Trial Outcomes & Findings for Long-Term, Open-Label Study Of CP-690,550 For Treatment Of Rheumatoid Arthritis In Japan (NCT NCT00661661)
NCT ID: NCT00661661
Last Updated: 2015-05-12
Results Overview
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to the last participants visit in the study. The baseline data of Study A3921039, A3921040 or A3921044 were used as baseline data for safety evaluation.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
487 participants
Baseline up to Week 288
2015-05-12
Participant Flow
Participants received study drug (CP-690,550 or placebo) in the precedent study A3921039 (NCT00603512) for 12 weeks, A3921040 (NCT00687193) for 12 weeks, or A3921044 (NCT00847613) for 2 years.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg BID
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for less than 84 days in total within the current study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 5 mg BID.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg BID
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for more than or equal to 84 days in total within the long-term safety study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 10 mg BID.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
382
|
105
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
242
|
66
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
140
|
39
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg BID
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for less than 84 days in total within the current study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 5 mg BID.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg BID
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for more than or equal to 84 days in total within the long-term safety study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 10 mg BID.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
99
|
24
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
3
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
15
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
22
|
7
|
|
Overall Study
Not assigned treatment
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Long-Term, Open-Label Study Of CP-690,550 For Treatment Of Rheumatoid Arthritis In Japan
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg BID
n=381 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for less than 84 days in total within the current study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 5 mg BID.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=105 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for more than or equal to 84 days in total within the long-term safety study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 10 mg BID.
|
Total
n=486 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
53.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2 • n=99 Participants
|
49.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7 • n=107 Participants
|
52.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
318 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
86 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
404 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
63 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
82 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 288Population: Safety analysis set: all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication in current study.
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to the last participants visit in the study. The baseline data of Study A3921039, A3921040 or A3921044 were used as baseline data for safety evaluation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg BID
n=381 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for less than 84 days in total within the current study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 5 mg BID.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=105 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for more than or equal to 84 days in total within the long-term safety study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 10 mg BID.
|
Total
n=486 Participants
All subjects were assigned oral CP-690,550 5 mg tablets twice a day at baseline visit. Dose flexibility (increasing from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID, reducing from 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID, or temporary discontinuation) during study was allowed in consideration for the risks and benefits to the patient's condition. Data was summarized in three reporting groups including CP-690,550 5 mg BID, CP-690,550 10 mg BID and Total.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Number of participants with AEs (including SAEs)
|
371 Particiants
|
105 Particiants
|
476 Particiants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Number of participants with SAEs
|
111 Particiants
|
28 Particiants
|
139 Particiants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4,8,12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, 204, 216, 228, 240, 252, 264, 276 and 288Population: Full analysis set (FAS): All participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication in current study. No imputation was used (observed data).
ACR20 response: greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent (%) improvement in tender joint count; \>=20% improvement in swollen joint count; and \>=20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ\]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP). The baseline data of Study A3921039, A3921040 or A3921044 were used as baseline data for efficacy evaluations except for Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg BID
n=381 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for less than 84 days in total within the current study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 5 mg BID.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=105 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for more than or equal to 84 days in total within the long-term safety study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 10 mg BID.
|
Total
n=486 Participants
All subjects were assigned oral CP-690,550 5 mg tablets twice a day at baseline visit. Dose flexibility (increasing from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID, reducing from 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID, or temporary discontinuation) during study was allowed in consideration for the risks and benefits to the patient's condition. Data was summarized in three reporting groups including CP-690,550 5 mg BID, CP-690,550 10 mg BID and Total.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 12 (n=370, 105, 475)
|
91.9 Percentage of participants
|
77.1 Percentage of participants
|
88.6 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 2 (n= 378, 105, 483)
|
80.2 Percentage of participants
|
68.6 Percentage of participants
|
77.6 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 4 (n=373, 105, 478)
|
87.1 Percentage of participants
|
70.5 Percentage of participants
|
83.5 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 8 (n=371, 105, 476)
|
90.0 Percentage of participants
|
72.4 Percentage of participants
|
86.1 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 24 (n=357, 104, 461)
|
90.8 Percentage of participants
|
85.6 Percentage of participants
|
89.6 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 48 (n=331, 102, 433)
|
93.7 Percentage of participants
|
88.2 Percentage of participants
|
92.4 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 60 (n=323, 102, 425)
|
92.3 Percentage of participants
|
90.2 Percentage of participants
|
91.8 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 84 (n=309, 92, 401)
|
93.2 Percentage of participants
|
87.0 Percentage of participants
|
91.8 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 108 (n=259, 84, 343)
|
91.9 Percentage of participants
|
86.9 Percentage of participants
|
90.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 120 (n=242, 80, 322)
|
91.3 Percentage of participants
|
88.8 Percentage of participants
|
90.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 132 (n=232, 79, 311)
|
92.2 Percentage of participants
|
84.8 Percentage of participants
|
90.4 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 192 (n=138, 42, 180)
|
92.8 Percentage of participants
|
85.7 Percentage of participants
|
91.1 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 204 (n=109, 30, 139)
|
92.7 Percentage of participants
|
90.0 Percentage of participants
|
92.1 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 216 (n=76, 13, 89)
|
96.1 Percentage of participants
|
84.6 Percentage of participants
|
94.4 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 228 (n=68, 5, 73)
|
91.2 Percentage of participants
|
80.0 Percentage of participants
|
90.4 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 240 (n=65, 5, 70)
|
93.8 Percentage of participants
|
80.0 Percentage of participants
|
92.9 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 276 (n=22, 1, 23)
|
95.5 Percentage of participants
|
100 Percentage of participants
|
95.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 288 (n=3, 0, 3)
|
100 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
100 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 36 (n=339, 102, 441)
|
94.1 Percentage of participants
|
87.3 Percentage of participants
|
92.5 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 72 (n=315, 99, 414)
|
92.4 Percentage of participants
|
86.9 Percentage of participants
|
91.1 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 96 (n=281, 87, 368)
|
92.2 Percentage of participants
|
92.0 Percentage of participants
|
92.1 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 144 (n=224, 76, 300)
|
89.7 Percentage of participants
|
86.8 Percentage of participants
|
89.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 156 (n=219, 73, 292)
|
91.3 Percentage of participants
|
84.9 Percentage of participants
|
89.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 168 (n=213, 70, 283)
|
92.5 Percentage of participants
|
82.9 Percentage of participants
|
90.1 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 180 (n=180, 57, 237)
|
92.8 Percentage of participants
|
86.0 Percentage of participants
|
91.1 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 252 (n=65, 5, 70)
|
92.3 Percentage of participants
|
80.0 Percentage of participants
|
91.4 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 264 (n=59, 5, 64)
|
89.8 Percentage of participants
|
80.0 Percentage of participants
|
89.1 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4,8,12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, 204, 216, 228, 240, 252, 264, 276 and 288Population: Full analysis set (FAS): All participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication in current study. No imputation was used (observed data).
ACR50 response: greater than or equal to (\>=) 50 percent (%) improvement in tender joint count; \>=50% improvement in swollen joint count; and \>=50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ\]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP). The baseline data of Study A3921039, A3921040 or A3921044 were used as baseline data for efficacy evaluations except for Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg BID
n=381 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for less than 84 days in total within the current study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 5 mg BID.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=105 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for more than or equal to 84 days in total within the long-term safety study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 10 mg BID.
|
Total
n=486 Participants
All subjects were assigned oral CP-690,550 5 mg tablets twice a day at baseline visit. Dose flexibility (increasing from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID, reducing from 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID, or temporary discontinuation) during study was allowed in consideration for the risks and benefits to the patient's condition. Data was summarized in three reporting groups including CP-690,550 5 mg BID, CP-690,550 10 mg BID and Total.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 2 (n= 378, 105, 483)
|
59.5 Percentage of participants
|
36.2 Percentage of participants
|
54.5 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 8 (n=371, 105, 476)
|
70.4 Percentage of participants
|
47.6 Percentage of participants
|
65.3 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 24 (n=357, 104, 461)
|
76.2 Percentage of participants
|
62.5 Percentage of participants
|
73.1 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 36 (n=339, 102, 441)
|
77.3 Percentage of participants
|
56.9 Percentage of participants
|
72.6 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 48 (n=331, 102, 433)
|
77.3 Percentage of participants
|
59.8 Percentage of participants
|
73.2 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 60 (n=323, 102, 425)
|
77.1 Percentage of participants
|
66.7 Percentage of participants
|
74.6 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 96 (n=281, 87, 368)
|
78.3 Percentage of participants
|
60.9 Percentage of participants
|
74.2 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 108 (n=259, 84, 343)
|
79.9 Percentage of participants
|
72.6 Percentage of participants
|
78.1 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 144 (n=224, 76, 300)
|
78.1 Percentage of participants
|
69.7 Percentage of participants
|
76.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 168 (n=213, 70, 283)
|
79.3 Percentage of participants
|
67.1 Percentage of participants
|
76.3 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 180 (n=180, 57, 237)
|
82.2 Percentage of participants
|
71.9 Percentage of participants
|
79.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 192 (n=138, 42, 180)
|
79.7 Percentage of participants
|
61.9 Percentage of participants
|
75.6 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 204 (n=109, 30, 139)
|
84.4 Percentage of participants
|
80.0 Percentage of participants
|
83.5 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 216 (n=76, 13, 89)
|
86.8 Percentage of participants
|
53.8 Percentage of participants
|
82.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 228 (n=68, 5, 73)
|
76.5 Percentage of participants
|
80.0 Percentage of participants
|
76.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 240 (n=65, 5, 70)
|
83.1 Percentage of participants
|
40.0 Percentage of participants
|
80.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 264 (n=59, 5, 64)
|
84.7 Percentage of participants
|
40.0 Percentage of participants
|
81.3 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 276 (n=22, 1, 23)
|
81.8 Percentage of participants
|
100 Percentage of participants
|
82.6 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 4 (n=373, 105, 478)
|
63.8 Percentage of participants
|
35.2 Percentage of participants
|
57.5 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 12 (n=370, 105, 475)
|
70.8 Percentage of participants
|
46.7 Percentage of participants
|
65.5 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 72 (n=315, 99, 414)
|
77.8 Percentage of participants
|
74.7 Percentage of participants
|
77.1 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 84 (n=309, 92, 401)
|
78.6 Percentage of participants
|
64.1 Percentage of participants
|
75.3 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 120 (n=242, 80, 322)
|
76.4 Percentage of participants
|
68.8 Percentage of participants
|
74.5 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 132 (n=232, 79, 311)
|
77.2 Percentage of participants
|
72.2 Percentage of participants
|
75.9 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 156 (n=219, 73, 292)
|
79.5 Percentage of participants
|
65.8 Percentage of participants
|
76.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 252 (n=65, 5, 70)
|
86.2 Percentage of participants
|
40.0 Percentage of participants
|
82.9 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 288 (n=3, 0, 3)
|
100 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
100 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4,8,12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, 204, 216, 228, 240, 252, 264, 276 and 288Population: Full analysis set (FAS): All participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication in current study. No imputation was used (observed data).
ACR70 response: greater than or equal to (\>=) 70 percent (%) improvement in tender joint count; \>=70% improvement in swollen joint count; and \>=70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ\]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP). The baseline data of Study A3921039, A3921040 or A3921044 were used as baseline data for efficacy evaluations except for Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg BID
n=381 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for less than 84 days in total within the current study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 5 mg BID.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=105 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for more than or equal to 84 days in total within the long-term safety study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 10 mg BID.
|
Total
n=486 Participants
All subjects were assigned oral CP-690,550 5 mg tablets twice a day at baseline visit. Dose flexibility (increasing from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID, reducing from 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID, or temporary discontinuation) during study was allowed in consideration for the risks and benefits to the patient's condition. Data was summarized in three reporting groups including CP-690,550 5 mg BID, CP-690,550 10 mg BID and Total.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 168 (n=213, 70, 283)
|
62.9 Percentage of participants
|
41.4 Percentage of participants
|
57.6 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 2 (n= 378, 105, 483)
|
37.0 Percentage of participants
|
19.0 Percentage of participants
|
33.1 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 4 (n=373, 105, 478)
|
44.8 Percentage of participants
|
20.2 Percentage of participants
|
39.3 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 8 (n=371, 105, 476)
|
47.7 Percentage of participants
|
21.0 Percentage of participants
|
41.8 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 24 (n=357, 104, 461)
|
54.1 Percentage of participants
|
27.9 Percentage of participants
|
48.2 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 36 (n=339, 102, 441)
|
56.6 Percentage of participants
|
24.5 Percentage of participants
|
49.2 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 60 (n=323, 102, 425)
|
59.1 Percentage of participants
|
37.3 Percentage of participants
|
53.9 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 72 (n=315, 99, 414)
|
61.9 Percentage of participants
|
38.4 Percentage of participants
|
56.3 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 84 (n=309, 92, 401)
|
60.2 Percentage of participants
|
35.9 Percentage of participants
|
54.6 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 120 (n=242, 80, 322)
|
62.0 Percentage of participants
|
37.5 Percentage of participants
|
55.9 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 156 (n=219, 73, 292)
|
61.6 Percentage of participants
|
41.1 Percentage of participants
|
56.5 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 252 (n=65, 5, 70)
|
73.8 Percentage of participants
|
20.0 Percentage of participants
|
70.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 264 (n=59, 5, 64)
|
71.2 Percentage of participants
|
20.0 Percentage of participants
|
67.2 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 288 (n=3, 0, 3)
|
66.7 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
66.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 12 (n=370, 105, 475)
|
50.0 Percentage of participants
|
16.2 Percentage of participants
|
42.5 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 48 (n=331, 102, 433)
|
59.8 Percentage of participants
|
34.3 Percentage of participants
|
53.8 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 96 (n=281, 87, 368)
|
59.4 Percentage of participants
|
42.5 Percentage of participants
|
55.4 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 108 (n=259, 84, 343)
|
60.6 Percentage of participants
|
42.9 Percentage of participants
|
56.3 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 132 (n=232, 79, 311)
|
60.8 Percentage of participants
|
40.5 Percentage of participants
|
55.6 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 144 (n=224, 76, 300)
|
61.2 Percentage of participants
|
35.5 Percentage of participants
|
54.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 180 (n=180, 57, 237)
|
63.9 Percentage of participants
|
47.4 Percentage of participants
|
59.9 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 192 (n=138, 42, 180)
|
63.8 Percentage of participants
|
42.9 Percentage of participants
|
58.9 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 204 (n=109, 30, 139)
|
62.4 Percentage of participants
|
56.7 Percentage of participants
|
61.2 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 216 (n=76, 13, 89)
|
69.7 Percentage of participants
|
30.8 Percentage of participants
|
64.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 228 (n=68, 5, 73)
|
63.2 Percentage of participants
|
20.0 Percentage of participants
|
60.3 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 240 (n=65, 5, 70)
|
69.2 Percentage of participants
|
20.0 Percentage of participants
|
65.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 276 (n=22, 1, 23)
|
68.2 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
65.2 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4,8,12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, 204, 216, 228, 240, 252, 264, 276 and 288Population: Full analysis set (FAS): All participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication in current study. No imputation was used (observed data).
HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom, arise, eat, walk, reach, grip, hygiene and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale, 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty;2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as sum of domain sc ores and divided by number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3: 0=least difficulty and 3=extreme difficulty. The baseline data of Study A3921039, A3921040 or A3921044 were used as baseline data for efficacy evaluations except for Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg BID
n=381 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for less than 84 days in total within the current study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 5 mg BID.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=105 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for more than or equal to 84 days in total within the long-term safety study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 10 mg BID.
|
Total
n=486 Participants
All subjects were assigned oral CP-690,550 5 mg tablets twice a day at baseline visit. Dose flexibility (increasing from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID, reducing from 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID, or temporary discontinuation) during study was allowed in consideration for the risks and benefits to the patient's condition. Data was summarized in three reporting groups including CP-690,550 5 mg BID, CP-690,550 10 mg BID and Total.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 8 (n=371, 105, 476)
|
-0.66 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
-0.49 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.62 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 24 (n=357, 104, 461)
|
-0.69 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
-0.55 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.65 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 36 (n=339, 102, 441)
|
-0.70 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
-0.54 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.66 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 48 (n=331, 102, 433)
|
-0.70 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
-0.62 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.68 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 60 (n=323, 102, 425)
|
-0.71 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
-0.57 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.67 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 72 (n=315, 99, 414)
|
-0.72 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
-0.60 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.69 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 84 (n=309, 92, 401)
|
-0.72 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
-0.61 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.69 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 96 (n=281, 87, 368)
|
-0.72 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
-0.61 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.69 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 108 (n=259, 84, 343)
|
-0.70 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
-0.64 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.69 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 120 (n=242, 80, 322)
|
-0.70 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
-0.63 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.68 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 132 (n=232, 79, 311)
|
-0.70 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
-0.64 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.68 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 144 (n=224, 76, 300)
|
-0.67 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
-0.59 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
-0.65 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 156 (n=219, 72, 291)
|
-0.68 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
-0.62 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.66 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 168 (n=213, 70, 283)
|
-0.68 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
-0.57 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
-0.65 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 180 (n=180, 57, 237)
|
-0.70 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.63 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
-0.68 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 192 (n=138, 42, 180)
|
-0.69 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.61 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
-0.67 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 204 (n=109, 30, 139)
|
-0.67 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.67 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
-0.67 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 216 (n=76, 13, 89)
|
-0.62 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.42 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
-0.59 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 228 (n=68, 5, 73)
|
-0.62 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.25 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
|
-0.59 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 240 (n=65, 5, 70)
|
-0.66 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.33 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
|
-0.64 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 252 (n=65, 5, 70)
|
-0.68 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
-0.25 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
|
-0.65 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 264 (n=59, 5, 64)
|
-0.65 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
-0.23 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
-0.62 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 276 (n=22, 1, 23)
|
-0.83 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
-0.63 Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Standard error was not calculated due to one participant data available.
|
-0.82 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 288 (n=3, 0, 3)
|
-0.96 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.37
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Mean and standard error were not calculated because no data were available.
|
-0.96 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.37
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 2 (n= 378, 105, 483)
|
-0.55 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
-0.44 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.53 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 4 (n=372, 105, 477)
|
-0.61 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
-0.45 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.57 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 12 (n=370, 105, 475)
|
-0.66 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
-0.51 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.63 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4,8,12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, 204, 216, 228, 240, 252, 264, 276 and 288Population: Full analysis set (FAS): All participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication in current study. No imputation was used (observed data).
DAS28-4 (ESR) calculated from swollen joint count (SJC) and tender/painful joint count (TJC) using 28 joint count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour \[mm/hour\]) and patient's global assessment (PtGA) of disease activity (transformed score ranging 0 to 10; higher score indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). Total score range:0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. The baseline data of Study A3921039, A3921040 or A3921044 were used as baseline data for efficacy evaluations except for Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg BID
n=381 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for less than 84 days in total within the current study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 5 mg BID.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=105 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for more than or equal to 84 days in total within the long-term safety study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 10 mg BID.
|
Total
n=486 Participants
All subjects were assigned oral CP-690,550 5 mg tablets twice a day at baseline visit. Dose flexibility (increasing from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID, reducing from 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID, or temporary discontinuation) during study was allowed in consideration for the risks and benefits to the patient's condition. Data was summarized in three reporting groups including CP-690,550 5 mg BID, CP-690,550 10 mg BID and Total.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])
Week 2 (n= 378, 105, 483)
|
-2.60 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
-1.94 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
-2.45 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])
Week 8 (n=371, 104, 475)
|
-2.95 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-2.14 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
|
-2.77 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])
Week 12 (n=370, 105, 475)
|
-3.01 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-2.08 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
|
-2.81 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])
Week 72 (n=315, 99, 414)
|
-3.20 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
-2.83 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
|
-3.11 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])
Week 156 (n=218, 72, 290)
|
-3.08 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
-2.84 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
-3.02 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])
Week 180 (n=178, 56, 234)
|
-3.21 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
|
-3.06 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.19
|
-3.18 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])
Week 240 (n=65, 5, 70)
|
-3.22 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
|
-2.61 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.70
|
-3.17 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])
Week 252 (n=65, 5, 70)
|
-3.33 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
|
-1.81 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.51
|
-3.23 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])
Week 288 (n=3, 0, 3)
|
-2.95 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.51
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Mean and standard error were not calculated because no data were available.
|
-2.95 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.51
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])
Week 4 (n=372, 105, 477)
|
-2.77 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
-1.95 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
-2.59 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])
Week 24 (n=357, 104, 461)
|
-3.12 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-2.42 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
|
-2.96 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])
Week 36 (n=339, 102, 441)
|
-3.18 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
-2.54 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
-3.03 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])
Week 48 (n=331, 102, 433)
|
-3.20 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
-2.72 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
-3.08 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])
Week 60 (n=323, 101, 424)
|
-3.25 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
-2.80 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
|
-3.15 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])
Week 84 (n=309, 92, 401)
|
-3.26 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
-2.86 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
|
-3.17 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])
Week 96 (n=281, 87, 368)
|
-3.21 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
-2.87 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
|
-3.13 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])
Week 108 (n=259, 83, 342)
|
-3.22 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
-2.83 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
|
-3.12 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])
Week 120 (n=242, 79, 321)
|
-3.24 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
-2.78 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
|
-3.12 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])
Week 132 (n=232, 79, 311)
|
-3.14 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
-2.84 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
|
-3.07 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])
Week 144 (n=224, 76, 300)
|
-3.17 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
-2.84 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
-3.09 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])
Week 168 (n=213, 70, 283)
|
-3.16 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
-2.87 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
|
-3.09 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])
Week 192 (n=138, 42, 180)
|
-3.17 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
-3.07 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.19
|
-3.15 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])
Week 204 (n=109, 30, 139)
|
-3.24 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
|
-3.35 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.25
|
-3.26 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])
Week 216 (n=76, 13, 89)
|
-3.20 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
-2.44 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.44
|
-3.09 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])
Week 228 (n=68, 5, 73)
|
-3.08 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
|
-2.25 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.58
|
-3.02 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])
Week 264 (n=59, 5, 64)
|
-3.32 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
|
-2.09 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.45
|
-3.23 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])
Week 276 (n=21, 1, 22)
|
-3.34 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.25
|
-2.15 Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Standard error was not calculated due to one participant data available.
|
-3.29 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.24
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4,8,12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, 204, 216, 228, 240, 252, 264, 276 and 288Population: Full analysis set (FAS): All participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication in current study. No imputation was used (observed data).
DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joint count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. The baseline data of Study A3921039, A3921040 or A3921044 were used as baseline data for efficacy evaluations except for Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg BID
n=381 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for less than 84 days in total within the current study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 5 mg BID.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=105 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for more than or equal to 84 days in total within the long-term safety study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 10 mg BID.
|
Total
n=486 Participants
All subjects were assigned oral CP-690,550 5 mg tablets twice a day at baseline visit. Dose flexibility (increasing from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID, reducing from 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID, or temporary discontinuation) during study was allowed in consideration for the risks and benefits to the patient's condition. Data was summarized in three reporting groups including CP-690,550 5 mg BID, CP-690,550 10 mg BID and Total.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 264 (n=58, 5, 63)
|
-3.13 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
|
-1.86 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.30
|
-3.03 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 2 (n= 378, 105, 483)
|
-2.44 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-1.90 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
|
-2.32 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 4 (n=372, 105, 477)
|
-2.55 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-1.90 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
|
-2.41 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 36 (n=337, 102, 439)
|
-2.92 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-2.45 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
-2.81 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 156 (n=219, 72, 291)
|
-2.84 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
-2.70 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
|
-2.81 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 8 (n=371, 105, 476)
|
-2.68 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-2.06 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
-2.55 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 12 (n=370, 105, 475)
|
-2.75 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-1.97 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
-2.57 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 24 (n=357, 104, 461)
|
-2.85 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-2.29 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
-2.72 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 48 (n=331, 102, 433)
|
-2.92 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-2.58 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
|
-2.84 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 60 (n=322, 102, 424)
|
-2.92 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-2.60 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
-2.85 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 72 (n=315, 99, 414)
|
-2.93 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-2.61 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
-2.86 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 84 (n=309, 92, 401)
|
-2.98 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-2.70 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
|
-2.92 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 96 (n=281, 87, 368)
|
-2.95 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
-2.69 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
-2.88 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 108 (n=259, 83, 342)
|
-2.93 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
-2.64 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
-2.86 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 120 (n=242, 80, 322)
|
-2.97 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
-2.60 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
-2.88 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 132 (n=231, 79, 310)
|
-2.89 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
-2.66 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
-2.83 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 144 (n=224, 76, 300)
|
-2.90 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
-2.68 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
|
-2.85 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 168 (n=213, 70, 283)
|
-2.90 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
-2.68 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
|
-2.84 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 180 (n=180, 57, 237)
|
-2.92 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
-2.80 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
|
-2.89 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 192 (n=138, 42, 180)
|
-2.93 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
-2.84 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
-2.91 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 204 (n=109, 30, 139)
|
-2.95 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
-3.05 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
-2.97 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 216 (n=76, 13, 89)
|
-2.94 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
|
-2.46 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.34
|
-2.87 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 228 (n=68, 5, 73)
|
-2.84 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
|
-2.38 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.44
|
-2.81 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 240 (n=65, 5, 70)
|
-2.97 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
-2.36 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.57
|
-2.92 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 252 (n=65, 5, 70)
|
-3.09 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
|
-1.89 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.42
|
-3.00 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 276 (n=22, 1, 23)
|
-3.24 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.24
|
-1.50 Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Standard error was not calculated due to one participant data available.
|
-3.16 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.24
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 288 (n=3, 0, 3)
|
-2.67 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.27
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Mean and standard error were not calculated because no data were available.
|
-2.67 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.27
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4,8,12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, 204, 216, 228, 240, 252, 264, 276 and 288Population: Full analysis set (FAS): All participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication in current study. No imputation was used (observed data).
Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" Participants responded by using a 0 - 100 mm VAS where 0 = very well and 100 = very poorly. The baseline data of Study A3921039, A3921040 or A3921044 were used as baseline data for efficacy evaluations except for Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg BID
n=381 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for less than 84 days in total within the current study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 5 mg BID.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=105 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for more than or equal to 84 days in total within the long-term safety study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 10 mg BID.
|
Total
n=486 Participants
All subjects were assigned oral CP-690,550 5 mg tablets twice a day at baseline visit. Dose flexibility (increasing from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID, reducing from 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID, or temporary discontinuation) during study was allowed in consideration for the risks and benefits to the patient's condition. Data was summarized in three reporting groups including CP-690,550 5 mg BID, CP-690,550 10 mg BID and Total.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 36 (n=339, 102, 441)
|
-41.70 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.42
|
-29.95 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.63
|
-38.98 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.27
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 48 (n=331, 102, 433)
|
-41.03 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.46
|
-32.48 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.56
|
-39.02 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.28
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 60 (n=323, 102, 425)
|
-41.79 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.44
|
-34.33 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.42
|
-40.00 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.25
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 108 (n=259, 84, 343)
|
-42.47 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.67
|
-34.95 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.98
|
-40.63 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.46
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 120 (n=242, 80, 322)
|
-42.97 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.71
|
-35.00 Units on a scale
Standard Error 3.05
|
-40.99 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 144 (n=224, 76, 300)
|
-42.48 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.77
|
-33.78 Units on a scale
Standard Error 3.22
|
-40.27 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.57
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 192 (n=138, 42, 180)
|
-42.05 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.10
|
-34.40 Units on a scale
Standard Error 3.95
|
-40.27 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.86
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 204 (n=109, 30, 139)
|
-42.44 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.36
|
-35.73 Units on a scale
Standard Error 5.31
|
-40.99 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.18
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 228 (n=68, 5, 73)
|
-37.09 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.96
|
-17.60 Units on a scale
Standard Error 10.66
|
-35.75 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.89
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 240 (n=65, 5, 70)
|
-38.91 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.98
|
-18.20 Units on a scale
Standard Error 8.36
|
-37.43 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.89
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 288 (n=3, 0, 3)
|
-41.67 Units on a scale
Standard Error 7.31
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Mean and standard error were not calculated because no data were available.
|
-41.67 Units on a scale
Standard Error 7.31
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 252 (n=65, 5, 70)
|
-40.37 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.92
|
-7.60 Units on a scale
Standard Error 9.17
|
-38.03 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.95
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 264 (n=59, 5, 64)
|
-37.32 Units on a scale
Standard Error 3.69
|
-16.20 Units on a scale
Standard Error 9.01
|
-35.67 Units on a scale
Standard Error 3.54
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 276 (n=21, 1, 22)
|
-35.62 Units on a scale
Standard Error 6.09
|
-10.00 Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Standard error was not calculated due to one participant data available.
|
-34.45 Units on a scale
Standard Error 5.92
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 2 (n= 378, 105, 483)
|
-34.52 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.38
|
-25.38 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.43
|
-32.54 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.21
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 4 (n=372, 105, 477)
|
-37.81 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.36
|
-25.34 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.61
|
-35.06 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.23
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 8 (n=371, 105, 476)
|
-39.61 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.35
|
-28.86 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.31
|
-37.24 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.19
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 12 (n=370, 105, 475)
|
-39.31 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.38
|
-27.33 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.23
|
-36.67 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.20
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 24 (n=357, 104, 461)
|
-40.67 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.39
|
-30.75 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.53
|
-38.43 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.24
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 72 (n=315, 99, 414)
|
-41.30 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.53
|
-35.38 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.31
|
-39.88 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.29
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 84 (n=309, 92, 401)
|
-42.29 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.53
|
-35.12 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.63
|
-40.65 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.33
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 96 (n=281, 87, 368)
|
-41.90 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.62
|
-34.98 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.88
|
-40.27 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.42
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 132 (n=232, 79, 311)
|
-42.87 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.73
|
-35.05 Units on a scale
Standard Error 3.13
|
-40.88 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 156 (n=219, 72, 291)
|
-42.72 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.71
|
-32.64 Units on a scale
Standard Error 3.13
|
-40.22 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 168 (n=213, 70, 283)
|
-43.00 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.72
|
-33.61 Units on a scale
Standard Error 3.22
|
-40.67 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.53
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 180 (n=180, 57, 237)
|
-43.22 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.91
|
-36.14 Units on a scale
Standard Error 3.72
|
-41.52 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.71
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 216 (n=76, 13, 89)
|
-42.04 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.87
|
-23.92 Units on a scale
Standard Error 9.22
|
-39.39 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.86
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4,8,12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, 204, 216, 228, 240, 252, 264, 276 and 288Population: Full analysis set (FAS): All participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication in current study. No imputation was used (observed data).
Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very good and 100 mm = very bad. The baseline data of Study A3921039, A3921040 or A3921044 were used as baseline data for efficacy evaluations except for Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg BID
n=381 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for less than 84 days in total within the current study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 5 mg BID.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=105 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for more than or equal to 84 days in total within the long-term safety study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 10 mg BID.
|
Total
n=486 Participants
All subjects were assigned oral CP-690,550 5 mg tablets twice a day at baseline visit. Dose flexibility (increasing from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID, reducing from 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID, or temporary discontinuation) during study was allowed in consideration for the risks and benefits to the patient's condition. Data was summarized in three reporting groups including CP-690,550 5 mg BID, CP-690,550 10 mg BID and Total.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 2 (n= 378, 105, 483)
|
-42.80 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.13
|
-33.49 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.01
|
-40.78 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 4 (n=372, 105, 477)
|
-46.06 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.08
|
-34.91 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.20
|
-43.60 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.99
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 8 (n=371, 105, 476)
|
-47.34 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.06
|
-37.15 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.00
|
-45.09 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.95
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 12 (n=370, 105, 475)
|
-47.78 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.09
|
-36.56 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.33
|
-45.30 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 24 (n=357, 104, 461)
|
-48.29 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.07
|
-41.26 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.01
|
-46.70 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.95
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 36 (n=339, 102, 441)
|
-49.28 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.09
|
-41.92 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.01
|
-47.58 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.97
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 48 (n=331, 102, 433)
|
-49.96 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.13
|
-45.28 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.08
|
-48.86 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 60 (n=323, 102, 425)
|
-49.89 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.14
|
-47.01 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.05
|
-49.20 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 72 (n=315, 99, 414)
|
-50.03 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.14
|
-45.70 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.95
|
-48.99 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.99
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 84 (n=309, 92, 401)
|
-50.61 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.16
|
-46.89 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.17
|
-49.75 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.02
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 96 (n=281, 87, 368)
|
-49.99 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.28
|
-48.16 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.23
|
-49.55 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.11
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 108 (n=259, 83, 342)
|
-49.62 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.33
|
-47.99 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.56
|
-49.22 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.18
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 120 (n=242, 80, 322)
|
-49.42 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.47
|
-47.76 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.39
|
-49.01 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.26
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 132 (n=231, 78, 309)
|
-49.99 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.41
|
-50.19 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.33
|
-50.04 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.20
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 144 (n=224, 76, 300)
|
-50.80 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.46
|
-49.55 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.44
|
-50.49 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.25
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 156 (n=219, 72, 291)
|
-50.68 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.39
|
-49.78 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.58
|
-50.46 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.23
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 168 (n=213, 70, 283)
|
-51.52 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.45
|
-46.33 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.60
|
-50.23 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.27
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 180 (n=180, 57, 237)
|
-52.20 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.51
|
-50.33 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.84
|
-51.75 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.33
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 192 (n=138, 42, 180)
|
-51.41 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.72
|
-50.43 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.98
|
-51.18 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.49
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 204 (n=109, 30, 139)
|
-51.10 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.73
|
-50.97 Units on a scale
Standard Error 4.12
|
-51.07 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.61
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 216 (n=76, 13, 89)
|
-50.91 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.01
|
-42.77 Units on a scale
Standard Error 6.37
|
-49.72 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.96
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 228 (n=67, 5, 72)
|
-49.57 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.37
|
-33.60 Units on a scale
Standard Error 8.88
|
-48.46 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.33
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 240 (n=65, 5, 70)
|
-49.94 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.25
|
-34.40 Units on a scale
Standard Error 10.30
|
-48.83 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.25
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 252 (n=65, 5, 70)
|
-51.78 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.17
|
-31.60 Units on a scale
Standard Error 7.92
|
-50.34 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.17
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 264 (n=58, 5, 63)
|
-52.62 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.36
|
-33.80 Units on a scale
Standard Error 9.49
|
-51.13 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.36
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 276 (n=21, 1, 22)
|
-53.05 Units on a scale
Standard Error 3.92
|
-7.00 Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Standard error was not calculated due to one participant data available.
|
-50.95 Units on a scale
Standard Error 4.29
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 288 (n=3, 0, 3)
|
-37.67 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.33
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Mean and standard error were not calculated because no data were available.
|
-37.67 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.33
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4,8,12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, 204, 216, 228, 240, 252, 264, 276 and 288Population: Full analysis set (FAS): All participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication in current study. No imputation was used (observed data).
Participants rated the severity of arthritis pain on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) visual analogue scale (VAS), where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = most severe pain. The baseline data of Study A3921039, A3921040 or A3921044 were used as baseline data for efficacy evaluations except for Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg BID
n=381 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for less than 84 days in total within the current study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 5 mg BID.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=105 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for more than or equal to 84 days in total within the long-term safety study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 10 mg BID.
|
Total
n=486 Participants
All subjects were assigned oral CP-690,550 5 mg tablets twice a day at baseline visit. Dose flexibility (increasing from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID, reducing from 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID, or temporary discontinuation) during study was allowed in consideration for the risks and benefits to the patient's condition. Data was summarized in three reporting groups including CP-690,550 5 mg BID, CP-690,550 10 mg BID and Total.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 48 (n=331, 102, 433)
|
-41.98 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.41
|
-34.39 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.52
|
-40.19 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.24
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 264 (n=59, 5, 64)
|
-36.80 Units on a scale
Standard Error 3.72
|
-16.60 Units on a scale
Standard Error 11.91
|
-35.22 Units on a scale
Standard Error 3.60
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 2 (n= 378, 105, 483)
|
-34.23 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.40
|
-27.98 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.39
|
-32.87 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.22
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 4 (n=372, 105, 477)
|
-37.32 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.38
|
-27.70 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.61
|
-35.20 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.23
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 8 (n=371, 105, 476)
|
-39.54 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.34
|
-30.69 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.32
|
-37.59 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.17
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 12 (n=370, 105, 475)
|
-39.34 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.36
|
-29.03 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.25
|
-37.06 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.18
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 24 (n=357, 104, 461)
|
-40.70 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.42
|
-33.60 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.50
|
-39.10 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.24
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 36 (n=339, 102, 441)
|
-41.70 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.45
|
-32.71 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.56
|
-39.62 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.27
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 60 (n=323, 102, 425)
|
-42.37 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.44
|
-36.65 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.36
|
-41.00 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.24
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 72 (n=315, 99, 414)
|
-41.84 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.51
|
-37.41 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.28
|
-40.79 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.28
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 84 (n=309, 92, 401)
|
-42.49 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.53
|
-37.65 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.55
|
-41.38 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.32
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 96 (n=281, 87, 368)
|
-42.21 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.63
|
-38.21 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.87
|
-41.27 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.42
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 108 (n=259, 84, 343)
|
-42.61 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.68
|
-37.99 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.87
|
-41.48 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.45
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 120 (n=242, 80, 322)
|
-42.44 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.74
|
-37.45 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.92
|
-41.20 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 132 (n=232, 79, 311)
|
-42.52 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.78
|
-37.86 Units on a scale
Standard Error 3.04
|
-41.33 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.54
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 144 (n=224, 76, 300)
|
-42.05 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.81
|
-37.07 Units on a scale
Standard Error 3.09
|
-40.79 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.56
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 156 (n=219, 72, 291)
|
-43.77 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.75
|
-36.39 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.89
|
-41.94 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.51
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 168 (n=213, 70, 283)
|
-43.87 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.73
|
-37.96 Units on a scale
Standard Error 3.24
|
-42.41 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.54
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 180 (n=180, 57, 237)
|
-43.85 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.92
|
-40.21 Units on a scale
Standard Error 3.51
|
-42.97 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.68
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 192 (n=138, 42, 180)
|
-42.64 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.22
|
-36.67 Units on a scale
Standard Error 3.93
|
-41.24 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.94
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 204 (n=109, 30, 139)
|
-41.11 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.59
|
-38.70 Units on a scale
Standard Error 5.25
|
-40.59 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.32
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 216 (n=76, 13, 89)
|
-41.61 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.90
|
-30.38 Units on a scale
Standard Error 9.30
|
-39.97 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.84
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 228 (n=68, 5, 73)
|
-37.19 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.96
|
-28.40 Units on a scale
Standard Error 12.48
|
-36.59 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.87
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 240 (n=65, 5, 70)
|
-36.72 Units on a scale
Standard Error 3.08
|
-21.20 Units on a scale
Standard Error 7.85
|
-35.61 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.94
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 252 (n=65, 5, 70)
|
-38.54 Units on a scale
Standard Error 3.19
|
-21.20 Units on a scale
Standard Error 10.56
|
-37.30 Units on a scale
Standard Error 3.08
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 276 (n=21, 1, 22)
|
-40.19 Units on a scale
Standard Error 5.00
|
-44.00 Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Standard error was not calculated due to one participant data available.
|
-40.36 Units on a scale
Standard Error 4.77
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 288 (n=3, 0, 3)
|
-34.67 Units on a scale
Standard Error 9.82
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Mean and standard error were not calculated because no data were available.
|
-34.67 Units on a scale
Standard Error 9.82
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4,8,12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, 204, 216, 228, 240, 252, 264, 276 and 288Population: Full analysis set (FAS): All participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication in current study. No imputation was used (observed data).
This was carried out on 68 joints. Each joint's response to pressure/motion was assessed using the following scale: Present/Absent/Not Done/Not Applicable (to be used for artificial joints). The baseline data of Study A3921039, A3921040 or A3921044 were used as baseline data for efficacy evaluations except for Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg BID
n=381 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for less than 84 days in total within the current study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 5 mg BID.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=105 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for more than or equal to 84 days in total within the long-term safety study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 10 mg BID.
|
Total
n=486 Participants
All subjects were assigned oral CP-690,550 5 mg tablets twice a day at baseline visit. Dose flexibility (increasing from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID, reducing from 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID, or temporary discontinuation) during study was allowed in consideration for the risks and benefits to the patient's condition. Data was summarized in three reporting groups including CP-690,550 5 mg BID, CP-690,550 10 mg BID and Total.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Counts
Week 36 (n=339, 102, 441)
|
-14.32 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.53
|
-13.05 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.94
|
-14.03 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.46
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Counts
Week 48 (n=331, 102, 433)
|
-14.23 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.53
|
-13.43 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.99
|
-14.04 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.47
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Counts
Week 60 (n=323, 102, 425)
|
-14.23 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.55
|
-13.67 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.94
|
-14.09 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.48
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Counts
Week 72 (n=315, 99, 414)
|
-14.45 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.56
|
-14.00 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.96
|
-14.34 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.48
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Counts
Week 84 (n=309, 92, 401)
|
-14.39 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.56
|
-14.04 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 1.11
|
-14.31 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Counts
Week 168 (n=213, 70, 283)
|
-14.41 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.73
|
-14.06 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 1.25
|
-14.33 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.63
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Counts
Week 192 (n=138, 42, 180)
|
-15.01 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.87
|
-14.57 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 1.42
|
-14.91 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.74
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Counts
Week 204 (n=109, 30, 139)
|
-14.79 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.94
|
-15.67 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 1.93
|
-14.98 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.84
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Counts
Week 216 (n=76, 13, 89)
|
-14.42 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 1.04
|
-11.38 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 2.64
|
-13.98 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.97
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Counts
Week 228 (n=68, 5, 73)
|
-13.78 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 1.56
|
-11.60 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 5.46
|
-13.63 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 1.49
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Counts
Week 240 (n=65, 5, 70)
|
-15.11 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 1.15
|
-10.80 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 4.92
|
-14.80 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 1.12
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Counts
Week 264 (n=59, 5, 64)
|
-15.54 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 1.27
|
-9.80 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 3.95
|
-15.09 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 1.22
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Counts
Week 288 (n=3, 0, 3)
|
-8.67 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 1.20
|
NA Tender/painful joints
Standard Error NA
Mean and standard error were not calculated because no data were available.
|
-8.67 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 1.20
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Counts
Week 2 (n=378, 105, 483)
|
-11.88 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.48
|
-10.17 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.95
|
-11.51 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.43
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Counts
Week 4 (n=373, 105, 478)
|
-12.13 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.51
|
-10.46 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.90
|
-11.77 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.45
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Counts
Week 8 (n=371, 105, 476)
|
-13.06 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.47
|
-10.75 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.96
|
-12.55 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.43
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Counts
Week 12 (n=370, 105, 475)
|
-13.41 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.47
|
-10.74 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.97
|
-12.82 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.43
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Counts
Week 24 (n=357, 104, 461)
|
-14.02 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.50
|
-12.62 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.89
|
-13.70 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.44
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Counts
Week 96 (n=281, 87, 368)
|
-14.44 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.60
|
-13.92 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 1.03
|
-14.32 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Counts
Week 108 (n=259, 83, 342)
|
-14.46 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.61
|
-13.66 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 1.14
|
-14.26 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.54
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Counts
Week 120 (n=242, 80, 322)
|
-14.67 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.65
|
-13.69 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 1.07
|
-14.42 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.55
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Counts
Week 132 (n=232, 79, 311)
|
-14.01 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.73
|
-13.30 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 1.33
|
-13.83 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.64
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Counts
Week 144 (n=224, 76, 300)
|
-14.45 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.68
|
-13.83 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 1.18
|
-14.29 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.59
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Counts
Week 156 (n=219, 72, 291)
|
-14.24 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.70
|
-14.15 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 1.20
|
-14.22 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.61
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Counts
Week 180 (n=180, 57, 237)
|
-14.78 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.79
|
-15.18 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 1.46
|
-14.87 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 0.70
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Counts
Week 252 (n=65, 5, 70)
|
-15.34 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 1.17
|
-9.60 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 4.55
|
-14.93 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 1.14
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Counts
Week 276 (n=22, 1, 23)
|
-17.55 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 2.55
|
-4.00 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error NA
Standard error was not calculated due to one participant data available.
|
-16.96 Tender/painful joints
Standard Error 2.51
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4,8,12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, 192, 204, 216, 228, 240, 252, 264, 276 and 288Population: Full analysis set (FAS): All participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication in current study. No imputation was used (observed data).
Sixty-six (66) joints, the same as those assessed for tenderness/pain except for the right and left hip joints, were assessed for swelling by palpation using the following scale: Present/Absent/Not Done/Not Applicable (to be used for artificial joints). The baseline data of Study A3921039, A3921040 or A3921044 were used as baseline data for efficacy evaluations except for Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg BID
n=381 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for less than 84 days in total within the current study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 5 mg BID.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=105 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for more than or equal to 84 days in total within the long-term safety study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 10 mg BID.
|
Total
n=486 Participants
All subjects were assigned oral CP-690,550 5 mg tablets twice a day at baseline visit. Dose flexibility (increasing from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID, reducing from 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID, or temporary discontinuation) during study was allowed in consideration for the risks and benefits to the patient's condition. Data was summarized in three reporting groups including CP-690,550 5 mg BID, CP-690,550 10 mg BID and Total.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Counts
Week 144 (n=224, 76, 300)
|
-11.90 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.61
|
-11.74 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.94
|
-11.86 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.51
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Counts
Week 156 (n=219, 72, 291)
|
-12.07 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.61
|
-11.86 Swollen joints
Standard Error 1.04
|
-12.02 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Counts
Week 168 (n=213, 70, 283)
|
-12.17 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.62
|
-11.67 Swollen joints
Standard Error 1.05
|
-12.05 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.54
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Counts
Week 180 (n=180, 57, 237)
|
-12.43 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.70
|
-12.26 Swollen joints
Standard Error 1.24
|
-12.39 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.61
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Counts
Week 4 (n=373, 105, 478)
|
-10.12 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.42
|
-8.54 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.75
|
-9.78 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.37
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Counts
Week 8 (n=371, 105, 476)
|
-10.90 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.39
|
-9.31 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.73
|
-10.55 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.35
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Counts
Week 12 (n=370, 105, 475)
|
-11.18 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.40
|
-9.21 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.67
|
-10.74 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.35
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Counts
Week 48 (n=331, 102, 433)
|
-11.76 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.44
|
-11.11 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.74
|
-11.61 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.38
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Counts
Week 60 (n=323, 102, 425)
|
-11.83 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.44
|
-10.97 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.76
|
-11.62 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.38
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Counts
Week 72 (n=315, 99, 414)
|
-12.00 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.46
|
-11.38 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.80
|
-11.85 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.40
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Counts
Week 108 (n=259, 83, 342)
|
-11.94 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.52
|
-11.60 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.91
|
-11.86 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.45
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Counts
Week 132 (n=232, 79, 311)
|
-11.69 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.64
|
-11.15 Swollen joints
Standard Error 1.16
|
-11.55 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.56
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Counts
Week 216 (n=76, 13, 89)
|
-12.34 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.99
|
-9.00 Swollen joints
Standard Error 2.35
|
-11.85 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.91
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Counts
Week 228 (n=68, 5, 73)
|
-11.74 Swollen joints
Standard Error 1.47
|
-11.00 Swollen joints
Standard Error 5.09
|
-11.68 Swollen joints
Standard Error 1.41
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Counts
Week 240 (n=65, 5, 70)
|
-13.09 Swollen joints
Standard Error 1.12
|
-11.40 Swollen joints
Standard Error 5.48
|
-12.97 Swollen joints
Standard Error 1.10
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Counts
Week 252 (n=65, 5, 70)
|
-13.20 Swollen joints
Standard Error 1.15
|
-10.60 Swollen joints
Standard Error 4.70
|
-13.01 Swollen joints
Standard Error 1.11
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Counts
Week 264 (n=59, 5, 64)
|
-13.58 Swollen joints
Standard Error 1.24
|
-10.00 Swollen joints
Standard Error 4.11
|
-13.30 Swollen joints
Standard Error 1.19
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Counts
Week 276 (n=22, 1, 23)
|
-15.32 Swollen joints
Standard Error 2.53
|
-6.00 Swollen joints
Standard Error NA
Standard error was not calculated due to one participant data available.
|
-14.91 Swollen joints
Standard Error 2.46
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Counts
Week 288 (n=3, 0, 3)
|
-8.33 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.88
|
NA Swollen joints
Standard Error NA
Mean and standard error were not calculated because no data were available.
|
-8.33 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.88
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Counts
Week 2 (n=378, 105, 483)
|
-9.67 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.38
|
-8.69 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.74
|
-9.46 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.34
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Counts
Week 24 (n=357, 104, 461)
|
-11.33 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.40
|
-10.46 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.72
|
-11.13 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.35
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Counts
Week 36 (n=339, 102, 441)
|
-11.62 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.43
|
-10.75 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.73
|
-11.41 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.37
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Counts
Week 84 (n=309, 92, 401)
|
-12.08 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.47
|
-11.72 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.88
|
-12.00 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.41
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Counts
Week 96 (n=281, 87, 368)
|
-11.97 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.50
|
-11.54 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.84
|
-11.87 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.43
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Counts
Week 120 (n=242, 80, 322)
|
-12.09 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.56
|
-11.24 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.87
|
-11.88 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.47
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Counts
Week 192 (n=138, 42, 180)
|
-12.36 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.79
|
-12.48 Swollen joints
Standard Error 1.47
|
-12.38 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.69
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Counts
Week 204 (n=109, 30, 139)
|
-12.35 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.82
|
12.50 Swollen joints
Standard Error 1.89
|
12.38 Swollen joints
Standard Error 0.76
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240, 264, and 288Population: Full analysis set (FAS): All participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication in current study. No imputation was used (observed data).
SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning) and is reported as 2 summary scores; physical component score and mental component score. Total score range for the summary scores = 0-100, where higher score represents higher level of functioning. The baseline data of Study A3921039, A3921040 or A3921044 were used as baseline data for efficacy evaluations except for Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg BID
n=381 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for less than 84 days in total within the current study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 5 mg BID.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=105 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for more than or equal to 84 days in total within the long-term safety study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 10 mg BID.
|
Total
n=486 Participants
All subjects were assigned oral CP-690,550 5 mg tablets twice a day at baseline visit. Dose flexibility (increasing from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID, reducing from 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID, or temporary discontinuation) during study was allowed in consideration for the risks and benefits to the patient's condition. Data was summarized in three reporting groups including CP-690,550 5 mg BID, CP-690,550 10 mg BID and Total.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Physical Functioning
Week 24 (n=357, 104, 461)
|
8.67 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.46
|
6.12 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.01
|
8.10 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.42
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Physical Functioning
Week 48 (n=331, 102, 433)
|
9.06 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.48
|
6.84 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.05
|
8.54 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.45
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Physical Functioning
Week 72 (n=315, 99, 414)
|
9.10 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.51
|
7.61 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.93
|
8.74 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.45
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Physical Functioning
Week 96 (n=281, 87, 368)
|
9.11 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.55
|
8.26 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.88
|
8.91 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.47
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Physical Functioning
Week 120 (n=242, 80, 322)
|
9.12 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.57
|
8.34 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.09
|
8.92 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.51
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Physical Functioning
Week 144 (n=224, 76, 300)
|
8.85 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.66
|
7.57 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.18
|
8.53 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.57
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Physical Functioning
Week 168 (n=213, 70, 283)
|
9.01 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.68
|
7.16 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.36
|
8.55 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.61
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Physical Functioning
Week 216 (n=76, 13, 89)
|
8.78 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.98
|
5.04 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.27
|
8.23 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.91
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Physical Functioning
Week 240 (n=65, 5, 70)
|
8.91 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.00
|
3.27 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.90
|
8.51 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.95
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Physical Functioning
Week 264 (n=59, 5, 64)
|
8.85 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.08
|
1.64 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.98
|
8.28 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.03
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Physical Functioning
Week 288 (n=3, 0, 3)
|
10.23 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.18
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Mean and standard error were not calculated because no data were available.
|
10.23 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.18
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Physical Functioning
Week 12 (n=370, 105, 475)
|
7.87 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.45
|
5.94 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.76
|
7.45 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.39
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Physical Functioning
Week 192 (n=138, 42, 180)
|
9.43 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.78
|
8.09 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.25
|
9.12 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.66
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240, 264, and 288Population: Full analysis set (FAS): All participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication in current study. No imputation was used (observed data).
SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning) and is reported as 2 summary scores; physical component score and mental component score. Total score range for the summary scores = 0-100, where higher score represents higher level of functioning. The baseline data of Study A3921039, A3921040 or A3921044 were used as baseline data for efficacy evaluations except for Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg BID
n=381 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for less than 84 days in total within the current study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 5 mg BID.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=105 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for more than or equal to 84 days in total within the long-term safety study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 10 mg BID.
|
Total
n=486 Participants
All subjects were assigned oral CP-690,550 5 mg tablets twice a day at baseline visit. Dose flexibility (increasing from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID, reducing from 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID, or temporary discontinuation) during study was allowed in consideration for the risks and benefits to the patient's condition. Data was summarized in three reporting groups including CP-690,550 5 mg BID, CP-690,550 10 mg BID and Total.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Role Physical
Week 12 (n=370, 105, 475)
|
7.31 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.57
|
5.48 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.00
|
6.90 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Role Physical
Week 24 (n=357, 104, 461)
|
8.21 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.59
|
6.29 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.06
|
7.77 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.51
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Role Physical
Week 48 (n=331, 102, 433)
|
8.38 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.64
|
7.77 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.92
|
8.23 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.53
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Role Physical
Week 72 (n=315, 99, 414)
|
7.23 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.67
|
7.47 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.08
|
7.29 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.57
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Role Physical
Week 96 (n=281, 87, 368)
|
7.24 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.70
|
8.15 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.16
|
7.46 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.60
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Role Physical
Week 120 (n=242, 80, 322)
|
7.69 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.75
|
6.77 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.10
|
7.46 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.63
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Role Physical
Week 144 (n=224, 76, 300)
|
7.21 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.80
|
6.56 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.23
|
7.05 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.67
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Role Physical
Week 168 (n=213, 70, 283)
|
7.38 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.77
|
5.42 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.41
|
6.90 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.68
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Role Physical
Week 192 (n=138, 42, 180)
|
6.59 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.01
|
6.70 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.57
|
6.61 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.86
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Role Physical
Week 240 (n=65, 5, 70)
|
6.13 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.56
|
-0.48 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.86
|
5.66 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.48
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Role Physical
Week 264 (n=59, 5, 64)
|
6.15 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.58
|
0.95 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.68
|
5.74 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.48
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Role Physical
Week 288 (n=3, 0, 3)
|
22.27 Units on a scale
Standard Error 5.22
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Mean and standard error were not calculated because no data were available.
|
22.27 Units on a scale
Standard Error 5.22
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Role Physical
Week 216 (n=76, 13, 89)
|
6.53 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.37
|
4.59 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.53
|
6.25 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.22
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240, 264, and 288Population: Full analysis set (FAS): All participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication in current study. No imputation was used (observed data).
SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning) and is reported as 2 summary scores; physical component score and mental component score. Total score range for the summary scores = 0-100, where higher score represents higher level of functioning. The baseline data of Study A3921039, A3921040 or A3921044 were used as baseline data for efficacy evaluations except for Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg BID
n=381 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for less than 84 days in total within the current study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 5 mg BID.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=105 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for more than or equal to 84 days in total within the long-term safety study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 10 mg BID.
|
Total
n=486 Participants
All subjects were assigned oral CP-690,550 5 mg tablets twice a day at baseline visit. Dose flexibility (increasing from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID, reducing from 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID, or temporary discontinuation) during study was allowed in consideration for the risks and benefits to the patient's condition. Data was summarized in three reporting groups including CP-690,550 5 mg BID, CP-690,550 10 mg BID and Total.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Bodily Pain
Week 12 (n=370, 105, 475)
|
11.40 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.48
|
8.13 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.77
|
10.40 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.41
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Bodily Pain
Week 24 (n=357, 104, 461)
|
11.87 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.50
|
9.63 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.79
|
11.36 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.43
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Bodily Pain
Week 48 (n=331, 102, 433)
|
12.19 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.53
|
10.65 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.75
|
11.83 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.44
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Bodily Pain
Week 72 (n=315, 99, 414)
|
11.96 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.56
|
9.92 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.81
|
11.47 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.47
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Bodily Pain
Week 96 (n=281, 87, 368)
|
11.35 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.59
|
11.60 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.04
|
11.41 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.51
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Bodily Pain
Week 120 (n=242, 80, 322)
|
11.98 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.62
|
10.42 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.08
|
11.60 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.54
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Bodily Pain
Week 144 (n=224, 76, 300)
|
11.51 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.68
|
11.15 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.04
|
11.42 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.57
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Bodily Pain
Week 168 (n=213, 70, 283)
|
11.82 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.65
|
11.07 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.11
|
11.63 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.56
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Bodily Pain
Week 192 (n=138, 42, 180)
|
11.19 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.85
|
11.43 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.57
|
11.25 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.75
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Bodily Pain
Week 216 (n=76, 13, 89)
|
12.43 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.03
|
8.52 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.37
|
11.86 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.95
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Bodily Pain
Week 240 (n=65, 5, 70)
|
11.34 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.04
|
5.25 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.63
|
10.90 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.99
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Bodily Pain
Week 264 (n=59, 5, 64)
|
11.27 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.28
|
4.50 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.87
|
10.74 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.22
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Bodily Pain
Week 288 (n=3, 0, 3)
|
7.08 Units on a scale
Standard Error 5.60
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Mean and standard error were not calculated because no data were available.
|
7.08 Units on a scale
Standard Error 5.60
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240, 264, and 288Population: Full analysis set (FAS): All participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication in current study. No imputation was used (observed data).
SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning) and is reported as 2 summary scores; physical component score and mental component score. Total score range for the summary scores = 0-100, where higher score represents higher level of functioning. The baseline data of Study A3921039, A3921040 or A3921044 were used as baseline data for efficacy evaluations except for Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg BID
n=381 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for less than 84 days in total within the current study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 5 mg BID.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=105 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for more than or equal to 84 days in total within the long-term safety study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 10 mg BID.
|
Total
n=486 Participants
All subjects were assigned oral CP-690,550 5 mg tablets twice a day at baseline visit. Dose flexibility (increasing from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID, reducing from 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID, or temporary discontinuation) during study was allowed in consideration for the risks and benefits to the patient's condition. Data was summarized in three reporting groups including CP-690,550 5 mg BID, CP-690,550 10 mg BID and Total.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_General Health
Week 12 (n=370, 105, 475)
|
6.07 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.38
|
4.24 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.70
|
5.67 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.34
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_General Health
Week 24 (n=357, 104, 461)
|
6.38 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.39
|
5.00 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.58
|
6.07 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.33
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_General Health
Week 48 (n=331, 102, 433)
|
6.40 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.40
|
5.20 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.67
|
6.12 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.34
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_General Health
Week 72 (n=315, 99, 414)
|
6.29 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.42
|
5.35 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.63
|
6.06 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.35
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_General Health
Week 96 (n=281, 87, 368)
|
6.00 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.45
|
4.82 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.73
|
5.72 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.38
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_General Health
Week 120 (n=242, 80, 322)
|
5.86 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.49
|
5.36 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.82
|
5.74 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.42
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_General Health
Week 144 (n=224, 76, 300)
|
5.37 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.54
|
4.38 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.94
|
5.12 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.47
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_General Health
Week 168 (n=213, 70, 283)
|
5.82 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.53
|
3.93 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.87
|
5.35 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.46
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_General Health
Week 192 (n=138, 42, 180)
|
4.72 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.61
|
4.10 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.05
|
4.57 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.53
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_General Health
Week 216 (n=76, 13, 89)
|
3.73 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.87
|
1.59 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.31
|
3.42 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.77
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_General Health
Week 264 (n=59, 5, 64)
|
4.12 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.01
|
-1.03 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.17
|
3.72 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.96
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_General Health
Week 288 (n=3, 0, 3)
|
-0.94 Units on a scale
Standard Error 4.23
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Mean and standard error were not calculated because no data were available.
|
-0.94 Units on a scale
Standard Error 4.23
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_General Health
Week 240 (n=65, 5, 70)
|
4.39 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.96
|
-1.50 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.90
|
3.97 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.92
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240, 264, and 288Population: Full analysis set (FAS): All participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication in current study. No imputation was used (observed data).
SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning) and is reported as 2 summary scores; physical component score and mental component score. Total score range for the summary scores = 0-100, where higher score represents higher level of functioning. The baseline data of Study A3921039, A3921040 or A3921044 were used as baseline data for efficacy evaluations except for Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg BID
n=381 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for less than 84 days in total within the current study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 5 mg BID.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=105 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for more than or equal to 84 days in total within the long-term safety study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 10 mg BID.
|
Total
n=486 Participants
All subjects were assigned oral CP-690,550 5 mg tablets twice a day at baseline visit. Dose flexibility (increasing from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID, reducing from 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID, or temporary discontinuation) during study was allowed in consideration for the risks and benefits to the patient's condition. Data was summarized in three reporting groups including CP-690,550 5 mg BID, CP-690,550 10 mg BID and Total.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Vitality
Week 12 (n=370, 105, 475)
|
7.37 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.59
|
6.61 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.90
|
7.20 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Vitality
Week 48 (n=331, 102, 433)
|
6.83 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.58
|
7.22 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.89
|
6.92 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.49
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Vitality
Week 72 (n=315, 99, 414)
|
7.02 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.61
|
6.44 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.98
|
6.88 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.52
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Vitality
Week 168 (n=213, 70, 283)
|
6.58 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.72
|
4.75 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.27
|
6.12 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.63
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Vitality
Week 192 (n=138, 42, 180)
|
5.40 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.92
|
5.70 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.62
|
5.47 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.80
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Vitality
Week 264 (n=59, 5, 64)
|
4.72 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.17
|
-1.80 Units on a scale
Standard Error 3.36
|
4.21 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.13
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Vitality
Week 288 (n=3, 0, 3)
|
14.97 Units on a scale
Standard Error 8.64
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Mean and standard error were not calculated because no data were available.
|
14.97 Units on a scale
Standard Error 8.64
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Vitality
Week 24 (n=357, 104, 461)
|
7.24 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.58
|
6.25 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.97
|
7.02 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Vitality
Week 96 (n=281, 87, 368)
|
6.78 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.61
|
6.19 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.11
|
6.64 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.54
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Vitality
Week 120 (n=242, 80, 322)
|
6.49 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.70
|
6.96 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.26
|
6.61 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.61
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Vitality
Week 144 (n=224, 76, 300)
|
6.27 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.75
|
5.51 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.15
|
6.08 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.63
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Vitality
Week 216 (n=76, 13, 89)
|
5.04 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.18
|
5.30 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.47
|
5.08 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.07
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Vitality
Week 240 (n=65, 5, 70)
|
5.11 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.21
|
-0.60 Units on a scale
Standard Error 3.05
|
4.70 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.15
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240, 264, and 288Population: Full analysis set (FAS): All participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication in current study. No imputation was used (observed data).
SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning) and is reported as 2 summary scores; physical component score and mental component score. Total score range for the summary scores = 0-100, where higher score represents higher level of functioning. The baseline data of Study A3921039, A3921040 or A3921044 were used as baseline data for efficacy evaluations except for Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg BID
n=381 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for less than 84 days in total within the current study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 5 mg BID.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=105 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for more than or equal to 84 days in total within the long-term safety study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 10 mg BID.
|
Total
n=486 Participants
All subjects were assigned oral CP-690,550 5 mg tablets twice a day at baseline visit. Dose flexibility (increasing from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID, reducing from 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID, or temporary discontinuation) during study was allowed in consideration for the risks and benefits to the patient's condition. Data was summarized in three reporting groups including CP-690,550 5 mg BID, CP-690,550 10 mg BID and Total.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Social Functioning
Week 24 (n=357, 104, 461)
|
5.57 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.62
|
4.96 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.25
|
5.44 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.56
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Social Functioning
Week 48 (n=331, 102, 433)
|
5.28 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.64
|
5.27 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.14
|
5.28 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.55
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Social Functioning
Week 72 (n=315, 99, 414)
|
4.81 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.64
|
4.78 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.31
|
4.81 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.58
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Social Functioning
Week 144 (n=224, 76, 300)
|
5.23 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.77
|
3.33 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.39
|
4.75 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.67
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Social Functioning
Week 168 (n=213, 70, 283)
|
4.72 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.79
|
3.84 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.43
|
4.50 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.69
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Social Functioning
Week 216 (n=76, 13, 89)
|
4.53 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.23
|
3.31 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.48
|
4.35 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.10
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Social Functioning
Week 264 (n=59, 5, 64)
|
4.47 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.45
|
-2.15 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.15
|
3.95 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.37
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Social Functioning
Week 288 (n=3, 0, 3)
|
14.34 Units on a scale
Standard Error 9.49
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Mean and standard error were not calculated because no data were available.
|
14.34 Units on a scale
Standard Error 9.49
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Social Functioning
Week 12 (n=370, 105, 475)
|
4.99 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.60
|
5.17 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.09
|
5.03 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.52
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Social Functioning
Week 96 (n=281, 87, 368)
|
4.88 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.67
|
6.43 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.19
|
5.25 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.58
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Social Functioning
Week 120 (n=242, 80, 322)
|
5.20 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.76
|
5.98 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.11
|
5.39 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.63
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Social Functioning
Week 192 (n=138, 42, 180)
|
4.56 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.96
|
5.63 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.36
|
4.81 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.80
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Social Functioning
Week 240 (n=65, 5, 70)
|
4.88 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.41
|
0.00 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.00
|
4.53 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.32
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240, 264, and 288Population: Full analysis set (FAS): All participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication in current study. No imputation was used (observed data).
SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning) and is reported as 2 summary scores; physical component score and mental component score. Total score range for the summary scores = 0-100, where higher score represents higher level of functioning. The baseline data of Study A3921039, A3921040 or A3921044 were used as baseline data for efficacy evaluations except for Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg BID
n=381 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for less than 84 days in total within the current study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 5 mg BID.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=105 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for more than or equal to 84 days in total within the long-term safety study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 10 mg BID.
|
Total
n=486 Participants
All subjects were assigned oral CP-690,550 5 mg tablets twice a day at baseline visit. Dose flexibility (increasing from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID, reducing from 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID, or temporary discontinuation) during study was allowed in consideration for the risks and benefits to the patient's condition. Data was summarized in three reporting groups including CP-690,550 5 mg BID, CP-690,550 10 mg BID and Total.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Role Emotional
Week 12 (n=370, 105, 475)
|
6.65 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.65
|
4.98 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.19
|
6.28 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.57
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Role Emotional
Week 24 (n=357, 104, 461)
|
6.88 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.73
|
4.40 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.41
|
6.32 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.65
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Role Emotional
Week 48 (n=331, 102, 433)
|
7.26 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.75
|
5.49 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.29
|
6.85 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.65
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Role Emotional
Week 72 (n=315, 99, 414)
|
6.02 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.78
|
5.54 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.28
|
5.91 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.67
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Role Emotional
Week 96 (n=281, 87, 368)
|
6.04 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.79
|
5.96 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.43
|
6.02 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.69
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Role Emotional
Week 120 (n=242, 80, 322)
|
5.68 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.90
|
3.98 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.40
|
5.26 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.76
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Role Emotional
Week 144 (n=224, 76, 300)
|
5.39 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.96
|
3.74 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.56
|
4.97 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.82
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Role Emotional
Week 168 (n=213, 70, 283)
|
5.90 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.89
|
4.43 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.49
|
5.54 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.76
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Role Emotional
Week 192 (n=138, 42, 180)
|
4.31 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.23
|
4.42 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.91
|
4.33 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.04
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Role Emotional
Week 264 (n=59, 5, 64)
|
5.07 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.74
|
-0.76 Units on a scale
Standard Error 4.22
|
4.61 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.64
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Role Emotional
Week 288 (n=3, 0, 3)
|
22.71 Units on a scale
Standard Error 5.78
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Mean and standard error were not calculated because no data were available.
|
22.71 Units on a scale
Standard Error 5.78
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Role Emotional
Week 216 (n=76, 13, 89)
|
4.33 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.55
|
3.49 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.76
|
4.21 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.38
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Role Emotional
Week 240 (n=65, 5, 70)
|
4.72 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.66
|
-0.76 Units on a scale
Standard Error 4.22
|
4.33 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.58
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240, 264, and 288Population: Full analysis set (FAS): All participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication in current study. No imputation was used (observed data).
SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning) and is reported as 2 summary scores; physical component score and mental component score. Total score range for the summary scores = 0-100, where higher score represents higher level of functioning. The baseline data of Study A3921039, A3921040 or A3921044 were used as baseline data for efficacy evaluations except for Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg BID
n=381 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for less than 84 days in total within the current study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 5 mg BID.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=105 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for more than or equal to 84 days in total within the long-term safety study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 10 mg BID.
|
Total
n=486 Participants
All subjects were assigned oral CP-690,550 5 mg tablets twice a day at baseline visit. Dose flexibility (increasing from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID, reducing from 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID, or temporary discontinuation) during study was allowed in consideration for the risks and benefits to the patient's condition. Data was summarized in three reporting groups including CP-690,550 5 mg BID, CP-690,550 10 mg BID and Total.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Mental Health
Week 12 (n=370, 105, 475)
|
6.27 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.63
|
5.38 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.04
|
6.08 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.54
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Mental Health
Week 24 (n=357, 104, 461)
|
6.22 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.65
|
3.84 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.17
|
5.69 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.57
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Mental Health
Week 48 (n=331, 102, 433)
|
5.73 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.64
|
5.35 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.02
|
5.64 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.54
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Mental Health
Week 72 (n=315, 99, 414)
|
4.77 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.70
|
5.48 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.04
|
4.94 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.59
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Mental Health
Week 96 (n=281, 87, 368)
|
5.23 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.68
|
5.89 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.14
|
5.38 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.59
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Mental Health
Week 120 (n=242, 80, 322)
|
5.56 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.77
|
5.26 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.31
|
5.49 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.67
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Mental Health
Week 240 (n=65, 5, 70)
|
3.75 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.20
|
3.32 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.04
|
3.72 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.12
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Mental Health
Week 288 (n=3, 0, 3)
|
14.78 Units on a scale
Standard Error 7.56
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Mean and standard error were not calculated because no data were available.
|
14.78 Units on a scale
Standard Error 7.56
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Mental Health
Week 144 (n=224, 76, 300)
|
5.10 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.84
|
4.37 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.34
|
4.91 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.71
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Mental Health
Week 168 (n=213, 70, 283)
|
5.12 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.76
|
3.76 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.29
|
4.79 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.66
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Mental Health
Week 192 (n=138, 42, 180)
|
3.77 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.93
|
5.21 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.75
|
4.11 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.82
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Mental Health
Week 216 (n=76, 13, 89)
|
2.66 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.21
|
4.26 Units on a scale
Standard Error 3.04
|
2.89 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.12
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Score_Mental Health
Week 264 (n=59, 5, 64)
|
4.18 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.34
|
0.00 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.75
|
3.85 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.25
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240, 264, and 288Population: Full analysis set (FAS): All participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication in current study. No imputation was used (observed data).
SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning) and is reported as 2 summary scores; physical component score and mental component score. Total score range for the summary scores = 0-100, where higher score represents higher level of functioning. The baseline data of Study A3921039, A3921040 or A3921044 were used as baseline data for efficacy evaluations except for Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg BID
n=381 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for less than 84 days in total within the current study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 5 mg BID.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=105 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for more than or equal to 84 days in total within the long-term safety study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 10 mg BID.
|
Total
n=486 Participants
All subjects were assigned oral CP-690,550 5 mg tablets twice a day at baseline visit. Dose flexibility (increasing from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID, reducing from 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID, or temporary discontinuation) during study was allowed in consideration for the risks and benefits to the patient's condition. Data was summarized in three reporting groups including CP-690,550 5 mg BID, CP-690,550 10 mg BID and Total.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Component Score_Physical
Week 12 (n=370, 105, 475)
|
8.44 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.39
|
6.09 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.68
|
7.92 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.34
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Component Score_Physical
Week 24 (n=357, 104, 461)
|
9.39 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.38
|
7.56 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.70
|
8.98 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.34
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Component Score_Physical
Week 48 (n=331, 102, 433)
|
9.75 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.43
|
8.24 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.72
|
9.39 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.37
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Component Score_Physical
Week 72 (n=315, 99, 414)
|
9.72 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.43
|
8.21 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.76
|
9.36 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.37
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Component Score_Physical
Week 120 (n=242, 80, 322)
|
9.66 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.49
|
8.79 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.92
|
9.45 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.43
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Component Score_Physical
Week 144 (n=224, 76, 300)
|
9.26 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.54
|
8.60 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.92
|
9.09 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.47
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Component Score_Physical
Week 168 (n=213, 70, 283)
|
9.51 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.54
|
7.86 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.03
|
9.10 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.48
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Component Score_Physical
Week 216 (n=76, 13, 89)
|
9.59 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.88
|
5.37 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.93
|
8.97 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.82
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Component Score_Physical
Week 240 (n=65, 5, 70)
|
9.00 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.93
|
1.91 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.87
|
8.49 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.91
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Component Score_Physical
Week 264 (n=59, 5, 64)
|
8.72 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.03
|
2.31 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.27
|
8.22 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.99
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Component Score_Physical
Week 288 (n=3, 0, 3)
|
6.87 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.88
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Mean and standard error were not calculated because no data were available.
|
6.87 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.88
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Component Score_Physical
Week 96 (n=281, 87, 368)
|
9.35 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.48
|
8.93 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.77
|
9.25 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.41
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Component Score_Physical
Week 192 (n=138, 42, 180)
|
9.51 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.65
|
8.56 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.18
|
9.29 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.57
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240, 264, and 288Population: Full analysis set (FAS): All participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication in current study. No imputation was used (observed data).
SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning) and is reported as 2 summary scores; physical component score and mental component score. Total score range for the summary scores = 0-100, where higher score represents higher level of functioning. The baseline data of Study A3921039, A3921040 or A3921044 were used as baseline data for efficacy evaluations except for Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg BID
n=381 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for less than 84 days in total within the current study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 5 mg BID.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=105 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for more than or equal to 84 days in total within the long-term safety study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 10 mg BID.
|
Total
n=486 Participants
All subjects were assigned oral CP-690,550 5 mg tablets twice a day at baseline visit. Dose flexibility (increasing from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID, reducing from 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID, or temporary discontinuation) during study was allowed in consideration for the risks and benefits to the patient's condition. Data was summarized in three reporting groups including CP-690,550 5 mg BID, CP-690,550 10 mg BID and Total.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Component Score_Mental
Week 12 (n=370, 105, 475)
|
5.13 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.63
|
4.82 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.01
|
5.06 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.54
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Component Score_Mental
Week 24 (n=357, 104, 461)
|
4.95 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.67
|
3.38 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.26
|
4.60 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.59
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Component Score_Mental
Week 48 (n=331, 102, 433)
|
4.56 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.66
|
4.45 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.06
|
4.54 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.56
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Component Score_Mental
Week 96 (n=281, 87, 368)
|
3.88 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.68
|
4.53 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.25
|
4.03 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.60
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Component Score_Mental
Week 192 (n=138, 42, 180)
|
2.05 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.99
|
3.44 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.80
|
2.38 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.86
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Component Score_Mental
Week 216 (n=76, 13, 89)
|
1.49 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.29
|
3.14 Units on a scale
Standard Error 3.04
|
1.73 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.18
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Component Score_Mental
Week 240 (n=65, 5, 70)
|
2.41 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.27
|
-0.04 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.81
|
2.23 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.19
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Component Score_Mental
Week 264 (n=59, 5, 64)
|
2.59 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.42
|
-2.25 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.41
|
2.21 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.32
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Component Score_Mental
Week 72 (n=315, 99, 414)
|
3.63 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.69
|
4.15 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.14
|
3.75 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.59
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Component Score_Mental
Week 120 (n=242, 80, 322)
|
3.79 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.80
|
3.68 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.37
|
3.76 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.69
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Component Score_Mental
Week 144 (n=224, 76, 300)
|
3.57 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.84
|
2.24 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.40
|
3.23 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.72
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Component Score_Mental
Week 168 (n=213, 70, 283)
|
3.64 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.80
|
2.45 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.41
|
3.35 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.70
|
|
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Component Score_Mental
Week 288 (n=3, 0, 3)
|
18.64 Units on a scale
Standard Error 4.01
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Mean and standard error were not calculated because no data were available.
|
18.64 Units on a scale
Standard Error 4.01
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: First visit in the study (Month 24 in Study A3921044), Weeks 24, 48, and 96Population: Participants who had completed Study A3921044 among all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication in current study. No imputation was used (observed data).
mTSS = sum of erosion and Joint Space Narrowing (JSN) scores for 44 joints (16 per hand and 6 per foot). mTSS scores range from 0 (normal) to 448 (worst possible total score). Change: scores at observation minus score at baseline. An increase in mTSS from baseline represented disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represented halting of disease progression, and a decrease represented potential improvement. Month 24 (the final visit) in Study A3921044 was taken as the first visit in current study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg BID
n=75 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for less than 84 days in total within the current study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 5 mg BID.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=7 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for more than or equal to 84 days in total within the long-term safety study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 10 mg BID.
|
Total
n=82 Participants
All subjects were assigned oral CP-690,550 5 mg tablets twice a day at baseline visit. Dose flexibility (increasing from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID, reducing from 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID, or temporary discontinuation) during study was allowed in consideration for the risks and benefits to the patient's condition. Data was summarized in three reporting groups including CP-690,550 5 mg BID, CP-690,550 10 mg BID and Total.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Month 24 in Study A3921044 in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS)
Week 24 (n=69, 7, 76)
|
0.17 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
0.50 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
0.20 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
|
Change From Month 24 in Study A3921044 in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS)
Week 48 (n=64, 7, 71)
|
0.27 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
|
1.75 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.16
|
0.41 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.19
|
|
Change From Month 24 in Study A3921044 in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS)
Week 96 (n=39, 1, 40)
|
0.40 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
1.00 Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Standard error was not calculated because there was one participant data.
|
0.42 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
Adverse Events
CP-690,550 5 mg BID
CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Total
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg BID
n=381 participants at risk
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for less than 84 days in total within the current study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 5 mg BID.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=105 participants at risk
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for more than or equal to 84 days in total within the long-term safety study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 10 mg BID.
|
Total
n=486 participants at risk
All subjects were assigned oral CP-690,550 5 mg tablets twice a day at baseline visit. Dose flexibility (increasing from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID, reducing from 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID, or temporary discontinuation) during study was allowed in consideration for the risks and benefits to the patient's condition. Data was summarized in three reporting groups including CP-690,550 5 mg BID, CP-690,550 10 mg BID and Total.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Disseminated intravascular coagulation
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute coronary syndrome
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Prinzmetal angina
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular fibrillation
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo positional
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Hyperparathyroidism primary
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract
|
0.52%
2/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.95%
1/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.62%
3/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Dacryostenosis acquired
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal artery occlusion
|
0.00%
0/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.95%
1/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal detachment
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis ischaemic
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric polyps
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric ulcer haemorrhage
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ileus
|
0.00%
0/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.95%
1/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Inguinal hernia
|
0.00%
0/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.95%
1/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Large intestine polyp
|
0.79%
3/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.62%
3/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Radicular cyst
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Device material issue
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Submandibular mass
|
0.00%
0/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.95%
1/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis chronic
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Liver disorder
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
|
0.00%
0/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.95%
1/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.79%
3/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.95%
1/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.82%
4/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Chronic sinusitis
|
0.00%
0/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.95%
1/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diverticulitis
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Enteritis infectious
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Enterocolitis infectious
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Enterocolitis viral
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.52%
2/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.95%
1/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.62%
3/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
2.9%
11/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.9%
2/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.7%
13/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster disseminated
|
0.00%
0/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.95%
1/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Mycobacterium avium complex infection
|
0.00%
0/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.95%
1/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia
|
0.52%
2/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.41%
2/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
1.6%
6/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.95%
1/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
7/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia bacterial
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia haemophilus
|
0.52%
2/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.41%
2/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia mycoplasmal
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pulmonary tuberculosis
|
0.00%
0/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.95%
1/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis
|
0.79%
3/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.9%
2/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.0%
5/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
|
0.00%
0/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.95%
1/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.52%
2/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.41%
2/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ankle fracture
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Compression fracture
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
0.79%
3/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.62%
3/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femoral neck fracture
|
0.52%
2/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.41%
2/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femur fracture
|
0.00%
0/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.95%
1/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hand fracture
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Humerus fracture
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Joint dislocation
|
0.52%
2/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.41%
2/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Patella fracture
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural haemorrhage
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Pubis fracture
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Radius fracture
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tendon rupture
|
2.4%
9/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.9%
9/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tibia fracture
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ulna fracture
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Upper limb fracture
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Computerised tomogram thorax abnormal
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthropathy
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Foot deformity
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.95%
1/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.41%
2/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc protrusion
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint destruction
|
0.52%
2/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.41%
2/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Kyphosis
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Lumbar spinal stenosis
|
0.00%
0/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
3.8%
4/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.82%
4/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
|
0.00%
0/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.95%
1/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.52%
2/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.95%
1/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.62%
3/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteonecrosis
|
0.00%
0/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.95%
1/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Periostitis
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rheumatoid arthritis
|
0.79%
3/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.95%
1/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.82%
4/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spinal column stenosis
|
0.79%
3/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.62%
3/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spondylolisthesis
|
0.00%
0/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.95%
1/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Acute myeloid leukaemia
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Adenocarcinoma gastric
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer
|
0.52%
2/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.41%
2/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Colon adenoma
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Colon cancer
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Colorectal adenocarcinoma
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Fallopian tube cancer
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Gastric cancer
|
0.52%
2/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.41%
2/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Haemangioma
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Liposarcoma
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lymphoproliferative disorder
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Malignant ascites
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Malignant pleural effusion
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Metastases to liver
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Metastases to lung
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Metastases to lymph nodes
|
0.79%
3/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.62%
3/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Metastases to peritoneum
|
0.52%
2/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.41%
2/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Oesophageal carcinoma
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Ovarian cancer
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Ovarian cancer metastatic
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Ovarian germ cell teratoma benign
|
0.00%
0/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.95%
1/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Paget's disease of nipple
|
0.00%
0/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.95%
1/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Peritoneal neoplasm
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Small cell lung cancer
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Squamous cell carcinoma of lung
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Transitional cell carcinoma
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Uterine leiomyoma
|
0.52%
2/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.41%
2/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Carpal tunnel syndrome
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral haemorrhage
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral infarction
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral thrombosis
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Convulsion
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cubital tunnel syndrome
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
IIIrd nerve paralysis
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Lacunar infarction
|
0.00%
0/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.95%
1/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Loss of consciousness
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Spondylitic myelopathy
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Temporal lobe epilepsy
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Transient global amnesia
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Calculus ureteric
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.95%
1/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.41%
2/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Glomerulonephritis membranous
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Uterine polyp
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Interstitial lung disease
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Organising pneumonia
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleurisy
|
0.26%
1/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin ulcer
|
0.00%
0/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.95%
1/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.21%
1/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg BID
n=381 participants at risk
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for less than 84 days in total within the current study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 5 mg BID.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=105 participants at risk
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily (BID). After Week 12, the dose could be changed 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID based on investigator discretion. This study was continued until CP-690,550 was commercially supplied to participants at the sites. Participants who were exposed to 10 mg BID for more than or equal to 84 days in total within the long-term safety study (A3921041) were grouped into CP-690,550 10 mg BID.
|
Total
n=486 participants at risk
All subjects were assigned oral CP-690,550 5 mg tablets twice a day at baseline visit. Dose flexibility (increasing from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID, reducing from 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID, or temporary discontinuation) during study was allowed in consideration for the risks and benefits to the patient's condition. Data was summarized in three reporting groups including CP-690,550 5 mg BID, CP-690,550 10 mg BID and Total.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral herpes
|
6.8%
26/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.7%
7/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.8%
33/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
3.7%
14/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.5%
11/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.1%
25/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctivitis
|
4.5%
17/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.7%
6/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.7%
23/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
3.4%
13/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.7%
6/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
3.9%
19/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
8.9%
34/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
8.6%
9/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
8.8%
43/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dental caries
|
10.2%
39/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
14.3%
15/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
11.1%
54/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
7.3%
28/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
5/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.8%
33/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
5.8%
22/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
3.8%
4/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.3%
26/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
6.6%
25/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.7%
7/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.6%
32/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
3.9%
15/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
8.6%
9/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.9%
24/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
11.8%
45/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.8%
5/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.3%
50/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
|
10.2%
39/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.7%
7/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
46/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
8.9%
34/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.5%
11/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.3%
45/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gingivitis
|
2.6%
10/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.7%
7/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
3.5%
17/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
15.5%
59/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
21.0%
22/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
16.7%
81/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
9.7%
37/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.5%
11/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.9%
48/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
58.0%
221/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
68.6%
72/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
60.3%
293/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Periodontitis
|
5.2%
20/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
3/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.7%
23/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
9.4%
36/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
10/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
46/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tinea pedis
|
8.1%
31/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
3/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
7.0%
34/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
10.5%
40/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
7.6%
8/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.9%
48/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
9.4%
36/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
11.4%
12/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.9%
48/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
13.4%
51/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
19.0%
20/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
14.6%
71/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ligament sprain
|
2.9%
11/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
8.6%
9/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.1%
20/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Road traffic accident
|
2.4%
9/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
7.6%
8/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
3.5%
17/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
6.6%
25/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.95%
1/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.3%
26/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
5.8%
22/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.95%
1/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.7%
23/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Blood cholesterol increased
|
2.4%
9/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.7%
6/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
3.1%
15/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Low density lipoprotein increased
|
4.5%
17/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.7%
6/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.7%
23/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Lymphocyte count decreased
|
7.6%
29/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
8.6%
9/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
7.8%
38/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
White blood cell count decreased
|
4.5%
17/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
10/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.6%
27/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercholesterolaemia
|
3.4%
13/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.7%
6/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
3.9%
19/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperlipidaemia
|
9.4%
36/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
19.0%
20/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
11.5%
56/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
11.3%
43/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
3/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
46/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rheumatoid arthritis
|
1.6%
6/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.7%
7/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.7%
13/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
10.0%
38/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.5%
10/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.9%
48/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
6.3%
24/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
8.6%
9/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.8%
33/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
5.0%
19/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
3.8%
4/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.7%
23/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Upper respiratory tract inflammation
|
6.6%
25/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
8.6%
9/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
7.0%
34/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Eczema
|
6.6%
25/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.9%
2/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.6%
27/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
4.5%
17/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.7%
6/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.7%
23/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
10.5%
40/381 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
14.3%
15/105 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
11.3%
55/486 • Safety observations up to Week 288
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER