Trial Outcomes & Findings for 3 yr Efficacy & Safety Study of Zoledronic Acid in Post-menopausal Women With Osteoporosis Treated With Zol Acid for 6 Yrs (NCT NCT00718861)
NCT ID: NCT00718861
Last Updated: 2014-10-09
Results Overview
Bone Mineral Density (BMD) measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). DXA consists of two X-ray beams with different energy levels that are aimed at the patient's bones. When soft tissue absorption is subtracted out, the BMD can be determined from the absorption of each beam by bone. Percentage change from Year 6 = 100\*(Year 9 - Year 6)/Year 6.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
190 participants
Year 6 (baseline) and Year 9
2014-10-09
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Z9 (Zoledronic Acid 9)
Group Z9 patients were those who had been treated with zoledronic acid for up to 9 years in the core (CZOL446H2301) and extension studies (CZOL446H2301E1 and CZOL446H2301E2).
|
Z6P3 (Zoledronic Acid 6 Placebo 3)
Group Z6P3 patients were those who had been treated with zoledronic acid for 6 years in the core (CZOL446H2301) and the first extension study (CZOL446H2301E1) followed by up to 3 years of placebo in the second extension study (CZOL446H2301E2).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
95
|
95
|
|
Overall Study
Safety Set
|
92
|
95
|
|
Overall Study
Modified Intent to Treat
|
67
|
69
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
74
|
77
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
21
|
18
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Z9 (Zoledronic Acid 9)
Group Z9 patients were those who had been treated with zoledronic acid for up to 9 years in the core (CZOL446H2301) and extension studies (CZOL446H2301E1 and CZOL446H2301E2).
|
Z6P3 (Zoledronic Acid 6 Placebo 3)
Group Z6P3 patients were those who had been treated with zoledronic acid for 6 years in the core (CZOL446H2301) and the first extension study (CZOL446H2301E1) followed by up to 3 years of placebo in the second extension study (CZOL446H2301E2).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
15
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
2
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Administrative Problems
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
5
|
Baseline Characteristics
3 yr Efficacy & Safety Study of Zoledronic Acid in Post-menopausal Women With Osteoporosis Treated With Zol Acid for 6 Yrs
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Z9 (Zoledronic Acid 9)
n=95 Participants
Group Z9 patients were those who had been treated with zoledronic acid for up to 9 years in the core (CZOL446H2301) and extension studies (CZOL446H2301E1 and CZOL446H2301E2).
|
Z6P3 (Zoledronic Acid 6 Placebo 3)
n=95 Participants
Group Z6P3 patients were those who had been treated with zoledronic acid for 6 years in the core (CZOL446H2301) and the first extension study (CZOL446H2301E1) followed by up to 3 years of placebo in the second extension study (CZOL446H2301E2).
|
Total
n=190 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
78 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.71 • n=85 Participants
|
78.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.85 • n=18 Participants
|
78.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.77 • n=39 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
95 Participants
n=85 Participants
|
95 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
190 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=85 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Year 6 (baseline) and Year 9Population: The modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population included all patients in the ITT population who had DXA measurements of the total hip at Visit 11 (Year 6) and Visit 15 (Year 9). This was the primary population for the primary efficacy parameter.
Bone Mineral Density (BMD) measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). DXA consists of two X-ray beams with different energy levels that are aimed at the patient's bones. When soft tissue absorption is subtracted out, the BMD can be determined from the absorption of each beam by bone. Percentage change from Year 6 = 100\*(Year 9 - Year 6)/Year 6.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Z9 (Zoledronic Acid 9)
n=67 Participants
Group Z9 patients were those who had been treated with zoledronic acid for up to 9 years in the core (CZOL446H2301) and extension studies (CZOL446H2301E1 and CZOL446H2301E2).
|
Z6P3 (Zoledronic Acid 6 Placebo 3)
n=69 Participants
Group Z6P3 patients were those who had been treated with zoledronic acid for 6 years in the core (CZOL446H2301) and the first extension study (CZOL446H2301E1) followed by up to 3 years of placebo in the second extension study (CZOL446H2301E2).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density BMD at Year 6 (Baseline) and Year 9
|
-0.54 Percentage Change of BMD
Standard Error 0.433
|
-1.31 Percentage Change of BMD
Standard Error 0.427
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Year 6 (extension 2 baseline), Year 7, Year 8Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all patients who were enrolled in the extension study at Visit 12. This included patients who were randomized to Z9 and Z6P3 groups. n = the number of patients with measurements at Year 6 and follow-up visits as determined by the analysis window.
