Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study Evaluating The Effect Of Ramipril On Urinary Protein Excretion In Renal Transplant Patients Converted To Sirolimus (NCT NCT00502242)
NCT ID: NCT00502242
Last Updated: 2014-08-27
Results Overview
The event for each participant was defined as the initiation of losartan while on SRL and ramipril/placebo combination therapy. Participants who started losartan prior to SRL administration were not counted as events. Percentage was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method for time to event data.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
229 participants
From Day 1 of SRL conversion to 52 weeks after conversion
2014-08-27
Participant Flow
A Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Double-Blind Comparative Study Evaluating the Effect of Ramipril on Urinary Protein Excretion in Maintenance Renal Transplant Patients Converted to Sirolimus.
Eligible participants were randomly assigned in a Double-Blind fashion to the Ramipril treatment group or the Placebo control group.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Ramipril
Participants were receiving cyclosporine (CsA) or tacrolimus (TAC) and either mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), mycophenolate sodium (MPS), or azathioprine (AZA) or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received ramipril, 5 or 10 milligrams per day (mg/d) orally (PO). 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of sirolimus \[SRL\] initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 nanograms per milliliter \[ng/mL\] less than \[\<\]1 year post-transplant \[PT\], 5-15 ng/mL greater than or equal to \[≥\]1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Ramipril was increased to 10-20 mg if urinary protein to creatinine ratio (U p/c) was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
Placebo
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received double-blinded placebo, 1 capsule (5 or 10 mg/day), PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Placebo dose was doubled if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
155
|
140
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
104
|
84
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
51
|
56
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Ramipril
Participants were receiving cyclosporine (CsA) or tacrolimus (TAC) and either mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), mycophenolate sodium (MPS), or azathioprine (AZA) or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received ramipril, 5 or 10 milligrams per day (mg/d) orally (PO). 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of sirolimus \[SRL\] initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 nanograms per milliliter \[ng/mL\] less than \[\<\]1 year post-transplant \[PT\], 5-15 ng/mL greater than or equal to \[≥\]1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Ramipril was increased to 10-20 mg if urinary protein to creatinine ratio (U p/c) was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
Placebo
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received double-blinded placebo, 1 capsule (5 or 10 mg/day), PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Placebo dose was doubled if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
1
|
11
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
31
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
2
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Other - Unspecified
|
8
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
3
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
6
|
7
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study Evaluating The Effect Of Ramipril On Urinary Protein Excretion In Renal Transplant Patients Converted To Sirolimus
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Ramipril
n=155 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received ramipril 5 or 10 mg/d PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Ramipril was increased to 10-20 mg if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
Placebo
n=140 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received double-blinded placebo, 1 capsule (5 or 10 mg/day), PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Placebo dose was doubled if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
Total
n=295 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
46.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7 • n=99 Participants
|
47.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9 • n=107 Participants
|
47.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
48 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
98 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
107 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
90 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
197 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day 1 of SRL conversion to 52 weeks after conversionPopulation: Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) population: all participants in the safety population who took at least one dose of SRL.
The event for each participant was defined as the initiation of losartan while on SRL and ramipril/placebo combination therapy. Participants who started losartan prior to SRL administration were not counted as events. Percentage was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method for time to event data.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ramipril
n=138 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received ramipril 5 or 10 mg/d PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Ramipril was increased to 10-20 mg if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received double-blinded placebo, 1 capsule (5 or 10 mg/day), PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Placebo dose was doubled if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Had Initiated Losartan Therapy at 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
|
6.2 percentage of participants
Interval 2.7 to 11.6
|
23.2 percentage of participants
Interval 15.7 to 31.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day 1 of SRL conversion to 52 weeks after conversionPopulation: mITT population
Defined as the time from the first dose of SRL administration to the first dose escalation of randomized test article (ramipril or placebo; in weeks), or censored on the day that a participant stopped the combination of SRL and randomized test article (ramipril or placebo) if the participants did not experience any ramipril/placebo dose escalation following conversion to SRL. Dose-escalation was defined as an increase in total daily dose of ramipril/placebo compared to Day 1 post conversion. Percentage was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method for time to event data.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ramipril
n=138 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received ramipril 5 or 10 mg/d PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Ramipril was increased to 10-20 mg if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received double-blinded placebo, 1 capsule (5 or 10 mg/day), PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Placebo dose was doubled if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Had a Dose Escalation in Randomized Test Article (Ramipril or Placebo) by 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
|
14.4 percentage of participants
Interval 8.7 to 21.3
|
29.2 percentage of participants
Interval 21.2 to 37.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeks and 52 weeks after conversionPopulation: mITT population; includes assessments from On-Therapy and Off-Therapy Periods.
Spot urine sample of protein and creatinine concentrations were obtained during the pre-SRL conversion period and after conversion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ramipril
n=138 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received ramipril 5 or 10 mg/d PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Ramipril was increased to 10-20 mg if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received double-blinded placebo, 1 capsule (5 or 10 mg/day), PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Placebo dose was doubled if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With U p/c <0.5 at 24 and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to Sirolimus
Up to 24 weeks post-conversion
|
92.0 percentage of participants
|
77.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With U p/c <0.5 at 24 and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to Sirolimus
Up to 52 weeks post-conversion
|
82.6 percentage of participants
|
73.0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeks and 52 weeks after conversionPopulation: mITT population; includes assessments from On-Therapy and Off-Therapy Periods.
Spot urine sample of albumin and creatinine concentrations were obtained during the pre-SRL conversion period and after conversion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ramipril
n=138 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received ramipril 5 or 10 mg/d PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Ramipril was increased to 10-20 mg if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received double-blinded placebo, 1 capsule (5 or 10 mg/day), PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Placebo dose was doubled if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Urinary Albumin to Creatinine Ratio (U Alb/c) <0.5 at 24 and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
Up to 24 weeks post-conversion
|
95.7 percentage of participants
|
89.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Urinary Albumin to Creatinine Ratio (U Alb/c) <0.5 at 24 and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
Up to 52 weeks post-conversion
|
88.4 percentage of participants
|
82.5 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeks and 52 weeks after conversionPopulation: mITT population; includes assessments from On-Therapy and Off-Therapy Periods.
The U alb/c and U p/c must have been collected on the same day to be counted as the numerator.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ramipril
n=138 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received ramipril 5 or 10 mg/d PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Ramipril was increased to 10-20 mg if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received double-blinded placebo, 1 capsule (5 or 10 mg/day), PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Placebo dose was doubled if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Both U Alb/c <0.5 and U p/c <0.5 at 24 and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
Up to 24 weeks post-conversion
|
91.3 percentage of participants
|
77.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Both U Alb/c <0.5 and U p/c <0.5 at 24 and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
Up to 52 weeks post-conversion
|
79.0 percentage of participants
|
70.6 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 30, 36, and 52 weeks after conversionPopulation: mITT population; n (number) = number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit; only participants with nonmissing records of U p/c were included in the analysis. Includes measures collected from On-Therapy and Off-Therapy Periods.
U p/c was measured in milligrams per milligram (mg/mg). The baseline U p/c values were the last values of the pre-SRL conversion period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ramipril
n=138 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received ramipril 5 or 10 mg/d PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Ramipril was increased to 10-20 mg if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received double-blinded placebo, 1 capsule (5 or 10 mg/day), PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Placebo dose was doubled if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
U p/c at Baseline and Weeks 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 30, 36, and 52 Following Conversion to SRL
Baseline (n=138,126)
|
0.17 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.37
|
0.15 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
|
U p/c at Baseline and Weeks 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 30, 36, and 52 Following Conversion to SRL
Week 3 (n=130,117)
|
0.18 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
0.23 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.19
|
|
U p/c at Baseline and Weeks 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 30, 36, and 52 Following Conversion to SRL
Week 4 (n=136,124)
|
0.18 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
0.28 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.27
|
|
U p/c at Baseline and Weeks 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 30, 36, and 52 Following Conversion to SRL
Week 8 (n=130,119)
|
0.23 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.39
|
0.31 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.37
|
|
U p/c at Baseline and Weeks 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 30, 36, and 52 Following Conversion to SRL
Week 12 (n=124,121)
|
0.23 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.30
|
0.38 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 1.18
|
|
U p/c at Baseline and Weeks 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 30, 36, and 52 Following Conversion to SRL
Week 24 (n=121,122)
|
0.26 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.40
|
0.31 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.39
|
|
U p/c at Baseline and Weeks 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 30, 36, and 52 Following Conversion to SRL
Week 30 (n=111,108)
|
0.23 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.23
|
0.32 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.37
|
|
U p/c at Baseline and Weeks 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 30, 36, and 52 Following Conversion to SRL
Week 36 (n=109,92)
|
0.22 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
0.29 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.30
|
|
U p/c at Baseline and Weeks 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 30, 36, and 52 Following Conversion to SRL
Week 52 (n=126,111)
|
0.27 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.31
|
0.35 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.43
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 30, 36, and 52 weeks after conversionPopulation: mITT population; n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit; only participants with nonmissing records of U alb/c were included in the analysis. Includes measures collected from On-Therapy and Off-Therapy Periods.
