Trial Outcomes & Findings for Methylphenidate Transdermal System (MTS) in the Treatment of Adult ADHD (NCT NCT00506285)

NCT ID: NCT00506285

Last Updated: 2015-01-16

Results Overview

This scale measures the 7 domains of the Utah Criteria for Adult ADHD. Total scores run from 0 to 28. Normative samples average below 5. The worst possible score is 28.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

92 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Double-blind endpoints during MTS and placebo arms

Results posted on

2015-01-16

Participant Flow

Subjects (n=92) were recruited from 4-16-2007 through 10-24-2008. They were seen at the Psychiatry Research Clinic at the University of Utah School of Medicine.

There were 3 screening visits. Subjects met DSM-IV \&/or Utah criteria for adult ADHD, experiencing at least moderate impairment. Most DSM-IV axis-I disorders were excluded. Of 92 subjects enrolled, 65 were randomized and produced double-blind data. The assessment procedure was more extensive than normal, leading to a high dropout rate.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
A) MTS Arm Was 1st and PBO Arm Was 2nd
MTS was initiated using a 12.5cm2 patch then increased to the highest possible tolerated dose within two weeks and held at that level for the final two weeks of the first 4-week arm. In the second double-blind arm subjects were started using a 12.5cm2 placebo patch, which was increased to the highest tolerated dose within two weeks and held at that level for the final two weeks of the second 4-week arm.
B) PBO Arm Was 1st and MTS Arm Was 2nd
Placebo was initiated using a 12.5cm2 patch then increased to the highest possible tolerated dose within two weeks and held at that level for the final two weeks of the first 4-week arm. In the second double-blind arm subjects were started using a 12.5cm2 MTS patch, which was increased to the highest tolerated dose within two weeks and held at that level for the final two weeks of the second 4-week arm.
3 Week Screening Phase
STARTED
46
46
3 Week Screening Phase
COMPLETED
29
36
3 Week Screening Phase
NOT COMPLETED
17
10
Double Blind Cross-Over Phase
STARTED
29
36
Double Blind Cross-Over Phase
Received at Least 1 Dose MTS
29
31
Double Blind Cross-Over Phase
COMPLETED
20
31
Double Blind Cross-Over Phase
NOT COMPLETED
9
5
6-month Open Label Phase
STARTED
20
31
6-month Open Label Phase
COMPLETED
10
19
6-month Open Label Phase
NOT COMPLETED
10
12

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
A) MTS Arm Was 1st and PBO Arm Was 2nd
MTS was initiated using a 12.5cm2 patch then increased to the highest possible tolerated dose within two weeks and held at that level for the final two weeks of the first 4-week arm. In the second double-blind arm subjects were started using a 12.5cm2 placebo patch, which was increased to the highest tolerated dose within two weeks and held at that level for the final two weeks of the second 4-week arm.
B) PBO Arm Was 1st and MTS Arm Was 2nd
Placebo was initiated using a 12.5cm2 patch then increased to the highest possible tolerated dose within two weeks and held at that level for the final two weeks of the first 4-week arm. In the second double-blind arm subjects were started using a 12.5cm2 MTS patch, which was increased to the highest tolerated dose within two weeks and held at that level for the final two weeks of the second 4-week arm.
3 Week Screening Phase
Withdrawal by Subject
17
10
Double Blind Cross-Over Phase
Withdrawal by Subject
4
3
Double Blind Cross-Over Phase
Lost to Follow-up
5
2
6-month Open Label Phase
Lost to Follow-up
1
7
6-month Open Label Phase
Withdrawal by Subject
9
5

Baseline Characteristics

Methylphenidate Transdermal System (MTS) in the Treatment of Adult ADHD

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
a) Methylphenidate Transdermal System Was Taken First
n=29 Participants
Subjects took Methylphenidate Transdermal System in the first treatment arm and placebo patch in the second treatment arm
B Placebo Patch Was Used First
n=36 Participants
Placebo patch was used in the first treatment arm and MTS in the second treatment arm.
Total
n=65 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
29 Participants
n=99 Participants
36 Participants
n=107 Participants
65 Participants
n=206 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Age, Continuous
30.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5 • n=99 Participants
40.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8 • n=107 Participants
35.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8 • n=206 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants
n=99 Participants
13 Participants
n=107 Participants
21 Participants
n=206 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
21 Participants
n=99 Participants
23 Participants
n=107 Participants
44 Participants
n=206 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
29 participants
n=99 Participants
36 participants
n=107 Participants
65 participants
n=206 Participants
Wender-Reimherr Adult Attention Deficit Disorder Scale
21.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2 • n=99 Participants
21.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1 • n=107 Participants
21.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2 • n=206 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Double-blind endpoints during MTS and placebo arms

Population: All subjects given active treatment "last observation carried forward" using a mixed models design.

