Trial Outcomes & Findings for Three Dose Levels of CP-690,550 Monotherapy Versus Placebo, Administered Orally Twice Daily (BID) for 6 Weeks (NCT NCT00147498)
NCT ID: NCT00147498
Last Updated: 2013-01-30
Results Overview
ACR20 response: greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent (%) improvement in tender joints count (TJC); \>= 20% improvement in swollen joints count (SJC); and \>= 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ\]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
COMPLETED
PHASE2
264 participants
Week 6
2013-01-30
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
CP 690,550 5 mg
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
Placebo
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
61
|
69
|
69
|
65
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
58
|
60
|
52
|
48
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
9
|
17
|
17
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
CP 690,550 5 mg
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
Placebo
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
1
|
6
|
7
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
Laboratory abnormality
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Participant defaulted
|
0
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
Baseline Characteristics
Three Dose Levels of CP-690,550 Monotherapy Versus Placebo, Administered Orally Twice Daily (BID) for 6 Weeks
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=61 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=69 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=69 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=65 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
Total
n=264 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age Continuous
|
47.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8 • n=99 Participants
|
51.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.0 • n=107 Participants
|
51.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6 • n=206 Participants
|
51.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1 • n=157 Participants
|
50.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7 • n=390 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
53 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
58 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
60 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
55 Participants
n=157 Participants
|
226 Participants
n=390 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
8 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=157 Participants
|
38 Participants
n=390 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 6Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
ACR20 response: greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent (%) improvement in tender joints count (TJC); \>= 20% improvement in swollen joints count (SJC); and \>= 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ\]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=61 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=69 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=69 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=65 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 6
|
70.49 percentage of participants
|
81.16 percentage of participants
|
76.81 percentage of participants
|
29.23 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 1, 2, 4, and 8Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Missing data were imputed using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) at Week 1, 2, and 4. Here 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.
ACR20 response: \>=20% improvement in TJC; \>= 20% improvement in SJC; and \>= 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=61 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=69 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=69 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=65 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 1 (n=61,69,69,65)
|
27.87 percentage of participants
|
43.48 percentage of participants
|
56.52 percentage of participants
|
12.31 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 2 (n=61,69,69,65)
|
50.82 percentage of participants
|
71.01 percentage of participants
|
68.12 percentage of participants
|
20.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 4 (n=61,69,69,65)
|
63.93 percentage of participants
|
75.36 percentage of participants
|
75.36 percentage of participants
|
30.77 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 8 (n=56,56,51,45)
|
50.00 percentage of participants
|
66.07 percentage of participants
|
70.59 percentage of participants
|
28.89 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Missing data were imputed using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) at Week 1, 2, 4, and 6. Here 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.
ACR50 response: \>= 50% improvement in TJC or SJC and 50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=61 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=69 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=69 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=65 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 1 (n= 61,69,69,65)
|
6.56 percentage of participants
|
8.70 percentage of participants
|
18.84 percentage of participants
|
3.08 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 2 (n= 61,69,69,65)
|
9.84 percentage of participants
|
23.19 percentage of participants
|
28.99 percentage of participants
|
3.08 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 4 (n= 61,69,69,65)
|
32.79 percentage of participants
|
42.03 percentage of participants
|
42.03 percentage of participants
|
6.15 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 6 (n= 61,69,69,65)
|
32.79 percentage of participants
|
53.62 percentage of participants
|
50.72 percentage of participants
|
6.15 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 8 (n=56,56,51,45)
|
17.86 percentage of participants
|
30.36 percentage of participants
|
45.10 percentage of participants
|
13.33 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Missing data were imputed using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) at Week 1, 2, 4, and 6. Here 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.
ACR70 response: \>= 70% improvement in TJC or SJC and 70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=61 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=69 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=69 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=65 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 1 (n= 61,69,69,65)
|
1.64 percentage of participants
|
4.35 percentage of participants
|
4.35 percentage of participants
|
0.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 2 (n= 61,69,69,65)
|
4.92 percentage of participants
|
4.35 percentage of participants
|
10.14 percentage of participants
|
1.54 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 4 (n= 61,69,69,65)
|
9.84 percentage of participants
|
17.39 percentage of participants
|
21.74 percentage of participants
|
1.54 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 6 (n= 61,69,69,65)
|
13.11 percentage of participants
|
21.74 percentage of participants
|
27.54 percentage of participants
|
3.08 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 8 (n=56,56,51,45)
|
8.93 percentage of participants
|
14.29 percentage of participants
|
27.45 percentage of participants
|
8.89 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 6Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.
ACR-n: calculated by taking the lowest percentage improvement in (1) SJC or (2) TJC or (3) the median of the remaining 5 components of the ACR response (participant's assessment of disease activity; participant's global assessment of pain; physician's assessment of disease activity; participant's assessment of physical function; an acute phase reactant value - CRP). Negative numbers indicate worsening. The area under the curve (AUC) for ACR-n is the measure of the AUC of the mean change from baseline in ACR-n. The trapezoidal rule was used to compute the AUC.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=59 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=69 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=66 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=62 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Numeric Index of American College of Rheumatology Response (ACR-n) Curve
|
857.50 units on a scale*weeks
Standard Deviation 1151.36
|
1086.90 units on a scale*weeks
Standard Deviation 1664.77
|
1211.93 units on a scale*weeks
Standard Deviation 2107.65
|
-546.41 units on a scale*weeks
Standard Deviation 1721.78
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.
Number of tender joints was determined by examining 68 joints and identified the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=61 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=69 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=68 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=65 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Tender Joints Count (TJC)
Baseline (n=61,69,68,65)
|
32.37 tender joints
Standard Error 1.588
|
26.98 tender joints
Standard Error 1.485
|
29.52 tender joints
Standard Error 1.499
|
30.61 tender joints
Standard Error 1.529
|
|
Tender Joints Count (TJC)
Week 1 (n=60,68,66,59)
|
23.49 tender joints
Standard Error 1.597
|
16.62 tender joints
Standard Error 1.492
|
15.75 tender joints
Standard Error 1.511
|
27.39 tender joints
Standard Error 1.576
|
|
Tender Joints Count (TJC)
Week 2 (n=57,66,65,60)
|
18.90 tender joints
Standard Error 1.622
|
12.72 tender joints
Standard Error 1.505
|
13.51 tender joints
Standard Error 1.519
|
24.71 tender joints
Standard Error 1.572
|
|
Tender Joints Count (TJC)
Week 4 (n=56,58,59,49)
|
15.33 tender joints
Standard Error 1.628
|
9.97 tender joints
Standard Error 1.562
|
10.17 tender joints
Standard Error 1.562
|
19.78 tender joints
Standard Error 1.670
|
|
Tender Joints Count (TJC)
Week 6 (n=56,59,53,50)
|
12.21 tender joints
Standard Error 1.630
|
8.58 tender joints
Standard Error 1.556
|
7.41 tender joints
Standard Error 1.612
|
19.81 tender joints
Standard Error 1.661
|
|
Tender Joints Count (TJC)
Week 8 (n=57,56,52,45)
|
16.32 tender joints
Standard Error 1.62
|
11.50 tender joints
Standard Error 1.58
|
11.21 tender joints
Standard Error 1.62
|
20.37 tender joints
Standard Error 1.71
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.
Number of tender joints was determined by examining 68 joints and identified the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1. A negative value in change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=60 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=68 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=65 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=59 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender Joints Count (TJC) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 2 (n=57,66,65,60)
|
-11.68 tender joints
Standard Error 1.459
|
-15.66 tender joints
Standard Error 1.350
|
-15.78 tender joints
Standard Error 1.365
|
-5.13 tender joints
Standard Error 1.416
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender Joints Count (TJC) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 4 (n=56,58,58,49)
|
-15.23 tender joints
Standard Error 1.465
|
-18.33 tender joints
Standard Error 1.403
|
-18.66 tender joints
Standard Error 1.413
|
-10.09 tender joints
Standard Error 1.508
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender Joints Count (TJC) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 6 (n=56,59,52,50)
|
-18.35 tender joints
Standard Error 1.466
|
-19.81 tender joints
Standard Error 1.398
|
-21.37 tender joints
Standard Error 1.461
|
-9.69 tender joints
Standard Error 1.500
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender Joints Count (TJC) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 8 (n=57,56,52,45)
|
-14.26 tender joints
Standard Error 1.46
|
-16.89 tender joints
Standard Error 1.42
|
-17.78 tender joints
Standard Error 1.46
|
-9.34 tender joints
Standard Error 1.55
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tender Joints Count (TJC) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 1 (n=60,68,65,59)
|
-7.06 tender joints
Standard Error 1.435
|
-11.70 tender joints
Standard Error 1.338
|
-14.14 tender joints
Standard Error 1.362
|
-2.74 tender joints
Standard Error 1.417
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.
Number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 66 joints and identifying when swelling was present. The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no swelling = 0, swelling =1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=61 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=69 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=68 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=65 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Swollen Joints Count (SJC)
Baseline (n=61,69,68,65)
|
21.33 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.052
|
16.42 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.984
|
19.53 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.993
|
19.97 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.013
|
|
Swollen Joints Count (SJC)
Week 1 (n=60,68,66,59)
|
14.77 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.058
|
9.90 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.989
|
10.18 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.001
|
16.46 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.044
|
|
Swollen Joints Count (SJC)
Week 2 (n=57,66,65,60)
|
12.04 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.074
|
6.84 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.997
|
7.99 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.006
|
14.30 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.041
|
|
Swollen Joints Count (SJC)
Week 4 (n=56,58,59,49)
|
8.83 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.079
|
5.95 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.035
|
6.42 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.035
|
11.78 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.107
|
|
Swollen Joints Count (SJC)
Week 6 (n=56,59,53,50)
|
7.74 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.080
|
4.93 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.031
|
4.95 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.069
|
11.15 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.101
|
|
Swollen Joints Count (SJC)
Week 8 (n=57,56,52,45)
|
10.31 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.07
|
6.02 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.05
|
6.77 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.08
|
12.36 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.14
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.
Number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 66 joints and identifying when swelling was present. The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no swelling = 0, swelling =1. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=60 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=68 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=65 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=60 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joints Count (SJC) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 1 (n=60,68,65,59)
|
-5.02 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.913
|
-8.20 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.855
|
-9.00 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.866
|
-3.19 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.900
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joints Count (SJC) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 2 (n=57,66,65,60)
|
-7.83 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.927
|
-11.33 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.863
|
-11.11 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.868
|
-5.23 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.900
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joints Count (SJC) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 4 (n=56,58,58,49)
|
-11.03 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.930
|
-12.10 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.894
|
-12.58 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.897
|
-7.73 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.954
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joints Count (SJC) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 6 (n=56,59,52,50)
|
-12.10 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.931
|
-13.13 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.891
|
-13.91 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.925
|
-8.06 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.950
|
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joints Count (SJC) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 8 (n=57,56,52,45)
|
-9.54 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.93
|
-12.02 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.90
|
-12.14 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.93
|
-7.00 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.98
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.
Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" Participants responded by using a 0 - 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) where 0 mm = very well and 100 mm = very poorly.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=58 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=67 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=65 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=63 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis
Baseline (n=57,67,65,63)
|
71.03 mm
Standard Error 3.126
|
69.37 mm
Standard Error 2.887
|
63.99 mm
Standard Error 2.941
|
65.73 mm
Standard Error 2.985
|
|
Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis
Week 1 (n=58,67,64,58)
|
49.89 mm
Standard Error 3.111
|
45.36 mm
Standard Error 2.889
|
39.79 mm
Standard Error 2.958
|
61.48 mm
Standard Error 3.076
|
|
Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis
Week 2 (n=55,65,62,60)
|
46.18 mm
Standard Error 3.171
|
41.09 mm
Standard Error 2.917
|
32.09 mm
Standard Error 2.992
|
58.02 mm
Standard Error 3.046
|
|
Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis
Week 4 (n=56,58,58,48)
|
38.67 mm
Standard Error 3.146
|
29.53 mm
Standard Error 3.033
|
26.16 mm
Standard Error 3.062
|
52.55 mm
Standard Error 3.294
|
|
Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis
Week 6 (n=55,59,52,49)
|
37.11 mm
Standard Error 3.165
|
28.82 mm
Standard Error 3.018
|
24.52 mm
Standard Error 3.180
|
50.04 mm
Standard Error 3.273
|
|
Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis
Week 8 (n=57,57,50,45)
|
40.29 mm
Standard Error 3.13
|
37.56 mm
Standard Error 3.05
|
30.63 mm
Standard Error 3.23
|
50.76 mm
Standard Error 3.37
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.
Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" Participants responded by using a 0 - 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 100 mm = very poorly.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=56 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=66 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=62 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=59 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 1 (n=56,66,62,57)
|
-17.98 mm
Standard Error 3.121
|
-21.56 mm
Standard Error 2.859
|
-26.16 mm
Standard Error 2.948
|
-5.18 mm
Standard Error 3.022
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 2 (n=53,63,60,59)
|
-22.06 mm
Standard Error 3.184
|
-25.71 mm
Standard Error 2.900
|
-33.33 mm
Standard Error 2.984
|
-8.14 mm
Standard Error 2.998
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 4 (n=53,57,55,47)
|
-30.23 mm
Standard Error 3.176
|
-37.35 mm
Standard Error 3.001
|
-38.71 mm
Standard Error 3.072
|
-13.17 mm
Standard Error 3.238
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 6 (n=52,57,49,48)
|
-31.64 mm
Standard Error 3.203
|
-37.78 mm
Standard Error 3.005
|
-40.50 mm
Standard Error 3.191
|
-15.06 mm
Standard Error 3.219
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 8 (n=53,55,48,45)
|
-27.83 mm
Standard Error 3.18
|
-28.79 mm
Standard Error 3.04
|
-34.30 mm
Standard Error 3.21
|
-14.96 mm
Standard Error 3.28
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.
Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very good and 100 mm = very bad.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=60 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=69 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=66 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=64 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Baseline (n=60,69,66,64)
|
69.39 mm
Standard Error 2.566
|
64.11 mm
Standard Error 2.388
|
66.65 mm
Standard Error 2.436
|
67.75 mm
Standard Error 2.471
|
|
Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 1 (n=60,67,64,58)
|
49.85 mm
Standard Error 2.568
|
37.80 mm
Standard Error 2.417
|
36.30 mm
Standard Error 2.464
|
55.54 mm
Standard Error 2.575
|
|
Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 2 (n=57,66,65,60)
|
41.65 mm
Standard Error 2.618
|
29.54 mm
Standard Error 2.430
|
32.24 mm
Standard Error 2.453
|
52.76 mm
Standard Error 2.546
|
|
Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 4 (n=56,58,59,49)
|
34.18 mm
Standard Error 2.631
|
27.45 mm
Standard Error 2.547
|
23.91 mm
Standard Error 2.540
|
46.01 mm
Standard Error 2.746
|
|
Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 6 (n=55,58,53,50)
|
31.42 mm
Standard Error 2.651
|
22.22 mm
Standard Error 2.549
|
19.26 mm
Standard Error 2.643
|
46.52 mm
Standard Error 2.727
|
|
Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 8 (n=57,57,52,45)
|
39.10 mm
Standard Error 2.62
|
30.78 mm
Standard Error 2.57
|
26.24 mm
Standard Error 2.66
|
42.04 mm
Standard Error 2.84
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.
Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very good and 100 mm = very bad.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=59 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=67 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=63 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=59 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 1 (n=59,67,62,57)
|
-17.13 mm
Standard Error 2.626
|
-28.25 mm
Standard Error 2.445
|
-30.89 mm
Standard Error 2.534
|
-12.25 mm
Standard Error 2.636
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 2 (n=56,66,63,59)
|
-25.43 mm
Standard Error 2.675
|
-36.60 mm
Standard Error 2.456
|
-34.56 mm
Standard Error 2.525
|
-14.29 mm
Standard Error 2.611
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 4 (n=55,58,56,48)
|
-33.29 mm
Standard Error 2.686
|
-38.44 mm
Standard Error 2.563
|
-42.65 mm
Standard Error 2.627
|
-20.91 mm
Standard Error 2.803
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 6 (n=55,58,50,49)
|
-35.97 mm
Standard Error 2.690
|
-43.69 mm
Standard Error 2.566
|
-46.70 mm
Standard Error 2.730
|
-19.87 mm
Standard Error 2.786
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 8 (n=56,57,50,45)
|
-29.19 mm
Standard Error 2.67
|
-35.11 mm
Standard Error 2.58
|
-39.81 mm
Standard Error 2.73
|
-24.78 mm
Standard Error 2.87
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.
Participants rated the severity of arthritis pain on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = most severe pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=59 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=68 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=66 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=64 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 2 (n=57,65,65,60)
|
45.59 mm
Standard Error 3.154
|
40.14 mm
Standard Error 2.940
|
30.83 mm
Standard Error 2.956
|
60.65 mm
Standard Error 3.062
|
|
Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Baseline (n=59,68,66,64)
|
69.46 mm
Standard Error 3.112
|
67.47 mm
Standard Error 2.894
|
68.13 mm
Standard Error 2.936
|
64.17 mm
Standard Error 2.980
|
|
Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 1 (n=59,68,65,59)
|
51.76 mm
Standard Error 3.114
|
46.11 mm
Standard Error 2.897
|
37.71 mm
Standard Error 2.953
|
62.51 mm
Standard Error 3.072
|
|
Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 4 (n=57,58,59,49)
|
37.77 mm
Standard Error 3.150
|
30.42 mm
Standard Error 3.057
|
26.76 mm
Standard Error 3.053
|
56.96 mm
Standard Error 3.287
|
|
Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 6 (n=55,59,53,50)
|
35.57 mm
Standard Error 3.191
|
28.35 mm
Standard Error 3.043
|
23.39 mm
Standard Error 3.169
|
52.75 mm
Standard Error 3.266
|
|
Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 8 (n=57,57,52,45)
|
42.44 mm
Standard Error 3.15
|
37.62 mm
Standard Error 3.08
|
31.12 mm
Standard Error 3.19
|
49.06 mm
Standard Error 3.39
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.
Participants rated the severity of arthritis pain on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = most severe pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=57 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=67 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=63 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=59 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 4 (n=55,57,56,48)
|
-29.27 mm
Standard Error 3.137
|
-35.47 mm
Standard Error 2.996
|
-40.10 mm
Standard Error 3.050
|
-8.40 mm
Standard Error 3.242
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 1 (n=57,67,63,58)
|
-15.01 mm
Standard Error 3.102
|
-19.74 mm
Standard Error 2.843
|
-29.66 mm
Standard Error 2.932
|
-3.30 mm
Standard Error 3.027
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 2 (n=55,65,63,59)
|
-21.44 mm
Standard Error 3.142
|
-26.10 mm
Standard Error 2.870
|
-35.85 mm
Standard Error 2.936
|
-4.79 mm
Standard Error 3.027
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 6 (n=54,58,51,49)
|
-31.42 mm
Standard Error 3.159
|
-37.67 mm
Standard Error 2.983
|
-42.89 mm
Standard Error 3.144
|
-12.26 mm
Standard Error 3.223
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 8 (n=55,56,51,45)
|
-24.90 mm
Standard Error 3.14
|
-28.70 mm
Standard Error 3.02
|
-35.35 mm
Standard Error 3.15
|
-16.28 mm
Standard Error 3.31
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.
HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=60 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=69 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=67 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=62 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Baseline (n=60,69,67,62)
|
1.75 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.086
|
1.66 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.080
|
1.61 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.081
|
1.71 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.083
|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 1 (n=60,68,65,58)
|
1.46 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.086
|
1.37 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.080
|
1.19 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.082
|
1.63 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.084
|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 2 (n=57,66,64,60)
|
1.32 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.087
|
1.17 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.081
|
1.06 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.082
|
1.53 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.084
|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 4 (n=57,57,59,47)
|
1.17 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.087
|
1.07 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.083
|
0.92 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.083
|
1.54 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.088
|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 6 (n=54,59,53,50)
|
1.12 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.088
|
0.95 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.082
|
0.86 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.084
|
1.47 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.087
|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 8 (n=57,56,52,45)
|
1.30 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
1.06 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
0.92 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
1.52 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.
HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=59 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=68 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=64 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=57 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 1 (n=59,68,64,55)
|
-0.25 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.066
|
-0.30 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.061
|
-0.44 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.063
|
-0.05 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.067
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 2 (n=56,66,63,57)
|
-0.39 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.067
|
-0.50 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.062
|
-0.56 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.063
|
-0.15 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.067
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 4 (n=56,57,57,44)
|
-0.55 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.067
|
-0.60 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.064
|
-0.69 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.065
|
-0.13 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.071
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 6 (n=55,59,51,47)
|
-0.60 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.068
|
-0.72 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.063
|
-0.74 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.067
|
-0.20 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.070
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 8 (n=56,56,51,43)
|
-0.43 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
-0.60 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.70 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
-0.17 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.
The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. Normal range of CRP is 0 milligram per liter (mg/L) to 100 mg/L. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=50 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=57 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=58 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=53 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Baseline (n=50,57,58,53)
|
31.25 mg/L
Standard Deviation 35.00
|
25.47 mg/L
Standard Deviation 31.06
|
28.10 mg/L
Standard Deviation 28.43
|
22.28 mg/L
Standard Deviation 18.52
|
|
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Week 1 (n=50,55,55,49)
|
15.98 mg/L
Standard Deviation 16.72
|
7.57 mg/L
Standard Deviation 9.79
|
7.57 mg/L
Standard Deviation 11.32
|
25.40 mg/L
Standard Deviation 30.04
|
|
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Week 2 (n=46,53,53,48)
|
13.18 mg/L
Standard Deviation 12.97
|
7.25 mg/L
Standard Deviation 11.83
|
6.50 mg/L
Standard Deviation 14.81
|
24.41 mg/L
Standard Deviation 21.38
|
|
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Week 4 (n=46,49,47,39)
|
11.83 mg/L
Standard Deviation 11.10
|
5.17 mg/L
Standard Deviation 6.72
|
5.88 mg/L
Standard Deviation 10.98
|
22.26 mg/L
Standard Deviation 21.07
|
|
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Week 6 (n=45,49,41,41)
|
12.57 mg/L
Standard Deviation 21.01
|
6.59 mg/L
Standard Deviation 16.37
|
6.08 mg/L
Standard Deviation 11.80
|
22.94 mg/L
Standard Deviation 20.79
|
|
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Week 8 (n=45,45,41,37)
|
23.37 mg/L
Standard Deviation 22.72
|
12.06 mg/L
Standard Deviation 12.20
|
13.95 mg/L
Standard Deviation 14.68
|
23.64 mg/L
Standard Deviation 29.47
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.
The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. Normal range of CRP is 0 mg/L to 100 mg/L. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=50 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=54 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=55 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=48 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 1 (n=50,54,55,48)
|
-15.28 mg/L
Standard Deviation 26.65
|
-18.29 mg/L
Standard Deviation 28.98
|
-21.38 mg/L
Standard Deviation 25.56
|
-0.24 mg/L
Standard Deviation 15.40
|
|
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 2 (n=46,52,53,48)
|
-16.74 mg/L
Standard Deviation 32.94
|
-18.89 mg/L
Standard Deviation 31.87
|
-23.06 mg/L
Standard Deviation 31.49
|
1.79 mg/L
Standard Deviation 15.56
|
|
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 4 (n=46,49,47,39)
|
-17.76 mg/L
Standard Deviation 33.31
|
-22.02 mg/L
Standard Deviation 31.29
|
-20.70 mg/L
Standard Deviation 25.69
|
-0.67 mg/L
Standard Deviation 19.17
|
|
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 6 (n=45,49,41,41)
|
-17.83 mg/L
Standard Deviation 35.92
|
-18.08 mg/L
Standard Deviation 25.99
|
-17.58 mg/L
Standard Deviation 24.76
|
0.67 mg/L
Standard Deviation 16.81
|
|
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 8 (n=45,45,41,37)
|
-7.06 mg/L
Standard Deviation 35.75
|
-13.24 mg/L
Standard Deviation 27.69
|
-11.81 mg/L
Standard Deviation 29.46
|
1.32 mg/L
Standard Deviation 27.26
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.
DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from the SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score ranging 0 to 9.4; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity. DAS 28-3 (CRP) less than or equal to (\<=) 3.2 implied low disease activity and greater than (\>) 3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and less than (\<) 2.6 = remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=50 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=57 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=56 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=51 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Baseline (n=50,57,56,51)
|
6.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
5.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
5.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
6.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
|
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 1 (n=49,54,54,47)
|
5.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
|
4.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
4.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.21
|
5.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
|
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 2 (n=46,53,51,48)
|
4.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
|
3.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
3.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
5.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
|
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 4 (n=46,49,47,39)
|
4.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
3.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
3.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.33
|
4.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.22
|
|
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 6 (n=45,49,40,41)
|
4.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.29
|
3.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
3.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
4.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
|
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 8 (n=45,44,41,36)
|
4.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.37
|
4.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.32
|
3.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.38
|
5.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized to study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' signifies participants who were evaluable for a particular time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.
DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from the SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score ranging 0 to 9.4; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity. DAS 28-3 (CRP) \<=3.2 implied low disease activity and \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and \<2.6 = remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=49 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=53 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=52 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=46 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8
Change at Week 1 (n=49,53,52,45)
|
-0.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.74
|
-1.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
-1.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
-0.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8
Change at Week 2 (n=46,52,50,46)
|
-1.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
-1.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.23
|
-2.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.25
|
-0.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8
Change at Week 4 (n=46,49,46,37)
|
-1.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
-2.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.25
|
-2.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.39
|
-1.04 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8
Change at Week 6 (n=45,49,39,39)
|
-1.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.28
|
-2.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.33
|
-2.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.32
|
-1.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8
Change at Week 8 (n=45,44,41,35)
|
-1.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.32
|
-1.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.32
|
-1.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.38
|
-0.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.
Disease improvement was classified as good, moderate, and no change based on improvement in DAS 28-3 (CRP) from baseline and present DAS 28-3 (CRP) score. Good: an improvement from baseline of \>1.2 and a present score of \<=3.2; none: an improvement of \<=0.6 or \>0.6 to \<=1.2 with a present score of \>5.1; remaining participants were classified as having moderate improvement. Scores of good and moderate were considered to have therapeutic response.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=49 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=53 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=52 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=46 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Improvement Based on DAS28-3 (CRP)
Week 1, Moderate (n=49,53,52,45)
|
18 participants
|
28 participants
|
35 participants
|
10 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Improvement Based on DAS28-3 (CRP)
Week 2, Moderate (n=46,52,50,46)
|
26 participants
|
39 participants
|
38 participants
|
13 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Improvement Based on DAS28-3 (CRP)
Week 4, No Change (n=46,49,46,37)
|
14 participants
|
7 participants
|
8 participants
|
22 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Improvement Based on DAS28-3 (CRP)
Week 4, Good (n=46,49,46,37)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Improvement Based on DAS28-3 (CRP)
Week 2, No Change (n=46,52,50,46)
|
20 participants
|
13 participants
|
12 participants
|
33 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Improvement Based on DAS28-3 (CRP)
Week 2, Good (n=46,52,50,46)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Improvement Based on DAS28-3 (CRP)
Week 1, No Change (n=49,53,52,45)
|
31 participants
|
25 participants
|
17 participants
|
35 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Improvement Based on DAS28-3 (CRP)
Week 1, Good (n=49,53,52,45)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Improvement Based on DAS28-3 (CRP)
Week 4, Moderate (n=46,49,46,37)
|
32 participants
|
42 participants
|
38 participants
|
15 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Improvement Based on DAS28-3 (CRP)
Week 6, No Change (n=45,49,39,39)
|
11 participants
|
8 participants
|
3 participants
|
20 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Improvement Based on DAS28-3 (CRP)
Week 6, Good (n=45,49,39,39)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Improvement Based on DAS28-3 (CRP)
Week 6, Moderate (n=45,49,39,39)
|
34 participants
|
41 participants
|
36 participants
|
19 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Improvement Based on DAS28-3 (CRP)
Week 8, No Change (n=45,44,41,35)
|
21 participants
|
16 participants
|
11 participants
|
24 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Improvement Based on DAS28-3 (CRP)
Week 8, Good (n=45,44,41,35)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Improvement Based on DAS28-3 (CRP)
Week 8, Moderate (n=45,44,41,35)
|
24 participants
|
28 participants
|
30 participants
|
11 participants
|
Adverse Events
CP 690,550 5 mg
CP-690,550 15 mg
CP-690,550 30 mg
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=61 participants at risk
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=69 participants at risk
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=69 participants at risk
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=65 participants at risk
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial ischaemia
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia staphylococcal
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.5%
1/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis acute
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Whipple's disease
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rheumatoid arthritis
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Subarachnoid haemorrhage
|
1.6%
1/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope vasovagal
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Abortion spontaneous
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Pregnancy
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=61 participants at risk
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=69 participants at risk
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=69 participants at risk
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=65 participants at risk
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
1.6%
1/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
1.6%
1/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.8%
4/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.6%
3/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
3.3%
2/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.1%
7/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.5%
1/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphopenia
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
1.6%
1/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrioventricular block first degree
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac disorder
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
6.6%
4/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
4.9%
3/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
3.1%
2/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
4.9%
3/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.6%
3/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
|
3.3%
2/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.5%
1/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
3.1%
2/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
6.6%
4/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
8.7%
6/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.6%
3/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.5%
1/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
4.9%
3/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
3.1%
2/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
3.1%
2/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
1.6%
1/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
4.9%
3/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
3.1%
2/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
3.3%
2/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.5%
1/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes simplex
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
4.9%
3/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.8%
4/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
3.1%
2/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
4.9%
3/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.5%
1/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.6%
3/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tinea pedis
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tinea versicolour
|
3.3%
2/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.2%
4/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
1.6%
1/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
7.2%
5/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
3.1%
2/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.5%
1/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
1.6%
1/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.6%
3/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
3.1%
2/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercholesterolaemia
|
3.3%
2/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.8%
4/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
4.9%
3/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.2%
6/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
1.6%
1/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.6%
3/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
3.1%
2/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rheumatoid arthritis
|
1.6%
1/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.2%
4/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Shoulder pain
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.5%
1/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.8%
4/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.5%
1/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
16.4%
10/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
11.6%
8/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
24.6%
17/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.2%
6/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.5%
1/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Leukocyturia
|
3.3%
2/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
3.3%
2/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pharyngolaryngeal pain
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.5%
1/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acne
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Ecchymosis
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
3.1%
2/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.5%
1/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
1.6%
1/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
3.1%
2/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER