Kidney-Sparing Surgery Compared With Kidney Removal in Treating Patients With Kidney Cancer

NCT00002473 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Last updated 2013-06-12

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

RATIONALE: Kidney-sparing surgery is a less invasive type of surgery for kidney cancer, and may have fewer side effects and improve recovery. It is unknown whether kidney-sparing surgery is more effective than kidney removal in treating kidney cancer.

PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of surgery to completely remove the kidney with kidney-sparing surgery in treating patients with resectable kidney cancer.

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

conventional surgery

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

    collaborator NETWORK
  • American College of Surgeons

    collaborator OTHER
  • SWOG Cancer Research Network

    collaborator NETWORK
  • NCIC Clinical Trials Group

    collaborator NETWORK
  • European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC

    lead NETWORK

Principal Investigators

  • Hein van Poppel, MD, PhD · University Hospital, Gasthuisberg

  • Thomas Keane, MD · Emory University

  • Leonard G. Gomella, MD · Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University

  • Eila C. Skinner, MD · University of Southern California

  • Laurence H. Klotz, MD · Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
1992-03-31
Primary Completion
2011-02-28

Countries

  • Canada

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00002473 on ClinicalTrials.gov