This scale measures the 7 domains of the Utah Criteria for Adult ADHD. Total scores run from 0 to 28. Normative samples average below 5. The worst possible score is 28.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Scores in MTS Arm
n=49 Participants
Average WRAADDS scores at end of active treatment (MTS) arm
Scores in Placebo Arm
n=49 Participants
Average WRAADDS scores at end of placebo arm
Wender Reimherr Adult Attention Deficit Disorder Scale
11.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.4
17.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Double-blind endpoints for MTS and placebo arms

Measures the DSM based ADHD criteria of Inattention and Hyperactivity/Impulsivity. There are 30 items scored 0-3 for a minimum score of 0 (no symptoms) and a maximum score of 90 worst possible symptoms.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Scores in MTS Arm
n=49 Participants
Average WRAADDS scores at end of active treatment (MTS) arm
Scores in Placebo Arm
n=49 Participants
Average WRAADDS scores at end of placebo arm
Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scales (CAARS)
30.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.1
49.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.8

Adverse Events

MTS Arm

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 24 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Placebo Arm

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 10 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
MTS Arm
n=61 participants at risk
Adverse events and Serious AEs during active treatment (MTS) arm
Placebo Arm
n=58 participants at risk
Adverse events and Serious AEs during placebo arm
General disorders
insomnia/sleep
31.1%
19/61 • Number of events 19 • Adverse event data were collected during both double-blind treatment arms. Each arm was 4 weeks long. Subjects who did not complete the double-blind phase were included in the assessment.
A list of likely AEs were assessed at each visit. In addition, the investigator recorded any additional concerns by the subjects.
6.9%
4/58 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event data were collected during both double-blind treatment arms. Each arm was 4 weeks long. Subjects who did not complete the double-blind phase were included in the assessment.
A list of likely AEs were assessed at each visit. In addition, the investigator recorded any additional concerns by the subjects.
General disorders
dry eyes, nose, mouth
13.1%
8/61 • Number of events 8 • Adverse event data were collected during both double-blind treatment arms. Each arm was 4 weeks long. Subjects who did not complete the double-blind phase were included in the assessment.
A list of likely AEs were assessed at each visit. In addition, the investigator recorded any additional concerns by the subjects.
1.7%
1/58 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected during both double-blind treatment arms. Each arm was 4 weeks long. Subjects who did not complete the double-blind phase were included in the assessment.
A list of likely AEs were assessed at each visit. In addition, the investigator recorded any additional concerns by the subjects.
General disorders
headache
13.1%
8/61 • Number of events 8 • Adverse event data were collected during both double-blind treatment arms. Each arm was 4 weeks long. Subjects who did not complete the double-blind phase were included in the assessment.
A list of likely AEs were assessed at each visit. In addition, the investigator recorded any additional concerns by the subjects.
6.9%
4/58 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event data were collected during both double-blind treatment arms. Each arm was 4 weeks long. Subjects who did not complete the double-blind phase were included in the assessment.
A list of likely AEs were assessed at each visit. In addition, the investigator recorded any additional concerns by the subjects.
General disorders
anxiety
11.5%
7/61 • Number of events 7 • Adverse event data were collected during both double-blind treatment arms. Each arm was 4 weeks long. Subjects who did not complete the double-blind phase were included in the assessment.
A list of likely AEs were assessed at each visit. In addition, the investigator recorded any additional concerns by the subjects.
1.7%
1/58 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected during both double-blind treatment arms. Each arm was 4 weeks long. Subjects who did not complete the double-blind phase were included in the assessment.
A list of likely AEs were assessed at each visit. In addition, the investigator recorded any additional concerns by the subjects.
Gastrointestinal disorders
decreased appetite
11.5%
7/61 • Number of events 7 • Adverse event data were collected during both double-blind treatment arms. Each arm was 4 weeks long. Subjects who did not complete the double-blind phase were included in the assessment.
A list of likely AEs were assessed at each visit. In addition, the investigator recorded any additional concerns by the subjects.
3.4%
2/58 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected during both double-blind treatment arms. Each arm was 4 weeks long. Subjects who did not complete the double-blind phase were included in the assessment.
A list of likely AEs were assessed at each visit. In addition, the investigator recorded any additional concerns by the subjects.
Psychiatric disorders
anger/irritability
11.5%
7/61 • Number of events 7 • Adverse event data were collected during both double-blind treatment arms. Each arm was 4 weeks long. Subjects who did not complete the double-blind phase were included in the assessment.
A list of likely AEs were assessed at each visit. In addition, the investigator recorded any additional concerns by the subjects.
5.2%
3/58 • Number of events 3 • Adverse event data were collected during both double-blind treatment arms. Each arm was 4 weeks long. Subjects who did not complete the double-blind phase were included in the assessment.
A list of likely AEs were assessed at each visit. In addition, the investigator recorded any additional concerns by the subjects.

Additional Information

Barrie K. Marchant

Psychiatry Research Clinic

Phone: 801 585-6663

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place