Trial Outcomes & Findings for Pregabalin for Abdominal Pain From Adhesions (NCT NCT00310765)
NCT ID: NCT00310765
Last Updated: 2023-10-23
Results Overview
Patients were randomized to pregabalin or placebo 75 mg twice a day. Patients were allowed to double the dose on day 3 if adequate pain relief was not obtained. Abdominal pain reduction was measured on a Likert scale. A Likert scale assumes the intensity of pain is linear on a continuum from no pain at level 0 to severe pain at level 10. Patients were required to complete a daily dairy recording pain using the Likert 11-point numeric scale. The primary end point was a positive change in the daily pain diary of 2 points from each patient's baseline at weeks 8 after the completion of the blinded study and at week 12 during the open label portion of the study. After 7 weeks all patients are randomized to study drug pregabalin 150 to 300 mg daily for 4 additional weeks after a one week wash out with no medication.
TERMINATED
PHASE4
18 participants
Baseline and week 2 through week 12
2023-10-23
Participant Flow
Study was performed between December 2005 and August 2008. Patients were referred to the gastroenterology clinic if they had documented adhesions in the last 5 years, negative pain evaluation and pain that was thought to be from adhesions.
After signing consent patients completed a one week baseline pain and sleep evaluation. Patients completed a Short-Form McGill Pain Questionaire during screening and at randomization. Patients had an average daily diary score of at least 4 on the the Likert scale during the baseline week and 5 diary recordings with stable pain medication doses.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Active Drug
75-150 mg of pregabalin po BID
Pregabalin : First 7 weeks 75 or 150 mg of pregabalin po BID. Start at 75 mg pregabalin and increase to 150 mg po BID if no improvement after 3 days
|
Placebo
Placebo 75 or 150 mg po BID
Pregabalin : 75 mg po BID
Pregabalin : First 7 weeks 75 or 150 mg of placebo pregabalin po BID. Start at 75 mg and increase to 150 mg po BID if no improvement after 3 days
|
|---|---|---|
|
Placebo Controlled Double Blind
STARTED
|
11
|
7
|
|
Placebo Controlled Double Blind
COMPLETED
|
8
|
5
|
|
Placebo Controlled Double Blind
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
2
|
|
Open Label
STARTED
|
8
|
5
|
|
Open Label
COMPLETED
|
7
|
3
|
|
Open Label
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Pregabalin for Abdominal Pain From Adhesions
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Active Drug
n=11 Participants
75-150 mg of pregabalin po BID
Pregabalin : First 7 weeks 75 or 150 mg of pregabalin po BID. Start at 75 mg and increase to 150 mg po BID if no improvement after 3 days
|
Placebo
n=7 Participants
Placebo 75 or 150 mg po BID
Pregabalin : 75 mg po BID
Pregabalin : First 7 weeks 75 or 150 mg of pregabalin po BID. Start at 75 mg and increase to 150 mg po BID if no improvement after 3 days
|
Total
n=18 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
11 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
44.27 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.73 • n=99 Participants
|
48.85 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.94 • n=107 Participants
|
46.05 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.69 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
11 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
11 participants
n=99 Participants
|
7 participants
n=107 Participants
|
18 participants
n=206 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 2 through week 12Population: The number of patients required per treatment group to achieve greater tha 80% power with alpha=0.05 were based on rates from published articles. The study was terminated early due to low enrollment.
Patients were randomized to pregabalin or placebo 75 mg twice a day. Patients were allowed to double the dose on day 3 if adequate pain relief was not obtained. Abdominal pain reduction was measured on a Likert scale. A Likert scale assumes the intensity of pain is linear on a continuum from no pain at level 0 to severe pain at level 10. Patients were required to complete a daily dairy recording pain using the Likert 11-point numeric scale. The primary end point was a positive change in the daily pain diary of 2 points from each patient's baseline at weeks 8 after the completion of the blinded study and at week 12 during the open label portion of the study. After 7 weeks all patients are randomized to study drug pregabalin 150 to 300 mg daily for 4 additional weeks after a one week wash out with no medication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Patients Treated With Placebo
n=7 Participants
Patients treated with look alike pregabalin placebo 75 or 150 mg BID for seven weeks followed by a week wash out and 150 mg BID of pregabalin
|
Patients Treated With Pregabalin
n=11 Participants
Patients treated with pregabalin 75 or 150 mg po BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Absolute Adhesional Abdominal Pain Score Assessed at Baseline Through Week 12 in Patients Treated With Pregabalin 150-300 mg Daily Compared With Patients Given Look Alike Placebo
baseline pain score
|
5.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
6.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.72
|
|
Absolute Adhesional Abdominal Pain Score Assessed at Baseline Through Week 12 in Patients Treated With Pregabalin 150-300 mg Daily Compared With Patients Given Look Alike Placebo
week 2
|
5.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.29
|
2.87 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.28
|
|
Absolute Adhesional Abdominal Pain Score Assessed at Baseline Through Week 12 in Patients Treated With Pregabalin 150-300 mg Daily Compared With Patients Given Look Alike Placebo
week 3
|
4.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.66
|
1.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
|
Absolute Adhesional Abdominal Pain Score Assessed at Baseline Through Week 12 in Patients Treated With Pregabalin 150-300 mg Daily Compared With Patients Given Look Alike Placebo
week 4
|
4.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.28
|
3.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.60
|
|
Absolute Adhesional Abdominal Pain Score Assessed at Baseline Through Week 12 in Patients Treated With Pregabalin 150-300 mg Daily Compared With Patients Given Look Alike Placebo
week 5
|
4.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.57
|
2.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.05
|
|
Absolute Adhesional Abdominal Pain Score Assessed at Baseline Through Week 12 in Patients Treated With Pregabalin 150-300 mg Daily Compared With Patients Given Look Alike Placebo
week 6
|
3.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.82
|
2.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
|
|
Absolute Adhesional Abdominal Pain Score Assessed at Baseline Through Week 12 in Patients Treated With Pregabalin 150-300 mg Daily Compared With Patients Given Look Alike Placebo
week 7
|
3.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.76
|
2.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.19
|
|
Absolute Adhesional Abdominal Pain Score Assessed at Baseline Through Week 12 in Patients Treated With Pregabalin 150-300 mg Daily Compared With Patients Given Look Alike Placebo
week 8 open label with no study medication
|
4.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.51
|
2.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.36
|
|
Absolute Adhesional Abdominal Pain Score Assessed at Baseline Through Week 12 in Patients Treated With Pregabalin 150-300 mg Daily Compared With Patients Given Look Alike Placebo
week 9 open label
|
2.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.74
|
2.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.24
|
|
Absolute Adhesional Abdominal Pain Score Assessed at Baseline Through Week 12 in Patients Treated With Pregabalin 150-300 mg Daily Compared With Patients Given Look Alike Placebo
week 10 open label
|
2.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.74
|
1.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.13
|
|
Absolute Adhesional Abdominal Pain Score Assessed at Baseline Through Week 12 in Patients Treated With Pregabalin 150-300 mg Daily Compared With Patients Given Look Alike Placebo
week 11 open label
|
2.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.55
|
1.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.03
|
|
Absolute Adhesional Abdominal Pain Score Assessed at Baseline Through Week 12 in Patients Treated With Pregabalin 150-300 mg Daily Compared With Patients Given Look Alike Placebo
week 12 open label
|
1.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
1.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.93
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 2 through week 12Population: Pregabalin patients received 150mg or 300 mg for seven weeks and placebo patients received a look alike placebo for seven weeks. All patients received open label 300 mg of placebo for 4 weeks after a one week wash out phase at week 8.
Absolute Improvement in Sleep by assessing Mean Daily sleep interference scores as measured weekly starting at baseline and reported weekly through week 12 excluding the first week. This score is an 11 point scale the documents the pain interference in sleep in the preceding 24 hours. 0 is no interference and 10 is pain completely disrupted sleep in the previous 24 hours. During the study patients recorded a daily sleep interference score based on 11 point scale (0-10) with the higher number being the most sleep interference
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Patients Treated With Placebo
n=7 Participants
Patients treated with look alike pregabalin placebo 75 or 150 mg BID for seven weeks followed by a week wash out and 150 mg BID of pregabalin
|
Patients Treated With Pregabalin
n=11 Participants
Patients treated with pregabalin 75 or 150 mg po BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Improved Sleep Scores
baseline
|
4.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.79
|
3.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.22
|
|
Improved Sleep Scores
week 2
|
3.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.41
|
2.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.36
|
|
Improved Sleep Scores
week 3
|
3.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.11
|
1.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.72
|
|
Improved Sleep Scores
week 4
|
3.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.81
|
1.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.78
|
|
Improved Sleep Scores
week 5
|
3.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.90
|
1.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.75
|
|
Improved Sleep Scores
week 6
|
2.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.60
|
1.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.77
|
|
Improved Sleep Scores
week 7
|
3.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.27
|
1.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.09
|
|
Improved Sleep Scores
week 8 open label no study medication
|
3.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.13
|
1.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.15
|
|
Improved Sleep Scores
week 9 open label
|
1.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
1.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.84
|
|
Improved Sleep Scores
week 10 open label
|
1.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
|
1.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.83
|
|
Improved Sleep Scores
week 11 open label
|
1.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
1.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.04
|
|
Improved Sleep Scores
week 12 open label
|
0.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.55
|
1.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.43
|
Adverse Events
Active Drug 150 mg Double-blind and 300 mg Open-label
Active Drug 300mg Double-blind and 300mg Open-label
Placebo (150 mg or 300mg): Double-Blind
Placebo (300 mg Active Drug): Open-label Only
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Active Drug 150 mg Double-blind and 300 mg Open-label
n=5 participants at risk
Double-Blind: 75 mg of pregabalin po BID (Weeks1-7) Open-label:150 mg of pregabalin BID (Weeks 8-11)
Pregabalin : First 7 weeks 75 or 150 mg of pregabalin po BID. Start at 75 mg and increase to 150 mg po BID if no improvement after 3 days
|
Active Drug 300mg Double-blind and 300mg Open-label
n=6 participants at risk
Double blink:150 mg of pregabalin BID (Weeks 1-7) Open-label: 150 mg of pregabalin BID (Weeks 8-11)
Pregabalin : First 7 weeks 75 or 150 mg of pregabalin po BID. Start at 75 mg and increase to 150 mg po BID if no improvement after 3 days
|
Placebo (150 mg or 300mg): Double-Blind
n=7 participants at risk
Double-blind: Placebo (150 or 300 mg) for weeks 1-7 only.
|
Placebo (300 mg Active Drug): Open-label Only
n=5 participants at risk
Participants who received placebo during the Double-blind phase had the option to receive pregabalin 150 mg BID during the open-label phase for 4 weeks (Weeks 8-11 only).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicide attempt
|
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Active Drug 150 mg Double-blind and 300 mg Open-label
n=5 participants at risk
Double-Blind: 75 mg of pregabalin po BID (Weeks1-7) Open-label:150 mg of pregabalin BID (Weeks 8-11)
Pregabalin : First 7 weeks 75 or 150 mg of pregabalin po BID. Start at 75 mg and increase to 150 mg po BID if no improvement after 3 days
|
Active Drug 300mg Double-blind and 300mg Open-label
n=6 participants at risk
Double blink:150 mg of pregabalin BID (Weeks 1-7) Open-label: 150 mg of pregabalin BID (Weeks 8-11)
Pregabalin : First 7 weeks 75 or 150 mg of pregabalin po BID. Start at 75 mg and increase to 150 mg po BID if no improvement after 3 days
|
Placebo (150 mg or 300mg): Double-Blind
n=7 participants at risk
Double-blind: Placebo (150 or 300 mg) for weeks 1-7 only.
|
Placebo (300 mg Active Drug): Open-label Only
n=5 participants at risk
Participants who received placebo during the Double-blind phase had the option to receive pregabalin 150 mg BID during the open-label phase for 4 weeks (Weeks 8-11 only).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
headache and hyperactivity
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
night sweats
|
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
dizziness
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
|
General disorders
drowsiness
|
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
dizziness and blurred vision
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
hand numbness
|
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
gastroenteritis and dizziness
|
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
pedal edema
|
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse events were collected over 5 months. Enrolled patients were scheduled for a minimum of three visits after the first week of treatment at weeks 4,8 and 12 for physical examination, symptom assessment and laboratory studies. Patients were contacted by phone 2 months after completing the study to review general health and adverse events. Deaths and/or adverse events were not monitored/assessed separately between the double-blind and open-label phases in the Active Drug arms.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place