Trial Outcomes & Findings for Assessment of Left Ventricular Torsion by Echocardiography Study (NCT NCT00589836)
NCT ID: NCT00589836
Last Updated: 2018-02-05
Results Overview
The purpose of the present study was to examine the accuracy of a novel method with DTI for quantifying the LV torsion in humans and tagged MRI as the reference standard. LV torsion reflects the torsion (twisting deformation) occurring across the length of the ventricle (from the base to the apex) during the time interval defined by the beginning and end of contraction (or in physiologic terms, from end -diastole to end systole). In this study, end diastole was defined by the R wave of the ECG, while end systole is defined by minimum end-systolic volume or maximum of twisting deformation. The deformation is measured in degrees. Once the measurements are performed by experimental method (i.e. TDI imaging) and reference method (i.e. MRI imaging) these two methods are then compared using Bland Altman analysis. In a current study, mean difference between methods of torsion quantification was 0.57 degrees, while the standard deviation (SD) was 1.98 degrees.
COMPLETED
20 participants
1 1/2 hours
2018-02-05
Participant Flow
Consecutive patients with clinically indicated MRI and previous satisfactory echocardiographic images on a previously performed study had a research echocardiographic study on the same day as the MRI
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Cardiac Pathologies
Clinical diagnosis included aortic root disorder, severe aortic insufficiency, severe aortic stenosis, post aortic valve replacement, and cardiomyopathies.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Assessment of Left Ventricular Torsion by Echocardiography Study
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Cardiac Pathologies
n=20 Participants
Patients with cardiac pathologies of aortic root disorder, severe aortic stenosis, severe aortic insufficiency, aortic valve replacement, ischemic heart disease and cardiomyopathies had tissue DTI and MRI performed
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
12 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
8 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
3 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
17 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 1/2 hoursPopulation: population had both MRI and DTI on the same day.
The purpose of the present study was to examine the accuracy of a novel method with DTI for quantifying the LV torsion in humans and tagged MRI as the reference standard. LV torsion reflects the torsion (twisting deformation) occurring across the length of the ventricle (from the base to the apex) during the time interval defined by the beginning and end of contraction (or in physiologic terms, from end -diastole to end systole). In this study, end diastole was defined by the R wave of the ECG, while end systole is defined by minimum end-systolic volume or maximum of twisting deformation. The deformation is measured in degrees. Once the measurements are performed by experimental method (i.e. TDI imaging) and reference method (i.e. MRI imaging) these two methods are then compared using Bland Altman analysis. In a current study, mean difference between methods of torsion quantification was 0.57 degrees, while the standard deviation (SD) was 1.98 degrees.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cardiac Pathologies
n=20 Participants
Clinical diagnosis included aortic root disorder, severe aortic insufficiency, severe aortic stenosis, post aortic valve replacement, and cardiomyopathies.
|
|---|---|
|
Accuracy of Doppler Tissue Imaging
|
0.57 degrees
Standard Deviation 1.98
|
Adverse Events
Cardiac Pathologies
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place