MedTrace Logo

BEST (Burn Center Evaluation of Standard Therapies) Ventilator Mode Study-

NCT00351741 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 62

Last updated 2015-09-21

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare High Frequency Pressure Ventilation (HFPV) to conventional mechanical ventilation.

Hypothesis: Patients placed on HFPV will have significantly higher number of ventilator-free days compared to patients placed on a conventional volume mode.

Conditions

  • Burns

Interventions

DEVICE

Ventilation - High Frequency Percussive Ventilation

Ventilatory support delivering high frequency percussive ventilation using the Volumetric Diffusive Respirator

DEVICE

Ventilation - ARDSnet

Respiratory support with a conventional mode of ventilation using a conventional ventilator (Draeger Evita XL)

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • United States Army Institute of Surgical Research

    lead FED

Principal Investigators

  • Kevin K Chung, MD · United States Army Insitute of Surgical Research

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2006-07-31
Primary Completion
2010-02-28
Completion
2010-02-28

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00351741 on ClinicalTrials.gov