Safety/Efficacy Study Comparing the Misoprostol Vaginal Insert to Cervidil for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor

NCT00308711 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 1308

Last updated 2012-06-25

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the misoprostol vaginal insert (50 mcg and 100 mcg) can safely and effectively speed time to vaginal delivery compared to Cervidil (R) in women who need to have cervical ripneing and induction of labor.

Conditions

  • Cervical Ripening
  • Labor, Induced

Interventions

DRUG

Misoprostol vaginal insert 100 mcg

Hydrogel polymer intravaginal insert with retrieval system. One insert is to remain in the posterior fornix of the vagina until removed for one of the following conditions: onset of active labor; maternal/fetal complication, e.g. non-reassuring fetal heart rate. Record if the insert falls out prior to meeting one of the first two criteria. In no case is the insert to remain in place longer than 24h.

DRUG

Misoprostol vaginal insert 50 mcg

Hydrogel polymer intravaginal insert with retrieval system. One insert is to remain in the posterior fornix of the vagina until removed for one of the following conditions: onset of active labor; maternal/fetal complication, e.g. non-reassuring fetal heart rate. Record if the insert falls out prior to meeting one of the first two criteria. In no case is the insert to remain in place longer than 24h.

DRUG

Dinoprostone vaginal insert (Cervidil)

Hydrogel polymer intravaginal insert with retrieval system. One insert is to remain in the posterior fornix of the vagina until removed for one of the following conditions: onset of active labor; maternal/fetal complication, e.g. non-reassuring fetal heart rate. Record if the insert falls out prior to meeting one of the first two criteria. In no case is the insert to remain in place longer than 24h.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ferring Pharmaceuticals

    lead INDUSTRY

Principal Investigators

  • Helen Colquhoun, MD

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2006-04-30
Primary Completion
2007-08-31
Completion
2007-08-31

Countries

  • United States
  • Canada

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00308711 on ClinicalTrials.gov