Trial Outcomes & Findings for Three Dose Levels of CP-690,550 Monotherapy Versus Placebo, Administered Orally Twice Daily (BID) for 6 Weeks (NCT NCT00147498)

NCT ID: NCT00147498

Last Updated: 2013-01-30

Results Overview

ACR20 response: greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent (%) improvement in tender joints count (TJC); \>= 20% improvement in swollen joints count (SJC); and \>= 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ\]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE2

Target enrollment

264 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Week 6

Results posted on

2013-01-30

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
CP 690,550 5 mg
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 15 mg
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 30 mg
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Placebo
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Overall Study
STARTED
61
69
69
65
Overall Study
COMPLETED
58
60
52
48
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
3
9
17
17

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
CP 690,550 5 mg
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 15 mg
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 30 mg
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Placebo
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Overall Study
Adverse Event
1
6
7
3
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
1
1
1
8
Overall Study
Laboratory abnormality
0
0
2
0
Overall Study
Participant defaulted
0
1
4
3
Overall Study
Other
1
1
3
3

Baseline Characteristics

Three Dose Levels of CP-690,550 Monotherapy Versus Placebo, Administered Orally Twice Daily (BID) for 6 Weeks

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=61 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=69 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=69 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Placebo
n=65 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Total
n=264 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age Continuous
47.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8 • n=99 Participants
51.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.0 • n=107 Participants
51.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6 • n=206 Participants
51.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1 • n=157 Participants
50.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7 • n=390 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
53 Participants
n=99 Participants
58 Participants
n=107 Participants
60 Participants
n=206 Participants
55 Participants
n=157 Participants
226 Participants
n=390 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants
n=99 Participants
11 Participants
n=107 Participants
9 Participants
n=206 Participants
10 Participants
n=157 Participants
38 Participants
n=390 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 6

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

ACR20 response: greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent (%) improvement in tender joints count (TJC); \>= 20% improvement in swollen joints count (SJC); and \>= 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ\]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=61 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=69 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=69 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Placebo
n=65 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 6
70.49 percentage of participants
81.16 percentage of participants
76.81 percentage of participants
29.23 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 1, 2, 4, and 8

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Missing data were imputed using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) at Week 1, 2, and 4. Here 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.

ACR20 response: \>=20% improvement in TJC; \>= 20% improvement in SJC; and \>= 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=61 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=69 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=69 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Placebo
n=65 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 1 (n=61,69,69,65)
27.87 percentage of participants
43.48 percentage of participants
56.52 percentage of participants
12.31 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 2 (n=61,69,69,65)
50.82 percentage of participants
71.01 percentage of participants
68.12 percentage of participants
20.00 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 4 (n=61,69,69,65)
63.93 percentage of participants
75.36 percentage of participants
75.36 percentage of participants
30.77 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Week 8 (n=56,56,51,45)
50.00 percentage of participants
66.07 percentage of participants
70.59 percentage of participants
28.89 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Missing data were imputed using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) at Week 1, 2, 4, and 6. Here 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.

ACR50 response: \>= 50% improvement in TJC or SJC and 50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=61 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=69 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=69 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Placebo
n=65 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 1 (n= 61,69,69,65)
6.56 percentage of participants
8.70 percentage of participants
18.84 percentage of participants
3.08 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 2 (n= 61,69,69,65)
9.84 percentage of participants
23.19 percentage of participants
28.99 percentage of participants
3.08 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 4 (n= 61,69,69,65)
32.79 percentage of participants
42.03 percentage of participants
42.03 percentage of participants
6.15 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 6 (n= 61,69,69,65)
32.79 percentage of participants
53.62 percentage of participants
50.72 percentage of participants
6.15 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Week 8 (n=56,56,51,45)
17.86 percentage of participants
30.36 percentage of participants
45.10 percentage of participants
13.33 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Missing data were imputed using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) at Week 1, 2, 4, and 6. Here 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.

ACR70 response: \>= 70% improvement in TJC or SJC and 70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=61 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=69 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=69 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Placebo
n=65 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 1 (n= 61,69,69,65)
1.64 percentage of participants
4.35 percentage of participants
4.35 percentage of participants
0.00 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 2 (n= 61,69,69,65)
4.92 percentage of participants
4.35 percentage of participants
10.14 percentage of participants
1.54 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 4 (n= 61,69,69,65)
9.84 percentage of participants
17.39 percentage of participants
21.74 percentage of participants
1.54 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 6 (n= 61,69,69,65)
13.11 percentage of participants
21.74 percentage of participants
27.54 percentage of participants
3.08 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Week 8 (n=56,56,51,45)
8.93 percentage of participants
14.29 percentage of participants
27.45 percentage of participants
8.89 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 6

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ACR-n: calculated by taking the lowest percentage improvement in (1) SJC or (2) TJC or (3) the median of the remaining 5 components of the ACR response (participant's assessment of disease activity; participant's global assessment of pain; physician's assessment of disease activity; participant's assessment of physical function; an acute phase reactant value - CRP). Negative numbers indicate worsening. The area under the curve (AUC) for ACR-n is the measure of the AUC of the mean change from baseline in ACR-n. The trapezoidal rule was used to compute the AUC.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=59 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=69 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=66 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Placebo
n=62 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Area Under the Numeric Index of American College of Rheumatology Response (ACR-n) Curve
857.50 units on a scale*weeks
Standard Deviation 1151.36
1086.90 units on a scale*weeks
Standard Deviation 1664.77
1211.93 units on a scale*weeks
Standard Deviation 2107.65
-546.41 units on a scale*weeks
Standard Deviation 1721.78

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.

Number of tender joints was determined by examining 68 joints and identified the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=61 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=69 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=68 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Placebo
n=65 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Tender Joints Count (TJC)
Baseline (n=61,69,68,65)
32.37 tender joints
Standard Error 1.588
26.98 tender joints
Standard Error 1.485
29.52 tender joints
Standard Error 1.499
30.61 tender joints
Standard Error 1.529
Tender Joints Count (TJC)
Week 1 (n=60,68,66,59)
23.49 tender joints
Standard Error 1.597
16.62 tender joints
Standard Error 1.492
15.75 tender joints
Standard Error 1.511
27.39 tender joints
Standard Error 1.576
Tender Joints Count (TJC)
Week 2 (n=57,66,65,60)
18.90 tender joints
Standard Error 1.622
12.72 tender joints
Standard Error 1.505
13.51 tender joints
Standard Error 1.519
24.71 tender joints
Standard Error 1.572
Tender Joints Count (TJC)
Week 4 (n=56,58,59,49)
15.33 tender joints
Standard Error 1.628
9.97 tender joints
Standard Error 1.562
10.17 tender joints
Standard Error 1.562
19.78 tender joints
Standard Error 1.670
Tender Joints Count (TJC)
Week 6 (n=56,59,53,50)
12.21 tender joints
Standard Error 1.630
8.58 tender joints
Standard Error 1.556
7.41 tender joints
Standard Error 1.612
19.81 tender joints
Standard Error 1.661
Tender Joints Count (TJC)
Week 8 (n=57,56,52,45)
16.32 tender joints
Standard Error 1.62
11.50 tender joints
Standard Error 1.58
11.21 tender joints
Standard Error 1.62
20.37 tender joints
Standard Error 1.71

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.

Number of tender joints was determined by examining 68 joints and identified the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1. A negative value in change from baseline indicated an improvement.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=60 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=68 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=65 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Placebo
n=59 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Change From Baseline in Tender Joints Count (TJC) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 2 (n=57,66,65,60)
-11.68 tender joints
Standard Error 1.459
-15.66 tender joints
Standard Error 1.350
-15.78 tender joints
Standard Error 1.365
-5.13 tender joints
Standard Error 1.416
Change From Baseline in Tender Joints Count (TJC) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 4 (n=56,58,58,49)
-15.23 tender joints
Standard Error 1.465
-18.33 tender joints
Standard Error 1.403
-18.66 tender joints
Standard Error 1.413
-10.09 tender joints
Standard Error 1.508
Change From Baseline in Tender Joints Count (TJC) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 6 (n=56,59,52,50)
-18.35 tender joints
Standard Error 1.466
-19.81 tender joints
Standard Error 1.398
-21.37 tender joints
Standard Error 1.461
-9.69 tender joints
Standard Error 1.500
Change From Baseline in Tender Joints Count (TJC) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 8 (n=57,56,52,45)
-14.26 tender joints
Standard Error 1.46
-16.89 tender joints
Standard Error 1.42
-17.78 tender joints
Standard Error 1.46
-9.34 tender joints
Standard Error 1.55
Change From Baseline in Tender Joints Count (TJC) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 1 (n=60,68,65,59)
-7.06 tender joints
Standard Error 1.435
-11.70 tender joints
Standard Error 1.338
-14.14 tender joints
Standard Error 1.362
-2.74 tender joints
Standard Error 1.417

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.

Number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 66 joints and identifying when swelling was present. The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no swelling = 0, swelling =1.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=61 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=69 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=68 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Placebo
n=65 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Swollen Joints Count (SJC)
Baseline (n=61,69,68,65)
21.33 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.052
16.42 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.984
19.53 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.993
19.97 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.013
Swollen Joints Count (SJC)
Week 1 (n=60,68,66,59)
14.77 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.058
9.90 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.989
10.18 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.001
16.46 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.044
Swollen Joints Count (SJC)
Week 2 (n=57,66,65,60)
12.04 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.074
6.84 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.997
7.99 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.006
14.30 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.041
Swollen Joints Count (SJC)
Week 4 (n=56,58,59,49)
8.83 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.079
5.95 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.035
6.42 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.035
11.78 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.107
Swollen Joints Count (SJC)
Week 6 (n=56,59,53,50)
7.74 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.080
4.93 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.031
4.95 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.069
11.15 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.101
Swollen Joints Count (SJC)
Week 8 (n=57,56,52,45)
10.31 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.07
6.02 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.05
6.77 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.08
12.36 swollen joints
Standard Error 1.14

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.

Number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 66 joints and identifying when swelling was present. The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no swelling = 0, swelling =1. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=60 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=68 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=65 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Placebo
n=60 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joints Count (SJC) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 1 (n=60,68,65,59)
-5.02 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.913
-8.20 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.855
-9.00 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.866
-3.19 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.900
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joints Count (SJC) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 2 (n=57,66,65,60)
-7.83 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.927
-11.33 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.863
-11.11 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.868
-5.23 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.900
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joints Count (SJC) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 4 (n=56,58,58,49)
-11.03 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.930
-12.10 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.894
-12.58 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.897
-7.73 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.954
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joints Count (SJC) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 6 (n=56,59,52,50)
-12.10 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.931
-13.13 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.891
-13.91 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.925
-8.06 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.950
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joints Count (SJC) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 8 (n=57,56,52,45)
-9.54 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.93
-12.02 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.90
-12.14 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.93
-7.00 swollen joints
Standard Error 0.98

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.

Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" Participants responded by using a 0 - 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) where 0 mm = very well and 100 mm = very poorly.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=58 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=67 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=65 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Placebo
n=63 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis
Baseline (n=57,67,65,63)
71.03 mm
Standard Error 3.126
69.37 mm
Standard Error 2.887
63.99 mm
Standard Error 2.941
65.73 mm
Standard Error 2.985
Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis
Week 1 (n=58,67,64,58)
49.89 mm
Standard Error 3.111
45.36 mm
Standard Error 2.889
39.79 mm
Standard Error 2.958
61.48 mm
Standard Error 3.076
Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis
Week 2 (n=55,65,62,60)
46.18 mm
Standard Error 3.171
41.09 mm
Standard Error 2.917
32.09 mm
Standard Error 2.992
58.02 mm
Standard Error 3.046
Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis
Week 4 (n=56,58,58,48)
38.67 mm
Standard Error 3.146
29.53 mm
Standard Error 3.033
26.16 mm
Standard Error 3.062
52.55 mm
Standard Error 3.294
Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis
Week 6 (n=55,59,52,49)
37.11 mm
Standard Error 3.165
28.82 mm
Standard Error 3.018
24.52 mm
Standard Error 3.180
50.04 mm
Standard Error 3.273
Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis
Week 8 (n=57,57,50,45)
40.29 mm
Standard Error 3.13
37.56 mm
Standard Error 3.05
30.63 mm
Standard Error 3.23
50.76 mm
Standard Error 3.37

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.

Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" Participants responded by using a 0 - 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 100 mm = very poorly.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=56 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=66 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=62 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Placebo
n=59 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 1 (n=56,66,62,57)
-17.98 mm
Standard Error 3.121
-21.56 mm
Standard Error 2.859
-26.16 mm
Standard Error 2.948
-5.18 mm
Standard Error 3.022
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 2 (n=53,63,60,59)
-22.06 mm
Standard Error 3.184
-25.71 mm
Standard Error 2.900
-33.33 mm
Standard Error 2.984
-8.14 mm
Standard Error 2.998
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 4 (n=53,57,55,47)
-30.23 mm
Standard Error 3.176
-37.35 mm
Standard Error 3.001
-38.71 mm
Standard Error 3.072
-13.17 mm
Standard Error 3.238
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 6 (n=52,57,49,48)
-31.64 mm
Standard Error 3.203
-37.78 mm
Standard Error 3.005
-40.50 mm
Standard Error 3.191
-15.06 mm
Standard Error 3.219
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 8 (n=53,55,48,45)
-27.83 mm
Standard Error 3.18
-28.79 mm
Standard Error 3.04
-34.30 mm
Standard Error 3.21
-14.96 mm
Standard Error 3.28

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.

Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very good and 100 mm = very bad.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=60 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=69 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=66 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Placebo
n=64 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Baseline (n=60,69,66,64)
69.39 mm
Standard Error 2.566
64.11 mm
Standard Error 2.388
66.65 mm
Standard Error 2.436
67.75 mm
Standard Error 2.471
Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 1 (n=60,67,64,58)
49.85 mm
Standard Error 2.568
37.80 mm
Standard Error 2.417
36.30 mm
Standard Error 2.464
55.54 mm
Standard Error 2.575
Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 2 (n=57,66,65,60)
41.65 mm
Standard Error 2.618
29.54 mm
Standard Error 2.430
32.24 mm
Standard Error 2.453
52.76 mm
Standard Error 2.546
Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 4 (n=56,58,59,49)
34.18 mm
Standard Error 2.631
27.45 mm
Standard Error 2.547
23.91 mm
Standard Error 2.540
46.01 mm
Standard Error 2.746
Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 6 (n=55,58,53,50)
31.42 mm
Standard Error 2.651
22.22 mm
Standard Error 2.549
19.26 mm
Standard Error 2.643
46.52 mm
Standard Error 2.727
Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis
Week 8 (n=57,57,52,45)
39.10 mm
Standard Error 2.62
30.78 mm
Standard Error 2.57
26.24 mm
Standard Error 2.66
42.04 mm
Standard Error 2.84

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.

Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very good and 100 mm = very bad.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=59 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=67 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=63 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Placebo
n=59 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 1 (n=59,67,62,57)
-17.13 mm
Standard Error 2.626
-28.25 mm
Standard Error 2.445
-30.89 mm
Standard Error 2.534
-12.25 mm
Standard Error 2.636
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 2 (n=56,66,63,59)
-25.43 mm
Standard Error 2.675
-36.60 mm
Standard Error 2.456
-34.56 mm
Standard Error 2.525
-14.29 mm
Standard Error 2.611
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 4 (n=55,58,56,48)
-33.29 mm
Standard Error 2.686
-38.44 mm
Standard Error 2.563
-42.65 mm
Standard Error 2.627
-20.91 mm
Standard Error 2.803
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 6 (n=55,58,50,49)
-35.97 mm
Standard Error 2.690
-43.69 mm
Standard Error 2.566
-46.70 mm
Standard Error 2.730
-19.87 mm
Standard Error 2.786
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 8 (n=56,57,50,45)
-29.19 mm
Standard Error 2.67
-35.11 mm
Standard Error 2.58
-39.81 mm
Standard Error 2.73
-24.78 mm
Standard Error 2.87

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.

Participants rated the severity of arthritis pain on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = most severe pain.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=59 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=68 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=66 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Placebo
n=64 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 2 (n=57,65,65,60)
45.59 mm
Standard Error 3.154
40.14 mm
Standard Error 2.940
30.83 mm
Standard Error 2.956
60.65 mm
Standard Error 3.062
Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Baseline (n=59,68,66,64)
69.46 mm
Standard Error 3.112
67.47 mm
Standard Error 2.894
68.13 mm
Standard Error 2.936
64.17 mm
Standard Error 2.980
Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 1 (n=59,68,65,59)
51.76 mm
Standard Error 3.114
46.11 mm
Standard Error 2.897
37.71 mm
Standard Error 2.953
62.51 mm
Standard Error 3.072
Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 4 (n=57,58,59,49)
37.77 mm
Standard Error 3.150
30.42 mm
Standard Error 3.057
26.76 mm
Standard Error 3.053
56.96 mm
Standard Error 3.287
Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 6 (n=55,59,53,50)
35.57 mm
Standard Error 3.191
28.35 mm
Standard Error 3.043
23.39 mm
Standard Error 3.169
52.75 mm
Standard Error 3.266
Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Week 8 (n=57,57,52,45)
42.44 mm
Standard Error 3.15
37.62 mm
Standard Error 3.08
31.12 mm
Standard Error 3.19
49.06 mm
Standard Error 3.39

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.

Participants rated the severity of arthritis pain on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = most severe pain.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=57 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=67 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=63 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Placebo
n=59 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 4 (n=55,57,56,48)
-29.27 mm
Standard Error 3.137
-35.47 mm
Standard Error 2.996
-40.10 mm
Standard Error 3.050
-8.40 mm
Standard Error 3.242
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 1 (n=57,67,63,58)
-15.01 mm
Standard Error 3.102
-19.74 mm
Standard Error 2.843
-29.66 mm
Standard Error 2.932
-3.30 mm
Standard Error 3.027
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 2 (n=55,65,63,59)
-21.44 mm
Standard Error 3.142
-26.10 mm
Standard Error 2.870
-35.85 mm
Standard Error 2.936
-4.79 mm
Standard Error 3.027
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 6 (n=54,58,51,49)
-31.42 mm
Standard Error 3.159
-37.67 mm
Standard Error 2.983
-42.89 mm
Standard Error 3.144
-12.26 mm
Standard Error 3.223
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 8 (n=55,56,51,45)
-24.90 mm
Standard Error 3.14
-28.70 mm
Standard Error 3.02
-35.35 mm
Standard Error 3.15
-16.28 mm
Standard Error 3.31

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.

HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=60 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=69 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=67 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Placebo
n=62 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Baseline (n=60,69,67,62)
1.75 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.086
1.66 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.080
1.61 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.081
1.71 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.083
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 1 (n=60,68,65,58)
1.46 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.086
1.37 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.080
1.19 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.082
1.63 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.084
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 2 (n=57,66,64,60)
1.32 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.087
1.17 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.081
1.06 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.082
1.53 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.084
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 4 (n=57,57,59,47)
1.17 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.087
1.07 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.083
0.92 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.083
1.54 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.088
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 6 (n=54,59,53,50)
1.12 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.088
0.95 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.082
0.86 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.084
1.47 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.087
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Week 8 (n=57,56,52,45)
1.30 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
1.06 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
0.92 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
1.52 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.

HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=59 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=68 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=64 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Placebo
n=57 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 1 (n=59,68,64,55)
-0.25 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.066
-0.30 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.061
-0.44 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.063
-0.05 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.067
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 2 (n=56,66,63,57)
-0.39 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.067
-0.50 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.062
-0.56 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.063
-0.15 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.067
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 4 (n=56,57,57,44)
-0.55 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.067
-0.60 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.064
-0.69 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.065
-0.13 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.071
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 6 (n=55,59,51,47)
-0.60 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.068
-0.72 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.063
-0.74 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.067
-0.20 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.070
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 8 (n=56,56,51,43)
-0.43 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
-0.60 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
-0.70 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
-0.17 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.

The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. Normal range of CRP is 0 milligram per liter (mg/L) to 100 mg/L. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=50 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=57 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=58 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Placebo
n=53 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Baseline (n=50,57,58,53)
31.25 mg/L
Standard Deviation 35.00
25.47 mg/L
Standard Deviation 31.06
28.10 mg/L
Standard Deviation 28.43
22.28 mg/L
Standard Deviation 18.52
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Week 1 (n=50,55,55,49)
15.98 mg/L
Standard Deviation 16.72
7.57 mg/L
Standard Deviation 9.79
7.57 mg/L
Standard Deviation 11.32
25.40 mg/L
Standard Deviation 30.04
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Week 2 (n=46,53,53,48)
13.18 mg/L
Standard Deviation 12.97
7.25 mg/L
Standard Deviation 11.83
6.50 mg/L
Standard Deviation 14.81
24.41 mg/L
Standard Deviation 21.38
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Week 4 (n=46,49,47,39)
11.83 mg/L
Standard Deviation 11.10
5.17 mg/L
Standard Deviation 6.72
5.88 mg/L
Standard Deviation 10.98
22.26 mg/L
Standard Deviation 21.07
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Week 6 (n=45,49,41,41)
12.57 mg/L
Standard Deviation 21.01
6.59 mg/L
Standard Deviation 16.37
6.08 mg/L
Standard Deviation 11.80
22.94 mg/L
Standard Deviation 20.79
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Week 8 (n=45,45,41,37)
23.37 mg/L
Standard Deviation 22.72
12.06 mg/L
Standard Deviation 12.20
13.95 mg/L
Standard Deviation 14.68
23.64 mg/L
Standard Deviation 29.47

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.

The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. Normal range of CRP is 0 mg/L to 100 mg/L. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=50 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=54 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=55 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Placebo
n=48 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 1 (n=50,54,55,48)
-15.28 mg/L
Standard Deviation 26.65
-18.29 mg/L
Standard Deviation 28.98
-21.38 mg/L
Standard Deviation 25.56
-0.24 mg/L
Standard Deviation 15.40
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 2 (n=46,52,53,48)
-16.74 mg/L
Standard Deviation 32.94
-18.89 mg/L
Standard Deviation 31.87
-23.06 mg/L
Standard Deviation 31.49
1.79 mg/L
Standard Deviation 15.56
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 4 (n=46,49,47,39)
-17.76 mg/L
Standard Deviation 33.31
-22.02 mg/L
Standard Deviation 31.29
-20.70 mg/L
Standard Deviation 25.69
-0.67 mg/L
Standard Deviation 19.17
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 6 (n=45,49,41,41)
-17.83 mg/L
Standard Deviation 35.92
-18.08 mg/L
Standard Deviation 25.99
-17.58 mg/L
Standard Deviation 24.76
0.67 mg/L
Standard Deviation 16.81
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8
Change at Week 8 (n=45,45,41,37)
-7.06 mg/L
Standard Deviation 35.75
-13.24 mg/L
Standard Deviation 27.69
-11.81 mg/L
Standard Deviation 29.46
1.32 mg/L
Standard Deviation 27.26

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.

DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from the SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score ranging 0 to 9.4; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity. DAS 28-3 (CRP) less than or equal to (\<=) 3.2 implied low disease activity and greater than (\>) 3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and less than (\<) 2.6 = remission.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=50 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=57 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=56 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Placebo
n=51 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Baseline (n=50,57,56,51)
6.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
5.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
5.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
6.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 1 (n=49,54,54,47)
5.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
4.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
4.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.21
5.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 2 (n=46,53,51,48)
4.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
3.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
3.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
5.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 4 (n=46,49,47,39)
4.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20
3.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
3.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.33
4.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.22
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 6 (n=45,49,40,41)
4.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.29
3.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
3.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
4.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Week 8 (n=45,44,41,36)
4.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.37
4.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.32
3.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.38
5.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

Population: FAS included all participants who were randomized to study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' signifies participants who were evaluable for a particular time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.

DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from the SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score ranging 0 to 9.4; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity. DAS 28-3 (CRP) \<=3.2 implied low disease activity and \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and \<2.6 = remission.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=49 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=53 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=52 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Placebo
n=46 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8
Change at Week 1 (n=49,53,52,45)
-0.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.74
-1.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
-1.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
-0.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8
Change at Week 2 (n=46,52,50,46)
-1.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
-1.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.23
-2.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.25
-0.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8
Change at Week 4 (n=46,49,46,37)
-1.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
-2.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.25
-2.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.39
-1.04 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8
Change at Week 6 (n=45,49,39,39)
-1.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.28
-2.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.33
-2.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.32
-1.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8
Change at Week 8 (n=45,44,41,35)
-1.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.32
-1.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.32
-1.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.38
-0.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'N' (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' is number of participants evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.

Disease improvement was classified as good, moderate, and no change based on improvement in DAS 28-3 (CRP) from baseline and present DAS 28-3 (CRP) score. Good: an improvement from baseline of \>1.2 and a present score of \<=3.2; none: an improvement of \<=0.6 or \>0.6 to \<=1.2 with a present score of \>5.1; remaining participants were classified as having moderate improvement. Scores of good and moderate were considered to have therapeutic response.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=49 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=53 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=52 Participants
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Placebo
n=46 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Improvement Based on DAS28-3 (CRP)
Week 1, Moderate (n=49,53,52,45)
18 participants
28 participants
35 participants
10 participants
Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Improvement Based on DAS28-3 (CRP)
Week 2, Moderate (n=46,52,50,46)
26 participants
39 participants
38 participants
13 participants
Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Improvement Based on DAS28-3 (CRP)
Week 4, No Change (n=46,49,46,37)
14 participants
7 participants
8 participants
22 participants
Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Improvement Based on DAS28-3 (CRP)
Week 4, Good (n=46,49,46,37)
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Improvement Based on DAS28-3 (CRP)
Week 2, No Change (n=46,52,50,46)
20 participants
13 participants
12 participants
33 participants
Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Improvement Based on DAS28-3 (CRP)
Week 2, Good (n=46,52,50,46)
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Improvement Based on DAS28-3 (CRP)
Week 1, No Change (n=49,53,52,45)
31 participants
25 participants
17 participants
35 participants
Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Improvement Based on DAS28-3 (CRP)
Week 1, Good (n=49,53,52,45)
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Improvement Based on DAS28-3 (CRP)
Week 4, Moderate (n=46,49,46,37)
32 participants
42 participants
38 participants
15 participants
Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Improvement Based on DAS28-3 (CRP)
Week 6, No Change (n=45,49,39,39)
11 participants
8 participants
3 participants
20 participants
Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Improvement Based on DAS28-3 (CRP)
Week 6, Good (n=45,49,39,39)
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Improvement Based on DAS28-3 (CRP)
Week 6, Moderate (n=45,49,39,39)
34 participants
41 participants
36 participants
19 participants
Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Improvement Based on DAS28-3 (CRP)
Week 8, No Change (n=45,44,41,35)
21 participants
16 participants
11 participants
24 participants
Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Improvement Based on DAS28-3 (CRP)
Week 8, Good (n=45,44,41,35)
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Improvement Based on DAS28-3 (CRP)
Week 8, Moderate (n=45,44,41,35)
24 participants
28 participants
30 participants
11 participants

Adverse Events

CP 690,550 5 mg

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 34 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

CP-690,550 15 mg

Serious events: 5 serious events
Other events: 38 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

CP-690,550 30 mg

Serious events: 3 serious events
Other events: 46 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Placebo

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 37 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=61 participants at risk
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=69 participants at risk
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=69 participants at risk
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Placebo
n=65 participants at risk
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial ischaemia
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia staphylococcal
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.5%
1/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis acute
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Whipple's disease
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rheumatoid arthritis
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Subarachnoid haemorrhage
1.6%
1/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Syncope vasovagal
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Abortion spontaneous
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Pregnancy
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
CP 690,550 5 mg
n=61 participants at risk
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 15 mg
n=69 participants at risk
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 15 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
CP-690,550 30 mg
n=69 participants at risk
CP-690,550 tablets equivalent to CP-690,550 30 mg orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Placebo
n=65 participants at risk
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablets orally twice daily for 6 weeks.
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
1.6%
1/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
1.6%
1/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
5.8%
4/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.6%
3/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
3.3%
2/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
10.1%
7/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.5%
1/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphopenia
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
1.6%
1/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders
Atrioventricular block first degree
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac disorder
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
6.6%
4/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
4.9%
3/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.1%
2/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
4.9%
3/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.6%
3/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
3.3%
2/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.5%
1/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.1%
2/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
6.6%
4/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
8.7%
6/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.6%
3/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.5%
1/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
4.9%
3/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.1%
2/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
General disorders
Asthenia
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.1%
2/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
General disorders
Fatigue
1.6%
1/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
General disorders
Malaise
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
4.9%
3/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.1%
2/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
3.3%
2/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.5%
1/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Herpes simplex
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Influenza
4.9%
3/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
5.8%
4/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.1%
2/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
4.9%
3/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.5%
1/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.6%
3/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Tinea pedis
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Tinea versicolour
3.3%
2/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.2%
4/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
1.6%
1/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
7.2%
5/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.1%
2/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.5%
1/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
1.6%
1/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.6%
3/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Investigations
Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.1%
2/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercholesterolaemia
3.3%
2/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
5.8%
4/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
4.9%
3/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
9.2%
6/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
1.6%
1/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.6%
3/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.1%
2/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rheumatoid arthritis
1.6%
1/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.2%
4/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Shoulder pain
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.5%
1/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
5.8%
4/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.5%
1/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
16.4%
10/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
11.6%
8/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
24.6%
17/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
9.2%
6/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.5%
1/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Renal and urinary disorders
Leukocyturia
3.3%
2/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
3.3%
2/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pharyngolaryngeal pain
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.5%
1/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acne
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Ecchymosis
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.9%
2/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.4%
1/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.1%
2/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.3%
3/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.5%
1/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
1.6%
1/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/69
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.1%
2/65
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.

Additional Information

Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center

Pfizer, Inc.

Phone: 1-800-718-1021

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER