Trial Outcomes & Findings for Phase I/II Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer (NCT NCT00214097)

NCT ID: NCT00214097

Last Updated: 2019-11-25

Results Overview

To evaluate acute tolerances to dose-per-fraction escalation in the treatment of prostate cancer using optimized treatment of Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), daily rectal balloon displacement, and transabdominal ultrasound localization of the prostate. For toxicities observed within the first 10 patients at each hypofractionation level, ≥20% acute grade 3 or higher GI or genitourinary (GU) toxicity will constitute a threshold toxicity level and will dictate a decrease in frequency of treatment by one treatment per week. Maximum tolerated dose is reached if 20% of participants experience acute toxicities grade 3 or higher.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Target enrollment

347 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

90 days post radiation treatment

Results posted on

2019-11-25

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Level 1
2.94 gy/fr, 22 fractions, Radiotherapy: Daily radiation to prescribed dose
Level 2
3.63 gy/fr, 16 fractions, 50 patients first 10 treated with 4 fractions per week next 40 treated with 5 fractions per week Radiotherapy: Daily radiation to prescribed dose
Level 3
4.3 gy/fr, 12 fractions, 50 patients first 10 treated with 4 fractions per week next 40 treated with 5 fractions per week Radiotherapy: Daily radiation to prescribed dose
Overall Study
STARTED
101
111
135
Overall Study
COMPLETED
101
111
135
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Phase I/II Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Level I
n=101 Participants
2.94 gy/fr, 22 fractions, Radiotherapy: Daily radiation to prescribed dose
Level II
n=111 Participants
3.63 gy/fr, 16 fractions, Radiotherapy: Daily radiation to prescribed dose
Level III
n=135 Participants
4.3 gy/fr, 12 fractions, Radiotherapy: Daily radiation to prescribed dose
Total
n=347 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
67 years
n=99 Participants
67 years
n=107 Participants
68 years
n=206 Participants
68 years
n=157 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
0 Participants
n=157 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
101 Participants
n=99 Participants
111 Participants
n=107 Participants
135 Participants
n=206 Participants
347 Participants
n=157 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
2 Participants
n=206 Participants
4 Participants
n=157 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
76 Participants
n=99 Participants
98 Participants
n=107 Participants
118 Participants
n=206 Participants
292 Participants
n=157 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
25 Participants
n=99 Participants
11 Participants
n=107 Participants
15 Participants
n=206 Participants
51 Participants
n=157 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
78 Participants
n=99 Participants
84 Participants
n=107 Participants
108 Participants
n=206 Participants
270 Participants
n=157 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
5 Participants
n=99 Participants
16 Participants
n=107 Participants
10 Participants
n=206 Participants
31 Participants
n=157 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
17 Participants
n=99 Participants
11 Participants
n=107 Participants
17 Participants
n=206 Participants
45 Participants
n=157 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
1 Participants
n=157 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
101 participants
n=99 Participants
111 participants
n=107 Participants
135 participants
n=206 Participants
347 participants
n=157 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 90 days post radiation treatment

To evaluate acute tolerances to dose-per-fraction escalation in the treatment of prostate cancer using optimized treatment of Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), daily rectal balloon displacement, and transabdominal ultrasound localization of the prostate. For toxicities observed within the first 10 patients at each hypofractionation level, ≥20% acute grade 3 or higher GI or genitourinary (GU) toxicity will constitute a threshold toxicity level and will dictate a decrease in frequency of treatment by one treatment per week. Maximum tolerated dose is reached if 20% of participants experience acute toxicities grade 3 or higher.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Level 1
n=101 Participants
2.94 gy/fr, 22 fractions, Radiotherapy: Daily radiation to prescribed dose
Level 2
n=111 Participants
3.63 gy/fr, 16 fractions, Radiotherapy: Daily radiation to prescribed dose
Level 3
n=135 Participants
4.3 gy/fr, 12 fractions, Radiotherapy: Daily radiation to prescribed dose
Number of Participants Who Experience Grade 3 or Higher Acute Toxicities
1 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: from 90 days post XRT through last follow-up visit (up to 3 years)

To evaluate late radiation toxicities to dose-per fraction escalation in the treatment of prostate

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Level 1
n=101 Participants
2.94 gy/fr, 22 fractions, Radiotherapy: Daily radiation to prescribed dose
Level 2
n=111 Participants
3.63 gy/fr, 16 fractions, Radiotherapy: Daily radiation to prescribed dose
Level 3
n=135 Participants
4.3 gy/fr, 12 fractions, Radiotherapy: Daily radiation to prescribed dose
Number of Subjects Experiencing Grade 2 or Higher Late Rectal Toxicities at Any Time During Follow Up
14 Participants
26 Participants
29 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: up to 15 years from enrollment

Patients will be considered to be without biochemical recurrence if either the Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is still declining or the PSA nadir has been reached and is below 1.0ng/ml

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Level 1
n=101 Participants
2.94 gy/fr, 22 fractions, Radiotherapy: Daily radiation to prescribed dose
Level 2
n=111 Participants
3.63 gy/fr, 16 fractions, Radiotherapy: Daily radiation to prescribed dose
Level 3
n=135 Participants
4.3 gy/fr, 12 fractions, Radiotherapy: Daily radiation to prescribed dose
Biochemical Progression-free Survival Based on PSA Surveillance
91.5 percentage of participants
Interval 88.2 to 94.8
92.7 percentage of participants
Interval 90.0 to 95.4
94.1 percentage of participants
Interval 91.9 to 96.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 3 years

Population: Unavailable quality of life questionnaires at year 3. All mean scores were adjusted for missing data. The missing data for questionnaires were handled by weighted mean imputation. Cases with more than half of the total questions missing were not included.

The Fox Chase Bowel/Bladder survey was divided into two sections: Bowel (questions 1 to 14, N=14) and Bladder (questions 19, and 21 to 30, N=11). To facilitate analysis, Bowel and Bladder scores for each section were rescaled to a total score of between 0 - 100, where higher scores indicated better Quality of Life (QoL). Results for the Bowel Section are reported here.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Level 1
n=101 Participants
2.94 gy/fr, 22 fractions, Radiotherapy: Daily radiation to prescribed dose
Level 2
n=111 Participants
3.63 gy/fr, 16 fractions, Radiotherapy: Daily radiation to prescribed dose
Level 3
n=135 Participants
4.3 gy/fr, 12 fractions, Radiotherapy: Daily radiation to prescribed dose
Fox Chase Bowel Survey at Baseline and 3 Years
Baseline
90.0 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.7
88.0 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.6
86.2 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.6
Fox Chase Bowel Survey at Baseline and 3 Years
Year 3
86.3 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.1
87.7 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.6
85.4 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 3 years

Population: Unavailable quality of life questionnaires at year 3. All mean scores were adjusted for missing data. The missing data for questionnaires were handled by weighted mean imputation. Cases with more than half of the total questions missing were not included.

The Fox Chase Bowel/Bladder survey was divided into two sections: Bowel (questions 1 to 14, N=14) and Bladder (questions 19, and 21 to 30, N=11). To facilitate analysis, Bowel and Bladder scores for each section were rescaled to a total score of between 0 - 100, where higher scores indicated better Quality of Life. Results for the Bladder Section are reported here.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Level 1
n=101 Participants
2.94 gy/fr, 22 fractions, Radiotherapy: Daily radiation to prescribed dose
Level 2
n=111 Participants
3.63 gy/fr, 16 fractions, Radiotherapy: Daily radiation to prescribed dose
Level 3
n=135 Participants
4.3 gy/fr, 12 fractions, Radiotherapy: Daily radiation to prescribed dose
Fox Chase Bladder Survey at Baseline and 3 Years
3 years
79.5 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.5
82.5 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.1
81.1 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.2
Fox Chase Bladder Survey at Baseline and 3 Years
Baseline
84.2 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.4
84.7 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.1
82.7 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 3 years

Population: Unavailable quality of life questionnaires at year 3. All mean scores were adjusted for missing data. The missing data for questionnaires were handled by weighted mean imputation. Cases with more than half of the total questions missing were not included.

The IIEF is a 15-item survey where 9-items are scored 0-5 and 6-items are scored 1-5 with a total range of 6-75. The standard scoring mechanism was used for IIEF, where the QoL items corresponded to the following domains: erectile function (score range 1-30), orgasmic function (score range 1-10), sexual desire (score range 2-10), intercourse satisfaction (score range 0-15), and overall satisfaction (score range 2-10). Higher numbers indicate increased QoL.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Level 1
n=101 Participants
2.94 gy/fr, 22 fractions, Radiotherapy: Daily radiation to prescribed dose
Level 2
n=111 Participants
3.63 gy/fr, 16 fractions, Radiotherapy: Daily radiation to prescribed dose
Level 3
n=135 Participants
4.3 gy/fr, 12 fractions, Radiotherapy: Daily radiation to prescribed dose
International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Score at Baseline and 3 Years
Baseline
15.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.7
17.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.7
15.1 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.1
International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Score at Baseline and 3 Years
3 years
10.4 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.6
13.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.7
9.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 3 years

Population: Unavailable quality of life questionnaires at year 3. All mean scores were adjusted for missing data. The missing data for questionnaires were handled by weighted mean imputation. Cases with more than half of the total questions missing were not included.

The SQLI is composed of five items (activity, daily living, health, support, outlook) scored utilizing a numerical scale of 0-2. Standard scoring was also used for the SQLI survey (total score range 0-10) where higher score indicate increased QoL.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Level 1
n=101 Participants
2.94 gy/fr, 22 fractions, Radiotherapy: Daily radiation to prescribed dose
Level 2
n=111 Participants
3.63 gy/fr, 16 fractions, Radiotherapy: Daily radiation to prescribed dose
Level 3
n=135 Participants
4.3 gy/fr, 12 fractions, Radiotherapy: Daily radiation to prescribed dose
Spritzer Quality of Life Index (SQLI) at Baseline and 3 Years
Baseline
9.7 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
9.4 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
9.5 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.4
Spritzer Quality of Life Index (SQLI) at Baseline and 3 Years
Year 3
9.5 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.4
9.8 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.4
9.5 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.4

Adverse Events

Level 1

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 40 other events
Deaths: 22 deaths

Level 2

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 56 other events
Deaths: 18 deaths

Level 3

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 52 other events
Deaths: 20 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Level 1
n=101 participants at risk
2.94 gy/fr, 22 fractions, minimum 50 patients to escalate, (back filling permitted while next dose level data matures for escalation) first 10 treated with 4 fractions per week next 40 + treated with 5 fractions per week Radiotherapy: Daily radiation to prescribed dose
Level 2
n=111 participants at risk
3.63 gy/fr, 16 fractions, minimum 50 patients ( back filling permitted while next dose level data matures for escalation) first 10 treated with 4 fractions per week next 40 + treated with 5 fractions per week Radiotherapy: Daily radiation to prescribed dose
Level 3
n=135 participants at risk
4.3 gy/fr, 12 fractions, 50 patients, for safety, up to an additional 100 for phase II component of study first 10 treated with 4 fractions per week next 40 +treated with 5 fractions per week Radiotherapy: Daily radiation to prescribed dose
Gastrointestinal disorders
Acute GI
3.0%
3/101 • Number of events 3 • Acute GI and GU toxicities and Late GI and GU toxicities were recorded for the duration of the study. For level 1 patients, median followup was 100 months, for level 2 patients median follow up was 85.5 months and for level 3 it was 61.7 months
5.4%
6/111 • Number of events 6 • Acute GI and GU toxicities and Late GI and GU toxicities were recorded for the duration of the study. For level 1 patients, median followup was 100 months, for level 2 patients median follow up was 85.5 months and for level 3 it was 61.7 months
2.2%
3/135 • Number of events 3 • Acute GI and GU toxicities and Late GI and GU toxicities were recorded for the duration of the study. For level 1 patients, median followup was 100 months, for level 2 patients median follow up was 85.5 months and for level 3 it was 61.7 months
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute GU
22.8%
23/101 • Number of events 23 • Acute GI and GU toxicities and Late GI and GU toxicities were recorded for the duration of the study. For level 1 patients, median followup was 100 months, for level 2 patients median follow up was 85.5 months and for level 3 it was 61.7 months
21.6%
24/111 • Number of events 24 • Acute GI and GU toxicities and Late GI and GU toxicities were recorded for the duration of the study. For level 1 patients, median followup was 100 months, for level 2 patients median follow up was 85.5 months and for level 3 it was 61.7 months
14.8%
20/135 • Number of events 20 • Acute GI and GU toxicities and Late GI and GU toxicities were recorded for the duration of the study. For level 1 patients, median followup was 100 months, for level 2 patients median follow up was 85.5 months and for level 3 it was 61.7 months
Renal and urinary disorders
Late GI and GU toxicities
13.9%
14/101 • Number of events 14 • Acute GI and GU toxicities and Late GI and GU toxicities were recorded for the duration of the study. For level 1 patients, median followup was 100 months, for level 2 patients median follow up was 85.5 months and for level 3 it was 61.7 months
23.4%
26/111 • Number of events 26 • Acute GI and GU toxicities and Late GI and GU toxicities were recorded for the duration of the study. For level 1 patients, median followup was 100 months, for level 2 patients median follow up was 85.5 months and for level 3 it was 61.7 months
21.5%
29/135 • Number of events 29 • Acute GI and GU toxicities and Late GI and GU toxicities were recorded for the duration of the study. For level 1 patients, median followup was 100 months, for level 2 patients median follow up was 85.5 months and for level 3 it was 61.7 months

Additional Information

Diana Trask

University of Wisconsin

Phone: 608-263-9528

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place