Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study Evaluating Etanercept for the Treatment of Active, Severe, and Advanced Axial Ankylosing Spondylitis (NCT NCT00420238)
NCT ID: NCT00420238
Last Updated: 2010-06-29
Results Overview
BASDAI subject asessment of discomfort, pain and fatigue measured using a 100 millimeter Visual Analog Scale; range: 0=none to 100=very severe. Normalized net incremental area under the curve (AUC) = area between baseline and the BASDAI curve as a function of time (randomization to Week 12); computed using the linear trapezoidal method. All areas above baseline and under the curve are positive and all areas below baseline and above the curve are negative. Net incremental AUC = sum of these areas; this result was then divided by the study duration of the patients; negative value = improvement.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
82 participants
Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
2010-06-29
Participant Flow
Subjects with advanced ankylosing spondylitis (AS) by Modified New York criteria, advanced and severe disease with intervertebral bridges, and an axial defined by a score of ≥30 for overall level of AS neck, back, or hip pain on the BASDAI were eligible to participate in the study and were randomized at 19 study sites.
Subjects completed a screening period of up to 6 weeks duration prior to entering the treatment period; 95 subjects were screened, and 82 subjects were randomized.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Etanercept/Etanercept
Etanercept 50 mg subcutaneously (SC) once weekly
|
Placebo/Etanercept
Placebo subcutaneously (SC), once weekly; Etanercept 50 mg SC, once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
12 Week Double-Blind Treatment Period 1
STARTED
|
39
|
43
|
|
12 Week Double-Blind Treatment Period 1
COMPLETED
|
38
|
39
|
|
12 Week Double-Blind Treatment Period 1
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
4
|
|
12 Week Open-Label Treatment Period 2
STARTED
|
38
|
39
|
|
12 Week Open-Label Treatment Period 2
COMPLETED
|
36
|
38
|
|
12 Week Open-Label Treatment Period 2
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Etanercept/Etanercept
Etanercept 50 mg subcutaneously (SC) once weekly
|
Placebo/Etanercept
Placebo subcutaneously (SC), once weekly; Etanercept 50 mg SC, once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
12 Week Double-Blind Treatment Period 1
Adverse Event
|
1
|
0
|
|
12 Week Double-Blind Treatment Period 1
Lack of Efficacy
|
0
|
2
|
|
12 Week Double-Blind Treatment Period 1
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
1
|
|
12 Week Double-Blind Treatment Period 1
Withdrawal of Consent
|
0
|
1
|
|
12 Week Open-Label Treatment Period 2
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
0
|
|
12 Week Open-Label Treatment Period 2
Withdrawal of Consent
|
1
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study Evaluating Etanercept for the Treatment of Active, Severe, and Advanced Axial Ankylosing Spondylitis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Total
n=82 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age Continuous
|
46.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8 • n=99 Participants
|
48.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 47.3 • n=107 Participants
|
47.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
37 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
76 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: Modified Intent-To-Treat (mITT) population: includes all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of blinded study drug. Last observation carried forward (LOCF).
BASDAI subject asessment of discomfort, pain and fatigue measured using a 100 millimeter Visual Analog Scale; range: 0=none to 100=very severe. Normalized net incremental area under the curve (AUC) = area between baseline and the BASDAI curve as a function of time (randomization to Week 12); computed using the linear trapezoidal method. All areas above baseline and under the curve are positive and all areas below baseline and above the curve are negative. Net incremental AUC = sum of these areas; this result was then divided by the study duration of the patients; negative value = improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Normalized Net Incremental Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activities Index (BASDAI) Between Randomization and Week 12
|
-19.79 millimeters
95% Confidence Interval 16.83 • Interval -25.03 to -14.54
|
-10.96 millimeters
95% Confidence Interval 16.46 • Interval -15.95 to -5.97
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT; LOCF.
BASDAI subject assessment of discomfort, pain and fatigue was measured using a 100 millimeter Visual Analog Scale (VAS); range: 0=none to 100=very severe. BASDAI 50 response defined as at least a 50 percent (%) improvement (decrease) from baseline to observation (last observation carried forward) in the BASDAI. Baseline score minus score at observation divided by Baseline score \* 100 = \>=50%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Subjects Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) 50 Response
Week 2
|
23.08 percent of participants
|
9.30 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) 50 Response
Week 4
|
28.21 percent of participants
|
16.28 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) 50 Response
Week 8
|
41.03 percent of participants
|
23.26 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) 50 Response
Week 12
|
46.15 percent of participants
|
23.26 percent of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT; LOCF.
ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) patients; 4 domains: patient global assessment of disease activity, pain, function,and inflammation. ASAS 20 = 20% improvement (versus baseline) and an absolute change (net improvement) ≥ 10 millimeters (mm) on a 0-100 mm scale (100=high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening (absence of deterioration by \>=20% and by \>= 10 mm) in remaining domain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Subjects Achieving Assessment Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2
|
30.77 percent of participants
|
20.93 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects Achieving Assessment Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4
|
41.03 percent of participants
|
30.23 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects Achieving Assessment Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8
|
64.10 percent of participants
|
27.91 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects Achieving Assessment Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12
|
66.67 percent of participants
|
32.56 percent of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 14, Week 18, Week 24Population: Open-label population: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of open test article (Etanercept). LOCF.
ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) patients; 4 domains: patient global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, and inflammation. ASAS 20 = 20% improvement (versus baseline) and an absolute change (net improvement) ≥ 10 units (millimeters) on a 0-100 scale (100=high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening (absence of deterioration by \>=20% and by \>=10 mm) in remaining domain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=38 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=39 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Subjects Acheiving Assessment Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14
|
71.05 percent of participants
|
53.85 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects Acheiving Assessment Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18
|
71.05 percent of participants
|
64.10 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects Acheiving Assessment Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24
|
84.21 percent of participants
|
66.67 percent of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT; LOCF.
ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) patients; 4 domains: patient global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 50 = 50% improvement (versus baseline) and an absolute (net) change ≥ 20 units on a 0-100 scale (high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening (absence of deterioration by \>=20% and by \>=10 mm) in remaining domain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Subjects Achieving Assessment Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 50 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2
|
17.95 percent of participants
|
9.30 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects Achieving Assessment Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 50 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4
|
23.08 percent of participants
|
16.28 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects Achieving Assessment Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 50 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8
|
35.90 percent of participants
|
16.28 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects Achieving Assessment Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 50 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12
|
38.46 percent of participants
|
13.95 percent of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 14, Week 18, Week 24Population: Open-label population; LOCF.
ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) patients; 4 domains: patient global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 50 = 50% improvement (vs. baseline) and an absolute (net) change ≥ 20 units on a 0-100 scale (high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening (absence of deterioration by \>=20% and by \>=10 mm) in remaining domain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=38 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=39 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Subjects Achieving Assessment Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 50 at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14
|
44.74 percent of particpants
|
43.59 percent of particpants
|
|
Percent of Subjects Achieving Assessment Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 50 at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18
|
50.00 percent of particpants
|
48.72 percent of particpants
|
|
Percent of Subjects Achieving Assessment Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 50 at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24
|
60.53 percent of particpants
|
51.28 percent of particpants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT; LOCF.
ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) patients; 4 domains: patient global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 70 = 70% improvement (vs. baseline) and an absolute change ≥ 20 units on a 0-100 scale (high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening (absence of deterioration by \>=20% and by \>= 10 mm) in remaining domain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Subjects Achieving Assessment Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 70 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2
|
12.82 percent of participants
|
4.65 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects Achieving Assessment Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 70 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4
|
17.95 percent of participants
|
4.65 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects Achieving Assessment Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 70 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8
|
15.38 percent of participants
|
4.65 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects Achieving Assessment Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 70 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12
|
25.64 percent of participants
|
9.30 percent of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 14, Week 18, Week 24Population: Open-label population; LOCF.
ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) patients; 4 domains: patient global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 70 = 70% improvement (vs. baseline) and an absolute change ≥ 20 units on a 0-100 scale (high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening (absence of deterioration by \>=20% and by \>= 10 mm) in remaining domain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=38 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=39 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Subjects Achieiving Assessment Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 70 at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14
|
31.58 percent of participants
|
33.33 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects Achieiving Assessment Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 70 at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18
|
31.58 percent of participants
|
30.77 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects Achieiving Assessment Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 70 at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24
|
36.84 percent of participants
|
35.90 percent of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT; LOCF.
Partial remission defined as a score of \<20 millimeters (mm) on a scale of 0 to 100 mm in each of 4 domains: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) patient global assessment, VAS pain score (Total Back Pain), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) score, and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activities Index (BASDAI)-mean of two morning stiffness-related VAS scores. A negative score indicates an improvement in disease activity and a positive score indicates worsening.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Subjects Achieving Partial Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2
|
7.69 percent of participants
|
2.33 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects Achieving Partial Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4
|
10.26 percent of participants
|
2.33 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects Achieving Partial Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8
|
17.95 percent of participants
|
4.65 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects Achieving Partial Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12
|
17.95 percent of participants
|
4.65 percent of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 14, Week 18, Week 24Population: Open-label population; LOCF.
Partial remission defined as a score of \<20 millimeters (mm) on a scale of 0 to 100 mm in each of 4 domains: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) patient global assessment, VAS pain score (Total Back Pain), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) score, and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activities Index (BASDAI)-mean of two morning stiffness-related VAS scores. A negative score indicates an improvement in disease activity and a positive score indicates worsening.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=38 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=39 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Subjects Achieving Partial Remission at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14
|
28.95 percent of participants
|
23.08 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects Achieving Partial Remission at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18
|
31.58 percent of participants
|
25.64 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects Achieving Partial Remission at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24
|
28.95 percent of participants
|
23.08 percent of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT; LOCF. N = number of subjects with evaluable data.
PGA was measured using a 100 millimeter Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 = very good to 100 = very bad. Normalized net incremental area under the curve (AUC)=area between baseline and the Patient Global Asessment curve as a function of time (randomization to Week 12); computed using the linear trapezoidal method. All areas above baseline and under the curve are positive and all area below baseline and above the curve are negative. Net incremental AUC = sum of these areas; this result was then divided by the study duration of the patients; negative value = improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=41 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Normalized Net Incremental Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Between Baseline and Week 12
|
-20.35 millimeters
Interval -26.23 to -14.47
|
-10.39 millimeters
Interval -16.13 to -4.66
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT; LOCF.
Patient global assessment of all the ways ankylosing spondylitis affected them in the last 48 hours using a 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS); range 0=very good to 100=very bad.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12
|
-25.79 units on scale
Interval -32.84 to -18.74
|
-16.52 units on scale
Interval -23.4 to -9.64
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2
|
-16.90 units on scale
Interval -23.96 to -9.85
|
-8.36 units on scale
Interval -15.24 to -1.49
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4
|
-19.06 units on scale
Interval -26.11 to -12.01
|
-11.04 units on scale
Interval -17.92 to -4.16
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8
|
-25.29 units on scale
Interval -32.35 to -18.24
|
-10.56 units on scale
Interval -17.44 to -3.68
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 14, Week 18, Week 24Population: Open-label population; LOCF.
Patient global assessment of all the ways ankylosing spondylitis affected them in the last 48 hours using a 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS); range 0=very good to 100=very bad.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=38 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=39 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14
|
-31.26 units on scale
Interval -40.35 to -22.18
|
-31.20 units on scale
Interval -40.57 to -21.83
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18
|
-35.50 units on scale
Interval -44.18 to -26.82
|
-31.92 units on scale
Interval -41.44 to -22.4
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24
|
-40.70 units on scale
Interval -49.18 to -32.23
|
-34.19 units on scale
Interval -42.86 to -25.53
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT; LOCF. N= number of subjects with evaluable data.
PGA was measured using a 100 millimeter Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 = very good to 100 = very bad. Normalized net incremental area under the curve (AUC) = area between baseline and the Physician Global Assessment curve as a function of time (randomization to Week 12); computed using the linear trapezoidal method. All areas above baseline and under the curve are positive and all area below baseline and above the curve are negative. Net incremental AUC = sum of these areas; this result was then divided by the study duration of the patients; negative value = improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=42 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Normalized Net Incremental Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Between Baseline and Week 12
|
-24.14 millimeters
Interval -28.97 to -19.32
|
-13.15 millimeters
Interval -17.8 to -8.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT; LOCF. N = number of subjects with evaluable data.
Physician global assessment of all the ways ankylosing spondylitis has affected patient during the last 48 hours. 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS); range: 0=very good to 100=very bad.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=42 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2
|
-15.77 units on scale
Interval -21.87 to -9.67
|
-7.43 units on scale
Interval -13.31 to -1.55
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4
|
-26.25 units on scale
Interval -32.35 to -20.15
|
-15.23 units on scale
Interval -21.11 to -9.35
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8
|
-28.80 units on scale
Interval -34.9 to -22.7
|
-16.05 units on scale
Interval -21.93 to -10.17
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12
|
-32.62 units on scale
Interval -38.72 to -26.52
|
-17.32 units on scale
Interval -23.2 to -11.44
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 14, Week 18, Week 24Population: Open-label population; LOCF.
Physician global assessment of all the ways ankylosing spondylitis has affected patient during the last 48 hours. 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS); range: 0=very good to 100=very bad.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=38 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=39 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14
|
-37.66 units on scale
Interval -46.14 to -29.19
|
-35.57 units on scale
Interval -42.41 to -28.73
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18
|
-43.22 units on scale
Interval -49.79 to -36.65
|
-37.05 units on scale
Interval -44.14 to -29.96
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24
|
-42.68 units on scale
Interval -50.25 to -35.1
|
-40.41 units on scale
Interval -47.64 to -33.17
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT; LOCF. N=number of subjects with evaluable data.
Nocturnal back pain was measured using a 100 millimeter Visual Analog Scale (VAS); range: 0 = none to 100 = extreme. Normalized net incremental area under the curve (AUC) = area between baseline and the Nocturnal Back Pain curve as a function of time (randomization to Week 12); computed using the linear trapezoidal method. All areas above baseline and under the curve are positive and all area below baseline and above the curve are negative. Net incremental AUC = sum of these areas; this result was then divided by the study duration of the patients; negative value = improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=41 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Normalized Net Incremental Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Nocturnal Back Pain Between Baseline and Week 12
|
-23.23 millimeters
Interval -29.65 to -16.81
|
-13.64 millimeters
Interval -19.89 to -7.38
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT; LOCF.
Subject assessment of nocturnal back pain due to ankylosing spondylitis during the last 48 hours using a 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS); range: 0=none to 100=extreme.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Back Pain at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2
|
-19.41 units on scale
Interval -27.09 to -11.72
|
-13.12 units on scale
Interval -20.61 to -5.63
|
|
Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Back Pain at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4
|
-20.90 units on scale
Interval -28.58 to -13.21
|
-15.72 units on scale
Interval -23.21 to -8.23
|
|
Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Back Pain at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8
|
-29.27 units on scale
Interval -36.95 to -21.58
|
-15.54 units on scale
Interval -23.03 to -8.05
|
|
Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Back Pain at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12
|
-32.07 units on scale
Interval -39.75 to -24.38
|
-12.38 units on scale
Interval -19.87 to -4.89
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 14, Week 18, Week 24Population: Open-label population; LOCF.
Subject assessment of nocturnal back pain due to ankylosing spondylitis during the last 48 hours using a 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS); range: 0=none to 100=extreme.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=38 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=39 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Back Pain at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14
|
-36.92 units on scale
Interval -46.48 to -27.36
|
-27.76 units on scale
Interval -37.34 to -18.18
|
|
Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Back Pain at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18
|
-41.73 units on scale
Interval -50.58 to -32.87
|
-27.89 units on scale
Interval -37.91 to -17.86
|
|
Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Back Pain at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24
|
-45.26 units on scale
Interval -54.25 to -36.28
|
-28.44 units on scale
Interval -38.45 to -18.43
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT; LOCF. N=number of subjects with evaluable data.
Total back pain was measured using a 100 millimeter Visual Analog Scale (VAS); range: 0 = none to 100 = extreme. Normalized net incremental area under the curve (AUC) = area between baseline and the Total Back Pain curve as a function of time (randomization to Week 12); computed using the linear trapezoidal method. All areas above baseline and under the curve are positive and all area below baseline and above the curve are negative. Net incremental AUC = sum of these areas; this result was then divided by the study duration of the patients; negative value = improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=41 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Normalized Net Incremental Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Total Back Pain Between Baseline and Week 12
|
-21.73 millimeters
Interval -28.26 to -15.2
|
-13.24 millimeters
Interval -19.61 to -6.88
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT; LOCF.
Subject assessment of total back pain due to ankylosing spondylitis during the last 48 hours using a 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS); range: 0=none to 100=extreme.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Total Back Pain at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2
|
-15.37 units on scale
Interval -22.99 to -7.76
|
-11.80 units on scale
Interval -19.22 to -4.38
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total Back Pain at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4
|
-18.93 units on scale
Interval -26.54 to -11.32
|
-14.36 units on scale
Interval -21.78 to -6.94
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total Back Pain at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8
|
-28.24 units on scale
Interval -35.85 to -20.62
|
-15.78 units on scale
Interval -23.2 to -8.36
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total Back Pain at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12
|
-29.18 units on scale
Interval -36.79 to -21.57
|
-14.93 units on scale
Interval -22.35 to -7.51
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 14, Week 18, Week 24Population: Open-label population; LOCF.
Subject assessment of total back pain due to ankylosing spondylitis during the last 48 hours using a 100 millimeter Visual Analog Scale (VAS); range: 0=none to 100=extreme.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=38 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=39 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Total Back Pain at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14
|
-35.21 units on scale
Interval -43.72 to -26.71
|
-30.29 units on scale
Interval -40.43 to -20.16
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total Back Pain at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18
|
-40.02 units on scale
Interval -48.4 to -31.64
|
-31.19 units on scale
Interval -42.27 to -20.12
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total Back Pain at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24
|
-44.50 units on scale
Interval -52.74 to -36.25
|
-32.27 units on scale
Interval -42.71 to -21.83
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT; LOCF. N=number of subjects with evaluable data.
BASFI was measured using a 100 millimeter Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 = easy to 100 = impossible. Normalized net incremental area under the curve (AUC) = area between baseline and the BASFI curve as a function of time (randomization to Week 12); computed using the linear trapezoidal method. All areas above baseline and under the curve are positive and all area below baseline and above the curve are negative. Net incremental AUC = sum of these areas; this result was then divided by the study duration of the patients; negative value = improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=42 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Normalized Net Incremental Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) Between Baseline and Week 12
|
-14.59 millimeters
Interval -19.44 to -9.74
|
-9.34 millimeters
Interval -14.02 to -4.67
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT; LOCF. N = number of subjects with evaluable data.
BASFI is a validated self assessment tool that determines the degree of functional limitation in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients using a 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) measuring level of ability with activities in the last 48 hours; range: 0=easy to 100=impossible. Higher score = greater limitation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=42 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2
|
-8.23 units on scale
Interval -13.82 to -2.63
|
-7.80 units on scale
Interval -13.19 to -2.41
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4
|
-12.44 units on scale
Interval -18.03 to -6.85
|
-10.04 units on scale
Interval -15.43 to -4.65
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8
|
-19.75 units on scale
Interval -25.35 to -14.16
|
-11.54 units on scale
Interval -16.93 to -6.15
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12
|
-21.63 units on scale
Interval -27.22 to -16.03
|
-10.09 units on scale
Interval -15.47 to -4.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT; in the case of missing data, no replacement or imputation method was performed. Abbreviations: C = component (number), Act = Activities.
