Randomized Trial of Immediate Versus Early and Selective Invasive Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in NSTEMI

NCT00402675 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 600

Last updated 2010-01-05

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

In non-ST-elevation the optimal time of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unclear.

Some studies showed benefit of very early PCI, some others early PCI between 12-48 hours and others even showed a benefit of a selective invasive approach only in case of recurrence of symptoms or a positive stress test.

The optimal timing of intervention is still matter of debate as a result of a randomized clinical trial.

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Timing of percutaneous coronary intervention

Immediate, early or selective invasive angiography

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Leipzig

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Holger Thiele · Heart Center Leipzig - University Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
89 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2006-07-31
Primary Completion
2009-12-31
Completion
2010-01-31

Countries

  • Germany

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00402675 on ClinicalTrials.gov