U alb/c was measured in mg/mg. Baseline U alb/c values were the last values of the pre-SRL conversion period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ramipril
n=138 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received ramipril 5 or 10 mg/d PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Ramipril was increased to 10-20 mg if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received double-blinded placebo, 1 capsule (5 or 10 mg/day), PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Placebo dose was doubled if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
U Alb/c at Baseline and Weeks 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 30, 36, and 52 Following Conversion to SRL
Baseline (n=138,126)
|
0.04 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.26
|
0.02 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.02
|
|
U Alb/c at Baseline and Weeks 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 30, 36, and 52 Following Conversion to SRL
Week 3 (n=129,117)
|
0.03 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
0.06 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
|
U Alb/c at Baseline and Weeks 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 30, 36, and 52 Following Conversion to SRL
Week 4 (n=136,124)
|
0.03 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.04
|
0.09 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
|
U Alb/c at Baseline and Weeks 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 30, 36, and 52 Following Conversion to SRL
Week 8 (n=129,119)
|
0.06 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.31
|
0.11 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.24
|
|
U Alb/c at Baseline and Weeks 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 30, 36, and 52 Following Conversion to SRL
Week 12 (n=124,121)
|
0.05 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
0.17 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
|
U Alb/c at Baseline and Weeks 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 30, 36, and 52 Following Conversion to SRL
Week 24 (n=121,122)
|
0.08 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.24
|
0.11 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.28
|
|
U Alb/c at Baseline and Weeks 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 30, 36, and 52 Following Conversion to SRL
Week 30 (n=111,108)
|
0.06 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
0.11 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.21
|
|
U Alb/c at Baseline and Weeks 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 30, 36, and 52 Following Conversion to SRL
Week 36 (n=109,92)
|
0.05 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
0.10 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.21
|
|
U Alb/c at Baseline and Weeks 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 30, 36, and 52 Following Conversion to SRL
Week 52 (n=126,111)
|
0.09 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.21
|
0.15 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 0.31
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeks and 52 weeks after conversionPopulation: mITT population
Defined as the percentage of participants who stop SRL (as test article) between the first day of SRL and either Week 24 or Week 52 following conversion to SRL. If a participant had a \>14 day gap in SRL use, the stop date of SRL was the date of the last SRL use before it was re-initiated. Participants who early terminate SRL at Week 24 were defined as having SRL stop day less than or equal to (≤) Day 190 (selected as the midpoint between Weeks 24 and 30). Participants who early terminate SRL at Week 52 were defined as having SRL stop day ≤Day 337 (selected as the midpoint between Weeks 44 and 52).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ramipril
n=138 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received ramipril 5 or 10 mg/d PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Ramipril was increased to 10-20 mg if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received double-blinded placebo, 1 capsule (5 or 10 mg/day), PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Placebo dose was doubled if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued SRL Therapy at 24 and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
Up to 24 weeks post-conversion
|
15.2 percentage of participants
|
15.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued SRL Therapy at 24 and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
Up to 52 weeks post-conversion
|
19.6 percentage of participants
|
28.6 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12, 24, and 52 weeks following conversionPopulation: mITT population; n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit. Includes measures collected from On-Therapy and Off-Therapy Periods.
Calculated in millimeters per minute per 1.73 square meters (mL/min/1.73m\^2). Age and corresponding creatinine at each visit (Weeks 12, 24, and 52) were used to calculate GFR.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ramipril
n=138 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received ramipril 5 or 10 mg/d PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Ramipril was increased to 10-20 mg if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received double-blinded placebo, 1 capsule (5 or 10 mg/day), PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Placebo dose was doubled if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Abbreviated Modified Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Weeks 12, 24, and 52 Following Conversion to SRL
Baseline (n=138,126)
|
62.06 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 14.08
|
63.30 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 15.64
|
|
Abbreviated Modified Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Weeks 12, 24, and 52 Following Conversion to SRL
Week 12 (n=125,122)
|
64.91 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 16.54
|
66.58 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 15.26
|
|
Abbreviated Modified Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Weeks 12, 24, and 52 Following Conversion to SRL
Week 24 (n=123,122)
|
65.18 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 17.99
|
63.85 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 16.49
|
|
Abbreviated Modified Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Weeks 12, 24, and 52 Following Conversion to SRL
Week 52 (n=128,115)
|
64.17 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 16.79
|
63.41 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 15.54
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeks and 52 weeks after conversionPopulation: mITT population; n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit. Includes measures collected from On-Therapy and Off-Therapy Periods.
Baseline fraction was the last value of the pre-SRL conversion period. Only the last value of U p/c or U alb/c was used for analysis if multiple measurements occurred in the same data anlysis interval. Fraction of albumin and protein was calculated only when urine protein was 6.2 mg/dL or higher. For urine albumin, if the value was reported as '\<xx.x', the numerical portion of the value was used in the calculation of fraction of albumin and protein.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ramipril
n=111 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received ramipril 5 or 10 mg/d PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Ramipril was increased to 10-20 mg if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
Placebo
n=110 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received double-blinded placebo, 1 capsule (5 or 10 mg/day), PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Placebo dose was doubled if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Fraction of Albumin (Milligrams Per Deciliter [mg/dL]) to Protein (mg/dL) in Urine at 24 and 52 Weeks After Conversion to SRL
Week 24 (n=104,110)
|
0.19 (mg/dL)/(mg/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
0.25 (mg/dL)/(mg/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.19
|
|
Fraction of Albumin (Milligrams Per Deciliter [mg/dL]) to Protein (mg/dL) in Urine at 24 and 52 Weeks After Conversion to SRL
Week 52 (n=111,105)
|
0.22 (mg/dL)/(mg/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
0.25 (mg/dL)/(mg/dL)
Standard Deviation 0.20
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Pre-SRL (from first dose of ramipril/placebo up to SRL conversion), On-Therapy (up to 52 weeks after SRL conversion), and Off-Therapy Period (up to 56 weeks after SRL conversion)Population: Safety population
BP values of potential clinical importance were recorded and categorized as follows: diastolic BP (DBP) ≤50 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) or ≥110 mmHg and systolic BP (SBP) ≤90 mmHg and ≥180 mmHg. Data were summarized for the on-therapy period and the off-therapy period and for the pre-SRL period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ramipril
n=155 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received ramipril 5 or 10 mg/d PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Ramipril was increased to 10-20 mg if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
Placebo
n=140 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received double-blinded placebo, 1 capsule (5 or 10 mg/day), PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Placebo dose was doubled if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Important Blood Pressure (BP) Values by Diastolic and Systolic BP Category
Off Therapy, Low SBP: ≤90 mmHg (n=35,69)
|
2.9 percentage of participants
|
1.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Important Blood Pressure (BP) Values by Diastolic and Systolic BP Category
Baseline, Low DBP ≤50 mmHg (n=155,140)
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Important Blood Pressure (BP) Values by Diastolic and Systolic BP Category
Baseline, Low SBP: ≤90 mmHg (n=155,140)
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Important Blood Pressure (BP) Values by Diastolic and Systolic BP Category
Pre-SRL, Low DBP: ≤50 mmHg (n=152,135)
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Important Blood Pressure (BP) Values by Diastolic and Systolic BP Category
Pre-SRL, High DBP: ≥110 mmHg (n=152,135)
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
1.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Important Blood Pressure (BP) Values by Diastolic and Systolic BP Category
Pre-SRL, Low SBP: ≤90 mmHg (n=152,135)
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Important Blood Pressure (BP) Values by Diastolic and Systolic BP Category
Pre-SRL, High SBP: ≥180 mmHg (n=152,135)
|
0.7 percentage of participants
|
0.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Important Blood Pressure (BP) Values by Diastolic and Systolic BP Category
On Therapy, Low DBP: ≤50 mmHg (n=138,126)
|
3.6 percentage of participants
|
2.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Important Blood Pressure (BP) Values by Diastolic and Systolic BP Category
On Therapy, High DBP: ≥110 mmHg (n=138,126)
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
1.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Important Blood Pressure (BP) Values by Diastolic and Systolic BP Category
On Therapy, Low SBP: ≤90 mmHg (n=138,126)
|
3.6 percentage of participants
|
4.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Important Blood Pressure (BP) Values by Diastolic and Systolic BP Category
On Therapy, High SBP: ≥180 mmHg (n=138,126)
|
0.7 percentage of participants
|
4.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Important Blood Pressure (BP) Values by Diastolic and Systolic BP Category
Off Therapy, High DBP ≥110 mmHg (n=35,69)
|
2.9 percentage of participants
|
1.4 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day 1 of SRL conversion to 52 weeks after conversionPopulation: Safety population; n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter for the given time interval; only participants dosed throughout the interval were included.
