Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy And Safety Of Azithromycin SR Compared With Minocycline In Acne (NCT NCT00392223)

NCT ID: NCT00392223

Last Updated: 2010-01-12

Results Overview

GAGS used to assess 6 locations on face/chest/upper back; factor for each location based on surface area, distribution, density of pilosebaceous units. Locations graded separately 0 - 4 (hi). Global score factored based on summing of local scores. Change: (Global) score at observation minus (global) score at baseline.

Recruitment status

TERMINATED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

118 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline, Week 8 End of Treatment (EOT)

Results posted on

2010-01-12

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Azithromycin
2 grams per week administered orally (PO) for 8 weeks (azithromycin microspheres, powder for oral suspension)
Minocycline
100 milligrams (mg) administered PO (oral) QD (every day) for 8 weeks (minocycline capsules)
Overall Study
STARTED
58
60
Overall Study
COMPLETED
49
47
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
9
13

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Azithromycin
2 grams per week administered orally (PO) for 8 weeks (azithromycin microspheres, powder for oral suspension)
Minocycline
100 milligrams (mg) administered PO (oral) QD (every day) for 8 weeks (minocycline capsules)
Overall Study
Adverse Event
5
4
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
1
4
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
0
3
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
3
2

Baseline Characteristics

Efficacy And Safety Of Azithromycin SR Compared With Minocycline In Acne

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Azithromycin
n=58 Participants
2 grams per week administered orally (PO) for 8 weeks (azithromycin microspheres, powder for oral suspension)
Minocycline
n=60 Participants
100 milligrams (mg) administered PO (oral) QD (every day) for 8 weeks (minocycline capsules)
Total
n=118 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Customized
<18 years
10 participants
n=99 Participants
17 participants
n=107 Participants
27 participants
n=206 Participants
Age, Customized
Between 18 and 44 years
48 participants
n=99 Participants
43 participants
n=107 Participants
91 participants
n=206 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
35 Participants
n=99 Participants
36 Participants
n=107 Participants
71 Participants
n=206 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants
n=99 Participants
24 Participants
n=107 Participants
47 Participants
n=206 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8 End of Treatment (EOT)

Population: Full Analysis Set, Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

GAGS used to assess 6 locations on face/chest/upper back; factor for each location based on surface area, distribution, density of pilosebaceous units. Locations graded separately 0 - 4 (hi). Global score factored based on summing of local scores. Change: (Global) score at observation minus (global) score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Azithromycin
n=53 Participants
2 grams per week administered orally (PO) for 8 weeks (azithromycin microspheres, powder for oral suspension)
Minocycline
n=59 Participants
100 milligrams (mg) administered PO (oral) QD (every day) for 8 weeks (minocycline capsules)
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
-8.69 score on scale
Interval -10.33 to -7.05
-9.16 score on scale
Interval -10.62 to -7.71

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8 EOT

Population: Per Protocol population

GAGS used to assess 6 locations on face/chest/upper back; factor for each location based on surface area, distribution, density of pilosebaceous units. Locations graded separately 0 - 4 (hi). Global score factored based on summing of local scores. Change: (Global) score at observation minus (global) score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Azithromycin
n=48 Participants
2 grams per week administered orally (PO) for 8 weeks (azithromycin microspheres, powder for oral suspension)
Minocycline
n=48 Participants
100 milligrams (mg) administered PO (oral) QD (every day) for 8 weeks (minocycline capsules)
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (EOT) in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score - Per Protocol Population
-9.35 score on scale
Interval -10.75 to -7.94
-10.22 score on scale
Interval -11.54 to -8.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 End of Treatment (EOT), 8 weeks after EOT

Population: Full Analysis Set. Where noted: LOCF = Last Observation Carried Forward technique was used. Number of subjects with analyzable data: n=azithromycin, minocycline (respectively).

GAGS used to assess 6 locations on face/chest/upper back; factor for each location based on surface area, distribution, density of pilosebaceous units. Locations graded separately 0 - 4 (hi. Global score factored based on summing of local scores. Change: mean at observation minus baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Azithromycin
n=53 Participants
2 grams per week administered orally (PO) for 8 weeks (azithromycin microspheres, powder for oral suspension)
Minocycline
n=59 Participants
100 milligrams (mg) administered PO (oral) QD (every day) for 8 weeks (minocycline capsules)
Change From Baseline in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
Week 4 (n=50,56)
-7.0 score on scale
95% Confidence Interval 7.05 • Interval -8.33 to -5.59
-6.5 score on scale
95% Confidence Interval 6.45 • Interval -7.77 to -5.16
Change From Baseline in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
Week 8 EOT (End of Treatment) (n=52,56)
-9.7 score on scale
Interval -11.66 to -7.77
-10.2 score on scale
Interval -11.86 to -8.57
Change From Baseline in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
Week 8 EOT (LOCF) (n=53,59)
-9.5 score on scale
Interval -11.47 to -7.59
-9.8 score on scale
Interval -11.48 to -8.12
Change From Baseline in Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
8 weeks after EOT (n=49,49)
-11.1 score on scale
Interval -13.42 to -8.82
-12.9 score on scale
Interval -14.79 to -11.01

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 4, Week 8 End of Treatment (EOT), 8 weeks after EOT

Population: Full Analysis Set. Where noted: LOCF = Last Observation Carried Forward technique was used.

Number of subjects by improvement category of GAGS score: Best improvement = reduction of GAGS score \>75% (pre-post evaluation); Good improvement = reduction score \> 50 - 75%; Moderate improvement : reduction score \> 25 - 50%; Light improvement : reduction score \> 0 - 25%; No change = reduction score = 0%; Worsening = increase score \> 0 %.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Azithromycin
n=53 Participants
2 grams per week administered orally (PO) for 8 weeks (azithromycin microspheres, powder for oral suspension)
Minocycline
n=59 Participants
100 milligrams (mg) administered PO (oral) QD (every day) for 8 weeks (minocycline capsules)
Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
Week 4 Best Improvement
1 participants
1 participants
Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
Week 4 Good Improvement
4 participants
2 participants
Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
Week 4 Moderate Improvement
19 participants
25 participants
Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
Week 4 Light Improvement
23 participants
24 participants
Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
Week 4 No Change
2 participants
2 participants
Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
Week 4 Worsening
1 participants
2 participants
Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
Week 4 Missing
3 participants
3 participants
Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
Week 8 EOT Best Improvement
4 participants
3 participants
Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
Week 8 EOT Good Improvement
11 participants
16 participants
Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
Week 8 EOT Moderate Improvement
21 participants
20 participants
Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
Week 8 EOT Light Improvement
11 participants
15 participants
Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
Week 8 EOT No Change
2 participants
2 participants
Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
Week 8 EOT Worsening
3 participants
0 participants
Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
Week 8 EOT Missing
1 participants
3 participants
Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
Week 8 EOT LOCF Best Improvement
4 participants
3 participants
Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
Week 8 EOT LOCF Good Improvement
11 participants
16 participants
Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
Week 8 EOT LOCF Moderate Improvement
21 participants
20 participants
Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
Week 8 EOT LOCF Light Improvement
11 participants
17 participants
Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
Week 8 EOT LOCF No Change
3 participants
2 participants
Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
Week 8 EOT LOCF Worsening
3 participants
1 participants
Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
Week 8 EOT LOCF Missing
0 participants
0 participants
Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
8 weeks after EOT Best Improvement
7 participants
6 participants
Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
8 weeks after EOT Good Improvement
15 participants
17 participants
Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
8 weeks after EOT Moderate Improvement
13 participants
18 participants
Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
8 weeks after EOT Light Improvement
6 participants
8 participants
Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
8 weeks after EOT No Change
3 participants
0 participants
Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
8 weeks after EOT Worsening
5 participants
0 participants
Improvement of Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) Score
8 weeks after EOT Missing
4 participants
10 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 End of Treatment (EOT), 8 weeks after EOT

Population: Full Analysis Set. Where noted: LOCF = Last Observation Carried Forward technique was used. Number of subjects with analyzable data: n=azithromycin, minocycline (respectively).

Leeds Grading technique: evaluates three sites (face, back, chest) on a 0 to 10 grading scale where 0 equals to no acne and 10 equals to most severe acne.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Azithromycin
n=53 Participants
2 grams per week administered orally (PO) for 8 weeks (azithromycin microspheres, powder for oral suspension)
Minocycline
n=59 Participants
100 milligrams (mg) administered PO (oral) QD (every day) for 8 weeks (minocycline capsules)
Change From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds Technique
Face Week 4 (n=50, 56)
-1.5 score on scale
Interval -1.82 to -1.14
-1.3 score on scale
Interval -1.6 to -1.05
Change From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds Technique
Face Week 8 EOT (n=52, 56)
-2.5 score on scale
Interval -3.06 to -2.01
-2.4 score on scale
Interval -2.84 to -2.02
Change From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds Technique
Face Week 8 EOT (LOCF) (n=53,59)
-2.5 score on scale
Interval -3.01 to -1.97
-2.3 score on scale
Interval -2.74 to -1.91
Change From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds Technique
Face 8 weeks after EOT (n=49,49)
-3.0 score on scale
Interval -3.65 to -2.35
-2.9 score on scale
Interval -3.44 to -2.39
Change From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds Technique
Back Week 4 (n=50,56)
-1.1 score on scale
Interval -1.58 to -0.7
-0.9 score on scale
Interval -1.21 to -0.61
Change From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds Technique
Back Week 8 EOT (n=52,56)
-1.5 score on scale
Interval -1.98 to -1.02
-1.4 score on scale
Interval -1.83 to -1.06
Change From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds Technique
Back Week 8 EOT (LOCF) (n=53,59)
-1.5 score on scale
Interval -1.96 to -1.02
-1.4 score on scale
Interval -1.76 to -0.99
Change From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds Technique
Back 8 weeks after EOT (n=49,49)
-1.5 score on scale
Interval -2.03 to -0.95
-2.0 score on scale
Interval -2.52 to -1.4
Change From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds Technique
Chest Week 4 (n=50,56)
-0.8 score on scale
Interval -1.12 to -0.48
-0.7 score on scale
Interval -0.99 to -0.4
Change From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds Technique
Chest Week 8 EOT (n=52,56)
-1.5 score on scale
Interval -2.04 to -0.92
-1.2 score on scale
Interval -1.57 to -0.75
Change From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds Technique
Chest Week 8 EOT (LOCF) (n=53,59)
-1.5 score on scale
Interval -2.0 to -0.9
-1.1 score on scale
Interval -1.51 to -0.73
Change From Baseline in Acne Graded by Leeds Technique
Chest 8 weeks after EOT (n=49,49)
-1.5 score on scale
Interval -2.1 to -0.92
-1.8 score on scale
Interval -2.32 to -1.23

POST_HOC outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8 End of Treatment (EOT)

Population: Full Analysis Set. Where noted: LOCF = Last Observation Carried Forward technique was used.

Global Acne Grading System score used to assess 6 locations on face/chest/upper back; factor for each based on area, distribution, density of pilosebaceous units. Locations graded separately 0 - 4 (hi). Global score factored based on sum of local scores and se verity: 0=no acne, 1-18=mild, 19-30=moderate, 31-38=severe, \>39=very severe.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Azithromycin
n=53 Participants
2 grams per week administered orally (PO) for 8 weeks (azithromycin microspheres, powder for oral suspension)
Minocycline
n=59 Participants
100 milligrams (mg) administered PO (oral) QD (every day) for 8 weeks (minocycline capsules)
Number of Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe Acne
Baseline Mild acne
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe Acne
Baseline Moderate acne
49 participants
52 participants
Number of Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe Acne
Baseline Severe acne
3 participants
5 participants
Number of Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe Acne
Baseline Very severe acne
1 participants
1 participants
Number of Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe Acne
Baseline Missing
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe Acne
Week 8 EOT (LOCF) Mild acne
31 participants
41 participants
Number of Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe Acne
Week 8 EOT (LOCF) Moderate acne
19 participants
16 participants
Number of Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe Acne
Week 8 EOT (LOCF) Severe acne
1 participants
0 participants
Number of Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe Acne
Week 8 EOT (LOCF) Very severe acne
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Subjects With Mild, Moderate, and Severe Acne
Week 8 EOT (LOCF) Missing
2 participants
1 participants

Adverse Events

Azithromycin

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 29 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Minocycline

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 21 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Azithromycin
n=58 participants at risk
2 grams per week administered orally (PO) for 8 weeks (azithromycin microspheres, powder for oral suspension)
Minocycline
n=60 participants at risk
100 milligrams (mg) administered PO (oral) QD (every day) for 8 weeks (minocycline capsules)
Eye disorders
Eyelid edema
0.00%
0/58
1.7%
1/60
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
12.1%
7/58
5.0%
3/60
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain, upper
8.6%
5/58
3.3%
2/60
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
1.7%
1/58
0.00%
0/60
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
17.2%
10/58
3.3%
2/60
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
3.4%
2/58
1.7%
1/60
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal disorder
1.7%
1/58
0.00%
0/60
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
8.6%
5/58
1.7%
1/60
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
8.6%
5/58
3.3%
2/60
General disorders
Fatigue
1.7%
1/58
0.00%
0/60
General disorders
Malaise
3.4%
2/58
0.00%
0/60
General disorders
Pyrexia
3.4%
2/58
6.7%
4/60
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
0.00%
0/58
3.3%
2/60
Infections and infestations
Furnucle
1.7%
1/58
0.00%
0/60
Infections and infestations
Influenza
1.7%
1/58
1.7%
1/60
Infections and infestations
Localized infection
0.00%
0/58
1.7%
1/60
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
3.4%
2/58
3.3%
2/60
Infections and infestations
Otitis media acute
0.00%
0/58
1.7%
1/60
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
0.00%
0/58
3.3%
2/60
Infections and infestations
Tonsillitis
1.7%
1/58
1.7%
1/60
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Joint dislocation
0.00%
0/58
1.7%
1/60
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
0.00%
0/58
3.3%
2/60
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Anorexia
1.7%
1/58
0.00%
0/60
Nervous system disorders
Disturbance in attention
1.7%
1/58
0.00%
0/60
Nervous system disorders
Headache
1.7%
1/58
5.0%
3/60
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Migraine
0.00%
0/58
1.7%
1/60
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Dysmenorrhea
0.00%
0/58
1.7%
1/60
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
0.00%
0/58
1.7%
1/60

Additional Information

Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center

Pfizer, Inc.

Phone: 1-800-718-1021

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of \< 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), \< 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER