Safety/Efficacy Study Comparing the Misoprostol Vaginal Insert to Cervidil for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
NCT00308711 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 1308
Last updated 2012-06-25
Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the misoprostol vaginal insert (50 mcg and 100 mcg) can safely and effectively speed time to vaginal delivery compared to Cervidil (R) in women who need to have cervical ripneing and induction of labor.
Conditions
- Cervical Ripening
- Labor, Induced
Interventions
- DRUG
-
Misoprostol vaginal insert 100 mcg
Hydrogel polymer intravaginal insert with retrieval system. One insert is to remain in the posterior fornix of the vagina until removed for one of the following conditions: onset of active labor; maternal/fetal complication, e.g. non-reassuring fetal heart rate. Record if the insert falls out prior to meeting one of the first two criteria. In no case is the insert to remain in place longer than 24h.
- DRUG
-
Misoprostol vaginal insert 50 mcg
Hydrogel polymer intravaginal insert with retrieval system. One insert is to remain in the posterior fornix of the vagina until removed for one of the following conditions: onset of active labor; maternal/fetal complication, e.g. non-reassuring fetal heart rate. Record if the insert falls out prior to meeting one of the first two criteria. In no case is the insert to remain in place longer than 24h.
- DRUG
-
Dinoprostone vaginal insert (Cervidil)
Hydrogel polymer intravaginal insert with retrieval system. One insert is to remain in the posterior fornix of the vagina until removed for one of the following conditions: onset of active labor; maternal/fetal complication, e.g. non-reassuring fetal heart rate. Record if the insert falls out prior to meeting one of the first two criteria. In no case is the insert to remain in place longer than 24h.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Ferring Pharmaceuticals
lead INDUSTRY
Principal Investigators
-
Helen Colquhoun, MD
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2006-04-30
- Primary Completion
- 2007-08-31
- Completion
- 2007-08-31
Countries
- United States
- Canada
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Safety and Efficacy Study of Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
NCT01428037 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparison Between Vaginal and Sublingual Misoprostol 50 µg for Cervical Ripening Prior to Induction of Labor
NCT02732522 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Low-dose Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Dinoprostone Insert for Induction of Labor
NCT03744364 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Efficacy and Safety Study of the Misoprostol Vaginal Priming Insert (MVPI) Prior to Hysteroscopy
NCT00925938 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
A Comparison of Oral Misoprostol and Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
NCT02777190 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Is More Than One Dose of Misoprostol Needed to Expedite Vaginal Delivery in a Patient With an Unripe Cervix?
NCT02680314 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Same-day Cervical Preparation Before Dilation and Evacuation
NCT03002441 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Same-Day Mifepristone-Misoprostol Compared to Misoprostol Only for Surgical Abortion Cervical Preparation
NCT02412618 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Value of Mifepristone in Cervical Preparation Prior to Dilation and Evacuation 19-24 Weeks
NCT01615731 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
24-hour Mifepristone and Buccal Versus Mifepristone and Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Preparation for D&E
NCT03134183 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Cervical Ripening in Obese Women: Efficacy of 25 mcg Versus 50 mcg of Misoprostol
NCT03748147 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Misoprostol Versus Dilapan-S for Cervical Preparation
NCT00835731 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Study of the 200 Microgram (mcg) Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI 200) in Women at Term Gestation (The MVI-PK Study)
NCT01283022 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Cervical Ripening With Misoprostol vs Isosorbide Mononitrate ; A Parallel -Arm Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT07121634 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Labor Induction With Oral Versus Vaginal Misoprostol
NCT04755218 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Randomized Study of Cervical Priming With Misoprostol Prior to Elective First Trimester Pregnancy Termination
NCT00310921 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Mifepristone Versus Laminaria Insertion for Cervical Preparation Prior to Surgical Abortion at 14-16 Weeks
NCT00986921 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mifepristone Versus Osmotic Dilator Insertion for Cervical Preparation Prior to Surgical Abortion at 15-18 Weeks
NCT01436279 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Mifepristone vs Misoprostol
NCT06502158 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Outpatient Cervical Ripening With Orally Administered Misoprostol in Diabetics
NCT00514618 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginal Misodel® in Comparison With Orally Administrated Misoprostol (Cytotec®) at Induction of Labour
NCT02918110 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Induction With Misoprostol: Oral Mucosa Versus Vaginal Epithelium (IMPROVE)
NCT02408315 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparison of Misoprostol Ripening Efficacy With Dilapan
NCT03670836 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Cervical Preparation With Mifepristone Prior to Osmotic Dilators
NCT03714880 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Vaginal Vs Subling Misoprost Before Iud Insertion in Women With Previous CS
NCT05204979 ·Status: UNKNOWN