Trial Outcomes & Findings for XERECEPT® (hCRF) for Patients Requiring Dexamethasone to Treat Edema Associated With Brain Tumors (NCT NCT00088166)
NCT ID: NCT00088166
Last Updated: 2014-08-13
Results Overview
The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients in each treatment group who were Responders at Week 2 and who continued to be Responders at Week 5. Responders were defined as study patients who demonstrated the following: * 50% or greater reduction in dexamethasone dose relative to Baseline * Overall 10-Item Neurological Examination Score unchanged or lower compared to Baseline * Karnofsky Score unchanged or increased relative to Baseline
COMPLETED
PHASE3
200 participants
Prospective
2014-08-13
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
hCRF
Patients will take hCRF (XERECEPT) 2mg/day and open label-dexamethasone they are currently taking.
|
Placebo
Patient will receive placebo hCRF and any open-label dexamethasone that they are currently taking
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
100
|
100
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
47
|
39
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
53
|
61
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
hCRF
Patients will take hCRF (XERECEPT) 2mg/day and open label-dexamethasone they are currently taking.
|
Placebo
Patient will receive placebo hCRF and any open-label dexamethasone that they are currently taking
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
11
|
9
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
3
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
4
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
1
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Patient deterioration
|
29
|
39
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
5
|
5
|
Baseline Characteristics
XERECEPT® (hCRF) for Patients Requiring Dexamethasone to Treat Edema Associated With Brain Tumors
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
hCRF
n=100 Participants
Patients will take hCRF (XERECEPT) 2mg/day and open label-dexamethasone they are currently taking.
|
Placebo
n=100 Participants
Patient will receive placebo hCRF and any open-label dexamethasone that they are currently taking
|
Total
n=200 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
89 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
87 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
176 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
11 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
51.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8 • n=99 Participants
|
52.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6 • n=107 Participants
|
52.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
43 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
86 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
57 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
57 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
114 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
90 participants
n=99 Participants
|
81 participants
n=107 Participants
|
171 participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Canada
|
7 participants
n=99 Participants
|
15 participants
n=107 Participants
|
22 participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Australia
|
3 participants
n=99 Participants
|
3 participants
n=107 Participants
|
6 participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
New Zealand
|
0 participants
n=99 Participants
|
1 participants
n=107 Participants
|
1 participants
n=206 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: ProspectivePopulation: Intent to Treat Population
The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients in each treatment group who were Responders at Week 2 and who continued to be Responders at Week 5. Responders were defined as study patients who demonstrated the following: * 50% or greater reduction in dexamethasone dose relative to Baseline * Overall 10-Item Neurological Examination Score unchanged or lower compared to Baseline * Karnofsky Score unchanged or increased relative to Baseline
Outcome measures
| Measure |
hCRF
n=100 Participants
Patients will take hCRF (XERECEPT) 2mg/day and open label-dexamethasone they are currently taking.
|
Placebo
n=100 Participants
Patient will receive placebo hCRF and any open-label dexamethasone that they are currently taking
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Proportion of Patients in Each Treatment Group Who Are Responders at Week 2 and Continue to be Responders at Week 5
|
57 participants
|
46 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: ProspectivePopulation: Intent to Treat Population
Outcome measures
| Measure |
hCRF
n=100 Participants
Patients will take hCRF (XERECEPT) 2mg/day and open label-dexamethasone they are currently taking.
|
Placebo
n=100 Participants
Patient will receive placebo hCRF and any open-label dexamethasone that they are currently taking
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Patients in Each Treatment Group Achieving 50% Reduction in Dexamethasone Usage Relative to Baseline by Week 2 Without Deterioration in Neurological Function as Measured by the 10-Item Neurological Exam and the KPS
|
78 participants
|
62 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: ProspectivePopulation: Intent to Treat Population
• The proportion of patients in each treatment group who were Responders at Week 2 and who continued to be Responders at Weeks 5 and 8.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
hCRF
n=100 Participants
Patients will take hCRF (XERECEPT) 2mg/day and open label-dexamethasone they are currently taking.
|
Placebo
n=100 Participants
Patient will receive placebo hCRF and any open-label dexamethasone that they are currently taking
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Proportion of Patients in Each Treatment Group Who Are Responders at Week 2 and Who Continue to be Responders at Weeks 5 and 8
Week 2
|
78 participants
|
62 participants
|
|
The Proportion of Patients in Each Treatment Group Who Are Responders at Week 2 and Who Continue to be Responders at Weeks 5 and 8
Week 5
|
62 participants
|
48 participants
|
|
The Proportion of Patients in Each Treatment Group Who Are Responders at Week 2 and Who Continue to be Responders at Weeks 5 and 8
Week 8
|
57 participants
|
42 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: ProspectivePopulation: Intent to Treat population
Change from Baseline in the 10-Item Neurological Examination Score at Weeks 2, 5, 8, 12 (or Early Study Drug Discontinuation), and 16 (or 4-week follow-up visit). Each item is scored from 0 (normal) to 4 (severely abnormal) except for speech (0-3) for a total range of 0-39. Total score for each patient was the sum of each item score. Change is calculated as the follow-up score minus the baseline score; a negative value indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
hCRF
n=100 Participants
Patients will take hCRF (XERECEPT) 2mg/day and open label-dexamethasone they are currently taking.
|
Placebo
n=100 Participants
Patient will receive placebo hCRF and any open-label dexamethasone that they are currently taking
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the 10-Item Neurological Examination Score at Weeks 2, 5, 8 12 and 16 (or Early Discontinuation)
Week 12
|
0.1 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.1
|
0.7 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.4
|
|
Change From Baseline in the 10-Item Neurological Examination Score at Weeks 2, 5, 8 12 and 16 (or Early Discontinuation)
Week 2
|
-0.1 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.3
|
-0.1 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
|
|
Change From Baseline in the 10-Item Neurological Examination Score at Weeks 2, 5, 8 12 and 16 (or Early Discontinuation)
Week 5
|
0.2 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
0.4 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in the 10-Item Neurological Examination Score at Weeks 2, 5, 8 12 and 16 (or Early Discontinuation)
Week 8
|
0.3 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.1
|
0.5 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.3
|
|
Change From Baseline in the 10-Item Neurological Examination Score at Weeks 2, 5, 8 12 and 16 (or Early Discontinuation)
Last Visit
|
0.1 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.1
|
0.8 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: ProspectivePopulation: Intent to Treat population
Change from Baseline in the Karnofsky Performance Score at Weeks 2, 5, 8, 12 and 16.The Karnofsky score runs from 100 to 0, where 100 is "perfect" health and 0 is death. Although practitioners occasionally assign performance scores in between standard intervals of 10 as follows: 100 - Normal; no complaints; no evidence of disease. 90 - Able to carry on normal activity; minor signs or symptoms of disease. 80 - Normal activity with effort; some signs or symptoms of disease. 70 - Cares for self; unable to carry on normal activity or to do active work. 60 - Requires occasional assistance, but is able to care for most of his personal needs. 50 - Requires considerable assistance and frequent medical care. 40 - Disabled; requires special care and assistance. 30 - Severely disabled; hospital admission is indicated although death not imminent. 20 - Very sick; hospital admission necessary; active supportive treatment nec
Outcome measures
| Measure |
hCRF
n=100 Participants
Patients will take hCRF (XERECEPT) 2mg/day and open label-dexamethasone they are currently taking.
|
Placebo
n=100 Participants
Patient will receive placebo hCRF and any open-label dexamethasone that they are currently taking
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Karnofsky Performance Score
Week 2
|
-0.5 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.4
|
-2.2 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.5
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Karnofsky Performance Score
Week 5
|
-2.1 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.6
|
-2.6 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.8
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Karnofsky Performance Score
Week 8
|
-3.2 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.3
|
-3.2 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Karnofsky Performance Score
Week 12
|
-3.4 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.1
|
-3.3 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.1
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Karnofsky Performance Score
Last Visit
|
-3.5 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.1
|
-3.6 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: ProspectivePopulation: Intent to Treat; LOCF
The FACT-Br Quality of Life Questionnaire was self-administered at Baseline, Weeks 5 and 12 (or upon Early SDD), and at the post-treatment 4-week follow-up visit (Week 16 and/or any unscheduled 4-week Follow-up).FACT-Br is a reliable and valid 50-item measure that includes FACT-G (27 items) and a brain subscale (23 items) to assess health-related quality of life in brain tumor patients. Each inventory question is scored from 0 (worst possible QOL) to 4 (best possible QOL)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
hCRF
n=75 Participants
Patients will take hCRF (XERECEPT) 2mg/day and open label-dexamethasone they are currently taking.
|
Placebo
n=71 Participants
Patient will receive placebo hCRF and any open-label dexamethasone that they are currently taking
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the FACT-Br Quality of Life Results
Week 5
|
0.6 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.5
|
-2.2 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.8
|
|
Change From Baseline in the FACT-Br Quality of Life Results
Week 12
|
-1.8 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.3
|
-1.9 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.3
|
|
Change From Baseline in the FACT-Br Quality of Life Results
Week 16
|
01.7 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.9
|
-5.9 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: ProspectiveMyopathy, using Kendall Myopathy Scale, was assessed at Baseline, Week 12 (or upon Early SDD), and at the post-treatment 4-week follow-up visit (Week 16 and/or any unscheduled 4-week Follow-up). The Kendall Myopathy Scale is a 10 point scale where 10 represents holding test position against strong pressure (best) and 0 represents no contraction palpable (worst).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
hCRF
n=78 Participants
Patients will take hCRF (XERECEPT) 2mg/day and open label-dexamethasone they are currently taking.
|
Placebo
n=77 Participants
Patient will receive placebo hCRF and any open-label dexamethasone that they are currently taking
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Myopathy Assessment Results at Week 12 (or Early Study Drug Discontinuation) and Week 16 (or 4-week Follow-up Visit)
Week 12
|
0.1 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.8
|
-0.2 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
|
Change From Baseline in Myopathy Assessment Results at Week 12 (or Early Study Drug Discontinuation) and Week 16 (or 4-week Follow-up Visit)
Week 16
|
0.0 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
|
-0.3 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: ProspectivePopulation: Intent to Treat population; baseline observation carried forward
The maximum reduction in dexamethasone usage at any time during the study. Dexamethasone dosage was assessed at Weeks 0, 2, 5, 8, 12 and 16.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
hCRF
n=95 Participants
Patients will take hCRF (XERECEPT) 2mg/day and open label-dexamethasone they are currently taking.
|
Placebo
n=92 Participants
Patient will receive placebo hCRF and any open-label dexamethasone that they are currently taking
|
|---|---|---|
|
Maximum Percent Reduction in Dexamethasone Usage Relative to Baseline Achieved During the Study
|
-62.7 Percent dexamethasone dose reduction
Standard Deviation 21.8
|
-51.4 Percent dexamethasone dose reduction
Standard Deviation 21.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: ProspectivePopulation: Intent to Treat population
Numbers of patients who discontinued prior to the Week 5 assessment
Outcome measures
| Measure |
hCRF
n=100 Participants
Patients will take hCRF (XERECEPT) 2mg/day and open label-dexamethasone they are currently taking.
|
Placebo
n=100 Participants
Patient will receive placebo hCRF and any open-label dexamethasone that they are currently taking
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patients Who Discontinued Study Drug Prior to the End of Week 5
|
29 participants
|
39 participants
|
Adverse Events
hCRF
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
hCRF
n=101 participants at risk
Patients will take hCRF (XERECEPT) 2mg/day and open label-dexamethasone they are currently taking.
|
Placebo
n=99 participants at risk
Patient will receive placebo hCRF and any open-label dexamethasone that they are currently taking
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Pancytopenia
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
2.0%
2/99 • Number of events 2 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia
|
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Eye disorders
Blindness
|
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Eye disorders
Glaucoma
|
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ileus paralytic
|
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Peritonitis
|
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
General disorders
General physical health deterioration
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
General disorders
Generalised oedema
|
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
2.0%
2/99 • Number of events 2 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Biliary colic
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacteraemia
|
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Brain abscess
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Catheter related infection
|
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
2.0%
2/99 • Number of events 2 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
2.0%
2/99 • Number of events 2 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Meningitis
|
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
4.0%
4/101 • Number of events 4 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
2.0%
2/99 • Number of events 2 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory Tract infection
|
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
3.0%
3/101 • Number of events 3 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urosepsis
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Accidental overdose
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Cervical vertebral fracture
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Compression fracture
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Radiation injury
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Spinal compression fracture
|
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Traumatic brain injury
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponataemia
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Ketoacidosis
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Metabolic acidosis
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteonecrosis
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness
|
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
3.0%
3/99 • Number of events 3 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer metastatic
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Glioblastoma multiforme
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Large cell carcinoma respiratory tract
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung neoplasm malignant
|
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Metastases to meninges
|
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Metastatic neoplasm
|
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Neoplasm progression
|
14.9%
15/101 • Number of events 15 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
19.2%
19/99 • Number of events 19 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Non-small cell lung cancer
|
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ataxia
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Brain oedema
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
3.0%
3/99 • Number of events 3 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Convulsion
|
6.9%
7/101 • Number of events 7 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
5.1%
5/99 • Number of events 5 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
2.0%
2/99 • Number of events 2 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral schaemia
|
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Grand mal convulsion
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hydrocephalus
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hemiparesis
|
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Intracranial hypotension
|
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Metabolic encephalopathy
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Partial seizures
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Mental disorder
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Mental status changes
|
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure acute
|
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
2.0%
2/99 • Number of events 2 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Aspiration
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
COPD
|
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypoxia
|
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonia aspiration
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonitis
|
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
3.0%
3/101 • Number of events 3 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
6.1%
6/99 • Number of events 6 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory depression
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory distress
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Haemoptysis
|
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Swelling face
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritis
|
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Venous thrombosis limb
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/101 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
3.0%
3/99 • Number of events 3 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
hCRF
n=101 participants at risk
Patients will take hCRF (XERECEPT) 2mg/day and open label-dexamethasone they are currently taking.
|
Placebo
n=99 participants at risk
Patient will receive placebo hCRF and any open-label dexamethasone that they are currently taking
|
|---|---|---|
|
Vascular disorders
Flushing
|
28.7%
29/101 • Number of events 29 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
28.3%
28/99 • Number of events 28 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
27.7%
28/101 • Number of events 28 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
28.3%
28/99 • Number of events 28 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site erythema
|
27.7%
28/101 • Number of events 28 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
24.8%
25/101 • Number of events 25 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
21.2%
21/99 • Number of events 21 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Neoplasm progression
|
21.8%
22/101 • Number of events 22 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
21.2%
21/99 • Number of events 21 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
17.8%
18/101 • Number of events 18 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
29.3%
29/99 • Number of events 29 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
17.8%
18/101 • Number of events 18 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
12.1%
12/99 • Number of events 12 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness
|
15.8%
16/101 • Number of events 16 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
11.1%
11/99 • Number of events 11 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Convulsion
|
13.9%
14/101 • Number of events 14 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
18.2%
18/99 • Number of events 18 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site reaction
|
13.9%
14/101 • Number of events 14 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
11.9%
12/101 • Number of events 12 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
9.1%
9/99 • Number of events 9 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
11.9%
12/101 • Number of events 12 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
4.0%
4/99 • Number of events 4 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hemiparesis
|
10.9%
11/101 • Number of events 11 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
3.0%
3/99 • Number of events 3 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
9.9%
10/101 • Number of events 10 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
9.1%
9/99 • Number of events 9 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insmnia
|
8.9%
9/101 • Number of events 9 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
11.1%
11/99 • Number of events 11 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
8.9%
9/101 • Number of events 9 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
9.1%
9/99 • Number of events 9 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
myopathy
|
8.9%
9/101 • Number of events 9 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
7.1%
7/99 • Number of events 7 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Confusional state
|
7.9%
8/101 • Number of events 8 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
11.1%
11/99 • Number of events 11 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
7.9%
8/101 • Number of events 8 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
8.1%
8/99 • Number of events 8 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
General disorders
Gait disturbance
|
7.9%
8/101 • Number of events 8 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
4.0%
4/99 • Number of events 4 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
6.9%
7/101 • Number of events 7 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
6.1%
6/99 • Number of events 6 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
6.9%
7/101 • Number of events 7 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
5.1%
5/99 • Number of events 5 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
6.9%
7/101 • Number of events 7 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vision blurred
|
5.9%
6/101 • Number of events 6 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
7.1%
7/99 • Number of events 7 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Investigations
Weight increased
|
5.9%
6/101 • Number of events 6 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
7.1%
7/99 • Number of events 7 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
5.9%
6/101 • Number of events 6 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
6.1%
6/99 • Number of events 6 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
5.9%
6/101 • Number of events 6 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
5.1%
5/99 • Number of events 5 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
5.9%
6/101 • Number of events 6 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
2.0%
2/99 • Number of events 2 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
|
5.9%
6/101 • Number of events 6 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
2.0%
2/99 • Number of events 2 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Tremor
|
5.9%
6/101 • Number of events 6 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
2.0%
2/99 • Number of events 2 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
5.0%
5/101 • Number of events 5 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
10.1%
10/99 • Number of events 10 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
5.0%
5/101 • Number of events 5 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
9.1%
9/99 • Number of events 9 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
5.0%
5/101 • Number of events 5 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
5.1%
5/99 • Number of events 5 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
5.0%
5/101 • Number of events 5 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
3.0%
3/99 • Number of events 3 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
5.0%
5/101 • Number of events 5 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
3.0%
3/99 • Number of events 3 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
5.0%
5/101 • Number of events 5 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
3.0%
3/99 • Number of events 3 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
5.0%
5/101 • Number of events 5 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
3.0%
3/99 • Number of events 3 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral candidiasis
|
5.0%
5/101 • Number of events 5 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
0.00%
0/99 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Eye disorders
Diplopia
|
4.0%
4/101 • Number of events 4 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
5.1%
5/99 • Number of events 5 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Balance disorder
|
4.0%
4/101 • Number of events 4 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
5.1%
5/99 • Number of events 5 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Aphasia
|
3.0%
3/101 • Number of events 3 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
7.1%
7/99 • Number of events 7 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
3.0%
3/101 • Number of events 3 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
7.1%
7/99 • Number of events 7 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Partial seizures
|
3.0%
3/101 • Number of events 3 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
7.1%
7/99 • Number of events 7 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ataxia
|
3.0%
3/101 • Number of events 3 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
6.1%
6/99 • Number of events 6 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
3.0%
3/101 • Number of events 3 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
6.1%
6/99 • Number of events 6 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
3.0%
3/101 • Number of events 3 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
5.1%
5/99 • Number of events 5 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Cushingoid
|
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
13.1%
13/99 • Number of events 13 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
6.1%
6/99 • Number of events 6 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
5.1%
5/99 • Number of events 5 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Brain oedema
|
2.0%
2/101 • Number of events 2 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
5.1%
5/99 • Number of events 5 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Candidiasis
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
6.1%
6/99 • Number of events 6 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cognitive disorder
|
0.99%
1/101 • Number of events 1 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
5.1%
5/99 • Number of events 5 • Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported at each visit to Week 16
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) excluded steroid-related conditions noted on the medical history. One patient was randomized to placebo but was administered hCRF instead. For the assessment of safety, the patient data has been included based on the treatment administered rather than that originally randomized.
|
Additional Information
Patrick O'Connor, MD, Managing Director Clinical Development
Celtic Pharma Development Services America Inc
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60