Cmin,TN was determined for SRL using the area method for the intervals: 0-2 weeks, \>2-4 weeks, \>4-12 weeks, \>12-24 weeks, \>24-36 weeks and \>36-52 weeks using the equation:Cmin,TN = AUCi-j/timej-timeiwhere AUC is the area under the concentration-time curve, i is the beginning of the interval and j is the end of the interval. Cmin,TN was calculated for participants who did not dropout of studies, but were missing concentrations at the interval endpoints by carrying the last observed concentration forward to the interval endpoint.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ramipril
n=258 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received ramipril 5 or 10 mg/d PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Ramipril was increased to 10-20 mg if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
Placebo
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received double-blinded placebo, 1 capsule (5 or 10 mg/day), PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Placebo dose was doubled if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
SRL Time-Normalized Trough Concentration (Cmin,TN) by Time Interval
0-2 weeks (n=258)
|
9.853 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 6.0250
|
—
|
|
SRL Time-Normalized Trough Concentration (Cmin,TN) by Time Interval
>2-4 weeks (n=257)
|
9.872 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 4.1408
|
—
|
|
SRL Time-Normalized Trough Concentration (Cmin,TN) by Time Interval
>4-12 weeks (n=256)
|
9.273 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 3.1763
|
—
|
|
SRL Time-Normalized Trough Concentration (Cmin,TN) by Time Interval
>12-24 weeks (n=244)
|
9.274 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 2.8944
|
—
|
|
SRL Time-Normalized Trough Concentration (Cmin,TN) by Time Interval
>24-36 weeks (n=226)
|
9.316 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 3.1535
|
—
|
|
SRL Time-Normalized Trough Concentration (Cmin,TN) by Time Interval
>36-52 weeks (n=193)
|
8.961 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 2.9031
|
—
|
|
SRL Time-Normalized Trough Concentration (Cmin,TN) by Time Interval
0-52 weeks (n=264)
|
9.300 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 2.2678
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Pre-SRL (from first dose of ramipril/placebo up to SRL conversion), On-Therapy (up to 52 weeks after SRL conversion), and Off-Therapy Period (up to 56 weeks after SRL conversion)Population: Safety population
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ramipril
n=155 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received ramipril 5 or 10 mg/d PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Ramipril was increased to 10-20 mg if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
Placebo
n=140 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received double-blinded placebo, 1 capsule (5 or 10 mg/day), PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Placebo dose was doubled if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Levels ≤100 Grams Per Liter (g/L)
Baseline (n=155,140)
|
1.3 percentage of participants
|
1.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Levels ≤100 Grams Per Liter (g/L)
Pre-SRL (n=148,129)
|
2.0 percentage of participants
|
0.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Levels ≤100 Grams Per Liter (g/L)
On-Therapy (n=138,124)
|
17.4 percentage of participants
|
12.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Levels ≤100 Grams Per Liter (g/L)
Off-Therapy (n=33,34)
|
9.1 percentage of participants
|
2.9 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Pre-SRL (from first dose of ramipril/placebo up to SRL conversion), On-Therapy (up to 52 weeks after SRL conversion), and Off-Therapy Period (up to 56 weeks after SRL conversion)Population: Safety population; n=number of participants analyzed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ramipril
n=155 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received ramipril 5 or 10 mg/d PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Ramipril was increased to 10-20 mg if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
Placebo
n=140 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received double-blinded placebo, 1 capsule (5 or 10 mg/day), PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Placebo dose was doubled if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Using Red Blood Cell Production Stimulants (Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents [ESAs])
Baseline (n=155,140)
|
5.8 percentage of participants
|
1.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Using Red Blood Cell Production Stimulants (Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents [ESAs])
Pre-SRL (n=155,140)
|
4.5 percentage of participants
|
0.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Using Red Blood Cell Production Stimulants (Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents [ESAs])
On-Therapy (n=138,126)
|
4.3 percentage of participants
|
3.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Using Red Blood Cell Production Stimulants (Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents [ESAs])
Off-Therapy (n=136,122)
|
1.5 percentage of participants
|
4.1 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4, 12, 24, and 52 weeks after conversionPopulation: Safety population; n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Parameters assessed included (all fasting) total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-densitylipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ramipril
n=128 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received ramipril 5 or 10 mg/d PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Ramipril was increased to 10-20 mg if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
Placebo
n=109 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received double-blinded placebo, 1 capsule (5 or 10 mg/day), PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Placebo dose was doubled if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid Parameters (Millimoles Per Liter [mmol/L]) at 4, 12, 24, and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
TC, Week 4 (n=128,109)
|
0.83 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.06
|
0.91 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.09
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid Parameters (Millimoles Per Liter [mmol/L]) at 4, 12, 24, and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
TC, Week 12 (n=115,108)
|
0.94 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.09
|
0.92 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.10
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid Parameters (Millimoles Per Liter [mmol/L]) at 4, 12, 24, and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
TC, Week 24 (n=105,102)
|
0.91 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.12
|
0.87 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.09
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid Parameters (Millimoles Per Liter [mmol/L]) at 4, 12, 24, and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
TC, Week 52 (n=94,79)
|
0.84 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.11
|
0.69 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.12
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid Parameters (Millimoles Per Liter [mmol/L]) at 4, 12, 24, and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
HDL-C, Week 4 (n=125,107)
|
0.06 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.02
|
0.09 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.03
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid Parameters (Millimoles Per Liter [mmol/L]) at 4, 12, 24, and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
HDL-C, Week 12 (n=114,104)
|
0.03 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.02
|
0.03 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.02
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid Parameters (Millimoles Per Liter [mmol/L]) at 4, 12, 24, and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
HDL-C, Week 24 (n=102,100)
|
0.07 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.03
|
0.04 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.03
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid Parameters (Millimoles Per Liter [mmol/L]) at 4, 12, 24, and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
HDL-C, Week 52 (n=92,78)
|
0.12 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.03
|
0.06 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.04
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid Parameters (Millimoles Per Liter [mmol/L]) at 4, 12, 24, and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
LDL-C, Week 4 (n=123,100)
|
0.59 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.06
|
0.56 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.07
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid Parameters (Millimoles Per Liter [mmol/L]) at 4, 12, 24, and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
LDL-C, Week 12 (n=109,96)
|
0.66 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.08
|
0.53 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.08
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid Parameters (Millimoles Per Liter [mmol/L]) at 4, 12, 24, and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
LDL-C, Week 24 (n=96,95)
|
0.66 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.10
|
0.56 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.08
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid Parameters (Millimoles Per Liter [mmol/L]) at 4, 12, 24, and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
LDL-C, Week 52 (n=90,73)
|
0.56 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.10
|
0.27 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.09
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid Parameters (Millimoles Per Liter [mmol/L]) at 4, 12, 24, and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
Triglycerides, Week 4 (n=127,108)
|
0.41 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.07
|
0.65 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.10
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid Parameters (Millimoles Per Liter [mmol/L]) at 4, 12, 24, and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
Triglycerides, Week 12 (n=114,107)
|
0.59 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.10
|
0.79 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.11
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid Parameters (Millimoles Per Liter [mmol/L]) at 4, 12, 24, and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
Triglycerides, Week 24 (n=104,102)
|
0.54 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.11
|
0.72 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.13
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid Parameters (Millimoles Per Liter [mmol/L]) at 4, 12, 24, and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
Triglycerides, Week 52 (n=93,77)
|
0.44 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.10
|
0.58 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.14
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day 1 of SRL conversion to 52 weeks after conversionPopulation: mITT population; includes BCAR occurring in On-Therapy and Off-Therapy Periods.
BCAR was defined according to updated Banff criteria (1997)for renal allograft rejection. The time to the first BCAR was defined as the date of first BCAR to the date of the first dose of SRL (in weeks). Participants without BCAR were censored at the time of withdrawal from the study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ramipril
n=138 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received ramipril 5 or 10 mg/d PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Ramipril was increased to 10-20 mg if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received double-blinded placebo, 1 capsule (5 or 10 mg/day), PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Placebo dose was doubled if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Biopsy-Confirmed Acute Rejection (BCAR) - Number of Participants With an Event
|
13 participants
|
5 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeks and 52 weeks after conversionPopulation: mITT population; includes BCAR occurring in the On-Therapy and Off-Therapy Periods
BCAR was defined according to updated Banff criteria (1997)for renal allograft rejection. Participants without BCAR were censored at the time of withdrawal from the study. Defined as the first BCAR occurring on therapy following conversion to SRL based on the mITT population. Time to first BCAR was defined as the date of first BCAR to date of the first dose of SRL (in weeks). Percentages were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for time to event data.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ramipril
n=138 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received ramipril 5 or 10 mg/d PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Ramipril was increased to 10-20 mg if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received double-blinded placebo, 1 capsule (5 or 10 mg/day), PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Placebo dose was doubled if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With First BCAR at 24 and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
24 weeks post-conversion
|
8.0 percentage of participants
Interval 4.2 to 13.3
|
0.8 percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 4.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With First BCAR at 24 and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
52 weeks post-conversion
|
9.5 percentage of participants
Interval 5.3 to 15.1
|
3.2 percentage of participants
Interval 1.1 to 7.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day 1 of SRL conversion to 52 weeks after conversionPopulation: mITT population; only participants with BCAR were included in the anlaysis.
Severity was summarized by type (antibody versus T-cell) and by phase: post-SRL (where both on-therapy and off-therapy events are included) and post-SRL (on-therapy). BCAR was categorized using Banff criteria as antibody-mediated (AM) or T-cell. AM BCAR severity was graded as Grade I (mild), Grade II (moderate \[mod\]), and Grade III (severe). T-cell BCAR severity was graded as 'Grade Ia, Ib (mild), Grade IIa, IIb (mod), and Grade III (severe). If a participant had both T-cell BCAR and antibody-mediated BCAR on the first rejection, the participant was counted in each category. For participants with T-cell BCAR (post-SRL and post-SRL On -Therapy) the p-value could not be calculated and all events were mild in severity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ramipril
n=13 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received ramipril 5 or 10 mg/d PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Ramipril was increased to 10-20 mg if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
Placebo
n=8 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received double-blinded placebo, 1 capsule (5 or 10 mg/day), PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Placebo dose was doubled if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With BCAR by Severity of First BCAR
Post-SRL, AM BCAR, Grade I (mild)
|
1 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With BCAR by Severity of First BCAR
Post-SRL, AM BCAR, Grade II (mod)
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With BCAR by Severity of First BCAR
Post-SRL, AM BCAR, Grade III (severe)
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With BCAR by Severity of First BCAR
Post-SRL, T-Cell BCAR, Grade I (mild)
|
12 participants
|
4 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With BCAR by Severity of First BCAR
Post-SRL (On-Therapy), AM BCAR, Grade I (mild)
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With BCAR by Severity of First BCAR
Post-SRL (On-Therapy), AM BCAR, Grade II (mod)
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With BCAR by Severity of First BCAR
Post-SRL (On-Therapy), T-Cell BCAR, Grade I (mild)
|
10 participants
|
3 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeks and 52 weeks after conversionPopulation: mITT population
Graft loss was defined as physical loss (nephrectomy orretransplantation), functional loss (requiring dialysis for ≥56days with no return of graft function), or death.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ramipril
n=138 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received ramipril 5 or 10 mg/d PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Ramipril was increased to 10-20 mg if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received double-blinded placebo, 1 capsule (5 or 10 mg/day), PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Placebo dose was doubled if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss at 24 and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
Week 24
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss at 24 and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
Week 52
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.8 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Pre-SRL (from first dose of ramipril/placebo up to SRL conversion), On-Therapy (up to 52 weeks after SRL conversion), and Off-Therapy Period (up to 56 weeks after SRL conversion)Population: Safety population; n=number of participants analyzed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ramipril
n=155 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received ramipril 5 or 10 mg/d PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Ramipril was increased to 10-20 mg if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
Placebo
n=140 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received double-blinded placebo, 1 capsule (5 or 10 mg/day), PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Placebo dose was doubled if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Using Statins
Baseline (n=155,140)
|
45.8 percentage of participants
|
36.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Using Statins
Pre-SRL (n=155,140)
|
45.2 percentage of participants
|
40.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Using Statins
On-Therapy (n=138,126)
|
67.4 percentage of participants
|
72.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Using Statins
Off-Therapy (n=136,122)
|
62.5 percentage of participants
|
68.9 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day 1 of Ramipril/Placebo to 52 weeks after SRL conversionPopulation: Safety population
Includes treatment-emergent adverse events based on categorization by the investigator as 'infection', regardless of the event preferred term in Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA.)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ramipril
n=155 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received ramipril 5 or 10 mg/d PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Ramipril was increased to 10-20 mg if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
Placebo
n=140 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received double-blinded placebo, 1 capsule (5 or 10 mg/day), PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Placebo dose was doubled if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Infection
|
54.2 percentage of participants
|
56.4 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day 1 of Ramipril/Placebo to 52 weeks after SRL conversionPopulation: Safety population
Includes treatment-emergent adverse events based on categorization by the investigator as angioedema, regardless of the event preferred term in MedDRA.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ramipril
n=155 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received ramipril 5 or 10 mg/d PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Ramipril was increased to 10-20 mg if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
Placebo
n=140 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received double-blinded placebo, 1 capsule (5 or 10 mg/day), PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Placebo dose was doubled if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Angioedema
|
1.3 percentage of participants
|
1.4 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day 1 of Ramipril/Placebo to 52 weeks after SRL conversionPopulation: Safety population
Includes treatment-emergent adverse events based on categorization by the investigator as 'malignancy', regardless of the event preferredterm in MedDRA.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ramipril
n=155 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received ramipril 5 or 10 mg/d PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Ramipril was increased to 10-20 mg if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
Placebo
n=140 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received double-blinded placebo, 1 capsule (5 or 10 mg/day), PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Placebo dose was doubled if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Malignancy
|
3.9 percentage of participants
|
2.9 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Pre-SRL (from first dose of ramipril/placebo up to SRL conversion), On-Therapy (up to 52 weeks after SRL conversion), and Off-Therapy Period (up to 56 weeks after SRL conversion)Population: Safety population; n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Hyperkalemia defined as serum potassium \>5.6 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ramipril
n=155 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received ramipril 5 or 10 mg/d PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Ramipril was increased to 10-20 mg if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
Placebo
n=140 Participants
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received double-blinded placebo, 1 capsule (5 or 10 mg/day), PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Placebo dose was doubled if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Hyperkalemia
Baseline (n=155,140)
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
1.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Hyperkalemia
Pre-SRL (n=151,135)
|
4.6 percentage of participants
|
1.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Hyperkalemia
On-Therapy (n=138,124)
|
0.7 percentage of participants
|
1.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Hyperkalemia
Off-Therapy (n=34,36)
|
2.9 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
Adverse Events
Ramipril
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Ramipril
n=155 participants at risk
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received ramipril 5 or 10 mg/d PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Ramipril was increased to 10-20 mg if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
Placebo
n=140 participants at risk
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received double-blinded placebo, 1 capsule (5 or 10 mg/day), PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Placebo dose was doubled if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
1.3%
2/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Iron deficiency anaemia
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukocytosis
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Basal cell carcinoma
|
1.9%
3/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
2/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Haemangioblastoma
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Squamous cell carcinoma
|
1.9%
3/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Squamous cell carcinoma of skin
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
2/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Embolism
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral vascular disorder
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Superior vena caval stenosis
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis ulcerative
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
2.6%
4/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
2/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ileus
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Inguinal hernia
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mouth ulceration
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal obstruction
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Umbilical hernia
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
1.9%
3/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Generalised oedema
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Impaired healing
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
2.6%
4/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
Congenital cystic kidney disease
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Palpitations
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Kidney transplant rejection
|
1.9%
3/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.1%
3/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Transplant rejection
|
7.1%
11/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
2.6%
4/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cytomegalovirus infection
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cytomegalovirus viraemia
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diabetic foot infection
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diverticulitis
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
1.3%
2/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
H1N1 influenza
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster disseminated
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infected skin ulcer
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral bacterial infection
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral infection
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis streptococcal
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
1.3%
2/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pulmonary sepsis
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis acute
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
1.9%
3/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Complications of transplanted kidney
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Graft complication
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ligament rupture
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Limb traumatic amputation
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Medication error
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Meniscus injury
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Overdose
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
|
1.3%
2/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Blood urea increased
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Clostridium test positive
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Cytomegalovirus test positive
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Immunosuppressant drug level increased
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Obstructive uropathy
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal cyst ruptured
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal impairment
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Ureteric obstruction
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary retention
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis acute
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral infarction
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Encephalitis
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
1.9%
3/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
1.3%
2/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Benign prostatic hyperplasia
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea exertional
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonitis
|
1.3%
2/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Angioedema
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermal cyst
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Diabetic foot
|
0.65%
1/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin ulcer
|
0.00%
0/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.71%
1/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Ramipril
n=155 participants at risk
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received ramipril 5 or 10 mg/d PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Ramipril was increased to 10-20 mg if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
Placebo
n=140 participants at risk
Participants were receiving CsA or TAC and either MMF, MPS, or AZA or steroids dosed per center's standard of care. Participants received double-blinded placebo, 1 capsule (5 or 10 mg/day), PO. 2-6 weeks after randomization, participants stopped TAC or CsA (within 21 days of SRL initiation) and received SRL, PO, 2-4 mg/d (6-12 mg on Day 1 if TAC or CsA withdrawn abruptly) to achieve target trough levels (7-15 ng/mL \<1 year PT, 5-15 ng/mL ≥1 year PT) for up to 52 weeks. Placebo dose was doubled if U p/c was ≥0.5. If U p/c ≥0.5 persisted, losartan 50 mg/d was added; if U p/c ≥0.5 still persisted, losartan was increased to 100 mg/d. If then U p/c \<0.5 was not maintained, study medication was discontinued and participant entered off-therapy phase of study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
11.6%
18/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
7.1%
10/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
12.3%
19/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.3%
6/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
3.2%
5/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.0%
7/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
9.7%
15/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.3%
13/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
6.5%
10/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.3%
6/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
3.9%
6/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
8.6%
12/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
6.5%
10/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.0%
14/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
9.0%
14/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.0%
7/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Aphthous stomatitis
|
7.7%
12/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.0%
14/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
25.8%
40/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
26.4%
37/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mouth ulceration
|
7.7%
12/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
12.1%
17/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
5.2%
8/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.4%
9/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
4.5%
7/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
7.9%
11/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
6.5%
10/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.7%
8/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
7.7%
12/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.0%
7/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Local swelling
|
1.9%
3/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.4%
9/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
17.4%
27/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
21.4%
30/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
7.1%
11/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.4%
9/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
2.6%
4/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.0%
7/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
5.2%
8/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.0%
7/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
17.4%
27/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
11.4%
16/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
7.7%
12/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.3%
13/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
|
15.5%
24/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
7.9%
11/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Weight increased
|
5.2%
8/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
3.6%
5/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Proteinuria
|
5.2%
8/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.7%
15/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dyslipidaemia
|
9.0%
14/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
13.6%
19/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercholesterolaemia
|
11.0%
17/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.0%
14/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperlipidaemia
|
9.7%
15/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.4%
9/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypertriglyceridaemia
|
10.3%
16/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.7%
15/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
1.9%
3/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.4%
9/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
7.7%
12/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
7.1%
10/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
12.3%
19/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
11.4%
16/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
15.5%
24/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.0%
14/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
4.5%
7/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
8.6%
12/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acne
|
11.6%
18/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
17.9%
25/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
3.2%
5/155 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.3%
13/140 • Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER