Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety and Efficacy of AGN 203818 for Pain Associated With Fibromyalgia Syndrome (NCT NCT00445705)
NCT ID: NCT00445705
Last Updated: 2015-09-07
Results Overview
Change from Baseline in mean daily-average-pain score at week 4. Patients recorded their daily average pain on a 11-point scale (where 0 equals no pain and 10 equals worst pain imaginable) using a diary during the 4-week treatment period. A negative number change from baseline represents a decrease in average pain (improvement).
TERMINATED
PHASE2
211 participants
Baseline, Week 4
2015-09-07
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Part A: Placebo every 12 hours for 4 weeks
|
AGN 203818 3 mg
Part A: 3 mg AGN 203818 every 12 hours for 4 weeks
|
AGN 203818 20 mg
Part A: 20 mg AGN 203818 every 12 hours for 4 weeks
|
AGN 203818 60 mg
Part A: 60 mg AGN 203818 every 12 hours for 4 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
53
|
53
|
52
|
53
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
44
|
42
|
41
|
39
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
9
|
11
|
11
|
14
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Safety and Efficacy of AGN 203818 for Pain Associated With Fibromyalgia Syndrome
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=53 Participants
Part A: Placebo every 12 hours for 4 weeks
|
AGN 203818 3 mg
n=53 Participants
Part A: 3 mg AGN 203818 every 12 hours for 4 weeks
|
AGN 203818 20 mg
n=52 Participants
Part A: 20 mg AGN 203818 every 12 hours for 4 weeks
|
AGN 203818 60 mg
n=53 Participants
Part A: 60 mg AGN 203818 every 12 hours for 4 weeks
|
Total
n=211 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
50.5 years
n=99 Participants
|
50.0 years
n=107 Participants
|
49.5 years
n=206 Participants
|
51.0 years
n=7 Participants
|
50.0 years
n=31 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
53 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
53 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
53 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
211 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4Population: Modified Intent-To-Treat (m-ITT). The m-ITT population included all patients who started the study (randomized) and received study medication with at least one post-treatment mean daily-average-pain score.
Change from Baseline in mean daily-average-pain score at week 4. Patients recorded their daily average pain on a 11-point scale (where 0 equals no pain and 10 equals worst pain imaginable) using a diary during the 4-week treatment period. A negative number change from baseline represents a decrease in average pain (improvement).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=50 Participants
Part A: Placebo every 12 hours for 4 weeks
|
AGN 203818 3 mg
n=51 Participants
Part A: 3 mg AGN 203818 every 12 hours for 4 weeks
|
AGN 203818 20 mg
n=50 Participants
Part A: 20 mg AGN 203818 every 12 hours for 4 weeks
|
AGN 203818 60 mg
n=50 Participants
Part A: 60 mg AGN 203818 every 12 hours for 4 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Mean Daily-Average-Pain Score at Week 4
Baseline
|
6.7 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
6.7 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
6.6 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
6.7 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.14
|
|
Change From Baseline in Mean Daily-Average-Pain Score at Week 4
Change from Baseline at Week 4
|
-1.3 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.66
|
-1.2 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.82
|
-1.5 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.79
|
-1.5 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.85
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4Population: Modified Intent-To-Treat (m-ITT). The m-ITT population included all patients who started the study (randomized) and received study medication with at least one post-treatment mean daily-average-pain score.
Change from baseline in the SF-BPI average pain question score at week 4. The SF-BPI is a patient-rated questionnaire that assesses certain aspects of pain including location, intensity, and interference with certain daily activities. The "average pain" question was rated on an 11-point scale (where 0=no pain and 10=worst pain imaginable). A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in average pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=50 Participants
Part A: Placebo every 12 hours for 4 weeks
|
AGN 203818 3 mg
n=51 Participants
Part A: 3 mg AGN 203818 every 12 hours for 4 weeks
|
AGN 203818 20 mg
n=50 Participants
Part A: 20 mg AGN 203818 every 12 hours for 4 weeks
|
AGN 203818 60 mg
n=50 Participants
Part A: 60 mg AGN 203818 every 12 hours for 4 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short Form Brief Pain Inventory (SF-BPI) Average Pain Score at Week 4
Baseline
|
6.4 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.19
|
6.6 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.21
|
6.5 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.23
|
6.5 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.28
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short Form Brief Pain Inventory (SF-BPI) Average Pain Score at Week 4
Change from Baseline at Week 4
|
-1.3 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.88
|
-1.2 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.79
|
-1.7 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 2.24
|
-1.3 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.68
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4Population: Modified Intent-To-Treat (m-ITT). The m-ITT population included all patients who started the study (randomized) and received study medication with at least one post-treatment mean daily-average-pain score.