Bone Mineral Density (BMD) measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). DXA consists of two X-ray beams with different energy levels that are aimed at the patient's bones. When soft tissue absorption is subtracted out, the BMD can be determined from the absorption of each beam by bone. Percentage change from Year 6 = 100\*(Year 9 - Year 6)/Year 6.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Z9 (Zoledronic Acid 9)
n=95 Participants
Group Z9 patients were those who had been treated with zoledronic acid for up to 9 years in the core (CZOL446H2301) and extension studies (CZOL446H2301E1 and CZOL446H2301E2).
|
Z6P3 (Zoledronic Acid 6 Placebo 3)
n=95 Participants
Group Z6P3 patients were those who had been treated with zoledronic acid for 6 years in the core (CZOL446H2301) and the first extension study (CZOL446H2301E1) followed by up to 3 years of placebo in the second extension study (CZOL446H2301E2).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change of Total Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Year 7 and 8 Compared to Year 6
Year 7 (n=83,76)
|
-0.28 percentage change of BMD
Standard Error 0.336
|
-0.83 percentage change of BMD
Standard Error 0.347
|
|
Percentage Change of Total Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Year 7 and 8 Compared to Year 6
Year 8 (n=73,72)
|
-0.14 percentage change of BMD
Standard Error 0.311
|
-1.06 percentage change of BMD
Standard Error 0.315
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Year 6 (extension 2 baseline), Year 7, Year 8, Year 9Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all patients who were enrolled in the extension study at Visit 12. This included patients who were randomized to Z9 and Z6P3 groups. n = the number of patients with measurements at Year 6 and follow-up visits as determined by the analysis window.
Bone Mineral Density (BMD) measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). DXA consists of two X-ray beams with different energy levels that are aimed at the patient's bones. When soft tissue absorption is subtracted out, the BMD can be determined from the absorption of each beam by bone. Percentage change from Year 6 = 100\*(Year 9 - Year 6)/Year 6.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Z9 (Zoledronic Acid 9)
n=95 Participants
Group Z9 patients were those who had been treated with zoledronic acid for up to 9 years in the core (CZOL446H2301) and extension studies (CZOL446H2301E1 and CZOL446H2301E2).
|
Z6P3 (Zoledronic Acid 6 Placebo 3)
n=95 Participants
Group Z6P3 patients were those who had been treated with zoledronic acid for 6 years in the core (CZOL446H2301) and the first extension study (CZOL446H2301E1) followed by up to 3 years of placebo in the second extension study (CZOL446H2301E2).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change of Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Year 7, 8 and 9 Compared to Year 6
Year 7 (n=83,76)
|
-0.78 percentage change of BMD
Standard Error 0.433
|
-1.24 percentage change of BMD
Standard Error 0.447
|
|
Percentage Change of Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Year 7, 8 and 9 Compared to Year 6
Year 8 (n=73,72)
|
0.00 percentage change of BMD
Standard Error 0.521
|
-0.88 percentage change of BMD
Standard Error 0.528
|
|
Percentage Change of Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Year 7, 8 and 9 Compared to Year 6
Year 9 (n=67,69)
|
-1.11 percentage change of BMD
Standard Error 0.554
|
-1.17 percentage change of BMD
Standard Error 0.547
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Year 0 (core baseline), Year 7, Year 8, Year 9Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all patients who were enrolled in the extension study at Visit 12. This included patients who were randomized to Z9 and Z6P3 groups. n = the number of patients with measurements at Year 0 and follow-up visits as determined by the analysis window.
Bone Mineral Density (BMD) measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). DXA consists of two X-ray beams with different energy levels that are aimed at the patient's bones. When soft tissue absorption is subtracted out, the BMD can be determined from the absorption of each beam by bone. Percentage change from Year 0 = 100\*(Year 9 - Year 0)/Year 0.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Z9 (Zoledronic Acid 9)
n=95 Participants
Group Z9 patients were those who had been treated with zoledronic acid for up to 9 years in the core (CZOL446H2301) and extension studies (CZOL446H2301E1 and CZOL446H2301E2).
|
Z6P3 (Zoledronic Acid 6 Placebo 3)
n=95 Participants
Group Z6P3 patients were those who had been treated with zoledronic acid for 6 years in the core (CZOL446H2301) and the first extension study (CZOL446H2301E1) followed by up to 3 years of placebo in the second extension study (CZOL446H2301E2).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change of Total Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Year 7, 8 and 9 Compared to Year 0
Year 8 (n=72,71)
|
5.35 percentage change of BMD
Standard Error 0.677
|
3.65 percentage change of BMD
Standard Error 0.684
|
|
Percentage Change of Total Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Year 7, 8 and 9 Compared to Year 0
Year 9 (n=67,68)
|
4.64 percentage change of BMD
Standard Error 0.760
|
3.68 percentage change of BMD
Standard Error 0.752
|
|
Percentage Change of Total Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Year 7, 8 and 9 Compared to Year 0
Year 7 (n=83,75)
|
4.81 percentage change of BMD
Standard Error 0.619
|
3.73 percentage change of BMD
Standard Error 0.640
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Year 0 (core baseline), Year 7, Year 8, Year 9Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all patients who were enrolled in the extension study at Visit 12. This included patients who were randomized to Z9 and Z6P3 groups. n = the number of patients with measurements at Year 0 and follow-up visits as determined by the analysis window.
Bone Mineral Density (BMD) measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). DXA consists of two X-ray beams with different energy levels that are aimed at the patient's bones. When soft tissue absorption is subtracted out, the BMD can be determined from the absorption of each beam by bone. Percentage change from Year 0 = 100\*(Year 9 - Year 0)/Year 0.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Z9 (Zoledronic Acid 9)
n=95 Participants
Group Z9 patients were those who had been treated with zoledronic acid for up to 9 years in the core (CZOL446H2301) and extension studies (CZOL446H2301E1 and CZOL446H2301E2).
|
Z6P3 (Zoledronic Acid 6 Placebo 3)
n=95 Participants
Group Z6P3 patients were those who had been treated with zoledronic acid for 6 years in the core (CZOL446H2301) and the first extension study (CZOL446H2301E1) followed by up to 3 years of placebo in the second extension study (CZOL446H2301E2).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change of Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Year 7, 8 and 9 Compared to Year 0
Year 7 (n=83,75)
|
5.11 percentage change of BMD
Standard Error 0.921
|
3.86 percentage change of BMD
Standard Error 0.952
|
|
Percentage Change of Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Year 7, 8 and 9 Compared to Year 0
Year 8 (n=72,71)
|
6.12 percentage change of BMD
Standard Error 1.041
|
4.43 percentage change of BMD
Standard Error 1.052
|
|
Percentage Change of Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Year 7, 8 and 9 Compared to Year 0
Year 9 (n=67,68)
|
4.16 percentage change of BMD
Standard Error 0.963
|
3.88 percentage change of BMD
Standard Error 0.954
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Year 6 (extension 2 baseline), Year 7, Year 8, Year 9Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all patients who were enrolled in the extension study at Visit 12. This included patients who were randomized to Z9 and Z6P3 groups. n = the number of patients with measurements at each visit as determined by the analysis window.
Bone marker analysis: All patients had blood samples collected for analysis of serum c-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTx). Serum CTX assays measure a fragment of the C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen released during resorption of mature bone
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Z9 (Zoledronic Acid 9)
n=95 Participants
Group Z9 patients were those who had been treated with zoledronic acid for up to 9 years in the core (CZOL446H2301) and extension studies (CZOL446H2301E1 and CZOL446H2301E2).
|
Z6P3 (Zoledronic Acid 6 Placebo 3)
n=95 Participants
Group Z6P3 patients were those who had been treated with zoledronic acid for 6 years in the core (CZOL446H2301) and the first extension study (CZOL446H2301E1) followed by up to 3 years of placebo in the second extension study (CZOL446H2301E2).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Biomarkers (Bone Markers) Serum C-terminal Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTx) at Year 6 (Extension 2 Baseline), Year 7, Year 8, Year 9
Year 6 (n=59, 58)
|
0.19 ng/ml
Interval 0.1 to 0.6
|
0.18 ng/ml
Interval 0.1 to 0.5
|
|
Biomarkers (Bone Markers) Serum C-terminal Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTx) at Year 6 (Extension 2 Baseline), Year 7, Year 8, Year 9
Year 7 (n=56, 51)
|
0.2 ng/ml
Interval 0.1 to 0.4
|
0.22 ng/ml
Interval 0.1 to 0.5
|
|
Biomarkers (Bone Markers) Serum C-terminal Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTx) at Year 6 (Extension 2 Baseline), Year 7, Year 8, Year 9
Year 8 (n=51, 52)
|
0.22 ng/ml
Interval 0.1 to 0.4
|
0.2 ng/ml
Interval 0.1 to 0.4
|
|
Biomarkers (Bone Markers) Serum C-terminal Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTx) at Year 6 (Extension 2 Baseline), Year 7, Year 8, Year 9
Year 9 (n=51,54)
|
0.22 ng/ml
Interval 0.1 to 0.6
|
0.22 ng/ml
Interval 0.1 to 0.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Year 6 (extension 2 baseline), Year 7, Year 8, Year 9Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all patients who were enrolled in the extension study at Visit 12. This included patients who were randomized to Z9 and Z6P3 groups. n = the number of patients with measurements at each visit as determined by the analysis window.
Bone marker analysis: All patients had blood samples collected for analysis of serum n-terminal propeptide of type I collagen (P1NP) The P1NP concentration is directly proportional to the amount of new collagen laid down during bone formation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Z9 (Zoledronic Acid 9)
n=95 Participants
Group Z9 patients were those who had been treated with zoledronic acid for up to 9 years in the core (CZOL446H2301) and extension studies (CZOL446H2301E1 and CZOL446H2301E2).
|
Z6P3 (Zoledronic Acid 6 Placebo 3)
n=95 Participants
Group Z6P3 patients were those who had been treated with zoledronic acid for 6 years in the core (CZOL446H2301) and the first extension study (CZOL446H2301E1) followed by up to 3 years of placebo in the second extension study (CZOL446H2301E2).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Biomarkers (Bone Markers)Serum N-terminal Propeptide of Type I Collagen (P1NP) at Year 6 (Extension 2 Baseline), Year 7, Year 8, Year 9
Year 8 (n=54, 57)
|
26.07 ng/ml
Interval 10.9 to 59.9
|
25.19 ng/ml
Interval 13.1 to 68.1
|
|
Biomarkers (Bone Markers)Serum N-terminal Propeptide of Type I Collagen (P1NP) at Year 6 (Extension 2 Baseline), Year 7, Year 8, Year 9
Year 6 (n=88, 86)
|
25.89 ng/ml
Interval 10.8 to 69.1
|
24.98 ng/ml
Interval 9.9 to 65.6
|
|
Biomarkers (Bone Markers)Serum N-terminal Propeptide of Type I Collagen (P1NP) at Year 6 (Extension 2 Baseline), Year 7, Year 8, Year 9
Year 7 (n=58, 65)
|
25.69 ng/ml
Interval 12.3 to 52.9
|
27.79 ng/ml
Interval 11.7 to 140.2
|
|
Biomarkers (Bone Markers)Serum N-terminal Propeptide of Type I Collagen (P1NP) at Year 6 (Extension 2 Baseline), Year 7, Year 8, Year 9
Year 9 (n=52,56)
|
26.74 ng/ml
Interval 12.4 to 133.4
|
27.41 ng/ml
Interval 11.3 to 119.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Year 6 (extension 2 baseline), Year 7, Year 8, Year 9Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all patients who were enrolled in the extension study at Visit 12. This included patients who were randomized to Z9 and Z6P3 groups. n = the number of patients with measurements at each visit as determined by the analysis window.
Bone marker analysis: All patients had blood samples collected for analysis of serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP).Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP) is a useful marker of active bone formation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Z9 (Zoledronic Acid 9)
n=95 Participants
Group Z9 patients were those who had been treated with zoledronic acid for up to 9 years in the core (CZOL446H2301) and extension studies (CZOL446H2301E1 and CZOL446H2301E2).
|
Z6P3 (Zoledronic Acid 6 Placebo 3)
n=95 Participants
Group Z6P3 patients were those who had been treated with zoledronic acid for 6 years in the core (CZOL446H2301) and the first extension study (CZOL446H2301E1) followed by up to 3 years of placebo in the second extension study (CZOL446H2301E2).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Biomarkers (Bone Markers) Serum Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP). at Year 6 (Extension 2 Baseline), Year 7, Year 8, Year 9
Year 6 (n=59, 62)
|
8.16 ng/ml
Interval 4.9 to 15.9
|
8.95 ng/ml
Interval 3.9 to 16.2
|
|
Biomarkers (Bone Markers) Serum Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP). at Year 6 (Extension 2 Baseline), Year 7, Year 8, Year 9
Year 7 (n=58, 65)
|
8.4 ng/ml
Interval 4.7 to 15.7
|
10.00 ng/ml
Interval 5.1 to 19.6
|
|
Biomarkers (Bone Markers) Serum Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP). at Year 6 (Extension 2 Baseline), Year 7, Year 8, Year 9
Year 8 (n=54, 57)
|
7.84 ng/ml
Interval 5.4 to 16.4
|
9.57 ng/ml
Interval 5.6 to 15.8
|
|
Biomarkers (Bone Markers) Serum Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP). at Year 6 (Extension 2 Baseline), Year 7, Year 8, Year 9
Year 9 (n=52, 56)
|
8.46 ng/ml
Interval 5.1 to 18.3
|
9.94 ng/ml
Interval 6.2 to 20.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Year 6 (extension 2 baseline), Year 9 (3 years of study duration)Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all patients who were enrolled in the extension study at Visit 12. This included patients who were randomized to Z9 and Z6P3 groups. n= the number of patients with the event
Morphometric vertebral fracture (VF) was assessed based on morphometry. QM (quantitative morphometry) incident VF(QM positive) was defined by at least a 20% decrease in any vertebral height (at least 4 mm). If a participant had a QM positive at any vertebrae at any visit, x-rays from all visits for participants were evaluated using Genant semi-quantitative (SQ) method for VF assessment. A fracture was defined as an SQ reading that was greater than the baseline SQ reading.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Z9 (Zoledronic Acid 9)
n=95 Participants
Group Z9 patients were those who had been treated with zoledronic acid for up to 9 years in the core (CZOL446H2301) and extension studies (CZOL446H2301E1 and CZOL446H2301E2).
|
Z6P3 (Zoledronic Acid 6 Placebo 3)
n=95 Participants
Group Z6P3 patients were those who had been treated with zoledronic acid for 6 years in the core (CZOL446H2301) and the first extension study (CZOL446H2301E1) followed by up to 3 years of placebo in the second extension study (CZOL446H2301E2).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With New/Worsening Morphometric Vertebral Fractures at Year 9 Compared to Year 6
New/worsening Morphometric vertebra
|
3 participants
|
5 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With New/Worsening Morphometric Vertebral Fractures at Year 9 Compared to Year 6
New Morphometric vertebral fracture
|
3 participants
|
5 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: over 3 years of study durationPopulation: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all patients who were enrolled in the extension study at Visit 12. This included patients who were randomized to Z9 and Z6P3 groups.
The mean of time to the first clinical fracture is estimated from the area under the Kaplan-Meier curve.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Z9 (Zoledronic Acid 9)
n=95 Participants
Group Z9 patients were those who had been treated with zoledronic acid for up to 9 years in the core (CZOL446H2301) and extension studies (CZOL446H2301E1 and CZOL446H2301E2).
|
Z6P3 (Zoledronic Acid 6 Placebo 3)
n=95 Participants
Group Z6P3 patients were those who had been treated with zoledronic acid for 6 years in the core (CZOL446H2301) and the first extension study (CZOL446H2301E1) followed by up to 3 years of placebo in the second extension study (CZOL446H2301E2).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean of Time to First Clinical Fracture
|
1212.05 Days
Standard Error 22.96
|
1204.65 Days
Standard Error 26.35
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Year 6 (extension 2 baseline), Year 7, Year 8, Year 9Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all patients who were enrolled in the extension study at Visit 12. This included patients who were randomized to Z9 and Z6P3 groups. n = the number of patients with evaluable measurements at both Year 6 and the post-Year 6 visit, as determined by the analysis window.
Height was measured using a stadiometer in millimeters (mm). A stadiometer is a piece of medical equipment used for measuring height. It is usually constructed out of a ruler and a sliding horizontal headpiece which is adjusted to rest on the top of the head.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Z9 (Zoledronic Acid 9)
n=95 Participants
Group Z9 patients were those who had been treated with zoledronic acid for up to 9 years in the core (CZOL446H2301) and extension studies (CZOL446H2301E1 and CZOL446H2301E2).
|
Z6P3 (Zoledronic Acid 6 Placebo 3)
n=95 Participants
Group Z6P3 patients were those who had been treated with zoledronic acid for 6 years in the core (CZOL446H2301) and the first extension study (CZOL446H2301E1) followed by up to 3 years of placebo in the second extension study (CZOL446H2301E2).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Height at Years 7, 8 and 9 Relative to Year 6
Year 9 (n=52, 48)
|
-13.31 millimeters (mm)
Standard Error 1.975
|
-11.65 millimeters (mm)
Standard Error 2.085
|
|
Change in Height at Years 7, 8 and 9 Relative to Year 6
Year 7 (n=58, 51)
|
-5.29 millimeters (mm)
Standard Error 1.171
|
-4.84 millimeters (mm)
Standard Error 1.199
|
|
Change in Height at Years 7, 8 and 9 Relative to Year 6
Year 8 (n=55, 49)
|
-10.16 millimeters (mm)
Standard Error 1.875
|
-9.90 millimeters (mm)
Standard Error 2.006
|
Adverse Events
Z9 (Zoledronic Acid 9)
Z6P3 (Zoledronic Acid 6 Placebo 3)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Z9 (Zoledronic Acid 9)
n=92 participants at risk
Group Z9 patients were those who had been treated with zoledronic acid for up to 9 years in the core (CZOL446H2301) and extension studies (CZOL446H2301E1 and CZOL446H2301E2).
|
Z6P3 (Zoledronic Acid 6 Placebo 3)
n=95 participants at risk
Group Z6P3 patients were those who had been treated with zoledronic acid for 6 years in the core (CZOL446H2301) and the first extension study (CZOL446H2301E1) followed by up to 3 years of placebo in the second extension study (CZOL446H2301E2).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Agranulocytosis
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
0.00%
0/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia
|
0.00%
0/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiomyopathy
|
0.00%
0/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial ischaemia
|
0.00%
0/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Palpitations
|
0.00%
0/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis ischaemic
|
0.00%
0/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oesophageal discomfort
|
0.00%
0/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
General disorders
Death
|
0.00%
0/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
2.1%
2/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
General disorders
Sudden death
|
0.00%
0/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diverticulitis
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
2.1%
2/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Vestibular neuronitis
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Concussion
|
0.00%
0/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Facial bones fracture
|
0.00%
0/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
0.00%
0/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
2.1%
2/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femur fracture
|
0.00%
0/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
2.1%
2/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fractured sacrum
|
0.00%
0/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
2.1%
2/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hip fracture
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lumbar vertebral fracture
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Pelvic fracture
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
2.1%
2/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Pubis fracture
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Radius fracture
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Thoracic vertebral fracture
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wrist fracture
|
0.00%
0/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Iron deficiency
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
2.2%
2/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
2.2%
2/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc protrusion
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.00%
0/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
3.2%
3/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
2.2%
2/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Basal cell carcinoma
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Brain neoplasm
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Colon cancer
|
0.00%
0/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Gastrointestinal tract adenoma
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Invasive lobular breast carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung neoplasm malignant
|
0.00%
0/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lymphoma
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral infarction
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
0.00%
0/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ischaemic stroke
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.00%
0/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute prerenal failure
|
0.00%
0/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure acute
|
0.00%
0/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Uterine prolapse
|
0.00%
0/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pemphigoid
|
0.00%
0/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin lesion
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Spinal fusion surgery
|
0.00%
0/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral arterial occlusive disease
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Z9 (Zoledronic Acid 9)
n=92 participants at risk
Group Z9 patients were those who had been treated with zoledronic acid for up to 9 years in the core (CZOL446H2301) and extension studies (CZOL446H2301E1 and CZOL446H2301E2).
|
Z6P3 (Zoledronic Acid 6 Placebo 3)
n=95 participants at risk
Group Z6P3 patients were those who had been treated with zoledronic acid for 6 years in the core (CZOL446H2301) and the first extension study (CZOL446H2301E1) followed by up to 3 years of placebo in the second extension study (CZOL446H2301E2).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
5.4%
5/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract
|
8.7%
8/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
5.3%
5/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
6.3%
6/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
5.4%
5/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
2.1%
2/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
5.4%
5/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
9.5%
9/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
|
5.4%
5/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
5.3%
5/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
9.8%
9/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
5.3%
5/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
3.3%
3/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
5.3%
5/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
10.9%
10/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
8.4%
8/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
2.2%
2/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
7.4%
7/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
8.7%
8/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
11.6%
11/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Investigations
Creatinine renal clearance decreased
|
6.5%
6/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
18.5%
17/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
12.6%
12/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
3.3%
3/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
13.7%
13/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
5.4%
5/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
8.4%
8/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
6.5%
6/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
13.7%
13/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
9.8%
9/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sciatica
|
1.1%
1/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
5.3%
5/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
5.4%
5/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
1.1%
1/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
10.9%
10/92
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
8.4%
8/95
The safety population included all patients in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population who received at least 1 dose of study drug during this second extension study. Adverse Events data used the safety population.
|
Additional Information
Study Director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. Other disclosure agreement that restricts the right of the PI to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single-site are postponed until the publication of pooled data (i.e.,data from all sites) in clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER