Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Peer-Oriented HIV Prevention Outreach Program for Individuals at High Risk for HIV and Other STIs (NCT NCT00183456)

NCT ID: NCT00183456

Last Updated: 2013-06-28

Results Overview

Number of participants that had 2 or more sex partners in the past 90 days.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE2

Target enrollment

746 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

6 months

Results posted on

2013-06-28

Participant Flow

The sample consisted of women and their social network members. Index participants were recruited through street outreach as well as at health clinics, and other local community agencies. Social network members were recruited by index participants after completion of the index's baseline visit. Recruitment took place from September 2005-July 2007

Those index participants that did not recruit a network member or did not show up to be randomized into a study condition were not assigned to a study condition. Network participants completed study interviews but were not assigned to a study condition and did not participate in the intervention.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Intervention Condition: CHAT
Participants received the program over the course of five small group sessions and one individual session based on a harm reduction philosophy. Participants were trained as Peer Mentors and were encouraged to talk to their family, friends, and sex partners about a range of sex risk reduction options.
Comparison Condition: Standard of Care
The comparison condition consisted of one group session. The session focused on HIV and STIs transmission and risk reduction information.
Network Participants
Index participants generated a list of network members during their baseline visits and were asked to recruit eligible network members into the study. These network participants completed study interviews but did not participate in the intervention.
Non-randomized Baseline Index Participants
This arm includes those index participants that did not show up for randomization or did not recruit a network member were thus not eligible to be randomized into a study condition.
Overall Study
STARTED
85
84
329
248
Overall Study
6 Month Follow-up
74
77
278
175
Overall Study
12 Month Follow-up
76
74
267
186
Overall Study
18 Month Follow-up
80
81
303
207
Overall Study
COMPLETED
82
83
313
220
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
3
1
16
28

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

A Peer-Oriented HIV Prevention Outreach Program for Individuals at High Risk for HIV and Other STIs

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Intervention Condition: CHAT
n=85 Participants
Participants received the program over the course of five small group sessions and one individual session based on a harm reduction philosophy. Participants were trained as Peer Mentors and were encouraged to talk to their family, friends, and sex partners about a range of sex risk reduction options.
Comparison Condition: Standard of Care
n=84 Participants
The comparison condition consisted of one group session. The session focused on HIV and STIs transmission and risk reduction information.
Network Participants
n=329 Participants
Index participants generated a list of network members during their baseline visits and were asked to recruit eligible network members into the study. These network participants completed study interviews but did not participate in the intervention.
Non-randomized Baseline Index Participants
n=248 Participants
This arm includes those index participants that did not show up for randomization or did not recruit a network member were thus not eligible to be randomized into a study condition.
Total
n=746 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
2 Participants
n=206 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
3 Participants
n=31 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
85 Participants
n=99 Participants
84 Participants
n=107 Participants
323 Participants
n=206 Participants
247 Participants
n=7 Participants
739 Participants
n=31 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
4 Participants
n=206 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=31 Participants
Age Continuous
42.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7 • n=99 Participants
43.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7 • n=107 Participants
42.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10 • n=206 Participants
40.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8 • n=7 Participants
42 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 • n=31 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
85 Participants
n=99 Participants
84 Participants
n=107 Participants
150 Participants
n=206 Participants
248 Participants
n=7 Participants
567 Participants
n=31 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
179 Participants
n=206 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
179 Participants
n=31 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
85 participants
n=99 Participants
84 participants
n=107 Participants
329 participants
n=206 Participants
248 participants
n=7 Participants
746 participants
n=31 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months

Number of participants that had 2 or more sex partners in the past 90 days.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Condition: CHAT
n=73 Participants
Participants received the program over the course of five small group sessions and one individual session based on a harm reduction philosophy. Participants were trained as Peer Mentors and were encouraged to talk to their family, friends, and sex partners about a range of sex risk reduction options.
Comparison Condition: Standard of Care
n=75 Participants
The comparison condition consisted of one group session. The session focused on HIV and STIs transmission and risk reduction information.
Network Participants
n=277 Participants
Index participants generated a list of network members during their baseline visits and were asked to recruit eligible network members into the study. These network participants completed study interviews but did not participate in the intervention.
Non-randomized Baseline Index Participants
n=174 Participants
This arm includes those index participants that did not show up for randomization or did not recruit a network member were thus not eligible to be randomized into a study condition.
Sex Risk Behaviors: Number of Sex Partners (>=2 Sex Partners)
17 participants
29 participants
50 participants
53 participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Condition: CHAT
n=76 Participants
Participants received the program over the course of five small group sessions and one individual session based on a harm reduction philosophy. Participants were trained as Peer Mentors and were encouraged to talk to their family, friends, and sex partners about a range of sex risk reduction options.
Comparison Condition: Standard of Care
n=74 Participants
The comparison condition consisted of one group session. The session focused on HIV and STIs transmission and risk reduction information.
Network Participants
n=264 Participants
Index participants generated a list of network members during their baseline visits and were asked to recruit eligible network members into the study. These network participants completed study interviews but did not participate in the intervention.
Non-randomized Baseline Index Participants
n=185 Participants
This arm includes those index participants that did not show up for randomization or did not recruit a network member were thus not eligible to be randomized into a study condition.
Sex Risk Behaviors: Unprotected Sex With Non-main Partner (Past 90 Days)
10 participants
22 participants
47 participants
58 participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 18 month

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Condition: CHAT
n=80 Participants
Participants received the program over the course of five small group sessions and one individual session based on a harm reduction philosophy. Participants were trained as Peer Mentors and were encouraged to talk to their family, friends, and sex partners about a range of sex risk reduction options.
Comparison Condition: Standard of Care
n=81 Participants
The comparison condition consisted of one group session. The session focused on HIV and STIs transmission and risk reduction information.
Network Participants
n=299 Participants
Index participants generated a list of network members during their baseline visits and were asked to recruit eligible network members into the study. These network participants completed study interviews but did not participate in the intervention.
Non-randomized Baseline Index Participants
n=205 Participants
This arm includes those index participants that did not show up for randomization or did not recruit a network member were thus not eligible to be randomized into a study condition.
Sex Risk Behaviors: Unprotected Anal Sex (Past 90 Days)
5 participants
18 participants
43 participants
35 participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 18 months

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Condition: CHAT
n=80 Participants
Participants received the program over the course of five small group sessions and one individual session based on a harm reduction philosophy. Participants were trained as Peer Mentors and were encouraged to talk to their family, friends, and sex partners about a range of sex risk reduction options.
Comparison Condition: Standard of Care
n=81 Participants
The comparison condition consisted of one group session. The session focused on HIV and STIs transmission and risk reduction information.
Network Participants
n=299 Participants
Index participants generated a list of network members during their baseline visits and were asked to recruit eligible network members into the study. These network participants completed study interviews but did not participate in the intervention.
Non-randomized Baseline Index Participants
n=205 Participants
This arm includes those index participants that did not show up for randomization or did not recruit a network member were thus not eligible to be randomized into a study condition.
Sex Risk Behaviors: Unprotected Vaginal Sex (Past 90 Days)
32 participants
49 participants
123 participants
119 participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 18 months

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Condition: CHAT
n=80 Participants
Participants received the program over the course of five small group sessions and one individual session based on a harm reduction philosophy. Participants were trained as Peer Mentors and were encouraged to talk to their family, friends, and sex partners about a range of sex risk reduction options.
Comparison Condition: Standard of Care
n=81 Participants
The comparison condition consisted of one group session. The session focused on HIV and STIs transmission and risk reduction information.
Network Participants
n=299 Participants
Index participants generated a list of network members during their baseline visits and were asked to recruit eligible network members into the study. These network participants completed study interviews but did not participate in the intervention.
Non-randomized Baseline Index Participants
n=205 Participants
This arm includes those index participants that did not show up for randomization or did not recruit a network member were thus not eligible to be randomized into a study condition.
Sex Risk Behaviors: Unprotected Sex With Main Partner (Past 90 Days)
30 participants
50 participants
127 participants
113 participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 18 months

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Condition: CHAT
n=80 Participants
Participants received the program over the course of five small group sessions and one individual session based on a harm reduction philosophy. Participants were trained as Peer Mentors and were encouraged to talk to their family, friends, and sex partners about a range of sex risk reduction options.
Comparison Condition: Standard of Care
n=81 Participants
The comparison condition consisted of one group session. The session focused on HIV and STIs transmission and risk reduction information.
Network Participants
n=299 Participants
Index participants generated a list of network members during their baseline visits and were asked to recruit eligible network members into the study. These network participants completed study interviews but did not participate in the intervention.
Non-randomized Baseline Index Participants
n=205 Participants
This arm includes those index participants that did not show up for randomization or did not recruit a network member were thus not eligible to be randomized into a study condition.
Sex Risk Behaviors: Unprotected Sex With a Non-main Partner (Past 90 Days)
8 participants
21 participants
47 participants
51 participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 18 months

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Condition: CHAT
n=80 Participants
Participants received the program over the course of five small group sessions and one individual session based on a harm reduction philosophy. Participants were trained as Peer Mentors and were encouraged to talk to their family, friends, and sex partners about a range of sex risk reduction options.
Comparison Condition: Standard of Care
n=81 Participants
The comparison condition consisted of one group session. The session focused on HIV and STIs transmission and risk reduction information.
Network Participants
n=299 Participants
Index participants generated a list of network members during their baseline visits and were asked to recruit eligible network members into the study. These network participants completed study interviews but did not participate in the intervention.
Non-randomized Baseline Index Participants
n=205 Participants
This arm includes those index participants that did not show up for randomization or did not recruit a network member were thus not eligible to be randomized into a study condition.
Sex Risk Behaviors: Any High Risk Sexual Behavior (Past 90 Days)
51 participants
69 participants
172 participants
151 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Condition: CHAT
n=73 Participants
Participants received the program over the course of five small group sessions and one individual session based on a harm reduction philosophy. Participants were trained as Peer Mentors and were encouraged to talk to their family, friends, and sex partners about a range of sex risk reduction options.
Comparison Condition: Standard of Care
n=77 Participants
The comparison condition consisted of one group session. The session focused on HIV and STIs transmission and risk reduction information.
Network Participants
n=277 Participants
Index participants generated a list of network members during their baseline visits and were asked to recruit eligible network members into the study. These network participants completed study interviews but did not participate in the intervention.
Non-randomized Baseline Index Participants
n=173 Participants
This arm includes those index participants that did not show up for randomization or did not recruit a network member were thus not eligible to be randomized into a study condition.
HIV Communication: Talk to Family About HIV or STIs (Past 6 Months)
61 participants
52 participants
155 participants
117 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Condition: CHAT
n=76 Participants
Participants received the program over the course of five small group sessions and one individual session based on a harm reduction philosophy. Participants were trained as Peer Mentors and were encouraged to talk to their family, friends, and sex partners about a range of sex risk reduction options.
Comparison Condition: Standard of Care
n=74 Participants
The comparison condition consisted of one group session. The session focused on HIV and STIs transmission and risk reduction information.
Network Participants
n=264 Participants
Index participants generated a list of network members during their baseline visits and were asked to recruit eligible network members into the study. These network participants completed study interviews but did not participate in the intervention.
Non-randomized Baseline Index Participants
n=184 Participants
This arm includes those index participants that did not show up for randomization or did not recruit a network member were thus not eligible to be randomized into a study condition.
HIV Communication: Talk to Family About HIV or STIs (Past 6 Months)
58 participants
39 participants
124 participants
104 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 18 months

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Condition: CHAT
n=78 Participants
Participants received the program over the course of five small group sessions and one individual session based on a harm reduction philosophy. Participants were trained as Peer Mentors and were encouraged to talk to their family, friends, and sex partners about a range of sex risk reduction options.
Comparison Condition: Standard of Care
n=81 Participants
The comparison condition consisted of one group session. The session focused on HIV and STIs transmission and risk reduction information.
Network Participants
n=291 Participants
Index participants generated a list of network members during their baseline visits and were asked to recruit eligible network members into the study. These network participants completed study interviews but did not participate in the intervention.
Non-randomized Baseline Index Participants
n=202 Participants
This arm includes those index participants that did not show up for randomization or did not recruit a network member were thus not eligible to be randomized into a study condition.
HIV Communication: Talk to Family About HIV or STIs (Past 6 Months)
56 participants
42 participants
141 participants
113 participants

Adverse Events

Intervention Condition: CHAT

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Comparison Condition: Standard of Care

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Network Participants

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Non-randomized Baseline Index Participants

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Carl Latkin, PhD

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place