Efficacy of a New Resurfacing Hip Prosthesis

NCT00391937 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 150

Last updated 2013-03-01

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the articular surface replacement (ASR) prosthesis placed by the conventional positioning method and the ASR prosthesis placed by 'computer assisted surgery' (CAS) in variation between pre planned position of the femoral component and the actual position of the femoral component of the prosthesis. The hypothesis is that this variation is larger with the conventional positioning method than when CAS is used.

Conditions

  • Osteoarthritis, Hip

Interventions

DEVICE

Articular Surface Replacement (ASR) hip prosthesis

a DePuy ASR™ primary resurfacing femoral and acetabular component (DePuy International Ltd, Leeds, UK). The cement that will be used is one dose of DePuy SmartSet® GHV 40 gram, a high-viscosity cement with gentamycin (DePuy CMW, Blackpool, UK). Instrumentation includes standard ASR™ instruments and Ci™ Software for DePuy ASR™ System1.0.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Principal Investigators

  • JAN Verhaar, PhD MD · Erasmus Medical Center

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2006-10-31
Primary Completion
2012-02-29
Completion
2013-01-31

Countries

  • Netherlands

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00391937 on ClinicalTrials.gov