Forced Air Versus Endovascular Warming in Polytrauma Patients

NCT00555126 · Status: SUSPENDED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100

Last updated 2010-07-28

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Trauma is the leading cause of death in young adults, bleeding and infection are major concomitant problems. We test the hypothesis that fast, perioperative warming with an endovascular catheter versus forced air warming may improve patient outcome (primary outcome: combined perioperative morbidity, secondary outcome: bleeding, infection).

Conditions

  • Polytrauma
  • Hypothermia

Interventions

DEVICE

Forced Air Warming

Warming after Randomization

DEVICE

Warming with endovascular catheter + forced air warming

Warming after Randomization

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Medical University of Vienna

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Oliver Kimberger, M.D. · Medical University of Vienna

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
FACTORIAL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2008-05-31
Primary Completion
2011-01-31
Completion
2011-01-31

Countries

  • Austria

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00555126 on ClinicalTrials.gov