Subject rating of last 48 hours, 100 millimeter Visual Analog Scale; range 0=easy to 100=impossible: 1)Putting on socks/tights without (w/o) help; 2)Bending forward from waist to pickup pen from floor w/o aid; 3)Reaching to high shelf w/o aid; 4)Getting out of armless dining room chair w/o using hands/other help; 5)Getting up off floor w/o help from lying on back; 6)Standing unsupported 10 minutes w/o discomfort; 7)Climbing 12-15 steps w/o handrail or walking aid; 8)Looking over shoulder w/o turning body; 9) Doing physically demanding activities; 10) Doing full days activities (home or work).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4 C6: Standing Unsupported
|
46.4 units on a scale
Interval 35.8 to 57.0
|
42.0 units on a scale
Interval 33.6 to 50.3
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Baseline C6: Standing Unsupported
|
58.9 units on a scale
Interval 49.9 to 67.9
|
49.0 units on a scale
Interval 39.7 to 58.3
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2 C6: Standing Unsupported
|
50.8 units on a scale
Interval 40.4 to 61.2
|
44.9 units on a scale
Interval 35.5 to 54.3
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Baseline C1: Putting on Socks or Tights
|
51.1 units on a scale
Interval 42.8 to 59.4
|
43.8 units on a scale
Interval 35.7 to 52.0
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2 C1: Putting on Socks or Tights
|
47.6 units on a scale
Interval 37.9 to 57.3
|
36.5 units on a scale
Interval 27.4 to 45.5
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4 C1: Putting on Socks or Tights
|
41.1 units on a scale
Interval 31.4 to 50.8
|
32.7 units on a scale
Interval 24.0 to 41.4
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8 C1: Putting on Socks or Tights
|
32.3 units on a scale
Interval 24.0 to 40.7
|
30.6 units on a scale
Interval 22.0 to 39.1
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12 C1: Putting on Socks or Tights
|
33.2 units on a scale
Interval 23.4 to 43.0
|
36.0 units on a scale
Interval 24.6 to 45.6
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Baseline C2: Bending from Waist
|
63.4 units on a scale
Interval 54.2 to 72.7
|
61.5 units on a scale
Interval 52.6 to 70.5
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2 C2: Bending from Waist
|
54.1 units on a scale
Interval 43.0 to 65.3
|
55.7 units on a scale
Interval 45.5 to 65.9
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4 C2: Bending from Waist
|
51.1 units on a scale
Interval 39.1 to 63.0
|
54.0 units on a scale
Interval 44.1 to 63.9
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8 C2: Bending from Waist
|
43.3 units on a scale
Interval 32.3 to 54.3
|
54.2 units on a scale
Interval 43.5 to 64.9
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12 C2: Bending from Waist
|
41.1 units on a scale
Interval 29.8 to 52.4
|
56.2 units on a scale
Interval 45.6 to 66.7
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Baseline C3: Reaching to High Shelf
|
61.5 units on a scale
Interval 52.5 to 70.6
|
54.3 units on a scale
Interval 46.3 to 62.3
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2 C3: Reaching to High Shelf
|
52.1 units on a scale
Interval 41.9 to 62.2
|
50.3 units on a scale
Interval 40.8 to 59.7
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4 C3: Reaching to High Shelf
|
50.2 units on a scale
Interval 39.7 to 60.7
|
43.8 units on a scale
Interval 35.2 to 52.4
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8 C3: Reaching to High Shelf
|
37.4 units on a scale
Interval 27.7 to 47.1
|
44.1 units on a scale
Interval 36.4 to 51.8
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12 C3: Reaching to High Shelf
|
37.3 units on a scale
Interval 26.8 to 47.9
|
44.5 units on a scale
Interval 36.2 to 52.8
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Baseline C4: Getting Out Armless Chair
|
55.8 units on a scale
Interval 46.1 to 65.5
|
47.5 units on a scale
Interval 38.8 to 56.2
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2 C4: Getting Out Armless Chair
|
47.2 units on a scale
Interval 36.7 to 57.6
|
38.1 units on a scale
Interval 29.0 to 47.2
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4 C4: Getting Out Armless Chair
|
42.1 units on a scale
Interval 31.0 to 53.3
|
36.1 units on a scale
Interval 27.7 to 44.6
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8 C4: Getting Out Armless Chair
|
33.6 units on a scale
Interval 24.3 to 42.9
|
35.1 units on a scale
Interval 25.9 to 44.3
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12 C4: Getting Out Armless Chair
|
31.7 units on a scale
Interval 21.7 to 41.7
|
36.5 units on a scale
Interval 26.8 to 46.3
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Baseline C5: Getting Up Off Floor
|
71.8 units on a scale
Interval 64.1 to 79.5
|
60.8 units on a scale
Interval 52.7 to 68.9
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2 C5: Getting Up Off Floor
|
57.0 units on a scale
Interval 46.7 to 67.3
|
49.4 units on a scale
Interval 40.1 to 58.8
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4 C5: Getting Up Off Floor
|
55.0 units on a scale
Interval 44.5 to 65.6
|
48.5 units on a scale
Interval 39.4 to 57.5
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8 C5: Getting Up Off Floor
|
43.7 units on a scale
Interval 32.9 to 54.4
|
44.2 units on a scale
Interval 34.7 to 53.7
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12 C5: Getting Up Off Floor
|
44.5 units on a scale
Interval 33.7 to 55.2
|
46.1 units on a scale
Interval 36.7 to 55.5
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8 C6: Standing Unsupported
|
40.8 units on a scale
Interval 30.9 to 50.7
|
40.9 units on a scale
Interval 31.6 to 50.1
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12 C6: Standing Unsupported
|
39.0 units on a scale
Interval 28.3 to 49.7
|
42.2 units on a scale
Interval 32.5 to 51.9
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Baseline C7: Climbing 12-15 Steps
|
55.0 units on a scale
Interval 45.3 to 64.8
|
47.5 units on a scale
Interval 37.9 to 57.1
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2 C7: Climbing 12-15 Steps
|
47.4 units on a scale
Interval 36.7 to 58.1
|
38.4 units on a scale
Interval 29.3 to 47.4
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4 C7: Climbing 12-15 Steps
|
42.3 units on a scale
Interval 31.8 to 52.8
|
37.4 units on a scale
Interval 28.4 to 46.4
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8 C7: Climbing 12-15 Steps
|
37.4 units on a scale
Interval 27.5 to 47.3
|
35.6 units on a scale
Interval 25.8 to 45.3
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12 C7: Climbing 12-15 Steps
|
35.0 units on a scale
Interval 24.7 to 45.2
|
32.9 units on a scale
Interval 23.6 to 42.3
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Baseline C8: Looking Over Shoulder
|
81.0 units on a scale
Interval 74.0 to 87.9
|
81.9 units on a scale
Interval 75.7 to 88.0
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2 C8: Looking Over Shoulder
|
72.9 units on a scale
Interval 64.3 to 81.5
|
68.4 units on a scale
Interval 59.5 to 77.2
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4 C8: Looking Over Shoulder
|
63.7 units on a scale
Interval 53.5 to 74.0
|
71.6 units on a scale
Interval 62.8 to 80.4
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8 C8: Looking Over Shoulder
|
56.9 units on a scale
Interval 45.9 to 67.9
|
71.1 units on a scale
Interval 61.6 to 80.7
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12: C8: Looking Over Shoulder
|
54.1 units on a scale
Interval 43.0 to 65.2
|
68.1 units on a scale
Interval 58.8 to 77.4
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Baseline C9: Physically Demanding Act
|
67.6 units on a scale
Interval 60.7 to 74.5
|
65.4 units on a scale
Interval 59.2 to 71.6
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2 C9: Physically Demanding Act
|
60.7 units on a scale
Interval 51.7 to 69.6
|
58.4 units on a scale
Interval 51.4 to 65.4
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4 C9: Physically Demanding Act
|
53.0 units on a scale
Interval 43.4 to 62.6
|
53.6 units on a scale
Interval 46.4 to 60.8
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8 C9: Physically Demanding Act
|
48.4 units on a scale
Interval 38.4 to 58.3
|
47.8 units on a scale
Interval 40.5 to 55.1
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12 C9: Physically Demanding Act
|
43.2 units on a scale
Interval 33.4 to 52.9
|
54.9 units on a scale
Interval 47.7 to 62.1
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Baseline C10: Full Days Act
|
66.9 units on a scale
Interval 59.4 to 74.5
|
57.1 units on a scale
Interval 49.4 to 64.8
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2 C10: Full Days Act
|
57.2 units on a scale
Interval 48.7 to 65.7
|
49.3 units on a scale
Interval 42.1 to 56.5
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4 C10: Full Days Act
|
52.4 units on a scale
Interval 43.3 to 61.4
|
51.6 units on a scale
Interval 43.7 to 59.5
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8 C10: Full Days Act
|
47.6 units on a scale
Interval 37.3 to 57.8
|
44.4 units on a scale
Interval 37.5 to 51.3
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI): Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12 C10: Full Days Act
|
43.1 units on a scale
Interval 32.2 to 53.9
|
49.0 units on a scale
Interval 40.9 to 57.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 14, Week 18, Week 24Population: Open-label population; in the case of missing data, no replacement or imputation method was performed. Abbreviations: C=component (number), Act=Activities.
Subject rating of last 48 hours, 100 mm Visual Analog Scale; range 0=easy to 100=impossible: 1) Putting on socks/tights without (w/o) help; 2) Bending forward from waist to pickup pen from floor w/o aid; 3) Reaching to high shelf w/o aid; 4) Getting out of armless dining room chair w/o using hands/other help; 5) Getting up off floor w/o help from lying on back; 6) Standing unsupported 10 minutes w/o discomfort; 7) Climbing 12-15 steps w/o handrail or walking aid; 8) Looking over shoulder w/o turning body; 9) Doing physically demanding activities; 10) Doing full days activities (home or work).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=38 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=39 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14 C1: Putting on Socks or Tights
|
32.7 units on a scale
Interval 22.6 to 42.8
|
25.7 units on a scale
Interval 16.6 to 34.8
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18 C1: Putting on Socks or Tights
|
31.3 units on a scale
Interval 21.3 to 41.2
|
26.6 units on a scale
Interval 17.1 to 36.1
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24 C1: Putting on Socks or Tights
|
26.7 units on a scale
Interval 16.8 to 36.5
|
24.5 units on a scale
Interval 15.4 to 33.6
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14 C2: Bending from Waist
|
42.1 units on a scale
Interval 29.6 to 54.6
|
47.1 units on a scale
Interval 35.9 to 58.4
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18 C2: Bending from Waist
|
36.9 units on a scale
Interval 25.0 to 48.8
|
45.3 units on a scale
Interval 32.9 to 57.7
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24 C2: Bending from Waist
|
36.1 units on a scale
Interval 23.9 to 48.3
|
44.6 units on a scale
Interval 33.0 to 56.3
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14 C3: Reaching to High Shelf
|
37.0 units on a scale
Interval 26.0 to 48.0
|
31.7 units on a scale
Interval 22.8 to 40.6
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18 C3: Reaching to High Shelf
|
32.1 units on a scale
Interval 21.7 to 42.6
|
34.2 units on a scale
Interval 25.0 to 43.5
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24 C3: Reaching to High Shelf
|
27.4 units on a scale
Interval 18.1 to 36.7
|
32.1 units on a scale
Interval 23.8 to 40.4
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14 C4: Getting Out Armless Chair
|
32.0 units on a scale
Interval 20.9 to 43.2
|
27.9 units on a scale
Interval 18.3 to 37.6
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18 C4: Getting Out Armless Chair
|
27.3 units on a scale
Interval 17.2 to 37.4
|
26.5 units on a scale
Interval 16.9 to 36.1
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24 C4: Getting Out Armless Chair
|
23.4 units on a scale
Interval 14.6 to 32.3
|
26.2 units on a scale
Interval 17.1 to 35.3
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14 C5: Getting Up Off Floor
|
43.6 units on a scale
Interval 31.1 to 56.1
|
36.3 units on a scale
Interval 26.6 to 46.1
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18 C5: Getting Up Off Floor
|
40.0 units on a scale
Interval 28.1 to 51.8
|
36.5 units on a scale
Interval 26.6 to 46.3
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24 C5: Getting Up Off Floor
|
38.2 units on a scale
Interval 27.0 to 49.4
|
34.4 units on a scale
Interval 24.1 to 44.7
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14 C6: Standing Unsupported
|
38.8 units on a scale
Interval 27.2 to 50.3
|
29.7 units on a scale
Interval 20.8 to 38.6
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18 C6: Standing Unsupported
|
32.6 units on a scale
Interval 22.1 to 43.2
|
33.3 units on a scale
Interval 22.9 to 43.7
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24 C6: Standing Unsupported
|
30.5 units on a scale
Interval 20.7 to 40.3
|
33.8 units on a scale
Interval 24.1 to 43.6
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14 C7: Climbing 12-15 Steps
|
34.0 units on a scale
Interval 22.4 to 45.6
|
26.7 units on a scale
Interval 17.7 to 35.7
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18 C7: Climbing 12-15 Steps
|
30.7 units on a scale
Interval 20.0 to 41.3
|
27.4 units on a scale
Interval 17.2 to 37.6
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24 C7: Climbing 12-15 Steps
|
28.8 units on a scale
Interval 18.7 to 38.9
|
27.1 units on a scale
Interval 17.0 to 37.2
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14 C8: Looking Over Shoulder
|
52.4 units on a scale
Interval 40.2 to 64.5
|
58.6 units on a scale
Interval 47.5 to 69.8
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18 C8: Looking Over Shoulder
|
50.7 units on a scale
Interval 38.6 to 62.7
|
57.7 units on a scale
Interval 46.9 to 68.5
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24 C8: Looking Over Shoulder
|
46.4 units on a scale
Interval 34.2 to 58.6
|
55.3 units on a scale
Interval 44.8 to 65.9
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14 C9: Physically Demanding Act
|
41.8 units on a scale
Interval 30.7 to 53.0
|
37.3 units on a scale
Interval 29.9 to 44.7
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18 C9: Physically Demanding Act
|
38.6 units on a scale
Interval 28.5 to 48.8
|
43.5 units on a scale
Interval 34.9 to 52.1
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24 C9: Physically Demanding Act
|
33.7 units on a scale
Interval 23.7 to 43.6
|
38.5 units on a scale
Interval 29.9 to 47.1
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14 C10: Full Days Act
|
40.4 units on a scale
Interval 29.2 to 51.6
|
36.1 units on a scale
Interval 27.7 to 44.4
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18 C10: Full Days Act
|
37.9 units on a scale
Interval 26.7 to 49.0
|
40.0 units on a scale
Interval 30.9 to 49.0
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Functional Index (BASFI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24 C10: Full Days Act
|
32.1 units on a scale
Interval 22.6 to 41.6
|
37.5 units on a scale
Interval 28.4 to 46.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT; LOCF.
BASDAI is a validated self assessment tool used to determine disease activity in patients with ankylosing spondylitis in the last 48 hours. Utilizing a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of 0-10 (0=none and 10=very severe) patient's answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain and fatigue. The BASDAI final mean score was calculated taking all 6 VAS assessments.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2
|
-14.25 units on a scale
Interval -20.51 to -7.99
|
-7.39 units on a scale
Interval -13.34 to -1.43
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4
|
-18.41 units on a scale
Interval -24.67 to -12.15
|
-11.97 units on a scale
Interval -17.92 to -6.01
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8
|
-26.06 units on a scale
Interval -32.31 to -19.8
|
-13.51 units on a scale
Interval -19.46 to -7.55
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12
|
-26.38 units on a scale
Interval -32.64 to -20.12
|
-14.43 units on a scale
Interval -20.39 to -8.47
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 14, Week 18, Week 24Population: Open-label population; LOCF.
BASDAI is a validated self assessment tool used to determine disease activity in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in the last 48 hours. Utilizing a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of 0-10 (0=none and 10=very severe) patient's answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain and fatigue. The BASDAI final mean score was calculated taking all 6 VAS assessments.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=38 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=39 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14
|
-29.26 units on scale
Interval -37.34 to -21.17
|
-27.41 units on scale
Interval -34.52 to -20.3
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18
|
-34.20 units on scale
Interval -41.89 to -26.52
|
-28.21 units on scale
Interval -35.94 to -20.47
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24
|
-37.62 units on scale
Interval -44.97 to -30.27
|
-28.62 units on scale
Interval -36.49 to -20.76
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT; in case of mising data, no replacement or imputation method was performed. Abbreviations: C=component, AS=Ankylosing Spondylitis.
BASDAI subject rated components over last 48 hours using 100 mm Visual Analog Scale; components 1-5: range 0=none to 100=very severe; component 6: range:0=0 hours to 100=2 hours or more. 1) Overall level of fatigue/tiredness experienced; 2) Overall level of AS neck,back or hip pain experienced; 3) Overall level of pain/swelling in joints other than neck, back or hips; 4) Overall level of discomfort from any areas tender to touch or pressure; 5) Overall level of morning stiffness from time of awakening; 6) Duration of morning stiffness from time of awakening, and morning stiffness subscale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Baseline C1: Fatigue/Tiredness
|
68.2 units on scale
Interval 62.5 to 73.8
|
61.9 units on scale
Interval 57.1 to 66.8
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2 C1: Fatigue/Tiredness
|
56.6 units on scale
Interval 48.7 to 64.5
|
55.8 units on scale
Interval 49.1 to 62.5
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4 C1: Fatigue/Tiredness
|
51.4 units on scale
Interval 43.1 to 59.6
|
54.2 units on scale
Interval 47.0 to 61.4
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8 C1: Fatigue/Tiredness
|
44.4 units on scale
Interval 36.2 to 52.7
|
50.9 units on scale
Interval 43.3 to 58.5
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12 C1: Fatigue/Tiredness
|
43.9 units on scale
Interval 33.9 to 53.9
|
48.5 units on scale
Interval 40.1 to 56.9
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Baseline C2: AS Neck, Back or Hip Pain
|
73.0 units on scale
Interval 68.7 to 77.3
|
68.1 units on scale
Interval 63.4 to 72.9
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2 C2: AS Neck, Back or Hip Pain
|
53.9 units on scale
Interval 45.7 to 62.1
|
57.6 units on scale
Interval 50.2 to 65.0
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4 C2: AS Neck, Back or Hip Pain
|
51.5 units on scale
Interval 43.0 to 60.0
|
55.0 units on scale
Interval 47.2 to 62.9
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8 C2: AS Neck, Back or Hip Pain
|
41.4 units on scale
Interval 32.8 to 50.1
|
52.1 units on scale
Interval 45.0 to 59.2
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12 C2: AS Neck, Back or Hip Pain
|
41.0 units on scale
Interval 31.8 to 50.2
|
52.0 units on scale
Interval 44.5 to 59.5
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Baseline C3: Pain/Swelling in Other Joints
|
49.3 units on scale
Interval 41.1 to 57.5
|
45.3 units on scale
Interval 36.1 to 54.4
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2 C3: Pain/Swelling in Other Joints
|
39.2 units on scale
Interval 29.5 to 48.9
|
41.7 units on scale
Interval 31.7 to 51.7
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4 C3: Pain/Swelling in Other Joints
|
37.3 units on scale
Interval 27.8 to 46.8
|
38.2 units on scale
Interval 30.0 to 46.5
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8 C3: Pain/Swelling in Other Joints
|
30.1 units on scale
Interval 20.8 to 39.5
|
40.4 units on scale
Interval 32.0 to 48.8
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12 C3: Pain/Swelling in Other Joints
|
31.8 units on scale
Interval 21.7 to 41.8
|
37.9 units on scale
Interval 29.6 to 46.2
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Baseline C4: Discomfort Areas Tender to Touch
|
62.3 units on scale
Interval 55.5 to 69.2
|
57.2 units on scale
Interval 49.9 to 64.4
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2 C4: Discomfort Areas Tender to Touch
|
42.1 units on scale
Interval 32.5 to 51.6
|
51.9 units on scale
Interval 43.3 to 60.4
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4 C4: Discomfort Areas Tender to Touch
|
38.3 units on scale
Interval 29.0 to 47.5
|
41.5 units on scale
Interval 33.2 to 49.9
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8 C4: Discomfort Areas Tender to Touch
|
31.2 units on scale
Interval 22.6 to 39.9
|
40.7 units on scale
Interval 32.5 to 48.8
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12 C4: Discomfort Areas Tender to Touch
|
28.8 units on scale
Interval 19.9 to 37.7
|
38.0 units on scale
Interval 30.5 to 45.4
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Baseline C5: Morning Stiffness
|
70.8 units on scale
Interval 64.8 to 76.8
|
66.3 units on scale
Interval 61.6 to 70.9
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2 C5: Morning Stiffness
|
51.3 units on scale
Interval 42.9 to 59.8
|
55.6 units on scale
Interval 48.7 to 62.4
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4 C5: Morning Stiffness
|
46.5 units on scale
Interval 37.2 to 55.7
|
50.7 units on scale
Interval 43.6 to 57.8
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8 C5: Morning Stiffness
|
38.1 units on scale
Interval 29.1 to 47.2
|
44.7 units on scale
Interval 37.4 to 52.0
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12 C5: Morning Stiffness
|
37.8 units on scale
Interval 27.6 to 48.1
|
44.8 units on scale
Interval 37.7 to 52.0
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Baseline C6: Duration Morning Stiffness
|
62.1 units on scale
Interval 53.9 to 70.3
|
52.4 units on scale
Interval 44.5 to 60.3
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2 C6: Duration Morning Stiffness
|
46.8 units on scale
Interval 36.6 to 57.0
|
44.0 units on scale
Interval 35.7 to 52.3
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4 C6: Duration Morning Stiffness
|
42.2 units on scale
Interval 31.9 to 52.6
|
43.0 units on scale
Interval 35.2 to 50.9
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8 C6: Duration Morning Stiffness
|
34.6 units on scale
Interval 24.2 to 44.9
|
43.7 units on scale
Interval 36.1 to 51.4
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12 C6: Duration Morning Stiffness
|
34.9 units on scale
Interval 24.0 to 45.8
|
44.7 units on scale
Interval 36.1 to 53.3
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Baseline: Subscore Morning Stiffness (n=39, 43)
|
66.45 units on scale
Interval 60.42 to 72.48
|
59.34 units on scale
Interval 54.19 to 64.48
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2: Subscore Morning Stiffness
|
49.72 units on scale
Interval 41.16 to 58.29
|
49.78 units on scale
Interval 42.88 to 56.68
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4: Subscore Morning Stiffness
|
44.34 units on scale
Interval 35.58 to 53.11
|
46.87 units on scale
Interval 39.83 to 53.91
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8: Subscore Morning Stiffness
|
36.34 units on scale
Interval 27.19 to 45.48
|
44.22 units on scale
Interval 37.2 to 51.24
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12: Subscore Morning Stiffness
|
36.39 units on scale
Interval 26.41 to 46.37
|
44.77 units on scale
Interval 37.41 to 52.13
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 14, Week 18, Week 24Population: Open-label population; in case of missing data, no replacement or imputation method was performed. Abbreviations: C=component, AS=Ankylosing Spondylitis.
BASDAI subject rated components over last 48 hours using a 100 millimeter Visual Analog Scale; components 1-5: range 0=none to 100=very severe; component 6: range:0=0 hours to 100=2 hours or more. 1) Overall level of fatigue/tiredness experienced; 2) Overall level of AS neck,back or hip pain experienced; 3)Overall level of pain/swelling in joints other than neck,back or hips; 4) Overall level of discomfort from any areas tender to touch or pressure; 5) Overall level of morning stiffness from time of awakening; 6) Duration of morning stiffness from time of awakening.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=38 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=39 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14 C1: Fatigue/Tiredness
|
41.7 units on scale
Interval 31.4 to 52.0
|
38.3 units on scale
Interval 29.5 to 47.0
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18 C1: Fatigue/Tiredness
|
33.1 units on scale
Interval 24.0 to 42.2
|
38.9 units on scale
Interval 28.9 to 48.9
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24 C1: Fatigue/Tiredness
|
28.0 units on scale
Interval 20.1 to 35.9
|
35.3 units on scale
Interval 25.5 to 45.1
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14 C2: AS Neck, Back or Hip Pain
|
39.9 units on scale
Interval 29.6 to 50.1
|
35.0 units on scale
Interval 26.8 to 43.3
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18 C2: AS Neck, Back or Hip Pain
|
35.1 units on scale
Interval 26.2 to 44.0
|
35.0 units on scale
Interval 25.7 to 44.3
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24 C2: AS Neck, Back or Hip Pain
|
28.2 units on scale
Interval 19.5 to 36.8
|
30.0 units on scale
Interval 21.3 to 38.7
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14 C3: Pain/Swelling in Other Joints
|
27.0 units on scale
Interval 17.3 to 36.8
|
28.4 units on scale
Interval 20.5 to 36.3
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18 C3: Pain/Swelling in Other Joints
|
23.8 units on scale
Interval 14.5 to 33.1
|
26.4 units on scale
Interval 17.4 to 35.4
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24 C3: Pain/Swelling in Other Joints
|
21.0 units on scale
Interval 12.5 to 29.4
|
24.9 units on scale
Interval 16.5 to 33.3
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14 C4: Discomfort Areas Tender to Touch
|
30.0 units on scale
Interval 19.9 to 40.0
|
29.1 units on scale
Interval 21.2 to 36.9
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18 C4: Discomfort Areas Tender to Touch
|
24.1 units on scale
Interval 15.4 to 32.8
|
28.7 units on scale
Interval 19.6 to 37.9
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24 C4: Discomfort Areas Tender to Touch
|
19.3 units on scale
Interval 11.9 to 26.8
|
25.6 units on scale
Interval 17.5 to 33.8
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14 C5: Morning Stiffness
|
35.8 units on scale
Interval 25.6 to 46.1
|
28.5 units on scale
Interval 20.3 to 36.7
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18 C5: Morning Stiffness
|
31.4 units on scale
Interval 21.5 to 41.4
|
28.6 units on scale
Interval 20.2 to 37.0
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24 C5: Morning Stiffness
|
26.4 units on scale
Interval 17.5 to 35.4
|
24.7 units on scale
Interval 17.8 to 31.7
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14 C6: Duration Morning Stiffness
|
31.3 units on scale
Interval 20.9 to 41.6
|
27.7 units on scale
Interval 19.4 to 36.0
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18 C6: Duration Morning Stiffness
|
31.3 units on scale
Interval 20.9 to 41.7
|
25.7 units on scale
Interval 17.6 to 33.9
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24 C6: Duration Morning Stiffness
|
24.9 units on scale
Interval 15.4 to 34.4
|
24.4 units on scale
Interval 17.2 to 31.6
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14: Subscore Morning Stiffness
|
33.5 units on scale
Interval 24.03 to 43.06
|
28.09 units on scale
Interval 20.14 to 36.04
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18: Subscore Morning Stiffness
|
31.38 units on scale
Interval 21.66 to 41.1
|
27.17 units on scale
Interval 19.02 to 35.32
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Independent Components at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24: Subscore Morning Stiffness
|
25.40 units on scale
Interval 16.69 to 34.12
|
24.55 units on scale
Interval 17.77 to 31.34
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT; LOCF. N=number of subjects with evaluable data.
BAS-G was measured using a 100 millimeter Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0=none to 100=very important. Normalized net incremental area under the curve (AUC) = area between baseline and the BAS-G curve as a function of time (randomization to Week 12); computed using the linear trapezoidal method. All areas above baseline and under the curve are positive and all area below baseline and above the curve are negative. Net incremental AUC = sum of these areas; this result was then divided by the study duration of the patients; negative value = improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=38 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=42 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Normalized Net Incremental Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis-Global Score (BAS-G) Visual Analog Scale Between Baseline and Week 12
|
-21.36 millimeters
Interval -27.07 to -15.66
|
-15.43 millimeters
Interval -20.85 to -10.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT; LOCF. N=number of subjects with evaluable data.
Subject assessment of the effect of their disease on well-being over last 48 hours using a 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS); range: 0=none to 100=very important.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=38 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=42 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis-Global Score (BAS-G) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2
|
-13.74 units on scale
Interval -20.81 to -6.68
|
-14.64 units on scale
Interval -21.36 to -7.92
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis-Global Score (BAS-G) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4
|
-20.09 units on scale
Interval -27.16 to -13.02
|
-14.99 units on scale
Interval -21.71 to -8.27
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis-Global Score (BAS-G) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8
|
-28.17 units on scale
Interval -35.24 to -21.11
|
-18.27 units on scale
Interval -24.99 to -11.55
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis-Global Score (BAS-G) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12
|
-29.78 units on scale
Interval -36.84 to -22.71
|
-16.12 units on scale
Interval -22.84 to -9.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 14, Week 18, Week 24Population: Open-label population; LOCF.
Subject assessment of the effect of their disease on well-being over last 48 hours using a 100 millimeter Visual Analog Scale (VAS); range: 0=none to 100=very important.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=38 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=39 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis-Global Score (BAS-G) at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14
|
-34.29 units on scale
Interval -43.58 to -25.0
|
-34.93 units on scale
Interval -44.51 to -25.34
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis-Global Score (BAS-G) at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18
|
-36.93 units on scale
Interval -45.27 to -28.6
|
-35.98 units on scale
Interval -44.69 to -27.26
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis-Global Score (BAS-G) at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24
|
-42.35 units on scale
Interval -50.58 to -34.13
|
-35.89 units on scale
Interval -44.3 to -27.48
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT; LOCF.
Subject evaluation of the effect of their disease on well-being over the last week using a using a 100 millimeter Visual Anaog Scale; range: 0=none to 100=very important.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Global Score (BAS-G) Independent Component: Effect of Disease on Well-being at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Baseline
|
72.1 units on scale
Interval 66.9 to 77.4
|
68.3 units on scale
Interval 62.6 to 73.9
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Global Score (BAS-G) Independent Component: Effect of Disease on Well-being at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2
|
57.8 units on scale
Interval 49.9 to 65.6
|
54.4 units on scale
Interval 47.4 to 61.4
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Global Score (BAS-G) Independent Component: Effect of Disease on Well-being at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4
|
51.4 units on scale
Interval 43.5 to 59.4
|
54.0 units on scale
Interval 46.8 to 61.3
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Global Score (BAS-G) Independent Component: Effect of Disease on Well-being at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8
|
43.3 units on scale
Interval 34.9 to 51.6
|
50.8 units on scale
Interval 44.9 to 56.7
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Global Score (BAS-G) Independent Component: Effect of Disease on Well-being at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12
|
42.1 units on scale
Interval 33.0 to 51.1
|
52.9 units on scale
Interval 46.3 to 59.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: mITT. In the case of missing data, no replacement or imputation method was performed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), Vital Capacity (VC), and Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)
Vital Capacity
|
0.14 liters
Interval 0.05 to 0.23
|
-0.05 liters
Interval -0.14 to 0.04
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), Vital Capacity (VC), and Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
|
0.16 liters
Interval 0.07 to 0.25
|
-0.02 liters
Interval -0.11 to 0.07
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), Vital Capacity (VC), and Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)
Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second
|
0.05 liters
Interval -0.02 to 0.12
|
-0.02 liters
Interval -0.09 to 0.05
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: mITT; N=number of subjects with evaluable data. In the case of missing data, no replacement or imputation method was performed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=37 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=38 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ratio Forced Expitatory Volume in One Second (FEV1)/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (%)
|
-2.49 percent
Interval -4.15 to -0.84
|
0.10 percent
Interval -1.53 to 1.73
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT; LOCF.
BASMI was composed of 5 measures; each measure scored 0-2 (0=normal mobility, 2=severe reduction); final score range: 0 to 10. Normalized net incremental area under the curve (AUC) = area between baseline and the BASMI curve as a function of time (randomization to Week 12); computed using the linear trapezoidal method. All areas above baseline and under the curve are positive and all area below baseline and above the curve are negative. Net incremental AUC = sum of these areas; this result was then divided by the study duration of the patients; negative value = improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Normalized Net Incremental Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) Between Baseline and Week 12
|
-0.41 millimeters
Interval -0.57 to -0.26
|
-0.18 millimeters
Interval -0.33 to -0.03
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT; LOCF.
BASMI is an objective measure of spinal mobility. The BASMI score is composed of 5 measures: cervical rotation, intermalleolar distance, modified Schober test, lateral flexion and tragus to wall distance. Each measure was scored 0-2 (0=normal mobility, 2=severe reduction) to give a final score ranging 0 to 10. Higher score = greater reduction in spinal mobility.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Spinal Mobility Measured With the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2
|
-0.27 units on scale
Interval -0.47 to -0.06
|
-0.17 units on scale
Interval -0.37 to 0.02
|
|
Change From Baseline in Spinal Mobility Measured With the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4
|
-0.37 units on scale
Interval -0.58 to -0.17
|
-0.23 units on scale
Interval -0.43 to -0.04
|
|
Change From Baseline in Spinal Mobility Measured With the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8
|
-0.57 units on scale
Interval -0.77 to -0.36
|
-0.18 units on scale
Interval -0.38 to 0.01
|
|
Change From Baseline in Spinal Mobility Measured With the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12
|
-0.57 units on scale
Interval -0.77 to -0.36
|
-0.20 units on scale
Interval -0.4 to -0.01
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 14, Week 18, Week 24Population: Open-label population; LOCF.
BASMI is an objective measure of spinal mobility. The BASMI score is composed of 5 measures: cervical rotation, intermalleolar distance, modified Schober's test, lateral flexion and tragus to wall distance. Each measure was scored 0-2 (0=normal mobility, 2=severe reduction) to give a final score ranging 0 to 10. Higher score = greater reduction in spinal mobility.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=38 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=39 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Spinal Mobility Measured With the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14
|
-0.73 units on scale
Interval -0.98 to -0.49
|
-0.49 units on scale
Interval -0.68 to -0.3
|
|
Change From Baseline in Spinal Mobility Measured With the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18
|
-0.65 units on scale
Interval -0.94 to -0.36
|
-0.49 units on scale
Interval -0.69 to -0.29
|
|
Change From Baseline in Spinal Mobility Measured With the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24
|
-0.80 units on scale
Interval -1.05 to -0.55
|
-0.50 units on scale
Interval -0.72 to -0.29
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT; LOCF. In the case of missing data, no replacement or imputation method was performed.
Cervical rotation: measurement of degrees to which the subjects could turn their heads as far as possible to the right and then to the left. Mean of ordinal scores from 0: \>= 85 degrees to 10: \<= 8.5 degrees.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) Independent Component: Cervical Rotation at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Baseline
|
39.85 units on scale
Interval 33.77 to 45.92
|
37.14 units on scale
Interval 30.37 to 43.91
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) Independent Component: Cervical Rotation at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2
|
43.05 units on scale
Interval 35.73 to 50.38
|
38.34 units on scale
Interval 32.08 to 44.6
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) Independent Component: Cervical Rotation at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4
|
42.55 units on scale
Interval 35.64 to 49.47
|
39.67 units on scale
Interval 33.21 to 46.14
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) Independent Component: Cervical Rotation at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8
|
44.34 units on scale
Interval 37.57 to 51.11
|
39.79 units on scale
Interval 32.44 to 47.14
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) Independent Component: Cervical Rotation at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12
|
46.39 units on scale
Interval 39.55 to 53.24
|
42.67 units on scale
Interval 35.58 to 49.75
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 14, Week 18, Week 24Population: Open-label population; in the case of missing data, no replacement or imputation method was performed.
Cervical rotation: measurement in degree to which the subjects could turn their heads as far as possible to the right and then to the left. Mean of ordinal scores from 0: \>= 85 degrees to 10: \<= 8.5 degrees.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=38 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=39 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI): Spinal Mobility Measured With Cervical Rotation at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18
|
44.62 units on scale
Interval 37.2 to 52.03
|
43.92 units on scale
Interval 36.57 to 51.27
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI): Spinal Mobility Measured With Cervical Rotation at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14
|
47.75 units on scale
Interval 40.85 to 54.65
|
44.78 units on scale
Interval 37.32 to 52.24
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI): Spinal Mobility Measured With Cervical Rotation at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24
|
48.74 units on scale
Interval 41.78 to 55.71
|
43.82 units on scale
Interval 36.26 to 51.37
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT. In the case of missing data, no replacement or imputation method was performed.
Measurement in centimeters (cm) of distance between the tragus and wall from right and left side while subject is standing with back against the wall; knees straight; scapulae, buttocks, and heels against the wall; with head in neutral position. Measurement of two attempts on right and left sides. Mean of ordinal scores from 0: \<= 10 cm to 10: \>= 37 cm.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) Independent Component: Spinal Mobility Measured With Tragus-to-wall Distance at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Baseline
|
20.18 centimeters
Interval 17.9 to 22.45
|
19.76 centimeters
Interval 17.64 to 21.87
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) Independent Component: Spinal Mobility Measured With Tragus-to-wall Distance at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2
|
19.69 centimeters
Interval 17.36 to 22.03
|
18.81 centimeters
Interval 16.4 to 21.22
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) Independent Component: Spinal Mobility Measured With Tragus-to-wall Distance at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4
|
19.19 centimeters
Interval 16.82 to 21.56
|
18.82 centimeters
Interval 16.54 to 21.09
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) Independent Component: Spinal Mobility Measured With Tragus-to-wall Distance at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8
|
18.70 centimeters
Interval 16.39 to 21.01
|
20.03 centimeters
Interval 16.91 to 23.14
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) Independent Component: Spinal Mobility Measured With Tragus-to-wall Distance at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12
|
18.54 centimeters
Interval 16.25 to 20.83
|
18.45 centimeters
Interval 16.06 to 20.83
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 14, Week 18, Week 24Population: Open-label population; in the case of missing data, no replacement or imputation method was performed.
Measurement in centimeters (cm) of distance between the tragus and wall from right and left side while subject is standing with back against the wall; knees straight; scapulae, buttocks, and heels against the wall; with head in neutral position. Measurement of two tries on right and left sides. Mean of ordinal scores from 0: \<= 10 cm to 10: \>= 37 cm.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=38 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=39 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI): Spinal Mobility Measured With Tragus-to-wall Measurement at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14
|
19.12 centimeters
Interval 16.86 to 21.38
|
18.38 centimeters
Interval 16.05 to 20.7
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI): Spinal Mobility Measured With Tragus-to-wall Measurement at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18
|
19.86 centimeters
Interval 17.74 to 21.98
|
18.55 centimeters
Interval 16.17 to 20.94
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI): Spinal Mobility Measured With Tragus-to-wall Measurement at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24
|
18.99 centimeters
Interval 16.85 to 21.13
|
18.60 centimeters
Interval 16.28 to 20.92
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT. In the case of missing data, no replacement or imputation method was performed.
Measurement in centimters (cm) of distance between subject's middle fingertip and the floor after bending sideways, without bending knees or lifting heels, while attemting to keep shoulders in same place (flexion position). Measurement of two attempts on each side (right and left). Mean of ordinal scores from 0: \>=20 cm to 10: \<=1.2 cm.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) Independent Component: Spinal Mobility Measured With Lateral Flexion at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Baseline
|
13.79 centimeters
Interval 7.34 to 20.25
|
9.80 centimeters
Interval 5.3 to 14.3
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) Independent Component: Spinal Mobility Measured With Lateral Flexion at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Week 2
|
13.58 centimeters
Interval 7.57 to 19.59
|
10.62 centimeters
Interval 5.94 to 15.31
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) Independent Component: Spinal Mobility Measured With Lateral Flexion at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Week 4
|
13.01 centimeters
Interval 7.46 to 18.55
|
10.60 centimeters
Interval 5.75 to 15.45
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) Independent Component: Spinal Mobility Measured With Lateral Flexion at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Week 8
|
12.19 centimeters
Interval 6.74 to 17.63
|
10.21 centimeters
Interval 5.52 to 14.89
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) Independent Component: Spinal Mobility Measured With Lateral Flexion at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Week 12
|
12.41 centimeters
Interval 6.94 to 17.87
|
8.56 centimeters
Interval 4.41 to 12.71
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 14, Week 18, Week 24Population: Open-label population; in the case of missing data, no replacement or imputation method was performed.
Measurement in centimters (cm) of distance between subject's middle fingertip and the floor after bending sideways, without bending knees or lifting heels, while attempting to keep shoulders in same place (flexion position). Measurement of two attempts on each side (right and left). Mean of ordinal scores from 0: \>=20 cm to 10: \<=1.2 cm.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=38 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=39 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI): Spinal Mobility Measured With Lateral Flexion at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14
|
12.93 centimeters
Interval 7.41 to 18.44
|
8.19 centimeters
Interval 4.42 to 11.95
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI): Spinal Mobility Measured With Lateral Flexion at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18
|
12.02 centimeters
Interval 6.19 to 17.85
|
8.08 centimeters
Interval 4.85 to 11.31
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI): Spinal Mobility Measured With Lateral Flexion at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24
|
10.95 centimeters
Interval 6.47 to 15.44
|
10.48 centimeters
Interval 5.73 to 15.24
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT. In the case of missing data, no replacement or imputation method was performed.
Measurement in centimeters of the distance between marks originally placed while the subject was standing erect 10 centimeters (cm) above and 5 cm below the midpoint of a line that joints the posterior superior iliac spines. Distance between marks was remeasured with subject maximally bend forward, knees fully extended, with spine in full flexion. Measurement of two attempts. Mean of ordinal scores from 1: 5.7 to 6.3 cm, to 10: \<=0.7 cm.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) Independent Component: Spinal Mobility Measured With Modified Schober's Test at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Baseline
|
1.63 centimeters
Interval 1.24 to 2.02
|
1.52 centimeters
Interval 1.1 to 1.93
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) Independent Component: Spinal Mobility Measured With Modified Schober's Test at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2
|
1.73 centimeters
Interval 1.28 to 2.18
|
1.57 centimeters
Interval 1.15 to 1.99
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) Independent Component: Spinal Mobility Measured With Modified Schober's Test at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4
|
1.85 centimeters
Interval 1.38 to 2.32
|
1.77 centimeters
Interval 1.28 to 2.26
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) Independent Component: Spinal Mobility Measured With Modified Schober's Test at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8
|
1.95 centimeters
Interval 1.47 to 2.42
|
1.57 centimeters
Interval 1.12 to 2.03
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) Independent Component: Spinal Mobility Measured With Modified Schober's Test at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12
|
1.88 centimeters
Interval 1.43 to 2.32
|
1.51 centimeters
Interval 1.05 to 1.97
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 14, Week 18, Week 24Population: Open-label population; in the case of missing data, no replacement or imputation method was performed.
Measurement in centimeters of the distance between marks originally placed while the subject was standing erect 10 centimeters (cm) above and 5 cm below the midpoint of a line that joints the posterior superior iliac spines. Distance between marks was remeasured with subject maximally bend forward, knees fully extended, with spine in full flexion. Measurement of two attempts. Mean of ordinal scores from 1: 5.7 to 6.3 cm, to 10: \<=0.7 cm.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=38 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=39 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI): Spinal Mobility Measured With Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14
|
1.87 centimeters
Interval 1.39 to 2.36
|
1.63 centimeters
Interval 1.16 to 2.1
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI): Spinal Mobility Measured With Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18
|
1.71 centimeters
Interval 1.17 to 2.25
|
1.69 centimeters
Interval 1.21 to 2.17
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI): Spinal Mobility Measured With Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24
|
1.92 centimeters
Interval 1.41 to 2.44
|
1.79 centimeters
Interval 1.31 to 2.28
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT. In the case of missing data, no replacement or imputation method was performed.
Measurement in centimeters (cm) of the distance between the medial malleoli when subject is lying supine with knees and feet straight up with legs separated as far as possible. Measurement of two attempts. Mean of ordinal scores from 0: \>= 120 cm, to 9: 30 to 39.9 cm.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) Independent Component: Spinal Mobility Measured With Intermalleolar Distance at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Baseline
|
82.31 centimeters
Interval 72.15 to 92.46
|
89.30 centimeters
Interval 81.6 to 97.0
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) Independent Component: Spinal Mobility Measured With Intermalleolar Distance at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2
|
87.89 centimeters
Interval 78.83 to 96.94
|
92.08 centimeters
Interval 84.85 to 99.31
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) Independent Component: Spinal Mobility Measured With Intermalleolar Distance at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4
|
90.86 centimeters
Interval 81.2 to 100.52
|
91.53 centimeters
Interval 82.97 to 100.08
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) Independent Component: Spinal Mobility Measured With Intermalleolar Distance at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8
|
93.56 centimeters
Interval 85.19 to 101.92
|
91.58 centimeters
Interval 83.62 to 99.54
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) Independent Component: Spinal Mobility Measured With Intermalleolar Distance at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12
|
94.46 centimeters
Interval 86.87 to 102.05
|
91.72 centimeters
Interval 83.84 to 99.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 14, Week 18, Week 24Population: Open-label population; in the case of missing data, no replacement or imputation method was performed.
Measurement in centimeters (cm) of the distance between the medial malleoli when subject is lying supine with knees and feet straight up with legs separated as far as possible. Measurement of two attempts. Mean of ordinal scores from 0: \>= 120 cm, to 9: 30 to 39.9 cm.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=38 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=39 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI): Spinal Mobility Measured With Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24
|
95.71 centimeters
Interval 87.96 to 103.46
|
96.41 centimeters
Interval 88.86 to 103.95
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI): Spinal Mobility Measured With Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14
|
95.79 centimeters
Interval 88.4 to 103.18
|
98.03 centimeters
Interval 90.25 to 105.81
|
|
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI): Spinal Mobility Measured With Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18
|
96.27 centimeters
Interval 88.76 to 103.78
|
96.66 centimeters
Interval 88.25 to 105.06
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT; LOCF. N=number of subjects with evaluable data.
Normalized net incremental area under the curve (AUC) = area between baseline and the Chest Expansion Test curve as a function of time (randomization to Week 12); computed using the linear trapezoidal method. All areas above baseline and under the curve are positive and all areas below baseline and above the curve are negative. Net incremental AUC = sum of these areas; this result was then divided by the study duration of the patients; negative value = improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=37 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Normalized Net Incremental Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Chest Expansion Test Between Baseline and Week 12
|
0.26 centimeters
Interval 0.05 to 0.48
|
0.19 centimeters
Interval -0.01 to 0.39
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT; LOCF. N=number of subjects with evaluable data.
Measurement and remeasurement of standing maximal inspiration; chest circumference at nipple line or at 4th intercostal space in centimeters.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=37 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Chest Expansion Test at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2
|
0.17 centimeters
Interval -0.12 to 0.46
|
0.10 centimeters
Interval -0.17 to 0.38
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Chest Expansion Test at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4
|
0.09 centimeters
Interval -0.2 to 0.39
|
0.19 centimeters
Interval -0.08 to 0.47
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Chest Expansion Test at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8
|
0.43 centimeters
Interval 0.14 to 0.73
|
0.23 centimeters
Interval -0.04 to 0.5
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Chest Expansion Test at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12
|
0.39 centimeters
Interval 0.09 to 0.68
|
0.33 centimeters
Interval 0.05 to 0.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 14, Week 18, Week 24Population: Open-label population; LOCF.
Measurement and remeasurement of standing maximal inspiration; chest circumference at nipple line or at 4th intercostal space in centimeters (cm).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=38 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=39 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Chest Expansion Test at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18
|
0.22 centimeters
Interval -0.16 to 0.6
|
0.33 centimeters
Interval -0.08 to 0.75
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Chest Expansion Test at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14
|
0.26 centimeters
Interval -0.13 to 0.65
|
0.22 centimeters
Interval -0.15 to 0.6
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Chest Expansion Test at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24
|
0.46 centimeters
Interval 0.01 to 0.9
|
0.44 centimeters
Interval 0.07 to 0.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT; LOCF. N = subgroup of subjects who reported performing daily physical activities and/or kinesitherapy for their ankylosing spondylitis at each visit (Week 2 through Week 12).
Subject evaluation of level of difficulty to perform daily physical activities and/or kinesitherapy for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) because of AS using a 100 millimeter Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0=easy to 100=impossible. Subgroup of subjects who responded that they were able to perform daily physical activities and/or kinesitherapy for their ankylosing spondylitis at each visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=18 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=17 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Level of Difficulty to Perform Physically Demanding Activities Due to Ankylosing Spondylitis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2
|
-11.88 units on scale
Interval -21.31 to -2.46
|
-7.16 units on scale
Interval -16.99 to 2.67
|
|
Change From Baseline in Level of Difficulty to Perform Physically Demanding Activities Due to Ankylosing Spondylitis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4
|
-15.14 units on scale
Interval -24.67 to -5.6
|
-12.04 units on scale
Interval -21.77 to -2.32
|
|
Change From Baseline in Level of Difficulty to Perform Physically Demanding Activities Due to Ankylosing Spondylitis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8
|
-18.65 units on scale
Interval -28.32 to -8.98
|
-17.25 units on scale
Interval -26.98 to -7.53
|
|
Change From Baseline in Level of Difficulty to Perform Physically Demanding Activities Due to Ankylosing Spondylitis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12
|
-22.55 units on scale
Interval -32.19 to -12.91
|
-18.53 units on scale
Interval -28.37 to -8.69
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 14, Week 18, Week 24Population: Open-label population; LOCF.
Subject evaluation of level of difficulty to perform daily physical activities and/or kinesitherapy for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) due to AS using a 100 millimeter Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0=easy to 100=impossible. Subgroup of subjects who responded that they were able to perform daily physical activities and/or kinesitherapy for their ankylosing spondylitis at each visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=17 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=17 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Self Assessment of Ability and or Easiness to Perform Physically Demanding Activities at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14
|
-20.01 units on scale
Interval -32.79 to -7.24
|
-22.95 units on scale
Interval -36.79 to -9.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in Self Assessment of Ability and or Easiness to Perform Physically Demanding Activities at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18
|
-22.39 units on scale
Interval -35.92 to -8.86
|
-27.80 units on scale
Interval -42.8 to -12.81
|
|
Change From Baseline in Self Assessment of Ability and or Easiness to Perform Physically Demanding Activities at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24
|
-24.21 units on scale
Interval -37.43 to -10.99
|
-25.55 units on scale
Interval -41.35 to -9.75
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT; LOCF. N=number of subjects with evaluable data.
Normalized net incremental area under the curve (AUC) = area between baseline and the Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate curve as a function of time (randomization to Week 12); computed using the linear trapezoidal method. All areas above baseline and under the curve are positive and all areas below baseline and above the curve are negative. Net incremental AUC = sum of these areas; this result was then divided by the study duration of the patients; negative value = improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=42 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Normalized Net Incremental Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Erythtocyte Sedimentation Rate Between Baseline and Week 12
|
-16.18 millimeters per hour
Interval -19.55 to -12.81
|
-1.45 millimeters per hour
Interval -4.7 to 1.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT; LOCF. N = number of subjects with evaluable data.
ESR is a laboratory test that provides a non-specific measure of inflammation. The test assesses the rate at which red blood cells fall in a test tube. A higher rate is consistent with inflammation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=42 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8
|
-17.02 millimeters per hour
Interval -21.18 to -12.86
|
-0.07 millimeters per hour
Interval -4.08 to 3.93
|
|
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2
|
-15.00 millimeters per hour
Interval -19.16 to -10.84
|
-2.62 millimeters per hour
Interval -6.63 to 1.39
|
|
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4
|
-20.05 millimeters per hour
Interval -24.21 to -15.89
|
-2.60 millimeters per hour
Interval -6.61 to 1.41
|
|
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12
|
-20.33 millimeters per hour
Interval -24.49 to -16.17
|
-2.17 millimeters per hour
Interval -6.18 to 1.84
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 14, Week 18, Week 24Population: Open-label population; LOCF.
ESR is a laboratory test that provides a non-specific measure of inflammation. The test assesses the rate at which red blood cells fall in a test tube. A higher rate is consistent with inflammation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=38 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=39 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14
|
-20.32 millimeters per hour
Interval -27.16 to -13.47
|
-10.21 millimeters per hour
Interval -15.99 to -4.43
|
|
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18
|
-17.95 millimeters per hour
Interval -25.5 to -10.39
|
-12.32 millimeters per hour
Interval -17.45 to -7.18
|
|
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24
|
-18.53 millimeters per hour
Interval -27.06 to -9.99
|
-14.61 millimeters per hour
Interval -20.39 to -8.82
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT; LOCF.
Normalized net incremental area under the curve (AUC) = area between baseline and the C-reactive Protein curve as a function of time (randomization to Week 12); computed using the linear trapezoidal method. All areas above baseline and under the curve are positive and all areas below baseline and above the curve are negative. Net incremental AUC = sum of these areas; this result was then divided by the study duration of the patients; negative value = improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Normalized Net Incremental Area Under the Curve (AUC) for C-reactive Protein Between Baseline and Week 12
|
-14.41 milligrams per liter
Interval -18.01 to -10.82
|
-1.17 milligrams per liter
Interval -4.59 to 2.25
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT. LOCF.
CRP is a marker of inflammation. A higher level is consistent with inflammation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2
|
-15.37 milligrams per liter
Interval -19.86 to -10.88
|
-1.05 milligrams per liter
Interval -5.32 to 3.23
|
|
Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4
|
-16.99 milligrams per liter
Interval -21.48 to -12.5
|
-2.01 milligrams per liter
Interval -6.28 to 2.26
|
|
Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8
|
-16.19 milligrams per liter
Interval -20.68 to -11.71
|
-1.01 milligrams per liter
Interval -5.28 to 3.27
|
|
Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12
|
-15.69 milligrams per liter
Interval -20.18 to -11.2
|
-1.28 milligrams per liter
Interval -5.55 to 2.99
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 14, Week 18, Week 24Population: Open-label population; LOCF.
Change from baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=38 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=39 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14
|
-18.11 milligrams per liter
Interval -27.76 to -8.46
|
-10.04 milligrams per liter
Interval -14.53 to -5.55
|
|
Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18
|
-17.15 milligrams per liter
Interval -26.73 to -7.58
|
-9.47 milligrams per liter
Interval -13.19 to -5.75
|
|
Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24
|
-16.05 milligrams per liter
Interval -26.9 to -5.2
|
-9.62 milligrams per liter
Interval -13.84 to -5.41
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 14, Week 18, Week 24Population: Open-label population; LOCF.
Percent of participants with normal (\<6 milligrams per liter) and abnormal (\>= 6 milligrams per liter) C-Reactive Protein.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=38 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=39 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Subjects With Normal and Abnormal C-Reactive Protein at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14: Normal
|
60.53 percent of participants
|
70.59 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects With Normal and Abnormal C-Reactive Protein at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14: Abnormal
|
39.47 percent of participants
|
29.41 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects With Normal and Abnormal C-Reactive Protein at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18: Normal
|
63.16 percent of participants
|
66.67 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects With Normal and Abnormal C-Reactive Protein at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18: Abnormal
|
36.84 percent of participants
|
33.33 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects With Normal and Abnormal C-Reactive Protein at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24: Normal
|
68.42 percent of participants
|
82.05 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects With Normal and Abnormal C-Reactive Protein at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24: Abnormal
|
31.58 percent of participants
|
17.95 percent of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT. In the case of missing data, no replacement or imputation method was performed.
Percent of subjects reporting acceptable symptom state: acceptance to remain for the rest of their lives with the level of pain they had during the last 48 hours; and unacceptable symptom state: not able to remain for the rest of their lives with the level of pain they had during the last 48 hours. In the case of missing data, subjects who withdrew from the study because of inefficacy or toxicity were considered "unacceptable".
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Subjects With Patient Acceptable and Unacceptable Symptom State (PASS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2: Acceptable
|
43.24 percent of participants
|
30.00 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects With Patient Acceptable and Unacceptable Symptom State (PASS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2: Unacceptable
|
56.76 percent of participants
|
70.00 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects With Patient Acceptable and Unacceptable Symptom State (PASS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4: Acceptable
|
57.89 percent of participants
|
35.71 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects With Patient Acceptable and Unacceptable Symptom State (PASS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4: Unacceptable
|
42.11 percent of participants
|
64.29 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects With Patient Acceptable and Unacceptable Symptom State (PASS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8: Acceptable
|
68.42 percent of participants
|
33.33 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects With Patient Acceptable and Unacceptable Symptom State (PASS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8: Unacceptable
|
31.58 percent of participants
|
66.67 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects With Patient Acceptable and Unacceptable Symptom State (PASS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12: Acceptable
|
60.53 percent of participants
|
40.54 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects With Patient Acceptable and Unacceptable Symptom State (PASS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12: Unacceptable
|
39.47 percent of participants
|
59.46 percent of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 14, Week 18, Week 24Population: Open-label population. In the case of missing data, no replacement or imputation method was performed.
Percent of subjects reporting acceptable symptom state: acceptance to remain for the rest of their lives with the level of pain they had during the last 48 hours; and unacceptable symptom state: not able to remain for the rest of their lives with the level of pain they had during the last 48 hours. In the case of missing data, subjects who withdrew from the study because of inefficacy or toxicity were considered "unacceptable".
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=38 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=39 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Subjects With Patient Acceptable and Unacceptable Symptom State (PASS) at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14: Acceptable
|
69.44 percent of participants
|
64.71 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects With Patient Acceptable and Unacceptable Symptom State (PASS) at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14: Unacceptable
|
30.56 percent of participants
|
35.29 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects With Patient Acceptable and Unacceptable Symptom State (PASS) at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18: Acceptable
|
74.29 percent of participants
|
66.67 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects With Patient Acceptable and Unacceptable Symptom State (PASS) at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18: Unacceptable
|
25.71 percent of participants
|
33.33 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects With Patient Acceptable and Unacceptable Symptom State (PASS) at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24: Acceptable
|
77.14 percent of participants
|
80.56 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects With Patient Acceptable and Unacceptable Symptom State (PASS) at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24: Unacceptable
|
22.86 percent of participants
|
19.44 percent of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: mITT; in the case of missing data, no replacement or imputation method was performed. Abbreviation: Mod = moderately.
Subjects were asked how their pain had been during the last 48 hours compared to baseline. Those subjects that reported improvement assessed how important this improvement was to them; range: very important, moderately important, slightly important, or not at all important. Binary response options: 1=improved very important, or improved moderately important; 2=slightly important, not at all important, no change, or worse-more pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Subjects With Minimum Clinically Important Improvement (MCII) in Pain Rating at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4: Improvement Very/Mod. Important
|
52.63 percent of participants
|
30.95 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects With Minimum Clinically Important Improvement (MCII) in Pain Rating at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 4: Improvement Slightly/Not Important
|
47.37 percent of participants
|
69.05 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects With Minimum Clinically Important Improvement (MCII) in Pain Rating at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8: Improvement Very/Mod. Important
|
75.00 percent of participants
|
35.90 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects With Minimum Clinically Important Improvement (MCII) in Pain Rating at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 8: Improvement Slightly/Not Important
|
25.00 percent of participants
|
64.10 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects With Minimum Clinically Important Improvement (MCII) in Pain Rating at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12: Improvement Very/Mod. Important
|
63.16 percent of participants
|
37.84 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects With Minimum Clinically Important Improvement (MCII) in Pain Rating at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 12: Improvement Slightly/Not Important
|
36.84 percent of participants
|
62.16 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects With Minimum Clinically Important Improvement (MCII) in Pain Rating at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2: Improvement Very/Mod. Important
|
50.00 percent of participants
|
20.00 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects With Minimum Clinically Important Improvement (MCII) in Pain Rating at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12
Week 2 : Improvement Slightly/Not Important
|
50.00 percent of participants
|
80.00 percent of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 14, Week 18, Week 24Population: Open-label population; in the case of missing data, no replacement or imputation method was performed. Abbreviation: Mod = moderately.
Subjects were asked how their pain had been during the last 48 hours compared to baseline. Those subjects that reported improvement assessed how important this improvement was to them; range: very important, moderately important, slightly important, or not at all important. Binary response options: 1=improved very important, or improved moderately important; 2=slightly important, not at all important, no change, or worse-more pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=38 Participants
50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo
n=39 Participants
Subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Subjects With Minimum Clinially Important Improvement (MCII) at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14: Improvement Very/Mod. Important
|
77.78 percent of participants
|
77.14 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects With Minimum Clinially Important Improvement (MCII) at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 14: Improvement Slightly/Not Important
|
22.22 percent of participants
|
22.86 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects With Minimum Clinially Important Improvement (MCII) at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18: Improvement Very/Mod. Important
|
94.12 percent of participants
|
78.38 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects With Minimum Clinially Important Improvement (MCII) at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 18: Improvement Slightly/Not Important
|
5.88 percent of participants
|
21.62 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects With Minimum Clinially Important Improvement (MCII) at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24: Improvement Very/Mod. Important
|
91.43 percent of participants
|
86.11 percent of participants
|
|
Percent of Subjects With Minimum Clinially Important Improvement (MCII) at Weeks 14, 18, 24
Week 24: Improvement Slightly/Not Important
|
8.57 percent of participants
|
13.89 percent of participants
|
Adverse Events
Etanercept
Placebo
Etanercept/Etanercept
Placebo/Etanercept
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 participants at risk
Double-blind Period 1: Etanercept 50 mg subcutaneously (SC) once weekly
|
Placebo
n=43 participants at risk
Double-blind Period 1: placebo subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Etanercept/Etanercept
n=38 participants at risk
Double-blind Period 1: Etanercept 50 mg subcutaneously (SC) once weekly; Open-label Period 2: Etanercept 50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo/Etanercept
n=39 participants at risk
Double-blind Period 1: placebo subcutaneously (SC), once weekly; Open-label Period 2: etanercept subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
|
0.00%
0/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
2.6%
1/39
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
2.6%
1/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung neoplasm malignant
|
2.6%
1/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Ankylosing spondylitis
|
0.00%
0/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=39 participants at risk
Double-blind Period 1: Etanercept 50 mg subcutaneously (SC) once weekly
|
Placebo
n=43 participants at risk
Double-blind Period 1: placebo subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Etanercept/Etanercept
n=38 participants at risk
Double-blind Period 1: Etanercept 50 mg subcutaneously (SC) once weekly; Open-label Period 2: Etanercept 50 mg subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
Placebo/Etanercept
n=39 participants at risk
Double-blind Period 1: placebo subcutaneously (SC), once weekly; Open-label Period 2: etanercept subcutaneously (SC), once weekly
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
0.00%
0/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
2.6%
1/39
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
2.6%
1/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
2.6%
1/39
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
External ear pain
|
2.6%
1/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
0.00%
0/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
2.6%
1/39
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract
|
0.00%
0/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Eye disorders
Iridocyclitis
|
2.6%
1/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Eye disorders
Uveitis
|
0.00%
0/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/39
|
4.7%
2/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
2.6%
1/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
2.6%
1/39
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.00%
0/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
2.6%
1/39
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
5.1%
2/39
|
4.7%
2/43
|
2.6%
1/38
|
2.6%
1/39
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
0.00%
0/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
2.6%
1/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
|
0.00%
0/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
2.6%
1/39
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric ulcer
|
2.6%
1/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haematochezia
|
2.6%
1/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Hiatus hernia
|
0.00%
0/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
2.6%
1/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
2.6%
1/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
General disorders
Exercise tolerance decreased
|
0.00%
0/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
2.6%
1/39
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
2.6%
1/39
|
|
General disorders
Injection site erythema
|
5.1%
2/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
General disorders
Injection site haematoma
|
2.6%
1/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
General disorders
Injection site pruritus
|
2.6%
1/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
2.6%
1/38
|
5.1%
2/39
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
0.00%
0/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
2.6%
1/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
2.6%
1/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
0.00%
0/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
2.6%
1/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cytolytic hepatitis
|
2.6%
1/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Immune system disorders
Seasonal allergy
|
0.00%
0/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
5.1%
2/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
2.6%
1/38
|
2.6%
1/39
|
|
Infections and infestations
Folliculitis
|
2.6%
1/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/39
|
4.7%
2/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
2.6%
1/39
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
0.00%
0/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Infections and infestations
Hordeolum
|
0.00%
0/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
2.6%
1/39
|
4.7%
2/43
|
5.3%
2/38
|
5.1%
2/39
|
|
Infections and infestations
Otitis externa
|
0.00%
0/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
2.6%
1/39
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Infections and infestations
Rhinitis
|
10.3%
4/39
|
7.0%
3/43
|
5.3%
2/38
|
2.6%
1/39
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
0.00%
0/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
2.6%
1/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tracheitis
|
2.6%
1/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
7.7%
3/39
|
4.7%
2/43
|
5.3%
2/38
|
2.6%
1/39
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
|
2.6%
1/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral pharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
2.6%
1/39
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arthropod bite
|
2.6%
1/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
2.6%
1/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
2.6%
1/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Road traffic accident
|
0.00%
0/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
2.6%
1/39
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skeletal injury
|
0.00%
0/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
2.6%
1/39
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin laceration
|
0.00%
0/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
2.6%
1/39
|
|
Investigations
Blood urea increased
|
0.00%
0/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Investigations
Haemoglobin urine present
|
2.6%
1/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Investigations
Transaminases increased
|
7.7%
3/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Investigations
Weight decreased
|
0.00%
0/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Investigations
Weight increased
|
2.6%
1/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercholesterolaemia
|
0.00%
0/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
2.6%
1/38
|
2.6%
1/39
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
|
0.00%
0/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
2.6%
1/39
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
0.00%
0/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypophosphataemia
|
2.6%
1/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypertriglyceridaemia
|
0.00%
0/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
2.6%
1/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Ankylosing spondylitis
|
0.00%
0/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint swelling
|
0.00%
0/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
0.00%
0/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
2.6%
1/39
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Tendonitis
|
0.00%
0/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
2.6%
1/39
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung neoplasm malignant
|
2.6%
1/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Carpal tunnel syndrome
|
0.00%
0/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
2.6%
1/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
5.1%
2/39
|
7.0%
3/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Intercostal neuralgia
|
0.00%
0/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
2.6%
1/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
|
2.6%
1/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope vasovagal
|
0.00%
0/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
2.6%
1/39
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Trigeminal neuralgia
|
2.6%
1/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
2.6%
1/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
2.6%
1/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
2.6%
1/39
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
|
2.6%
1/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Prostatitis
|
2.6%
1/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
0.00%
0/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
2.6%
1/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.00%
0/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
2.6%
1/39
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
0.00%
0/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pharyngolaryngeal pain
|
0.00%
0/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
2.6%
1/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Eczema
|
0.00%
0/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
2.6%
1/39
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperhidrosis
|
0.00%
0/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
7.7%
3/39
|
4.7%
2/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Psoriasis
|
0.00%
0/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
5.1%
2/39
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
2.6%
1/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash pruritic
|
0.00%
0/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
2.6%
1/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin inflammation
|
0.00%
0/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin lesion
|
0.00%
0/39
|
2.3%
1/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
2.6%
1/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Tooth extraction
|
0.00%
0/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
5.1%
2/39
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hot flush
|
2.6%
1/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
2.6%
1/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
0.00%
0/38
|
2.6%
1/39
|
|
Vascular disorders
Lymphoedema
|
0.00%
0/39
|
0.00%
0/43
|
2.6%
1/38
|
0.00%
0/39
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The PIs agreed to allow the sponsor 60 days to review and require changes to presentations or publications but only to protect confidential information and intellectual property, and for the sponsor to file a patent application, as applicable. The PIs also agreed for data to be presented first as a joint, multi-center publication.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER