Conventional or Video-Assisted Surgery in Treating Patients With Lung Metastases

NCT00003724 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 530

Last updated 2016-07-12

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

RATIONALE: Video-assisted surgery may have fewer side effects than conventional surgery in patients with lung metastases. It is not yet known whether conventional surgery or video-assisted surgery is more effective in treating lung metastases.

PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of conventional surgery with that of video-assisted surgery in treating patients who have lung metastases.

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

surgical procedure

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)

    collaborator NIH
  • Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Joshua R. Sonett, MD · University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
1999-02-28
Primary Completion
2007-02-28
Completion
2007-02-28

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00003724 on ClinicalTrials.gov