Study of Reactogenicity, Safety, Immunogenicity, and Pock Lesion Formation of a Cell-Cultured Smallpox Vaccine Compared to Dryvax®

NCT00042094 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE1 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 350

Last updated 2011-06-30

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of both Dryvax® and the new cell-cultured vaccine (CCSV) in a comparative fashion. Across 3 cohorts, 150 vaccinia-naive volunteers will be randomly assigned to receive either CCSV (100 volunteers) or Dryvax® (50 volunteers) in a blinded fashion. Subjects will be followed closely for up to 6 months and a subgroup of volunteers will be followed up to 3 years in order to evaluate the duration of immunity following vaccination. Another cohort will enroll 100 vaccinia-experienced volunteers and randomly assign them to receive either CCSV (50 volunteers) or Dryvax® (50 volunteers) and a sub group will be followed up to 3 years. A fifth cohort will enroll 100 vaccinia-naive volunteers and randomly assign them to receive different dilutions of CCSV (1:1, 1:5, 1:25, and 1:50).

Conditions

Interventions

BIOLOGICAL

Cell-Cultured Smallpox Vaccine compared to Dryvax®

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • DynPort Vaccine Company LLC, A GDIT Company

    lead INDUSTRY

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2002-03-31
Completion
2003-03-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00042094 on ClinicalTrials.gov