Change from baseline in FIQ total score of physical impairment at week 4. The FIQ is a disease-specific questionnaire consisting of 10 questions and visual analog scales regarding functional disability, pain intensity, sleep function, stiffness, anxiety, depression, and overall sense of wellbeing. Each question is scored from 0 to 10 with 0 = no impairment (best) and 10 indicates maximum impairment (worst), for a minimum possible score (best) of 0 and a maximum possible (worst) total score of 100. A negative number change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=50 Participants
Part A: Placebo every 12 hours for 4 weeks
|
AGN 203818 3 mg
n=51 Participants
Part A: 3 mg AGN 203818 every 12 hours for 4 weeks
|
AGN 203818 20 mg
n=50 Participants
Part A: 20 mg AGN 203818 every 12 hours for 4 weeks
|
AGN 203818 60 mg
n=50 Participants
Part A: 60 mg AGN 203818 every 12 hours for 4 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Total Score of Physical Impairment at Week 4
Baseline
|
59.9 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 15.35
|
65.5 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 15.55
|
65.7 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 13.63
|
63.0 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 13.44
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Total Score of Physical Impairment at Week 4
Change from Baseline at Week 4
|
-13.3 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 16.67
|
-15.1 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 18.17
|
-18.7 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 20.51
|
-12.8 Scores on a Scale
Standard Deviation 20.41
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 4Population: Modified Intent-To-Treat (m-ITT). The m-ITT population included all randomized patients who started study (randomized) and who received the study medication with at least one post-treatment mean daily-average-pain score.
PGIC status for fibromyalgia syndrome at week 4. The PGIC consists of a self-evaluation by the patient of the overall change of their fibromyalgia syndrome since the beginning of the study, rated on a 7-point scale (score of 1-3 = very much improved to minimally improved; 4= no change; 5-7 = minimally worse to very much worse). Results are presented for the percentage of patients reporting each status: "improved"= score of 1-3; "no change"=score of 4; and "worse"=score of 5-7.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=50 Participants
Part A: Placebo every 12 hours for 4 weeks
|
AGN 203818 3 mg
n=51 Participants
Part A: 3 mg AGN 203818 every 12 hours for 4 weeks
|
AGN 203818 20 mg
n=50 Participants
Part A: 20 mg AGN 203818 every 12 hours for 4 weeks
|
AGN 203818 60 mg
n=50 Participants
Part A: 60 mg AGN 203818 every 12 hours for 4 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) for Fibromyalgia Syndrome Status at Week 4
Improved
|
69.8 Percentage of Patients
|
67.4 Percentage of Patients
|
69.1 Percentage of Patients
|
69.1 Percentage of Patients
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) for Fibromyalgia Syndrome Status at Week 4
No Change
|
18.6 Percentage of Patients
|
21.7 Percentage of Patients
|
23.8 Percentage of Patients
|
19.0 Percentage of Patients
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) for Fibromyalgia Syndrome Status at Week 4
Worse
|
11.6 Percentage of Patients
|
10.9 Percentage of Patients
|
7.1 Percentage of Patients
|
11.9 Percentage of Patients
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
AGN 203818 3 mg
AGN 203818 20 mg
AGN 203818 60 mg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=52 participants at risk
Part A: Placebo every 12 hours for 4 weeks
|
AGN 203818 3 mg
n=53 participants at risk
Part A: 3 mg AGN 203818 every 12 hours for 4 weeks
|
AGN 203818 20 mg
n=52 participants at risk
Part A: 20 mg AGN 203818 every 12 hours for 4 weeks
|
AGN 203818 60 mg
n=52 participants at risk
Part A: 60 mg AGN 203818 every 12 hours for 4 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis
|
0.00%
0/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
0.00%
0/53
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
0.00%
0/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
1.9%
1/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric ulcer
|
0.00%
0/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
0.00%
0/53
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
0.00%
0/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
1.9%
1/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
0.00%
0/53
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
1.9%
1/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
0.00%
0/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=52 participants at risk
Part A: Placebo every 12 hours for 4 weeks
|
AGN 203818 3 mg
n=53 participants at risk
Part A: 3 mg AGN 203818 every 12 hours for 4 weeks
|
AGN 203818 20 mg
n=52 participants at risk
Part A: 20 mg AGN 203818 every 12 hours for 4 weeks
|
AGN 203818 60 mg
n=52 participants at risk
Part A: 60 mg AGN 203818 every 12 hours for 4 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry Mouth
|
0.00%
0/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
1.9%
1/53
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
1.9%
1/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
15.4%
8/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
9.6%
5/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
15.1%
8/53
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
13.5%
7/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
9.6%
5/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
9.6%
5/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
7.5%
4/53
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
0.00%
0/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
9.6%
5/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
1.9%
1/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
5.7%
3/53
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
1.9%
1/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
0.00%
0/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
5.8%
3/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
7.5%
4/53
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
9.6%
5/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
7.7%
4/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
1.9%
1/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
3.8%
2/53
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
0.00%
0/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
5.8%
3/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
9.6%
5/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
9.4%
5/53
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
1.9%
1/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
7.7%
4/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
5.8%
3/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
9.4%
5/53
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
3.8%
2/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
1.9%
1/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
5.8%
3/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
1.9%
1/53
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
0.00%
0/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
1.9%
1/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
1.9%
1/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
0.00%
0/53
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
0.00%
0/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
5.8%
3/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal stiffness
|
1.9%
1/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
0.00%
0/53
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
5.8%
3/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
0.00%
0/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
13.5%
7/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
24.5%
13/53
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
17.3%
9/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
25.0%
13/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
5.8%
3/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
9.4%
5/53
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
13.5%
7/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
17.3%
9/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
1.9%
1/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
7.5%
4/53
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
7.7%
4/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
11.5%
6/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
|
5.8%
3/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
5.7%
3/53
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
0.00%
0/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
0.00%
0/52
The safety population was used to calculate the number of participants at risk for SAEs and AEs and is the total number of patients that were randomized AND treated.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee A disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 90 days from the time submitted to the sponsor for review. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER