MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Infant Pain Responses Between Two Different Methods of Urine Collection

NCT00298584 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2007-02-23

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine which of the two procedures commonly used to collect urine, percutaneous suprapubic aspiration (SPA) and urethral catheterization (UC), is less painful, and the success rates and complication rates associated with both methods.

Conditions

  • Pain
  • Intensive Care, Neonatal

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Percutaneous Suprapubic Aspiration

PROCEDURE

Urethral Catheterization

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • The Hospital for Sick Children

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Anna Taddio, PhD · The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto Canada

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
1 Day
Max Age
6 Months
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2006-02-28

Countries

  • Canada

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00298584 on ClinicalTrials.gov