Comparison of Three Different Initial Treatments Without Protease Inhibitors for HIV Infection

NCT00013520 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 1125

Last updated 2012-05-21

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of 3 anti-HIV combination treatments that do not use protease inhibitors (PIs).

The current rule for starting treatment of HIV infection is to combine members from different classes of anti-HIV drugs, such as 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and either a PI or a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI). However, these combinations can be complicated and difficult to take, can cause a number of side effects, and may become ineffective. Combinations that are simpler, better tolerated, and more effective are needed. Because PIs can cause long-term side effects and because HIV can become resistant to many of them at the same time, anti-HIV combination treatments that do not use PIs are being tested.

Conditions

  • HIV Infections

Interventions

DRUG

Abacavir sulfate, Lamivudine and Zidovudine

DRUG

Atazanavir

DRUG

Lamivudine/Zidovudine

DRUG

Abacavir sulfate

DRUG

Efavirenz

DRUG

Nevirapine

DRUG

Lamivudine

DRUG

Stavudine

DRUG

Zidovudine

DRUG

Didanosine

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

    lead NIH

Principal Investigators

  • Roy Gulick, MD

  • Cecilia Shikuma, MD

Study Design

Purpose
TREATMENT

Eligibility

Min Age
16 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Completion
2005-06-30

Countries

  • United States
  • Puerto Rico

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00013520 on ClinicalTrials.gov