 mg
n=115 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Weeks 3-17: 1800 mg/day
|
GEn 2400 mg
n=121 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4-17: 2400 mg/day
|
GEn 3000 mg
n=55 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4: 2400 mg/day. Weeks 5-17: 3000 mg/day
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Were "Much Improved" or "Very Much Improved" on the 7-point Likert Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale Using LOCF at Week 17
|
71 participants
|
40 participants
|
84 participants
|
81 participants
|
36 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 17Population: ITT Population
The CGIC is a single question measured on a 7-point Likert Scale. (1 = "very much improved"; 2= "much improved, and 7 = "very much worse") designed to give an assessment of treatment from a clinician's perspective. A responder is defined as being 'Very much improved' or 'much improved'.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=124 Participants
Oral GEn (XP13512) placebo
|
Average of GEn 1800/2400 mg
n=57 Participants
Average of GEn 1800 mg group and GEn 2400 mg group
|
GEn 1800 mg
n=116 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Weeks 3-17: 1800 mg/day
|
GEn 2400 mg
n=120 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4-17: 2400 mg/day
|
GEn 3000 mg
n=55 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4: 2400 mg/day. Weeks 5-17: 3000 mg/day
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Were "Much Improved" or "Very Much Improved" (Responders) on the 7-point Likert Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) Scale Using LOCF at Week 17
|
75 Participants
|
40 Participants
|
84 Participants
|
85 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 17Population: ITT Population
The MSQ is a 14-item health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaire. Participants provide responses using a 6-point Likert scale (1=None of the time, 2= A little bit of the time, 3=Some of the time, 4=A good bit of the time, 5=Most of the time, 6=All of the time) that are then recoded with a final item value where 1=6, 2=5, 3=4, 4=3, 5=2, and 6=1. The scale measures 3 independently scored dimensions (Role Function Restrictive, Role Function, Preventive, and Emotional Function) of HRQOL that are affected by migraine. For each dimension, a higher score indicates a better health status.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=120 Participants
Oral GEn (XP13512) placebo
|
Average of GEn 1800/2400 mg
n=57 Participants
Average of GEn 1800 mg group and GEn 2400 mg group
|
GEn 1800 mg
n=115 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Weeks 3-17: 1800 mg/day
|
GEn 2400 mg
n=121 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4-17: 2400 mg/day
|
GEn 3000 mg
n=62 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4: 2400 mg/day. Weeks 5-17: 3000 mg/day
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ v2.1) Composite Score and Subscales (Role Function Restrictive, Role Function, Preventive, & Emotional Function) at Week 17
Role Function Restrictive
|
30.7 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.31
|
38.7 units on a scale
Standard Error 3.12
|
37.1 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.38
|
32.8 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.28
|
30.9 units on a scale
Standard Error 3.73
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ v2.1) Composite Score and Subscales (Role Function Restrictive, Role Function, Preventive, & Emotional Function) at Week 17
Role Function Preventive
|
22.7 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.98
|
28.6 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.67
|
28.0 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.04
|
23.9 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.96
|
22.4 units on a scale
Standard Error 3.20
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ v2.1) Composite Score and Subscales (Role Function Restrictive, Role Function, Preventive, & Emotional Function) at Week 17
Emotional Function
|
29.7 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.56
|
37.0 units on a scale
Standard Error 3.46
|
34.8 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.64
|
30.4 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.54
|
25.7 units on a scale
Standard Error 4.14
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Week 17Population: ITT Population
The HIT is a 6-item, self-administered HRQOL questionnaire used to measure six areas that impact headaches have on participants' ability to function on the job, at school, at home, and in social situations. Participants provide responses to questions using a 5-point Likert-type scale. All item values range from 6 to13.The total scores range from 36 to 78, where higher scores indicate greater impact on a participant's life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=120 Participants
Oral GEn (XP13512) placebo
|
Average of GEn 1800/2400 mg
n=57 Participants
Average of GEn 1800 mg group and GEn 2400 mg group
|
GEn 1800 mg
n=115 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Weeks 3-17: 1800 mg/day
|
GEn 2400 mg
n=121 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4-17: 2400 mg/day
|
GEn 3000 mg
n=54 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4: 2400 mg/day. Weeks 5-17: 3000 mg/day
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) Total Scores at Week 17
|
-10.0 Points on a scale
Standard Error 0.95
|
-12.2 Points on a scale
Standard Error 1.28
|
-11.8 Points on a scale
Standard Error 0.98
|
-9.8 Points on a scale
Standard Error 0.94
|
-10.3 Points on a scale
Standard Error 1.53
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Week 17Population: ITT Population
Productivity, as measured by LTE, is a metric used to assess productivity loss in migraine. It is a composite measure of presenteeism (continued to work while under the influence of migraine symptoms) and absenteeism (time missed from work due to migraine), and can be applied to productivity for work and non-work activities. Productivity data were collected via an e-diary, and productivity measures were summarized for each study phase by averaging each measure across migraine attacks for each participant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=99 Participants
Oral GEn (XP13512) placebo
|
Average of GEn 1800/2400 mg
n=52 Participants
Average of GEn 1800 mg group and GEn 2400 mg group
|
GEn 1800 mg
n=89 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Weeks 3-17: 1800 mg/day
|
GEn 2400 mg
n=102 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4-17: 2400 mg/day
|
GEn 3000 mg
n=44 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4: 2400 mg/day. Weeks 5-17: 3000 mg/day
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Productivity as Measured by Lost Time Equivalents (LTE) - (Work Activities, Non-work Activities, and Combination of Work and Non-work Activities)
Lost Work Time (n=52, 23, 41, 35, 17)
|
-0.8 Hours
Standard Error 0.49
|
-0.3 Hours
Standard Error 0.73
|
-0.9 Hours
Standard Error 0.55
|
-0.1 Hours
Standard Error 0.59
|
0.8 Hours
Standard Error 0.85
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Productivity as Measured by Lost Time Equivalents (LTE) - (Work Activities, Non-work Activities, and Combination of Work and Non-work Activities)
Lost Activity Time (n=99,52, 89, 102, 44)
|
0.1 Hours
Standard Error 0.74
|
-0.1 Hours
Standard Error 1.02
|
-1.2 Hours
Standard Error 0.78
|
-1.0 Hours
Standard Error 0.73
|
1.7 Hours
Standard Error 1.11
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Productivity as Measured by Lost Time Equivalents (LTE) - (Work Activities, Non-work Activities, and Combination of Work and Non-work Activities)
Lost Time Equivalents (n=99, 52, 89, 102, 44)
|
-0.2 Hours
Standard Error 0.83
|
-0.5 Hours
Standard Error 1.14
|
-1.7 Hours
Standard Error 0.87
|
-1.1 Hours
Standard Error 0.082
|
2.1 Hours
Standard Error 1.24
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Week 17Population: ITT Population
Three global treatment satisfaction items from the PPMQ included satisfaction or dissatisfaction with Medication Effectiveness, Medication Side Effects, and Overall Medication. Each item on the PPMQ uses a 7-point satisfaction scale (1 = Very Satisfied to 7 = Very Dissatisfied). Satisfied participants include those reporting "Very Satisfied" (scale value = 1) or "Satisfied" (scale value = 2) on the scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=123 Participants
Oral GEn (XP13512) placebo
|
Average of GEn 1800/2400 mg
n=57 Participants
Average of GEn 1800 mg group and GEn 2400 mg group
|
GEn 1800 mg
n=118 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Weeks 3-17: 1800 mg/day
|
GEn 2400 mg
n=120 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4-17: 2400 mg/day
|
GEn 3000 mg
n=54 Participants
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4: 2400 mg/day. Weeks 5-17: 3000 mg/day
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Assessment of Treatment Satisfaction Using the Patient Perception of Migraine Questionnaire (PPMQ-R) at Week 17
Overall Satisfaction with Medication
|
76 Percentage of Patients
|
39 Percentage of Patients
|
84 Percentage of Patients
|
84 Percentage of Patients
|
34 Percentage of Patients
|
|
Assessment of Treatment Satisfaction Using the Patient Perception of Migraine Questionnaire (PPMQ-R) at Week 17
How Effective Overall
|
74 Percentage of Patients
|
39 Percentage of Patients
|
84 Percentage of Patients
|
81 Percentage of Patients
|
36 Percentage of Patients
|
|
Assessment of Treatment Satisfaction Using the Patient Perception of Migraine Questionnaire (PPMQ-R) at Week 17
Side Effects of the Medication
|
79 Percentage of Patients
|
32 Percentage of Patients
|
72 Percentage of Patients
|
75 Percentage of Patients
|
28 Percentage of Patients
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
GEn 1200 mg
GEn 1800 mg
GEn 2400 mg
GEn 3000 mg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=128 participants at risk
Oral GEn (XP13512) placebo
|
GEn 1200 mg
n=66 participants at risk
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Weeks 2-17: 1200 mg/day
|
GEn 1800 mg
n=134 participants at risk
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Weeks 3-17: 1800 mg/day
|
GEn 2400 mg
n=133 participants at risk
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4-17: 2400 mg/day
|
GEn 3000 mg
n=62 participants at risk
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4: 2400 mg/day. Weeks 5-17: 3000 mg/day
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
|
0.00%
0/128
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/66
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/133
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/62
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
0.78%
1/128 • Number of events 1
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/66
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/134
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/133
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/62
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/128
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/66
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/134
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/133
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
1.6%
1/62 • Number of events 1
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
|
0.00%
0/128
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/66
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/133
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/62
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Choleslithiasis
|
0.00%
0/128
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/66
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/133
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/62
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle Spasms
|
0.78%
1/128 • Number of events 1
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/66
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/134
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/133
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/62
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Metastatic malignant melanoma
|
0.00%
0/128
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/66
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/134
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/133
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
1.6%
1/62 • Number of events 1
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Convulsion
|
0.00%
0/128
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/66
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/134
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/133
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
1.6%
1/62 • Number of events 1
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Conversion disorder
|
0.00%
0/128
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/66
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/134
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/133
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
1.6%
1/62 • Number of events 1
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchopneumonia
|
0.00%
0/128
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/66
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/133
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/62
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Accidental Overdose
|
0.00%
0/128
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/66
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/134
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.75%
1/133 • Number of events 1
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/62
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=128 participants at risk
Oral GEn (XP13512) placebo
|
GEn 1200 mg
n=66 participants at risk
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Weeks 2-17: 1200 mg/day
|
GEn 1800 mg
n=134 participants at risk
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Weeks 3-17: 1800 mg/day
|
GEn 2400 mg
n=133 participants at risk
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4-17: 2400 mg/day
|
GEn 3000 mg
n=62 participants at risk
Oral gabapentin enacarbil (GEn; XP13512/GSK1838262). Week 1: 600 mg/day. Week 2: 1200 mg/day. Week 3: 1800 mg/day. Weeks 4: 2400 mg/day. Weeks 5-17: 3000 mg/day
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
6.2%
8/128
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
24.2%
16/66
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
32.1%
43/134
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
26.3%
35/133
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
17.7%
11/62
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
7.0%
9/128
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
15.2%
10/66
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
9.0%
12/134
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
10.5%
14/133
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
4.8%
3/62
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
9.4%
12/128
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
4.5%
3/66
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
11.2%
15/134
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
9.0%
12/133
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
9.7%
6/62
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
4.7%
6/128
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
9.1%
6/66
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
5.2%
7/134
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
10.5%
14/133
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
14.5%
9/62
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
|
Investigations
Weight increased
|
5.5%
7/128
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
6.1%
4/66
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
6.0%
8/134
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
6.8%
9/133
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
6.5%
4/62
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Upper respiratory track infection
|
7.0%
9/128
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
6.1%
4/66
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
3.0%
4/134
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
6.8%
9/133
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
8.1%
5/62
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
2.3%
3/128
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
6.1%
4/66
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
5.2%
7/134
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
6.0%
8/133
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
8.1%
5/62
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry mouth
|
2.3%
3/128
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
6.1%
4/66
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
4.5%
6/134
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
3.8%
5/133
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
4.8%
3/62
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
6.2%
8/128
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
4.5%
3/66
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
3.0%
4/134
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
3.0%
4/133
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
3.2%
2/62
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
6.2%
8/128
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
5.3%
7/133
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
1.6%
1/62 • Number of events 1
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
3.9%
5/128
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
2.2%
3/134
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
5.3%
7/133
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
3.2%
2/62
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
3.1%
4/128
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
2.2%
3/134
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
3.0%
4/133
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
4.8%
3/62
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
0.78%
1/128 • Number of events 1
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
6.1%
4/66
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
4.5%
6/133
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
3.2%
2/62
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema
|
3.1%
4/128
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
6.1%
4/66
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
2.3%
3/133
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
3.2%
2/62
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
2.3%
3/128
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
6.1%
4/66
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
2.2%
3/134
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
2.3%
3/133
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
1.6%
1/62 • Number of events 1
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Balance
|
0.78%
1/128 • Number of events 1
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
3.0%
2/66
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
1.5%
2/134
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
4.5%
6/133
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
1.6%
1/62 • Number of events 1
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.78%
1/128 • Number of events 1
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
3.0%
2/66
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
1.5%
2/134
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
2.3%
3/133
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
4.8%
3/62
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/128
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
4.5%
6/134
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.75%
1/133 • Number of events 1
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
4.8%
3/62
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.00%
0/128
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
4.5%
3/66
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.75%
1/134 • Number of events 1
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/133
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
0.00%
0/62
Serious adverse events (AEs) and non-serious AEs were collected in the Safety Population, comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one tablet of investigational product. There were no participants who took drug and did not have at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment; thus, the Safety and ITT Populations are the same.
|
Additional Information
XenoPort Call Center
XenoPort, Inc.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER